
North Macedonia shutters illegal clubs after 59 killed in Kočani fire
Authorities in North Macedonia have shuttered dozens of nightclubs and entertainment venues across the country for not having valid operating licenses.
It comes after a fire broke out at a concert in an unlicensed venue in the eastern town of Kočani on Sunday which killed 59 people.
Government spokesperson Marija Miteva said that out of 50 establishments inspected in several cities, only 22 had valid licences.
"For all premises with expired licenses or no license at all, the state market inspectorate has ordered the suspension of activities until all necessary documents are reviewed and validated," Miteva said.
The fire in Club Pulse happened after pyrotechnics were used during a concert given by the popular hip-hop duo, DNK.
Multiple safety and licensing violations were subsequently discovered at the club.
Authorities said on Wednesday that 16 people remain in custody for questioning, following police interviews with more than 70 individuals.
North Macedonia declared a week of national mourning after the disaster, which has shaken the Balkan nation of two million people and triggered anti-corruption protests and mass vigils.
Funeral services for the mostly young concertgoers are scheduled for Thursday in Kočani, and authorities said autopsies and formal identifications have been completed.
Memorial services will also be held elsewhere in the country.
"Let us be calm, let us be gentle, let us be peaceful, patient," said Metropolitan Bishop Ilarion of Bregalnica, a region that includes Kočani. "Let our prayers and our thoughts be directed towards our deceased, but also towards our injured for their health and recovery."
Of the 150 people injured, dozens have been transferred to hospitals across Europe, primarily for specialist treatment for burns.
Belgium, the Netherlands and Greece are providing support in an EU-backed effort led by the Emergency Response Coordination Centre.
Croatia, Romania, Slovenia, Sweden, Lithuania, Hungary, Luxembourg and Norway also made immediate offers of assistance in the aftermath of the tragedy.
Stojance Angelov, who heads the country's crisis management agency, said the country's Orthodox Church is leading the funeral arrangements.
"No words can truly capture the depth of this tragedy or express the overwhelming sadness I feel," he said in an online post. "Broken by grief, I cannot find anything strong enough to convey my condolences to the families who lost their beloved sons and daughters."
The European Commission's highly-anticipated White Paper on Defence plans for member states to start pouring hundreds of billions of euros into the sector before the end of the year but largely fails to outline innovative and common financing opportunities.
The White Paper, released on Wednesday, broadly rehashes the Commission's ReArm Europe proposal unveiled two weeks ago that could see member states mobilise up to €800 billion for defence over the next four years by notably, pooling orders and procuring equipment together.
Kaja Kallas, the EU's top diplomat, described it as "a pivotal moment" for the bloc.
"The value we add by working together is priceless. It gives us a competitive advantage that is unrivalled anywhere in the world," she told reporters during a press conference to present the White Paper.
The main financial firepower for member states comes from the activation of the national escape clause in the Stability and Growth Pact, which would allow them to deviate from stringent EU fiscal rules that limit debt and deficit levels to 3% and 60% of GDP respectively.
An EU Commission official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said on Wednesday morning that they hope all 27 member states will request to activate the escape clause before, or in, April. The Commission will then have to assess the request, but "we hope the process can be concluded before the summer break", the official said.
Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen previously said that by allowing member states to pour in an additional 1.5% of GDP on defence over the next four years, member states should be able to invest some €650 billion into defence.
Another EU official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, however said that "the final outcome, we hope, will be even higher".
Accessing the other main financing option, the so-called SAFE instrument the Commission hopes to urgently set up to raise money on the capital markets to then loan up to €150 billion to member states, will require governments to submit requests for funding within six months.
Capabilities the Commission has identified as priority areas include air and missile defence, artillery systems, ammunition and missiles, drones and counter-drone systems, AI, Quantum, cyber and electronic warfare and strategic enablers.
One of the officials quoted above said negotiations between member states and the Commission on the basis of these plans should be relatively fast as the money will be given as loans member states will have to repay and not as grants.
The other three main proposals outlined in ReArm Europe to allow member states to invest more in defence over the next four years include expanding the mandate of the European Investment Bank, allowing the use of cohesion funds into defence projects, and enabling the use of savings and private financing into the sector.
