&w=3840&q=100)
Why is China losing its shipbuilding dominance? Trump or global slowdown?
According to Clarksons Research, new ship orders for Chinese shipyards plunged 68 per cent year-on-year to 26.3 million deadweight tonnes (dwt) in the first six months of 2025. This marks one of the steepest declines in recent years.
In contrast, South Korea — world's second-largest shipbuilding nation — saw a relatively modest drop of 7 per cent over the same period, receiving new orders totalling 14.2 million dwt, the report said.
Who is replacing China's shipbuilding dominance?
Although South Korea also experienced a drop in orders, it narrowed the gap to China in relative terms. China's share of global new ship orders in the first half of 2025 fell from 75 per cent to 56 per cent year-on-year. South Korea's share rose from 14 per cent to 30 per cent over the same period.
Although China still remains the largest volume player, this represents a substantial rebalancing of the global shipbuilding market. Experts included in the report suggested that Korean and Japanese shipyards have benefited from shipowners' decisions to build boats outside of China based on increased geopolitical tension.
South Korea's major players, including Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI) and Hanwha Ocean, have also increased their presence in the US market. Both companies have been bidding for contracts related to the maintenance and overhaul of US Navy vessels since 2024. In April this year, HHI signed an agreement to share technology and cooperate with Huntington Ingalls Industries, the largest military shipbuilder in the US.
Are Trump's tariffs hurting Chinese shipyards?
The report pointed to a combination of factors behind China's falling market share. One of the clearest drivers has been the series of measures by the Donald Trump-led US administration targeting China's shipbuilding sector.
In April this year, the US imposed steep fees on ships owned, operated or built by Chinese companies entering American ports. Additional tariffs on Chinese-made equipment used in shipbuilding, including ship-to-shore cranes, have further strained Chinese shipyards' competitiveness.
While these restrictions have met with resistance from industry groups, market data suggests they are beginning to have an effect. Beyond ship construction, Chinese shipyards are also losing ground in repair and maintenance services. Data shows China's share of repair work for very large crude carriers (VLCCs) fell from an average of 70 per cent between 2021 and 2024 to around 50 per cent in the first half of 2025.
Is weakening global demand affecting Chinese shipbuilding?
The US restrictions alone do not fully explain the shift. Analysts cited by South China Morning Post note that a cyclical decline in global shipbuilding demand is also impacting Chinese yards disproportionately. During the demand boom between 2021 and 2024, excess orders typically spilled over from capacity-limited Korean and Japanese yards to China's more flexible shipbuilders. However, with global new orders slowing in 2025, that spillover effect has diminished.
Shipowners reportedly prefer Korean or Japanese-built vessels as they fetch higher resale values on the second-hand market, further compounding the downturn for Chinese shipyards.
Despite the current slump, larger Chinese shipyards are expected to remain resilient. However, the outlook is less certain for smaller, private yards with weaker order books.
What lies ahead for global shipbuilding?
Chinese-built vessels still comprise 23 per cent of the total global fleet currently in service, Clarksons' data shows. But with US restrictions intensifying and South Korea deepening shipbuilding cooperation with Washington, industry analysts suggest that China's shipyards may face prolonged pressure.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Top Trump aide accuses India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine
A top aide to U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday (August 3, 2025) accused India of effectively financing Russia's war in Ukraine by purchasing oil from Moscow, after the U.S. leader escalated pressure on New Delhi to stop buying Russian oil. "What he (Trump) said very clearly is that it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing the oil from Russia," said Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House and one of Mr. Trump's most influential aides. Mr. Miller's criticism was one of the strongest yet by the Trump administration about one of the United States' major partners in the Indo-Pacific. "People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact," MR. Miller said on Fox News. The Indian Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday that New Delhi will keep purchasing oil from Moscow despite U.S. threats. A 25% tariff on Indian products went into effect on Friday as a result of its purchase of military equipment and energy from Russia. Trump has also threatened 100% tariffs on U.S. imports from countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Mr. Miller tempered his criticism by noting Mr. Trump's relationship with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which he described as "tremendous.


Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Will Trump ease tariffs based on market sentiment? Kevin Hassett clears the air on future plans
Live Events Hassett hails tariff deals (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Days after US President Donald Trump signed an executive order that modified tariff rates for dozens of countries, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said on Sunday (August 3, 2025) that a market reaction to tariff policies will not deter the US President from proceeding with his plans to levy fees on an interview on NBC News, Kevin Hassett responded to a question on whether Trump could change the tariff rates again if the market reacted as it did in April, when the tariff announcement sent stocks tumbling. Responding to a question on the future tariff rate change, Hassett said, 'The markets have seen what we're doing and celebrated them, so I don't see how that would happen.'Host of NBC News's 'Meet the Press' Kristen Welker pressed Hassett: 'OK, but not ruling it out?' 'No, I would rule it out,' Hassett responded. 'Because these are the final deals,' he saidThe US president signed an executive order that changed tariff rates for dozens of countries after twice postponing plans to implement 'reciprocal' tariffs on other nations. Tariff rates now range from as high as 41 percent on goods from Syria to as low as 10 percent. According to the executive order signed by Trump, all imports will face a 10 percent tariff, effective August countries have separately negotiated trade deals to set their tariff rates, including Indonesia and Thailand, which agreed to a 19 percent tariff. Meanwhile, South Korea and Japan secured 15 percent rates, and the United Kingdom finalized a 10 percent tariff. Other nations that did not negotiate deals are set to face higher the tariff deals struck by Trump, Hassett said that those rates are 'more or less locked in' as other countries are expected to continue to press for negotiations, even after the tariffs kick in.'We have eight deals that cover about 55 percent of world GDP with our biggest trading partners, the EU, Japan, Korea, and so on,' Hassett said. 'I expect that those matters are more or less locked in, although there will have to be some dancing around the edges about exactly what we mean when we do this or that,' he added.'For the deals that aren't ready yet, they're going to get the reciprocal rates soon, and then we would expect that there might continue to be negotiations with those countries,' he continued.


Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
US top official signals Donald Trump's tariff rates ‘pretty much set' ahead of August 7 rollout
US President Donald Trump's global tariff policy is coming into sharper focus as his administration moves to implement revised trade measures. The updated slate of customised tariffs—ranging from 10% to 40%—is set to take effect on August 7, according to an executive order issued last week. 'These tariff rates are pretty much set,' said US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer during an appearance on CBS News. 'I expect I do have my phone blowing up... we're seeing truly the contours of the President's tariff plan right now with these rates.' Trump first unveiled a baseline 10% tariff on nearly all US imports on April 2, dubbed 'Liberation Day,' followed by a series of higher, country-specific rates. The initial announcement triggered a stock market downturn, prompting the administration to delay implementation twice to allow time for negotiations. In the weeks following 'Liberation Day,' Trump's trade team engaged in fast-track talks with numerous countries. Agreements were reportedly reached with the European Union, United Kingdom, Vietnam, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia, Cambodia, Thailand, and others. 'Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country,' Greer explained. 'There are trade ministers who want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States,' said Greer. 'But I think that we have, we're seeing truly the contours of the President's tariff plan right now with these rates.' As part of Trump's broader trade strategy, a tariff truce with China is currently in place but is set to expire on August 12. Simultaneously, the administration has given Russia until August 8 to reach a peace agreement with Ukraine. Failure to do so may lead to secondary tariffs or sanctions on countries purchasing Russian oil. The sweeping tariff moves are also facing legal scrutiny. Last Thursday, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard arguments related to the administration's authority to impose such tariffs. Trump invoked emergency powers to justify the measures, but legal experts have raised questions about the extent of his authority.