Taiwan war game triggers US questions over its ‘will to fight' if mainland China attacks
In the exercise simulating a 2030 cross-strait conflict,
Taiwan lost control of key outlying territories – most notably Penghu, a group of islands 50km (30 miles) east of the main island – as the People's Liberation Army (PLA) launched a multifront assault that quickly outpaced Taiwan's initial response.
The two-day simulation, organised by three Taiwanese think tanks led by the Taipei School of Economics and Political Science, is one of the most detailed publicly conducted strategic exercises modelling a full-scale assault by Chinese mainland forces.
It reflects mounting concerns among local strategists and retired military leaders that Taiwan's eastern flank and offshore islands remain dangerously exposed amid
intensifying PLA threats and growing US pressure for Taiwan to bolster its own defences.
The result of the war game – whether the PLA seized Taiwan – or when the final outcome would be confirmed has not been made public, but the organisers said they would issue a full report.
Four teams represented Taiwan, the United States, Japan and mainland China, overseen by a control group.
Notable participants included Michael Mullen, a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Dennis Blair, a former US Pacific commander; and Shigeru Iwasaki, former chief of staff of Japan's Self-Defence Forces. Nine retired Taiwanese generals and admirals, including Lee Hsi-min, former chief of the general staff; and eight lieutenant generals also took part.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
14 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
South Korea's birth rate battles erode its military might: ‘still relatively large'
As South Korea 's troop numbers dwindle to levels unseen in decades, fears are growing that the country's ability to deter Pyongyang and secure its heavily fortified border with the nuclear-armed North may be slipping at a moment of heightened regional uncertainty. According to a Defence Ministry report released last Sunday, the South Korean military has shrunk by 20 per cent over the past six years, with active-duty personnel now numbering around 450,000 – down from about 690,000 soldiers in the early 2000s. Officials say the decline has been driven by a precipitous drop in the number of young men eligible for mandatory service: mainly the result of a deep demographic crisis This is despite all able-bodied men being required to serve at least 18 months in the military between the ages of 18 and 28. Those in the navy serve for 20 months, while those in the air force serve for 21 months. Civilians take part in a marine summer boot camp in South Korea's North Gyeongsang province last month. Military service is compulsory for able-bodied Korean men. Photo: Yonhap/EPA Though investments in advanced weaponry may compensate to a degree, this 'has its limits', as one analyst put it. The shortfall is already being felt on the ground. The Defence Ministry estimates that the military is 50,000 personnel below the threshold required for full operational readiness, with non-commissioned officer ranks particularly depleted. The most pressing issue? A severe shortage of troops to patrol the demilitarised zone (DMZ) separating the two Koreas, according to Jin Hwal-min, an assistant professor of political science at Chonnam National University in Gwangju.
South China Morning Post
14 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
South Korea's birth rate battles erode its military might
As South Korea 's troop numbers dwindle to levels unseen in decades, fears are growing that the country's ability to deter Pyongyang and secure its heavily fortified border with the nuclear-armed North may be slipping at a moment of heightened regional uncertainty. According to a Defence Ministry report released last Sunday, the South Korean military has shrunk by 20 per cent over the past six years, with active-duty personnel now numbering around 450,000 – down from about 690,000 soldiers in the early 2000s. Officials say the decline has been driven by a precipitous drop in the number of young men eligible for mandatory service: mainly the result of a deep demographic crisis This is despite all able-bodied men being required to serve at least 18 months in the military between the ages of 18 and 28. Those in the navy serve for 20 months, while those in the air force serve for 21 months. Civilians take part in a marine summer boot camp in South Korea's North Gyeongsang province last month. Military service is compulsory for able-bodied Korean men. Photo: Yonhap/EPA Though investments in advanced weaponry may compensate to a degree, this 'has its limits', as one analyst put it. The shortfall is already being felt on the ground. The Defence Ministry estimates that the military is 50,000 personnel below the threshold required for full operational readiness, with non-commissioned officer ranks particularly depleted. The most pressing issue? A severe shortage of troops to patrol the demilitarised zone (DMZ) separating the two Koreas, according to Jin Hwal-min, an assistant professor of political science at Chonnam National University in Gwangju.
South China Morning Post
17 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
6 pillars for peace to end wars in Asia
For a time, it seemed that economic interdependence had put an end to war between states. When Canadian psychologist Steven Pinker declared in 2011 that such wars had 'almost vanished', many believed the arc of history was bending towards peace. But from Ukraine to the recent Thailand-Cambodia conflict , the resurgence of wars in recent years has shown that we must look deeper at what sustains harmony between nations – and why some regions are so much better at it than others. Southeast Asia, though seen today as a relative oasis of stability and economic dynamism, does not enjoy the same freedom from conflict as North America , for example, where the prospect of war between neighbours is virtually unthinkable. Scholars have long argued that economic integration, particularly through trade, lessens the risk of conflict. There is truth in this. Since World War II, trade has indeed proven a powerful force for peace and prosperity. But in a rapidly changing world, trade alone is no longer enough to guarantee security. New, more robust mechanisms are needed to ensure that tensions between nuclear powers, especially, are contained. There is cause for hope. The European Union and North America are living proof that deep integration can bring lasting calm. Realistically, there is little to no prospect of armed conflict between the states that make up these regions. But can the rest of the world replicate this? And if so, how? European Union flags fly in front of the the seat of the European Commission in Brussels. Photo: dpa Six pillars for integrated peace