The only new financial option outlined in the White Paper is the possibility for member states to waive VAT for purchases they make jointly with other member states through the SAFE instrument. It is unclear however how much money this will save member states.
One of the Commission officials defended the lack of new financing options, saying ReArm "is already a considerable answer to the question of how we can help member states" and that what is included "doesn't necessarily exhaust the scope of this debate."
EU leaders should return to the issue at a summit in June. Some, like France's Emmanuel Macron, have for instance called for the use of so-called Eurobonds as well as the deployment of own resources, such as a digital tax.
Macron however seemingly secured a big win with the Commission including a European preference to secure money through SAFE, which would require the equipment purchased to have 65% of its content emanating from the EU and for the EU manufacturer to have design authority over the remaining 35%. This is to ensure that no third country can block the use of the equipment going forward.
The other flagship proposals in the White Paper include a European Military Sales Mechanism proposal to allow member states to aggregate demand and jointly procure equipment, already outlined by von der Leyen on Tuesday, as well as a European Armament Technological Roadmap, to boost investment in disruptive technologies for military purposes including AI and Quantum.
Finally, the Commission proposes to create strategic stockpiles and defence industrial readiness pools. This will be facilitated through the long-awaited European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP) regulation that is set to include a possibility to financially support stockpiling, according to one of the EU officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The European Parliament said last week that it would aim to fast-track the regulation.
The aim of stockpiling military capabilities, an EU Commission official said, is that "we want to be more agile and responsive to any crises".
Defence Commissioner Andrius Kubilius, speaking alongside Kallas, told reporters that the White Paper is "the beginning of the road and not an easy one" and that the priority for the EU's executive is now "implementation, implementation, implementation".
"Putin will not be deterred if we shall read the White Paper to him. He will be deterred if we shall turn the White Paper into action and if we shall use it to build real drones, tanks and artillery for our defence," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
One passenger survives London-bound Air India plane crash at Ahmedabad
Hamas "brutally attacked" a bus carrying the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) staff to a distribution site near the southern city of Khan Yunis on Wednesday night, killing at least five, the US-backed charity said. "There are at least five fatalities, multiple injuries and fear that some of our team members may have been taken hostage," GHF said in a statement. The five killed staff members are Palestinian. 'We condemn this heinous and deliberate attack in the strongest possible terms,' GHF said. 'These were aid workers. Humanitarians. Fathers, brothers, sons, and friends, who were risking their lives everyday to help others.' The killings early Wednesday were carried out by the Hamas Sahm police unit, which Hamas claims it established to combat looting. The unit released video footage showing several dead men lying in the street, saying they were Abu Shabab militia fighters who had been detained and killed for collaborating with Israel. It was not possible to verify the images or the claims around them. Abu Shabab officials denied that the images showed members of their militia. Israel's foreign ministry reacted to the news by stating on X that "Hamas is weaponising suffering in Gaza -- denying food, targeting lifesavers and forsaking its own people." Reverend Johnnie Moore, a Christian evangelical advisor to US President Donald Trump who was recently appointed head of GHF, called the killings 'absolute evil' and lashed out at the UN and Western countries over what he said was their failure to condemn them. 'The principle of impartiality does not mean neutrality. There is good and evil in this world. What we are doing is good and what Hamas did to these Gazans is absolute evil,' he wrote on X. Israel and the US say the new system is needed to prevent Hamas from siphoning off aid from the long-standing UN-run distribution scheme, which is capable of delivering food, fuel and other humanitarian assistance to all parts of Gaza. UN officials deny there has been any systematic diversion of aid by Hamas, and instead say they have struggled to deliver it because of Israeli restrictions and the breakdown of law and order in Gaza. The GHF began operating in late May, stating it has distributed more than 7 million meals worth of food during the first week of its mandate. However, its work has been marred by deadly shootings which have taken place near some of its four aid distribution centres in recent weeks. On Wednesday, at least 25 people were reportedly killed near a GHF convoy in the Netzarim corridor in Gaza, according to two hospitals there. The GHF has claimed it has faced continued threats from Hamas, saying on Saturday this has "made it impossible" to operate in Gaza. Hamas has denied this, in turn accusing the GHF of "failing on all levels". An Air India plane bound for London's Gatwick airport with 232 passengers and 12 crew members on board has crashed on takeoff at Ahmedabad airport on Thursday. Air India, whose numbers differed from those of the national civil aviation authority, reported that two fewer people, or 242, were on board, including crew. There were 169 Indian nationals, 53 British nationals, one Canadian national and seven Portuguese nationals on board, according to the airline. The police first said there were no survivors of those on board. However, one passenger has survived the crash and has been hospitalised, according to authorities. The