
Does the NBA playoffs have a physicality problem? ‘I think it's gone too far'
By Eric Koreen, Fred Katz, Kelly Iko and Law Murray
Before Game 2 of his team's series against the Los Angeles Lakers last week, Minnesota Timberwolves coach Chris Finch spoke honestly about the nature of the NBA playoffs.
'If you look around the playoffs right now, it's super physical,' Finch told reporters. 'To me, they've gone way too far on the physicality. I'm not complaining about the way our series, in particular, has been reffed. I'm just saying in general, I … think it's gone too far. It feels like it's physicality on purpose. It's disrupted the flow. If there's not a fight in that Houston-Golden State series, I'd be surprised. That thing feels like it's on the edge every single time.'
Advertisement
Clearly, the style of game has changed. Five series are being played at dramatically slower paces than the league's slowest team, the Orlando Magic, played in the regular season. There was a fracas that earned the Nuggets and Clippers six technical fouls on Sunday, while the Pistons-Knicks and Rockets-Warriors series have been notably chippy, with technicals and flagrants frequent. Ask the Celtics about how the Magic guarded them and you might get an earful.
The Athletic's Eric Koreen, who has been watching from home, Kelly Iko, who is covering the Rockets-Warriors series, Law Murray, who is covering Nuggets-Clippers, and Fred Katz, who is covering Knicks-Pistons, got together to chat about what they've seen.
Iko: Have I noticed? Without a doubt.
I've seen an uptick in conversations from folks in the NBA praising this year's playoffs and the amount of physicality allowed or tolerated. And I understand why people are excited. I've used the phrase 'attached detachment' before in an NBA context, but it applies to all professional sports. There's an elation that comes from witnessing heightened physicality (and potential violence in some instances), enjoying the competitive aspect of it while not being in danger yourself.
That's what these playoffs have been. I'd be a hypocrite to say I don't enjoy physical play. But having extensively covered this Rockets-Warriors series, I'd say there's a limit. It would be one thing if there was some sort of runway up to the postseason — officials letting more go in the second half of the year — but it's been so sudden that it's a surprise.
Katz: I've noticed it, and I am ambivalent about it. On one hand, I enjoy 10 world-class athletes battling for loose balls, fighting for rebounds, knocking others around the court in the hopes of winning a game. Healthy, sportsmanlike contentiousness is good for the playoffs.
Advertisement
However, the way this is happening has the vibe of last year's midseason adjustment, when the NBA decided to enforce foul rules differently and turned the game more physical with time still to go in the regular season. That change caught several teams by surprise. And while this one has a cleaner delineator (the playoffs are always more physical than the regular season), the chasm feels larger than normal. The sport seems different. And teams and players, based purely on conversations I've had with them, seem caught by surprise in a similar fashion to how they were a year ago.
A more physical game can be more fun, but the postseason should somewhat resemble the regular season. Otherwise, what's the point of a regular season? Right now, the gap is wide.
Koreen: I want to be careful in crediting the physicality with producing the compelling basketball we have seen in the playoffs. As always, it is how much the players care, combined with the ability for teams to specifically scout their opposition and tailor their game plans accordingly, that plays the biggest role in the improvement from the regular season to the playoffs.
With that said — and maybe it is because I spent so much time focusing on the worst of what the league has to offer — I have loved playoff basketball. The missed call at the end of Knicks-Pistons Game 4 was lamentable, but missed calls happen. Overall, the extra grime, which necessitates an extra level of offensive execution, has added to the product.
Murray: There's definitely more physicality. And I not only enjoy it, I expect it. Every year around the All-Star break, we reach a peak of conflict to figure out why offense feels like global warming. But nature is healing in the spring!
I'd argue players have as much to do with it as the officials. The Clippers were top-five in total points allowed this season. Some teams have already been conditioned to bring out an increased level of physicality. Now, it's the playoffs. There are no back-to-backs, there are no cupcakes on the schedule looking toward the lottery, and there's no lack of familiarity. This happens every year, and I'm amused by how shocking it is for some viewers.
