Tourist tax could 'revitalise' London's struggling arts scene
Pressure is growing on the government to allow London to impose a tourist tax on overnight visitors.Think tank the Centre for London said the tax could help "revitalise" arts and culture in the capital, as its new report warned the city's creative industries were in "peril".Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan previously voiced support for such a charge, saying most tourists in Europe "don't really mind paying an extra few euros".The government has reiterated there were "currently no plans to introduce a tourism tax in England".
The report, Arts for All, urged ministers to restore arts funding for local government to 2010 levels, as well as a number of other measures.They include a national Arts Pass for under-25s, and to allow the Greater London Authority (GLA) to "explore the implementation of a tourist tax".The government said that places can already choose to introduce a levy on overnight stays through the Accommodation Business Improvement District model.
The Arts for All report was unveiled on Thursday at the Barbican arts centre, where according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), the GLA said national legislation would be needed.The idea, that visitors pay a small percentage or set amount extra on their hotel bill, is already in place in cities including Barcelona and Paris.Venice has gone further, by introducing a €5 charge for day-trippers to the city – part of their effort to combat cruise tourism.
Rob Anderson, from the Centre for London, said art and culture was "at the heart of what it means" to be a Londoner.He said reductions in funding had made it harder for the capital's arts sector to provide "affordable, local and convenient offerings" and widen participation.He added: "We need to re-invest in our arts, to safeguard London's continued cultural success and ensure that more Londoners can benefit from the city's world-class offerings."The LDRS has contacted the Department for Culture, Media and Sport for comment on the Centre for London's report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
18 hours ago
- Evening Standard
12,000 drivers a day are avoiding Blackwall and Silvertown tunnel tolls, TfL reveals
Carl Eddleston, Director of Streets and Network Operations at TfL added: 'Although it is still early days, the initial data we are seeing shows that the new Silvertown Tunnel, supported by user charges, has already helped reduced congestion around the Blackwall Tunnel and improved cross-river public transport, with thousands of Londoners using the new, free bus services the tunnel facilitates.
New Statesman
19 hours ago
- New Statesman
Who will save local news?
Illustration by Harry Haysom / Ikon Images The 160-year history of the South London Press has come to an abrupt end. Its website shows a somewhat mournful 'This site can't be reached' message. If only the outpouring of grief from south-east Londoners across social media had been matched by them buying the paper or paying for its digital content, it may never have come to this. But the locals of Dulwich, Greenwich and Millwall cannot alone be blamed. Shifts in societal habits and media consumption mean the South London Press is just the latest of almost 300 local titles which have closed in the last 20 years. The number of journalists on regional and local titles has dropped from around 9,000 in 2007 to 3,000 in 2022. The reasons are well documented: the shift of property, jobs and motoring ads to digital; the hoovering up of ad revenue by Google and Meta while also controlling visibility of content; and an endless feed of more entertaining content for scrollers have left publishers starved of BBC's expansion of local online news rubbed salt into a weeping wound. Cuts and consolidation followed resulting in the loss of experienced journalists, closure of town-centre offices in favour of regional 'hubs' covering vast areas and titles becoming less local. Readers turned away and the doom loop continued. The consequences of all this are less well understood. Local journalism always served a dual purpose. Not only did it hold power to account and reflect on important local issues, covering council meetings and magistrates' courts, it also contributed to a sense of place and pride. Those stories about dog shows and weddings and giant vegetables were important (although admittedly I didn't appreciate that as I wrote them for the Harlow Star) because they knitted people in the community together. There is much research showing Reform's popularity in towns that have lost pride in their high streets and communities. The local paper lay at the heart of those places. Also lost is the pipeline of stories and staff to the national media. Ever wondered why the national news is so dominated by Punch and Judy political stories? In part it is to fill the gaps once crackling with fascinating tales from local reporters. Already there are concerns some areas of the UK are becoming 'news deserts', with no trusted local news coverage. Donald Trump won 91 per cent of counties categorised as 'news deserts' in last year's US election. In those gaps voters were fed less trustworthy, more polarising content from social media and national sources. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe The situation is not entirely bleak. The big owners of local media still attract significant traffic. In April 2024, regional Reach titles were visited by 58 per cent of online adults, Newsquest by 28 per cent and National World by 27 per cent. And there are exciting start-ups, such as Mill Media, building engaged communities in Glasgow, Manchester and beyond. There has been much hand-wringing about the crisis, with calls for a government innovation fund for local news, and tax relief, greater philanthropy or charity status for news sites. The Culture Secretary, Lisa Nandy, has spoken of local media as an important bulwark against misinformation, but in a fiscally constrained environment there will be little public support for tax breaks for news organisations. Unless part of Nandy's media plan is building a time machine, I am sceptical of its success. The artifice of AI has once again resulted in very real-world consequences. The Lib Dem MP Max Wilkinson was threatened with violence and told he would be tracked down after an AI-edited video appeared to show him calling Nigel Farage a 'c**t' in the Commons. The clip was posted on X by the Spen Valley Reform Party account and viewed almost 100,000 times before it was deleted and an apology issued. There was no response from X to a complaint. It's estimated 34 million images are being created daily by AI. The spread of misinformation, and its ability to undermine our democracy, is becoming ever greater as we move to an increasingly visual and aural media world. Spen Valley of all places should have been alert to the dangers of minds being manipulated by media. Trump is such a fan of Fox News that his national intelligence director, Tulsi Gabbard, is apparently considering delivering his regular intelligence briefings in the style of a Fox bulletin. Currently, the president's daily brief is a written online document (yawn!) which Trump has reportedly read less than once a week since being in office – fewer times than his predecessors. Hence the plans to come up with a style, insiders say, would be 'more aligned with how he likes to consume information'. Imagine it: 'So that's the siege on Gaza and troop movements in Ukraine, Mr President. And now to the weather…' Reform MP Lee Anderson has been doing his pound-shop Donald routine with an outburst at local news site Nottinghamshire Live. In a Facebook post he raged: 'We will take our country back and these lefty out-of-touch, low-level so-called journalists will have to go and get a proper job.' The post was a response to a report about the £25k cost of a by-election, which was triggered just days after the local elections when a newly elected Reform councillor quit. Presumably to get a proper job. [See also: Will Jeremy Corbyn trap the government on Gaza?] Related
Scotsman
21 hours ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh named one of the most expensive cities in the UK to buy a coffee
Research by the coffee experts at Philips has revealed that London, Brighton, Edinburgh, Liverpool and Cardiff are the most expensive cities for coffee drinkers. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... UK coffee drinkers are turning away from high street chains thanks to spiralling costs that see the average Brit spending £859 A YEAR on takeaway drinks, a new study has revealed. The coffee experts at Philips have found Brits drink an average of four takeaway coffees costing £4.13 each, a week. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad One in ten of us splash out £1,718 annually - on eight takeaway coffees a week. The 5500 LatteGo by Philips. It means more and more people are now getting their coffee fix at home - with us brewing on average 14 cups of joe a week. Londoners are paying the most per cup - with the average coffee totaling £6.13, which works out to £1,275 a year. Those in Edinburgh pay a huge £3.81 per cup. It has led to more than two out of five Brits (41%) describing themselves as 'frustrated' with the price of coffee. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As a result Philips has launched a new online calculator to show Brits how they could save as much as £547 a year** by making barista quality coffee at home. Coffee drinkers can simply head to add in the price of their go-to take-away cup, and the tool will Calculatté which bean-to-cup machine offers the best value for money. The tool gives the specs for each individual machine, and explains to consumers how soon the machine will pay for itself - when compared to the price of a takeaway coffee - based on the frequency of your purchases and the average price you pay for takeaway coffee. Lizzie Lee, Philips' in-house coffee expert, said: 'For some time now the cost of takeaway coffee has been spiralling out of control - and our data has revealed that those in London and the South East of England are being hit the hardest by the increase in costs. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Given the high cost of regular takeaway purchases, now's the perfect time to invest in a machine that will give you barista quality coffee in the comfort of your own home. 'Thanks to our new Calculatté, Brits can get an understanding of just how quickly a machine like the 5500 LatteGo can pay for itself, when compared to the cost of regular takeaway purchases.' Average Takeaway Coffee Prices per UK city London £6.13 Brighton £5.54 Edinburgh £3.81 Liverpool £3.80 Cardiff £3.77