plane, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, crashed into a residential area close to the airport shortly after takeoff. Local media reported that the aircraft crashed into a medical staff hostel in Ahmedabad shortly after it left the runway. Unverified photos show the tail of the plane lodged in a building with plumes of black smoke billowing behind it. It is unclear how many were injured on the ground. Police Commissioner GS Malik said "some (residents) would have also died" in the wreckage. "Exact figures on casualties are being ascertained,' Malik added. He later told the press that at least 41 were taken to hospital for treatment. Malik also told India's ANI news agency that one of the passengers, identified by his seat number 11A, survived the crash and "has been in the hospital and is under treatment". The flight manifest made public by authorities identifies the person in seat 11A as Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, a UK citizen. "We received the last signal from the aircraft at 08:08:51 UTC, just seconds after takeoff," tracking website Flight Radar wrote in a post on X. The Air India flight was scheduled to arrive at 6:25 pm local time (7:25 pm CEST). Videos from the scene show a low-flying aircraft trailing flames and descending toward a residential neighbourhood before bursting into orange and black smoke. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi called the tragedy "heartbreaking beyond words". Meanwhile, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the scenes of a "London-bound plane carrying many British nationals crashing in the Indian city of Ahmedabad are devastating.' The UK Foreign Office has arranged crisis teams in India and the UK, Foreign Secretary David Lammy said. "My thoughts, and I'm sure those of the entire House, are with those who've been affected by the tragic plane crash in India this morning," Lammy told the House of Commons. "We know that British nationals were on board and I can confirm that the FCDO is working urgently with local authorities to support British nationals and their families, and has stood up a crisis team in both Delhi and in London." India's Aviation Minister Kinjarapu Ram Mohan Naidu said he was "shocked and devastated" when news of the crash in the Indian state of Gujarat broke. "We are on highest alert. I am personally monitoring the situation and have directed all aviation and emergency response agencies to take swift and coordinated action," Ram Mohan Naidu said. "Rescue teams have been mobilised, and all efforts are being made to ensure medical aid and relief support are being rushed to the site. My thoughts and prayers are with all those on board and their families." The jet was 11 years old. This is the first-ever crash of a Boeing 787 aircraft, which was introduced in 2011, according to the Aviation Safety Network database. Boeing said it was aware of reports and "working to gather more information." Air India's Chairman Natarajan Chandrasekaran said that the company's "primary focus is on supporting all the affected people and their families.' The UN nuclear watchdog's board of governors on Thursday formally found that Iran is not complying with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years, a move that could lead to further tensions and set in motion an effort to restore United Nations sanctions on Tehran later this year. Iran immediately responded to the International Atomic Energy Agency board's vote, stating that it will establish a new enrichment facility. The announcement said the facility will be 'in a secure location". 'The Islamic Republic of Iran has no choice but to respond to this political resolution,' the Iranian Foreign Ministry and the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran said in a joint statement. Nineteen countries on the IAEA's board, which represents the agency's member nations, voted for the resolution, according to diplomats who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the outcome of the closed-door vote. Russia, China and Burkina Faso opposed it, 11 abstained ,and two did not vote. In the draft resolution seen by media outlets, the board of governors renews a call on Iran to provide answers 'without delay' in a long-running investigation into uranium traces found at several locations that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. Western officials suspect that the uranium traces could provide evidence that Iran had a secret nuclear weapons program until 2003. France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States proposed the resolution. In Brussels, the European Commission expressed support for the text and called on Iran to "restore full cooperation with the agency and fully implement its obligations". "We call on Iran to show restraint and avoid any step that would further escalate the situation," a Commission spokesperson said on Thursday afternoon. The vote comes at a sensitive time, as tensions in the region have been rising. On Wednesday, the US State Department announced that it is drawing down the presence of non-essential personnel in the Middle East. The European Commission said its "limited" diplomatic presence on the ground had been "informed" about the Pentagon's plan, but that no evacuation order would be issued to its staff for now. US President Donald Trump has previously said that Israel or Washington could carry out airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations failed. The US and Iran have been holding talks on Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. Oman's foreign minister said earlier Thursday that a sixth round of negotiations will be held in his country on Sunday. The draft resolution makes a direct reference to the US-Iran talks, stressing its 'support for a diplomatic solution to the problems posed by the Iranian nuclear program, including the talks between the United States and Iran, leading to an agreement that addresses all international concerns related to Iran's nuclear activities, encouraging all parties to constructively engage in diplomacy.' This article has been updated to reflect the European Commission's reaction.


Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
Istanbul mayor boycotts court hearing in expert witness case
Istanbul's jailed opposition Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu and his legal team have boycotted a court hearing on Thursday after they claimed that a late change in venue for the proceedings was 'unlawful'. The case, one of many criminal allegations Imamoglu is facing, was over comments the Istanbul mayor made on an expert witness, over the prosecution of other officials from his Republican People's Party, or CHP. In a statement, the CHP said neither Imamoglu nor his legal team would attend Thursday's hearing due to a change in venue through 'unlawful procedures.' Imamoglu, in a post from jail, described the hearing as 'irregular' and said it 'does not comply with the principles of the trial. I refuse to be a part of such a process and therefore I will not attend this hearing.' CHP Istanbul Provincial Chairman Ozgur Celik posted on X that the mayor's hearing had been moved from Caglayan courthouse in central Istanbul, to Silivri prison – where Imamoglu is being held – in western Istanbul, only 24 hours earlier. Imamoglu was arrested in almost three months ago, alongside other prominent political figures. His home was raided early morning on 19 March, as part of an investigation into alleged corruption and links to terror organisations. His arrest triggered weeks of nationwide protests calling for his release. Protesters believe Imamoglu, seen by many as President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's main political rival in the next presidential elections, was arrested for political reasons. The protests, which often turned violent, results in hundreds of arrests, many of whom are also on trial for 'inciting violence'. The demonstrations were the biggest Turkey has seen in over a decade. A conviction in any of the cases Imamoglu is facing could see the Istanbul mayor banned from holding or running for public office. Prosecutors have requested a prison sentence of two to four years and a political ban on charges of 'attempting to influence' an expert witness in the case. The hearing was adjourned to 26 September. Emerging priorities such as defence and competitiveness are increasingly drawing resources away from other sectors, raising concerns that health – a key focus of the previous EU mandate – may pay the highest price in the upcoming long-term EU budget. The European Commission is expected to unveil its proposal for the next seven-year budget in July. However, early leaks and mounting speculation suggest that the dedicated health fund could be merged with broader funding instruments, or potentially scrapped altogether. Although health policy is primarily the responsibility of national governments, EU member states allocated €5.3 billion for health through the EU4Health programme in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This marked the first time a standalone health budget was created at the EU level. Prior to this, EU health initiatives operated with much smaller resources: The health programme for 2014–2020 had a total budget of just €450 million, significantly less than EU4Health. Since its launch, EU4Health has financed a range of initiatives, such as a recent €1.3 million project to address the nursing shortage across Europe by promoting the profession in countries most affected. Yet many fear that the programme will not survive the next programming cycle. Even some EU officials have hinted that EU4Health may have been a one-time measure. Lawmakers have raised alarms about the potential disappearance of EU4Health and its impact on flagship initiatives from the previous term, such as the Beating Cancer Plan. Croatian MEP Tomislav Sokol pointed out the importance of maintaining a dedicated health budget since health has become one of the most important topics in the EU after the pandemic. For this reason, the EU has opted to create a separate health programme within the bloc's budget to support initiatives like the EU health data space and the European reference networks. 'If we're not able to protect this, I'm afraid this will all be diluted and absorbed by some other big funds in the budget, and we will lose this focus on healthcare that we have now,' he told Euronews. Sokol also cited newer priorities like the Critical Medicines Act, arguing that they, too, will require substantial EU funding. "Of course, healthcare remains largely a national responsibility, but EU support is needed to create a level playing field across member states," he added. Concerns over future health investment stem in part from recent budget reallocations. In February 2024, approximately €1 billion was redirected from EU4Health to help finance an aid package for Ukraine. The looming cuts are causing anxiety in the health sector. The PHSSR – a coalition of academics, policymakers, and politicians working on sustainable health systems – highlighted the need for continued investment in a recent report ahead of the Commission's proposal. In an interview with Euronews, AstraZeneca senior vice-president Greg Rossi, who participated in the PHSSR, stressed that Europe risks falling behind in life sciences. "We're seeing massive innovation and opportunity in improving health outcomes. My area, cancer, has seen extraordinary advances in the last 10 to 15 years. But Europe is losing ground," he said, adding that research and development funding has declined, with clinical trials increasingly moving out of Europe. He warned that, without specific health investment initiatives like a dedicated EU health funding, access to innovation will worsen, health outcomes will deteriorate, and Europe's competitive edge will erode. 