Advertisement
Iko: Physicality helped Houston the most. It's been their identity for the last two seasons under Ime Udoka. Any team that relies on its defensive versatility and intensity to win games has to benefit from added physicality. Now, it sounds somewhat ironic given the Rockets are trailing 3-1 in the series, but Houston has committed the fourth-fewest fouls per game amongst playoff teams. During the regular season, they were just outside the top 10.
It's hurt Detroit the most. The Pistons, like the Rockets, are on the brink of elimination, but Detroit leaned too hard into that brand of basketball. That's an especially difficult task to complete when Isaiah Stewart, the beacon of bullyball, has been out injured. The Pistons have opened an emotional door, getting too invested in winning some of these skirmishes and having less control over the actual basketball going on.
Katz: It will help the Thunder the most. Their greatest strength just became stronger and their greatest weakness became less relevant. Despite all the accusations hurled at supposed free-throw merchant Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, the Thunder do not live at the line. It's quite the opposite. No one had a less favorable free-throw differential during the regular season. Now, the league's best defense can bump into opponents with fewer repercussions.
I'll say it hurts the Lakers the most. No team goes smaller than Los Angeles and switches more frequently with like-minded defenders. The Lakers led the NBA in free-throw attempt rate; that rate falls in these circumstances. We think of physicality as affecting only defense, but it hits the other side of the ball, too. The Timberwolves are shoving around Lakers defenders with screeners and drivers, creating buckets for themselves. It's a significant reason Minnesota is up 3-1 heading into Wednesday's game.
Koreen: Long term, give me the Oklahoma City Thunder, as if they need the help. The Thunder already had the best defense in the league in the regular season. If Lu Dort, Alex Caruso and Jalen Williams are allowed to be even more handsy? Watch out.
Meanwhile, this could hurt Cleveland down the road. I love the Cavaliers' roster. But the more reliant you are on smaller guards to score, the more physicality could hurt you. The same can be said for teams lacking depth — the Lakers, Nuggets and Knicks.
Murray: It helps the teams that are already physical and embrace physicality. The Magic play the least aesthetically pleasing basketball in the NBA. They allowed the fewest points in the league, while only the Nets and Hornets averaged fewer points scored per game than Orlando. They can't hit the broad side of a barn, and yet here they were making the Boston Celtics sweat out a quarterfinal series. The Thunder play defense like the Legion of Boom Seattle Seahawks used to cover wide receivers. The refs can't call every pass interference and the Thunder know it.
Advertisement
On the flip side, the added physicality hurts the teams that can't adjust. Look no further than the two eighth seeds. The Heat and Grizzlies gave the people nonchalant regular-season basketball, and got thrown out the club as a result.
Iko: Game 4 in Rockets-Warriors was it for me.
The first three games felt like it was gradually building up to a boiling point, which happened on Monday night. At one point during the second quarter, my friend Monte Poole, who has covered the Warriors for years, leaned over and shouted, 'Can we just get back to basketball?'
There was just so much going on in that game that had nothing to do with anything meaningful. Steph Curry taunting Dillon Brooks, who incited a mini riot. Jimmy Butler and Brooks jawing back and forth, leading to an elbow to the throat and slight shove to the ground. Draymond Green and Tari Eason getting tangled up, grabbing at legs and stepping over each other. Big men Steven Adams and Quinton Post got in on the action. At one point, there were more stoppages to review for hostile acts than made buckets. It was a complete mess.
Katz: Let's take the final play of Knicks-Pistons Game 4. Cade Cunningham missed a jumper. Tobias Harris shoved Josh Hart away from the ball on the rebound attempt, which the league ruled a correct no-call in its last two-minute report. The ball trickles to the corner, where Tim Hardaway Jr. picks it up. Hardaway rises for a jumper as Hart closes out and bumps him. Again, there's no call, and the Knicks win by one as Hardaway's jumper doesn't hit the rim. After the game, crew chief David Guthrie acknowledged that referees should have called a foul on Hart. And in a vacuum, Guthrie is correct. Hart brushed into Hardaway when he was going up for the shot, a textbook foul.
