Gold Falls, US Dollar Strengthens Ahead of Key US Inflation Data
Gold prices fell on Friday as the US dollar ticked higher and investors remained cautious ahead of key US inflation data due later in the day to gauge the Federal Reserve's monetary policy trajectory.
Spot gold was down 0.7% at $3,292.28 an ounce as of 1145 GMT. Bullion is down 1.9% so far this week.
US gold futures fell 0.8% to $3,290.30.
The dollar rose 0.3% and was on track for a weekly gain, making gold costlier for foreign buyers.
"The US dollar is up slightly, which could be a source of pressure for gold," said Carsten Menke, analyst at Julius Baer.
"Barring a major surprise to the PCE data, I would not expect gold to show a meaningful reaction. That said, the market seems to be a bit more nervous as of late, suggesting that volatility should stay high in the short-term," Menke said. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index, the Fed's preferred inflation measure, is due at 1230 GMT. The data is likely to show that inflation rose 2.2% in April, according to economists polled by Reuters, compared with a 2.3% increase in March, Reuters reported.
"With US core PCE looming large, there is some hesitance to take new long positions in gold," said Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at KCM Trade.
Investors are currently anticipating 50 basis points worth of Fed rate cuts by the end of this year, starting in October.
Bullion, which is considered a hedge against economic and geopolitical uncertainty, tends to thrive in a low interest rate environment.
Meanwhile, a federal appeals court temporarily reinstated the most sweeping of President Donald Trump's tariffs on Thursday, a day after a US trade court ruled he had exceeded his authority and ordered an immediate block.
Spot silver fell 0.6% to $33.14 an ounce, platinum eased 1.2% to $1,068.80 and palladium dropped 0.6% to $967.70.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
The US-China trade war's consequences for agriculture
The trade war initiated by the Trump administration, particularly focused on China, has sparked widespread debate about its implications for various sectors, especially agriculture. As tariffs have been imposed on numerous goods, the US agricultural sector faces significant challenges, particularly concerning essential exports like soybeans and corn. This article examines the consequences of the trade conflict, especially regarding food security and weaponry, while also assessing the position of developing countries, with a specific focus on Saudi Arabia. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for formulating strategies that mitigate negative impacts and foster collaboration in an increasingly interdependent global economy. The US-China trade war was started with the intent to rectify perceived trade imbalances and protect American industries. The administration's tariffs aimed to shield domestic producers from foreign competition and address issues related to intellectual property theft. However, the immediate fallout of these tariffs has been a disruption in agricultural exports, particularly to China, which has historically been one of the largest markets for US agricultural products. American farmers, particularly those in Republican strongholds, have reported significant declines in sales, leading to financial distress. The repercussions extend beyond individual farms, threatening the broader agricultural sector's viability and influencing global food security. This conflict has highlighted the fragility of agricultural markets, which are intricately linked to international trade dynamics. The imposition of tariffs has led to a significant decrease in US agricultural exports to China, particularly in commodities like soybeans, which have seen a dramatic fall in demand. As Brazil and Argentina have ramped up their production and captured market shares, US farmers are finding it increasingly difficult to regain access to these crucial markets. The historical example of the 1980s grain embargo against the Soviet Union serves as a cautionary tale, illustrating how protectionist measures can backfire, hurting domestic producers while leaving foreign competitors relatively unscathed. Additionally, the psychological burden on American farmers cannot be overlooked. The uncertainty surrounding trade relations has led to fears of economic instability, with farmers expressing concerns over unsold crops and the long-term viability of their operations. Kenneth Hartman of the National Corn Growers Association encapsulated this anxiety by emphasizing the dire consequences of prolonged disconnection from the Chinese market. Food security has historically been a pivotal aspect of international relations. The US has often leveraged its agricultural prowess to exert influence over other nations, particularly in developing countries. Following its sanctions on Russia, the US sought to intertwine agricultural economies with its own, thereby fostering dependency through strategic practices. This raises questions about the ethical implications of using food security as a tool of power. In contrast, Saudi Arabia's approach to agricultural self-sufficiency offers a compelling counternarrative. By investing significantly in domestic agriculture, the Kingdom aims to reduce reliance on external sources, thereby