'Health is an investment to be made, not a cost to be managed. And if we do so, we'll improve the health and the wealth of our countries,' he said. The European Commission is preparing a comprehensive overhaul of the its long-term budget, also known as Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) post-2027. The aim is to make it simpler, more effective, and more aligned with evolving policy priorities. Currently, the MFF stands at around €1.2 trillion – roughly 1% of the EU's GDP. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is considering a major restructuring of the MFF for 2028–2034, possibly moving away from the current system of over 50 EU-level programmes. Budget Commissioner Piotr Serafin previously indicated that the next budget proposal will focus on "fewer, more focused programmes" and a more strategic, ambitious framework. The European Commission's proposal, expected in mid-July, will offer the first concrete signal of what lies ahead for health funding in the EU.


Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
Italy not liable for Libyan coastguard actions in migrant boat sinking
Judges at the European Court of Human Rights ruled on Thursday that Italy can't be held liable for the actions of Libya's coastguard, rejecting a case brought by a group of migrants rescued from the Mediterranean Sea in a fatal boat sinking in 2017. The court in Strasbourg declared the case inadmissible, finding Italy didn't have "effective control" of the expanse of waters off the coast of Tripoli where the small ship carrying around 150 people sank. Twenty people died in the sinking and around 45 survivors said they were taken to Tajura Detention Centre in Tripoli where they were beaten and abused. The judges found that the captain and crew of the Libyan vessel Ras Jadir had acted independently when they answered a distress signal in the early morning hours on 6 November 2017. Since 2017, Italy has supplied Libya with funding, vessels and training as part of an agreement to slow the numbers of migrants crossing the Mediterranean. However, the judges found that this support didn't prove that "Italy had taken over Libya's public-authority powers." A group of migrants was rescued by the humanitarian organisation Sea Watch and were taken to Italy. A ruling in favour of the 14 survivors who filed the complaint at the ECHR could have undermined international agreements made by several EU countries with Libya, Turkey and others to prevent migrants from coming to European shores. The ECHR handles complaints against the 46 member states of the Council of Europe. The intergovernmental organisation isn't an EU institution and was set up after World War II to promote peace and democracy. Libya isn't a member of the Council of Europe, so the court has no jurisdiction over the country's actions. Three right-wing political groups at the European Parliament are attempting for a second time to establish an investigative inquiry committee into NGO financing by the European Commission, as Transparency International alleges an MEP-orchestrated smear campaign against civil society and is launching a complaint about leaks. German newspaper Welt Am Sonntag claimed last week that the EU executive had allegedly secretly paid environmental NGOs up to €700,000 to promote the bloc's climate policy. The Commission denied the allegations of secret payments and a spokesperson told Euronews that the executive exercises a high degree of transparency when it comes to providing funding to NGOs. "The latest revelations published by the German press about murky ties between the European Commission and environmental NGOs make the establishment of a parliamentary committee of inquiry into the so-called 'Green Gate' scandal ever more urgent," European Conservatives and Reformists MEP Carlo Fidanza said in a press release, adding: "This committee, which has been requested by the ECR Group and backed by 200 MEPs from various political families, is essential." Hungarian Patriots MEP Csaba Dömötör told Euronews he believes more transparency is needed in relation to NGO contracts with the European Commission. "We see that they finance a blindly ideologically driven agenda from taxpayers' money, for which the price and the burden will be paid by taxpayers," Dömötör said, adding: "The Commission says those contracts are not secret. We will see, as we will launch targeted information requests to know the content of those lobbying contracts. The European Commission will have its chance to open up and to prove that the democratic values that they request from member states are also valid for themselves." The Welt allegations first