But here's the problem: If you listed the most intrusive non-fouls that could have been fouls throughout that game, I'm not sure the Hart-on-Hardaway play even makes the top 10.
To be clear, I thought that game was well officiated, fair and consistent for both sides, which is the most important part of the job. But when the officials announce after the game that they missed one call at the end, even though that no-call was consistent with the way they called the game all night, there may be a discrepancy.
Advertisement
Koreen: There were some moments early in the Rockets-Warriors series that barely resembled basketball. As Kelly noted, that continued on Monday. We shouldn't be surprised, given some of the involved parties, but that series started off as a slog. It has been a reminder that you only want to go so far in bringing back the '80s and '90s.
Beyond that, while I have some specific complaints about officiating, I haven't found play to be dirtier than in other postseasons. I didn't love Rudy Gobert delivering a forearm shiver to LeBron James' head after James threw his hip into him on a box out, but I don't think that's a huge outlier from playoffs past. Gobert got a flagrant, as he should have.
Murray: I love telling people that I was a referee as part of my work study as an undergrad. I know how hard officiating a game is. But I also know players pick up on patterns of how certain refs facilitate games.
I'm not comfortable with how inconsistent some of these games get, or how officials have to overcorrect to regain control of a game. I don't like how you know Draymond Green isn't going to get ejected despite putting out a mixtape of physicality that is usually only available on pay-per-view. That's the physicality that crosses the line.
The officials have to maintain the integrity of the game. Establish what is permitted, warn players (and coaches) to play basketball, and hold them accountable accordingly. We all see what's happening out there.
Iko: It would change how teams approach scouting. There might be more of an onus on seasoned players who play multiple positions and foul more. As far as current NBA players go, the modern floor-spacing big, more of a finesse type, could be phased out in favor of the traditional rim-to-rim bruiser — a world with more Steven Adams and less Nikola Vučević.
Katz: Maybe teams would have to prioritize Nos. 11 through 15 on the roster more. This is the age of rest and load management. If games are more exhausting, then it's possible load management or legitimate injuries increase, and that player on a two-way contract you haven't heard of could end up in the rotation.
Advertisement
Koreen: A more physical standard would only increase the need for physical, multi-positional defenders. Players like that, especially ones who can shoot, are already prized. With some rules loosened, their value would rise.
I also think more traditional bigs would gain value, but not because teams would simply be dumping the ball into the post more often. Rather, excellent screensetting would become crucial in freeing up perimeter scorers. The value of shooting wouldn't change, but on- and off-ball screens become so important at this time of year.
Murray: That should have already been the case. You build teams with two seasons in mind: the grind of an 82-game regular season, and the grind of the playoffs when only one team will win 16 games. You need skill, but you need the positional size to go with that skill. Defense validates your lineups. And the equalizer to height-weight-speed are players who play hard and through contact effectively on both ends.
No one is bringing the goon back to rosters any time soon, but you're not building a team that can't bump either. Just ask the Phoenix Suns how far that can get you.
Iko: It can be good, given the right parameters.
One of the biggest complaints from people who subscribe to the plummeting ratings argument is that today's game is too soft, with foul-grifting at an all-time high. Dialing some of that back, while celebrating controlled physicality, would do the league some good, I think.
The officials have done a solid job in preventing some of these dust-ups from spilling over. Now, you could argue that players aren't really 'about that life' and are just getting in each other's faces for theatrics. But I've enjoyed this playoff campaign in ways I didn't in recent years, and that's directly correlated to added physicality.
Advertisement
Katz: I'm into more physicality, in general. My only critique is that it should be explicit. I sense that players are a bit taken aback by the enforcement of the rules now. Every rule change for the past two decades has been in favor of the offense. The league wouldn't be the only ones to believe it's gone too far in that direction. But turning basketball into boxing isn't the only way to help a defense. The NBA could bring back some of the old rules. Allow handchecking again or get rid of defensive three-seconds.