enhancing national food security. This strategic pivot underscores the importance of sovereignty in food production and highlights the potential of developing nations to chart their own paths in the face of global trade pressures. Historically, John R. Block, who was secretary of agriculture in the Reagan administration, advocated for self-sufficiency in developing nations, promoting the idea that countries should cultivate their agricultural capabilities to reduce reliance on imports. However, this notion becomes paradoxical when considering that many developing countries could achieve food security more efficiently through American agricultural products. This dynamic illustrates a broader strategy of domination: controlling food equates to wielding power. By fostering dependency on US agricultural exports, America not only secures its own economic interests but also reinforces its geopolitical influence. A compelling counterexample to this paradigm is Saudi Arabia, where King Fahd's administration made a strategic pivot toward agricultural self-sufficiency, directly challenging US recommendations that favored external dependence. Recognizing the vulnerabilities associated with food imports, the Saudi government invested heavily in domestic agriculture, focusing on initiatives that would enhance local production capabilities. These investments led to significant advancements in technology, irrigation systems and agricultural practices, resulting in increased yields and a reduced reliance on imported food. This pursuit of self-sufficiency not only enhanced food security for Saudi Arabia but also economically empowered its citizens by creating jobs, fostering local industries and integrating them into the agricultural mainstream. Farmers received training and resources that allowed them to contribute to a more robust domestic agricultural sector, ultimately leading to greater national pride and resilience against global market fluctuations. Saudi Arabia's approach underscores the importance of national sovereignty in food security, highlighting that self-sufficiency can be achieved through strategic planning and investment rather than reliance on external sources. This successful policy serves as a valuable lesson for other nations, particularly those in similar geopolitical situations, emphasizing that prioritizing local agricultural development can lead to sustainable food security and economic empowerment. Saudi Arabia's pursuit of agricultural self-sufficiency serves as a valuable lesson for other nations. Dr. Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed Furthermore, as global food systems continue to evolve, the Saudi model demonstrates that countries can effectively balance self-sufficiency with international trade. By developing a robust domestic agricultural sector while maintaining trade relationships, Saudi Arabia has positioned itself to navigate the complexities of global food markets more effectively. This dual approach not only secures its food supply but also enables the country to play a more influential role in regional and global food security discussions. In conclusion, while the US promotes self-sufficiency in developing nations as a means of encouraging independence, the Saudi experience illustrates that achieving food security can also involve strategic investments in local agriculture. By recognizing the interplay between self-sufficiency and international cooperation, countries can develop more resilient food systems that protect their interests while contributing to global food security efforts. Developing countries, often caught in the crossfire of US-China trade tensions, face unique challenges. Many of these nations rely on agricultural exports to sustain their economies, making them particularly vulnerable to market fluctuations triggered by trade wars. The trade conflict can exacerbate existing inequalities, as wealthier nations with greater resources can better absorb the shocks of tariffs and retaliatory measures. In the context of Saudi Arabia, while the nation has made strides toward agricultural self-sufficiency, it remains heavily dependent on imports for various food products. The trade war complicates these dynamics, as rising food prices and market instability can threaten food security for vulnerable populations. The interplay of global trade and domestic agricultural policies thus becomes crucial in ensuring that developing nations can navigate these challenges effectively. Given the complexities of the trade war and its implications for agriculture and food security, several strategies can help mitigate negative impacts on both the US and developing nations. Firstly, pursuing diplomatic resolutions to enhance trade access with key markets, particularly China, can create a more stable environment for agricultural exports. Constructive dialogue focused on fair trade practices can cultivate cooperation and trust. Secondly, innovating through sustainable farming practices can enhance productivity and food security. Investing in technology such as precision farming can position US farmers to compete effectively in both domestic and international markets. Thirdly, forming strategic partnerships with countries facing similar agricultural challenges can establish a united front in advocating fair trade practices. Collaborating with nations