
US-China trade deal is 'done', Trump says as tariff truce on track
A U.S.-China trade deal is "done," U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday, hours after negotiators from Washington and Beijing agreed on a framework to get a fragile trade truce back on track and remove Chinese export restrictions on rare earth minerals and other critical industrial components.
Trump took to his social media platform to offer some of the first details to emerge from two days of marathon talks held in London that had, in the words of U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, put "meat on the bones" of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs that had reached crushing triple-digit levels. "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me," Trump said on the Truth Social platform. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!). We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%."
A White House official said the 55% represents the sum of a baseline 10% "reciprocal" tariff Trump has imposed on goods imported from nearly all U.S. trading partners; 20% on all Chinese imports because of punitive measures Trump has imposed on China, Mexico and Canada associated with his accusation the three facilitate the flow of the opioid fentanyl into the U.S.; and finally pre-existing 25% levies on imports from China that were put in place during Trump's first term in the White House.
The U.S. president later posted: "President XI and I are going to work closely together to open up China to American Trade. This would be a great WIN for both countries!!!"
Other specifics for how the deal would be implemented remained unclear.
China's commerce ministry did not immediately reply to a request for comment and more information.
Framework for a deal
Officials from the two superpowers had gathered at a rushed meeting in London starting on Monday following a call last week between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping that broke a standoff that had developed just weeks after a preliminary deal reached in Geneva that had defused their trade war. The Geneva deal had faltered over China's continued curbs on critical minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, aircraft and other goods to China. Lutnick said the agreement reached in London would remove restrictions on Chinese exports of rare earth minerals and magnets and some of the recent U.S. export restrictions "in a balanced way," but did not provide details after the talks concluded around midnight London time (7 p.m. EDT).
"We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents," Lutnick said, adding that both sides will now return to present the framework to their respective presidents for approvals.
"And if that is approved, we will then implement the framework," he said.
In a separate briefing, China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang also said a trade framework had been reached in principle that would be taken back to U.S. and Chinese leaders.
Trump's shifting tariff policies have roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports, and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. The World Bank on Tuesday slashed its global growth forecast for 2025 by four-tenths of a percentage point to 2.3%, saying higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a "significant headwind" for nearly all economies. The U.S.-China deal may keep the Geneva agreement from unravelling over duelling export controls, but does little to resolve deep differences over Trump's unilateral tariffs and longstanding U.S. complaints about China's state-led, export-driven economic model.
The two sides left Geneva with fundamentally different views of the terms of that agreement and needed to be more specific on required actions, said Josh Lipsky, senior director of the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center in Washington.
"They are back to square one, but that's much better than square zero," Lipsky added. It was not immediately clear from Trump's comments where things stood regarding the timeline for a more comprehensive deal that had been reached last month in Geneva. There, the two sides set August 10 as the deadline to negotiate a more comprehensive agreement to ease trade tensions, or tariff rates would snap back from about 30% to 145% on the U.S. side and from 10% to 125% on the Chinese side.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
an hour ago
- The National
Trump admits immigration sweeps are causing labour shortage in farming and hotels
President Donald Trump conceded on Thursday that his 'very aggressive ' immigration policies are causing labour shortages in farming and hotels. Mr Trump said he would soon issue a 'common sense' order that would protect those two industries. 'Our farmers are being hurt badly, they have very good workers,' he said. 'They've worked for them for 20 years. They're not citizens, but they turn out to be, you know, great, and we have to do something about that.' Earlier on Thursday, Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform that nationwide raids on people in the country without documentation is also hurting hotel and service business too. 'Our great farmers and people in the hotel and leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long-time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' he wrote. 'Changes are coming.' The comments were a stunning reversal for a president who ran on a campaign promise to conduct the largest deportation operation in the country's history. They also come amid worsening national tension, after he sent thousands of armed troops to Los Angeles to quell protests that erupted at the weekend over his administration's anti-immigration policies. The protests ignited after immigration agents went to the car park of a hardware shop where day labourers are known to gather. On the campaign trail, Mr Trump said he would focus on criminals and gang members, and that he would seal the southern border shut. Since he took office this year, immigration agents have conducted sweeping operations on restaurants, building sites and businesses, detaining hundreds of people, many without criminal records, and in some cases those in the country legally. The effort has largely affected Latin American migrants, many of whom are in the country illegally, and yet are indispensable – albeit underpaid – workers in the farming, building and service industries across much of the country. The arrests and deportations, often without due process, have separated families and deeply hurt communities. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said the nation has 'a very broken labour system' and that it was a matter of national security for it to be fixed. 'We have to make sure our workforce is legal and is here legally,' Ms Rollins told CNBC on Thursday. 'But the President understands that we can't feed our nation or the world without that labour force, and he's listening to the farmers, which I really appreciate.' On Thursday, Democratic Senator Alex Padilla from California was forcibly removed from a news conference in Los Angeles after he tried to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who was in the city to address the continuing protests and promote federal law enforcement's immigration crackdown efforts. Mr Padilla said he had concerns with that effort. 'I am Senator Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' he said, as men in plain clothes rushed towards him and pushed him out of the room. He said he was briefly handcuffed and detained but was later released.


Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Posturing or potential strikes? Iran tensions ramp up ahead of nuclear talks
US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that an Israeli strike on Iran "may very well happen', as he confirmed that the US was evacuating some US officials and their families from the region. The US is evacuating non-essential US embassy staff and their dependents from the embassy in Baghdad, Iraq. Other reports said the US was evacuating some staff from embassies in Bahrain and Kuwait, but the embassy in Bahrain denied a change in its posture on Thursday. Trump on Thursday said the risk of "massive conflict" led the US to draw down staff in the region. CBS News reported on Thursday that Israel is prepared to launch an attack on Iran's nuclear sites, and that US officials have been discussing how the US could assist Israel without taking a direct role. The report said options could include aerial refuelling or intelligence-sharing. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The steady drumbeat of leaks raises questions about whether a strike could take place in the future, or if the Trump administration is trying to put pressure on Iran ahead of a sixth round of nuclear talks scheduled to be held in Oman on Sunday. A US diplomat at one of the embassies restricting travel said the orders they have received were not out of the ordinary during flare-ups in local tensions. 'These steps don't necessarily mean military action is imminent. Still time for talks, it takes time to move people out. But these are steps that it would make sense to take as part of preparations, and to show seriousness. Provides important leverage in nuclear talks,' Danial Shapiro, a former US ambassador to Israel, said on X on Wednesday. 'Might help, could blow it' Trump himself toys publicly with the idea that the threat of an Israeli strike may help the US's negotiating position. "I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it,' Trump said, referring to Israel, before quickly adding, "Might help it actually, but it also could blow it." In some ways, the reports that Israel is "poised" to strike Iran are redundant. By Trump's own admission, Israel has been lobbying him for months to bomb Iran. One senior US official recently told Middle East Eye on the condition of anonymity that the Trump administration has been impressed by plans Israel shared with it that lay out unilateral strikes against Iran's nuclear programme without direct American involvement. The plans were discussed in April and May with CIA director John Ratcliffe, MEE reported. 'The Israelis have pinpointed everything they can take out that supports Iran's nuclear sites down to the water supply and power generation, etcetera,' the US official told MEE, referring to a process called Target Systems Analysis, by which militaries assess specific nodes to attack that support a bigger main target. Trump says Iran's proposal 'unacceptable' as Tehran touts intel on Israeli nukes Read More » Israel has also discussed combining cyberattacks and precision military strikes. Iran's nuclear facilities are buried deep in fortified bunkers in the Natanz desert and inside a mountain called Fordow. Analysts say Netanyahu has refrained from attacking Iran in defiance of Trump because he wants to share political responsibility if the strikes go wrong and preserve an American backstop in the likely case of Iranian retaliation. On Thursday, Axios reported that Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, told some Republican Senators that the administration fears Iran could retaliate against an Israeli strike with ballistic missiles, causing a 'mass casualty event". The article did not mention that Israel is widely understood to have its own arsenal of nuclear weapons. The Iranians have kept pace with Trump and upped their own rhetoric. During past flare-ups, Iranian officials have sent signals that they could shut down the Strait of Hormuz in the Gulf, where 30 percent of the world's oil transits, and have leaked that they could bomb US bases in Gulf states if attacked. Iran has now clearly stated that threat. "All its [the United States] bases are within our reach, we have access to them, and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries," Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said on Wednesday. "God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," the minister added. Israel and Iran had two unprecedented exchanges of fire in October and April 2024. The US came to Israel's defence, shooting down missiles and drones in an attack Iran had carefully telegraphed beforehand. IAEA tensions Ahead of the talks on Sunday, tensions have also been rising with the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Diplomats said the IAEA's board of governors adopted a resolution condemning Iran's "non-compliance" with its nuclear obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The resolution was carried by 19 votes in favour out of 35. The resolution could lay the groundwork for European countries to invoke a "snapback" mechanism, which expires in October. This mechanism would reinstate UN sanctions eased under a 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by then-US president Barack Obama. Iran's nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, said the resolution was "extremist" and blamed Israeli influence. In response to the resolution, he said Iran would launch a new enrichment centre in a secure location. The issue of whether Iran will be able to enrich uranium on its territory has become the main roadblock to nuclear talks with the US. Trump has insisted Iran will not be allowed to enrich any uranium.


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Israel 'could very well' strike Iran, Donald Trump says
US President Donald Trump on Thursday said Israel may well strike Iran but stressed that he had cautioned against an attack while nuclear talks with Tehran continue. Mr Trump's comments come as the US has authorised the departure of non-essential personnel from Iraq and elsewhere as fears grow that Israel may attack Iran's nuclear sites. 'I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen,' Mr Trump told reporters at the White House. The prospect of military action in the Middle East comes as the US-Iran nuclear talks appear to be stalled over whether Tehran would be able to continue to enrich uranium in any capacity. Mr Trump this week said he was less confident a deal could be reached, and Tehran on Wednesday threatened to hit US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out. But Mr Trump on Thursday said the US and Iran are 'fairly close to a pretty good agreement'. 'We've had very good discussions with Iran. It's got to be better than pretty good, though, but it's got to be – I prefer an agreement, as long as I think there is an agreement, I don't want [Israel] going in, because I think that would blow it,' Mr Trump said. In another sign that a strike on Iran may not be imminent, US special Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff plans to travel to Oman on Sunday for a sixth round of talks with Iran. 'Discussions are expected to be both direct and indirect, as in previous rounds,' a source said. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed to Iranian news outlet Tasnim that a delegation from Tehran would attend the talks. Tehran on Wednesday threatened to hit US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out, and if it were attacked over its nuclear programme, amid mounting speculation that Israel could strike the country's uranium enrichment sites. Further fuelling tension, Iran on Thursday said it has built and will activate a third nuclear enrichment plant, after the UN's atomic watchdog agency censured Tehran for failing to comply with non-proliferation obligations meant to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon. The US State Department has begun preparing to evacuate non-essential staff from the American embassy in Baghdad. At the same time, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth authorised the departure of military dependents from locations across the region. The US embassies in Kuwait and Bahrain have not changed their staffing levels, the State Department said. Meanwhile, the UK Maritime Trade Operations on Thursday said in an advisory note that the situation in the Middle East remains 'highly volatile'. The UKMTO has advised ships to use caution when passing through the Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and Strait of Hormuz.