Koreen: It's fair to say that what is allowed in the regular season has to be closer to what is allowed in the playoffs, and vice versa. As I stated above, there are reasons for the difference in styles that go beyond what is being called and what is not, but we have probably veered too far toward allowing physicality. As well, there's a lack of consistency within games that is troubling, and that is often what leads to melees and complaints.
Overall, I think this is good for the league. Give me a little more sense of rivalry, competitiveness and, sure, bad blood.
Murray: It's fine. There will be complaints about the game no matter how it's played. If teams were averaging 120 points per game, there would be complaints. If teams were struggling to get to 100 points, there would be clamors for rule changes. Defense is physicality. I see teams playing hard and realizing that if they don't, they get to book Cancun shortly.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sports betting roundup: Stanley Cup Final and NBA Finals each at 1-1 headed into Game 3s
Florida Panthers' Brad Marchand (63) scores the winning goal against Edmonton Oilers goalie Stuart Skinner (74) as Leon Draisaitl (29) watches during the second overtime period in Game 2 of the NHL Stanley Cup Final in Edmonton, Alberta, Friday, June 6, 2025. (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press via AP) The Stanley Cup Final and NBA Finals have each played two games, and both series are knotted at a game apiece. In the NHL, the Panthers won a double-overtime game Friday night against the Edmonton Oilers to tie that series at 1-1 heading into Monday's Game 3 in Florida. Both games have gone to overtime. Advertisement In the NBA, the Oklahoma City Thunder bounced back from a Game 1 loss to even the series against the Indiana Pacers. Game 3 in that series is Wednesday night in Indianapolis. Trends of the Week After losing Game 1 to Indiana, Oklahoma City was an 11.5-point favorite in Game 2, and they comfortably covered, winning 123-107. At the BetMGM sportsbook, the Thunder took in 70% of the money, but only 37% of the bets. Since 2005, teams to lose as double-digit favorites in the NBA playoffs and be favored by 10 or more points in the next game are now 5-2 against the spread. Oklahoma City ended the first quarter on a 9-0 run to lead 26-20 after 12 minutes. This allowed the 4.5-point first quarter spread to cash, with 91% of the money coming in on the Thunder. Advertisement Following Edmonton taking Game 1 against Florida, the Oilers were -235 to win the Stanley Cup. Now, with Florida winning Game 2, Florida is a slight favorite to win at -115, with Edmonton coming in at -105. Upset of the Week At the French Open, Coco Gauff (+185) upset Aryna Sabalenka to win the women's title. Only 29% of the money was on Gauff to win. On the men's side, Carlos Alcaraz came back from two sets down against Jannik Sinner to win a second straight French Open title. Alcaraz was +5000 live when he was down to sets. Ryan Fox won for the second time on the PGA Tour this season at the RBC Canadian Open. Fox beat Sam Burns on the fourth playoff hole after both players finished the event at 18 under. He was +5500 in pre-tournament winner betting, and took in only 0.8% of the bets and 1.7% of the money. Advertisement Coming Up NFL minicamps get underway this week and the Philadelphia Eagles remain the favorites to win the Super Bowl at +650. The Eagles are followed by the Baltimore Ravens at +700, the Buffalo Bills at +750 and the Kansas City Chiefs at +800. The Detroit Lions round out the top five at +1000. ___ This column was provided to The Associated Press by BetMGM online sportsbook. ___ AP sports:
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mac McClung's Likely Decision on NBA Future With Magic Revealed