with aligned agricultural interests can bolster global food security. Fourthly, encouraging farmers to diversify their export markets can reduce dependence on any single nation. By exploring opportunities in emerging markets, US agriculture can build resilience against trade disruptions. Finally, providing support to developing nations through investment, technology transfer and capacity building can help them achieve greater self-sufficiency in food production. This, in turn, can enhance global food security by reducing reliance on a few dominant suppliers. In summary, the trade war's impacts reach far beyond the immediate economic consequences for US farmers. They challenge the very foundations of global food security and the strategies employed to navigate this conflict will determine the resilience of agricultural sectors worldwide. As nations strive to adapt to these changes, the lessons learned from both the US and Saudi Arabia will prove integral to developing sustainable pathways for food security and economic cooperation in the future. The ongoing trade war between the US and China has significant implications for agriculture and global food security. As American farmers grapple with the challenges posed by tariffs and market disruptions, it is essential to consider the broader consequences of these actions on developing nations. By adopting a balanced approach that emphasizes collaboration, innovation and strategic engagement, the US can navigate the complexities of the global trade landscape. The decisions made today will shape the future of agriculture and international relations for generations to come. Through resilience and strategic foresight, American agriculture can not only weather the storms of trade conflict but also reaffirm its role as a leader in global food production. In an interconnected world, fostering cooperation and embracing the realities of global trade will be crucial for ensuring a sustainable and secure future for all nations.
Asharq Al-Awsat
12 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
‘Lilo & Stitch' Passes ‘Sinners' to Become 2nd Highest Grossing Film of 2025
'Lilo & Stich' and 'Mission: Impossible—The Final Reckoning' dominated the box office charts again after fueling a record-breaking Memorial Day weekend. Theaters in the US and Canada had several new films to offer this weekend as well, including Sony's family friendly 'Karate Kid: Legends' and the A24 horror movie 'Bring Her Back.' According to studio estimates Sunday, it added up to a robust $145 million post-holiday weekend that's up over 115% from the same timeframe last year. Disney's live-action hybrid 'Lilo & Stitch' took first place again with $63 million from 4,410 locations in North America. It was enough to pass 'Sinners' to become the second-highest grossing movie of the year with $280.1 million in domestic ticket sales. Globally, it's running total is $610.8 million. 'Sinners,' meanwhile, is still going strong in its seventh weekend with another $5.2 million, bumping it to $267.1 million domestically and $350.1 million globally. The eighth 'Mission: Impossible' movie also repeated in second place, with $27.3 million from 3,861 locations. As with 'Lilo & Stitch,' that's down 57% from its opening. With $122.6 million in domestic tickets sold, it's performing in line with the two previous installments. But with a reported production budget of $400 million, profitability is a ways off. Internationally, it added $76.1 million (including $25.2 million from China where it just opened), bringing its global total to $353.8 million. Leading the newcomers was Sony's 'Karate Kid: Legends,' with an estimated $21 million from 3,809 locations. The movie brings Jackie Chan and Ralph Macchio together to train a new kid, the kung fu prodigy Li Fong (Ben Wang). Chan starred in a 2010 reboot of the 1984 original, while Macchio has found a new generation of fans in the series 'Cobra Kai,' which just concluded a six-season run. Reviews might have been mixed, but opening weekend audiences gave the PG-13 rated film a strong A- CinemaScore and 4.5 stars on PostTrak. It also only cost a reported $45 million to produce and has several weeks until a new family-friendly film arrives. Fourth place went 'Final Destination: Bloodlines,' which earned $10.8 million in its third weekend. The movie is the highest-grossing in the franchise, not accounting for inflation, with $229.3 million globally. The weekend's other big newcomer, 'Bring Her Back' rounded out the top five with $7.1 million from 2,449 screens. Starring Sally Hawkins as a foster mother with some disturbing plans, the film is the sophomore feature of twin filmmakers Danny and Michael Philippou, who made the 2023 horror breakout 'Talk to Me.' It earned a rare-for-horror B+ CinemaScore and is essentially the only new film in the genre until '28 Years Later' opens on June 20. A new Wes Anderson movie, 'The Phoenician Scheme,' also debuted in New York and Los Angeles this weekend, where it made $270,000. It expands nationwide next weekend. The summer box office forecast remains promising, though there's a long way to go to get to the $4 billion target (a pre-pandemic norm that only the 'Barbenheimer' summer has surpassed). The month of May is expected to close out with $973 million – up 75% from May 2024, according to data from Comscore.