surfaced in February, and in April a parliamentary committee voted down a raft of amendments from right-wing lawmakers seeking to incorporate sharp criticism of EU funding for non-governmental organisations into the discharge of the bloc's 2023 budget. As well as rejecting a joint proposal by Fidesz and France's Rassemblement National to condemn an 'enormous EU-NGO propaganda complex', the committee at that time also rejected a slew of amendments tabled by conservative European People's Party (EPP) lawmaker Monika Hohlmeier. Among these was a call for the EU Court of Auditors (ECA) to conduct a probe specifically into the LIFE Programme, the bloc's funding instrument for environmental projects on the ground, a small portion of which supports campaign groups through operating grants. The Conference of the Presidents at the European Parliament will now decide on the establishment of the committee next week in Strasbourg. Another two right-wing groups, Patriots for Europe and Europe of Sovereign Nations, also lined up in support of the initiative. Rene Aust, chair of ESN, told Euronews the group will support any inquiry into the misuse of public funds. "The Commission is paying activists to shape public opinion – this is not neutral governance, but orchestrated democracy," Aust said. The position of the European People's Party group is not clear-cut, since not all MEPs share Hohlmeier's position. Meanwhile, Transparency International EU director Nick Aiossa told Euronews that the claims of NGO's shadow-lobbying for the Commission have already been debunked. "These are already debunked stories that were circulated in February," said Aiossa, adding: "I simply don't understand why the German press would jump on this, unless, of course, it has a more political agenda behind it from the people who are leaking the contracts." He said that Commission funding of civil society in order to participate in public debate is a good thing, and that ample transparency measures already exist. Back in April, Transparency International stood up against the idea of an inquiry committee in an open letter. "These coordinated attacks that we've seen from this House over the last six months have three very clear objectives. They're meant to discredit NGOs. They're meant to distract NGOs to try and counter these false narratives in the press but ultimately, unfortunately, the ultimate objective is to defund NGOs. And we are about to see this play out in the new budget negotiations that are going to take place over the next several years," Aiossa added. He said that a small circle of right-wing MEPs is responsible for leaking sensitive data to the press, and that Transparency would be filing a legal complaint on the issue. "We've had a handful of MEPs have access to a limited amount of confidential documents that they are using to leak to journalists as part of a smear campaign against NGOs. There are rules in place in how these documents must be handled because they are confidential, and there's no accountability in this House on these leaks. And so I intend to submit a formal complaint to both the Commission as well as the president of the Parliament." At the heart of the latest media revelations on EU funding for environmental NGOs are the LIFE operating grants. These are part of the EU's LIFE programme, a €5.4 billion budget (2021–2027) aimed at financing projects related to green innovation, circular economy, energy efficiency, nature conservation, and pollution reduction. Around €15.6 million of this is allocated to environmental NGOs via operating grants and under this scheme, individual organisations may receive up to €700,000 annually. Grants are awarded through open calls with clear eligibility criteria and NGOs are evaluated not by the Commission directly but by agencies such as, in the case of LIFE , the European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA). Advocacy through lobbying is permitted but not required or directed under the grants. Each grant includes the disclaimer that 'views and opinions expressed' by NGOs 'do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union'. Grant conditions are public, and there is no requirement that applicants align their objectives with Commission interests to receive funding. In short: NGOs retain full autonomy over how they use the money, within legal and contractual boundaries. They are subject to transparency rules, must uphold EU values, and are routinely audited. If they fail to implement their work programmes, funding can be withdrawn. While much of the oversight relies on self-reporting – one of the main pitfalls of the system – the Commission is enhancing its risk-based verification following advice from the European Court of Auditors. In April 2025, the EU auditors labelled the Commission's funding process as 'opaque' and warned of potential reputational risks. However, it found no evidence during a year-long probe of any wrongdoing by either NGOs or European Commission officials. As a result, the Commission last year issued new guidance to prevent EU funding from being used for direct lobbying of EU institutions following these concerns. With additional reporting by Gerardo Fortuna