Mac McClung's Likely Decision on NBA Future With Magic Revealed originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Guard Mac McClung represented the Orlando Magic at the NBA Slam Dunk Contest each of the past two seasons. But that might not be enough to keep him with the organization. Advertisement Spotrac's Keith Smith argued on June 5 that the Magic will move on from McClung this offseason. "Don't expect Mac McClung or Trevelin Queen to return," Smith wrote. "They've run their course on two-way deals with Orlando and will look for more opportunity elsewhere, or could cash in on good deals to play bigger roles overseas." McClung played just two games with the Magic this season. He didn't score and posted 1.5 assists with .5 rebound. Orlando Magic guard Mac McClung© Daniel Dunn-Imagn Images McClung is best known for his participation in the NBA Slam Dunk Contest. During his first season with the Magic organization in 2023-24, McClung became just the fifth player to win the contest in back-to-back seasons. Advertisement The guard, though, didn't play a game for the Magic in the 2023-24 season. He spent the entire season with the Osceola Magic in the G-League. McClung was the first G-League player to win the NBA Slam Dunk Contest. The guard also made history with his third consecutive Slam Dunk Contest victory in 2025. No other player has won the contest in three consecutive years. McClung joined Nate Robinson as the only two players to win the contest three times. In addition to the Magic, McClung has made appearances for the Chicago Bulls, Los Angeles Lakers and Philadelphia 76ers in over four years with the league. With all four teams, he's played a combined six games. Advertisement McClung saw his most average playing time in two games with the 76ers during the 2022-23 season. In six NBA contests overall, he's averaged 5.5 points, 2.3 rebounds and 2.2 assists per game. Related: Magic Dealt Unfortunate News on $197 Million NBA Trade Rumor This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 9, 2025, where it first appeared.

NBC Sports
41 minutes ago
- NBC Sports
Legendary Mavericks coach Don Nelson bashes Luka Doncic trade
OKLAHOMA CITY — Don Nelson was back on an NBA stage, and it was entertaining. The Hall of Fame coach with the second-most wins in NBA history left his home in Maui to come to Oklahoma City and receive the Chuck Daly Lifetime Achievement Award from the National Basketball Coaches Association and Pacers coach Rick Carlisle. Nelson talked and joked about his innovative offenses, telling stories of playing for the Bill Russell Celtics, having Manute Bol shoot 3-pointers, and coaching Hall of Famers such as Dirk Nowitzki. Nelson talked about player loyalty. Which led to the former Mavericks coach joining the rest of Dallas in bashing the Luka Doncic trade. 'As a matter of fact, I want everybody to know I'm wearing Luka's shoes, his new shoes from Nike, just got on the market. I'm wearing them in protest for the trade from Dallas,' Nelson said. 'I think it was a tremendous mistake by the Dallas franchise to trade him, and I want everybody to know that.' For Nelson, when you get a generational player on your team, you don't trade that player away. 'Because I learned from the best. I played a year for Red Auerbach. I played under him for Tommy Heinsohn and Bill Russell,' Nelson said. 'I had the opportunity on my way, because I always went to the games early to sit and talk with Red, philosophy. And his philosophy was when you have a great player, Bill Russell, [John] Havlicek, Sam Jones, you never lose that player. You keep him for a lifetime. You put his number up and you honor that player and that's been my philosophy. 'If you look at the players I've had over the years, Dirk and [Sidney] Moncrief and all the rest of them that I've coached,... my philosophy was always to honor the great players, not trade them away, but to add pieces to that player and make him and your franchise the best that it could be.' In Dallas, many fans are nodding their heads in agreement. At least they get a reset, thanks to the NBA Draft Lottery ping pong balls, which gave the Mavericks the chance to draft Cooper Flagg. Nelson shared another amusing story about when the Mavericks — led by his son, Donnie Nelson, as general manager — drafted Dirk Nowitzki. 'I have to say in that draft, Paul Pierce was my favorite player,' the elder Nelson said. 'We had Paul Pierce going top three. So we didn't even consider that he would be there. Wouldn't you believe that when No. 9 came up, Paul Pierce was there, and Dirk Nowitzki. I looked at Donnie and I said, 'Oh s***, Paul Pierce is my favorite player. He's going to be a star.' And Donnie says, 'Come on, Dad, you know what we've been doing for the last month.' We were hiding him in Donnie's basement so nobody else could interview him.' The rest is history.