ArabGT
13 hours ago
- ArabGT
The Dodge Durango SRT Hellcat Is Still Going Strong in 2026
What began as a one-year special edition has turned into a lasting chapter in Dodge's muscle SUV saga. Initially launched as a 2021 limited-run model, the Durango SRT Hellcat was supposed to be a rare beast — a three-row family hauler with the heart of a drag racer. But its overwhelming popularity changed everything. After a brief pause, Dodge brought it back in 2023, and now, against all odds (and some owner complaints), the 2026 Durango SRT Hellcat is entering its fourth consecutive year of production — and fifth year overall. How a 'One-Year Only' Icon Became a Staple When Dodge, under the Stellantis umbrella, introduced the Durango SRT Hellcat in 2021, it was marketed as the ultimate SUV — packing a supercharged 6.2-liter V8 that delivered 710 horsepower and 875 Nm of torque. All that power was sent to all four wheels via an eight-speed automatic transmission, turning the Durango into one of the fiercest utility vehicles on the market. At the time, customers rushed to own what they thought would be a true collector's item. However, with demand far exceeding expectations, Dodge couldn't resist bringing it back. The return in 2023 reignited excitement, but also stirred frustration among early adopters who believed they had something rare. Regardless, the Durango Hellcat's blend of performance, practicality, and sheer audacity made it impossible to shelve. 2026: Same Heart, Same Spirit While Dodge has yet to disclose every detail about the 2026 Durango SRT Hellcat, it has confirmed the model will remain in the lineup. So far, the essentials remain unchanged: Engine : Supercharged 6.2-liter V8, 710 hp, 875 Nm of torque Transmission : 8-speed automatic Chassis tuning : Performance-tuned suspension and steering for handling agility despite its hefty 2,600 kg curb weight Exterior : Aggressive front grille, bold air vents, signature Hellcat emblems, and 20-inch wheels Interior: 12.3-inch Uconnect 5 touchscreen, digital instrument cluster, Nappa leather sport seats with red stitching, and subtle engine acoustics 2026 Pricing Remains Steady Despite being 15 years into the current-generation Durango's lifespan, Dodge is holding base prices steady for 2026. The Durango GT, powered by a V6, starts at $40,490. The R/T trim remains at $51,990, with new 'Blacktop Redline' appearance options adding $3,495. Optional upgrades include the $5,990 Tow N Go Package — bringing many of the SRT 392's chassis enhancements minus the engine — and a $1,195 Tow Package with features like a trailer brake controller. Why the Durango Hellcat Isn't Going Anywhere Though initially billed as a short-lived experiment, it's clear Dodge used the 'limited edition' label to gauge market interest. Once it became obvious that buyers were hungry for a muscle-bound SUV with a traditional roar, the brand doubled down. Now, the Durango SRT Hellcat serves as a modern muscle icon that refuses to bow out. Looking Beyond 2026 More details on the 2026 model are expected later in 2025, potentially including new color choices, minor tweaks to the exhaust, or upgrades to the AWD system's electronics. But the real question looms: When will the Durango SRT Hellcat finally end? And with so many iterations, could it lose the special status it once had? For now, the Durango Hellcat remains a living legend — an unapologetic celebration of power in an SUV world increasingly leaning toward quiet electrification.
