&w=3840&q=100)
India not a dharamshala, says SC while denying Lankan Tamil's plea
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to interfere with the detention of a Sri Lankan Tamil national, observing that India is not a 'dharamshala' that can accommodate foreign nationals from all over the world.
The bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and K Vinod Chandran was hearing a petition challenging the Madras High Court order that directed the petitioner to leave India immediately after completing his sentence in a UAPA case, reported LiveLaw.
"Is India to host refugees from all over the world? We are struggling with 140 crore. This is not a dharamshala that we can entertain foreign nationals from all over," Justice Datta observed.
"There is no violation of Article 21 as the petitioner's liberty was taken away in accordance with the procedure established under law. The fundamental right to settle in India as per Article 19 is available only to citizens," he added.
Who is the petitioner?
The petitioner was arrested by the Q Branch of Tamil Nadu Police in 2015, along with two others, on suspicion of being LTTE (a banned organisation in India) operatives. Three years later, he was sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment under the UAPA by a trial court. The sentence was reduced to seven years by the Madras High Court in 2022, which also directed him to leave India immediately after completing his sentence. Until his departure, he was to remain in a refugee camp.
The case for staying
The petitioner's counsel argued that he had arrived in India on a visa and was now facing prolonged detention. 'There is a threat to his life in his home country,' the counsel said, adding that the man's wife and children are settled in India. He further submitted that he has been detained in India for nearly three years without deportation proceedings.
He also claimed to have fought in the Sri Lankan war in 2009 as a former member of the LTTE, following which he has been black-gazetted in Sri Lanka. If deported, he would face arrest and torture, the counsel argued.
When the petitioner's counsel stated that returning to Sri Lanka could endanger his client's life, Justice Datta responded, 'Go to some other country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Democracy without dissent a contradiction: Justice Surya Kant
Democracy without dissent is a contradiction and that silence in the face of injustice is not neutrality, but complicity, Supreme Court judge justice Surya Kant has asserted as he invoked India's constitutional ethos and the top court's role in defending civil liberties. Justice Kant, who is in line to take over as the Chief Justice of India (CJI) in November this year, was speaking at the Washington Supreme Court as part of an international judicial exchange. In his address earlier this week that underscored the shared constitutional commitments of India and the United States, the judge said: 'Democracy without dissent is a contradiction, and that silence in the face of injustice is not neutrality, but complicity…These are not merely legal precedents; they are constitutional declarations.' Justice Kant highlighted that the right to free speech, protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution and the First Amendment in the US, has been 'zealously defended' by courts on both sides of the Atlantic. Drawing parallels with the US Supreme Court's protection of student protest in Tinker Vs Des Moines (1969), he recalled how India's top court, much earlier, had established the primacy of expression in Romesh Thappar and Brij Bhushan cases in 1950, ruling against pre-censorship and vague notions of public order. 'In both countries, the judiciary has consistently pushed back against the temptation to suppress dissent under misguided and deceptive notions that the executive may hold,' he noted. Reaffirming the foundational nature of constitutional supremacy in both democracies, Justice Kant highlighted that the basic structure doctrine in India that asserts Parliament cannot amend away core constitutional values mirrors the American principle that 'even the majoritarian will must bow' before foundational ideals like liberty, federalism, and equality. 'These doctrines reflect a shared understanding that tampering with these principles would cause a rift so immense that it would threaten the very heart of our existence,' he warned. ALSO READ | Free speech, democracy, and the epidemic of hurt feelings Justice Kant also spotlighted India's global leadership in using public interest litigation (PIL) as a judicial tool to redress collective harm. Citing the Vishaka judgment (1997) where the Indian Supreme Court laid down workplace sexual harassment guidelines in the absence of legislation, he said: 'Though structurally distinct, both approaches reflect a shared judicial philosophy: that justice must not be confined to individual litigants but must be responsive to collective harm and systemic failure.' In contrast, he acknowledged the role of class action lawsuits in the US, such as Lois Jenson Vs Eveleth Taconite Co (1993), where female workers collectively challenged workplace abuse. Addressing the evolution of due process jurisprudence, Justice Kant recalled how the Indian Constitution initially adopted 'procedure established by law' over the American-style 'due process,' but eventually evolved the latter through judicial interpretation. 'In the seminal Maneka Gandhi case (1978), the Indian Supreme Court read into the phrase the requirements of justice, fairness, and reasonableness -- effectively harmonizing our doctrine with the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,' he added. Justice Kant concluded his address on a note of judicial kinship, stating: 'It is my firm belief that our countries, and our legal systems, share a kindred spirit rooted in the pursuit of justice, liberty, and the rule of law… The law must be a shield for the weak, not a sword for the powerful.'
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Amit Shah slams DMK govt for scams across departments
Madurai: Union home minister Amit Shah on Sunday launched a scathing attack on the DMK govt saying it indulged in largescale corruption across departments, and said the NDA alliance would form the govt in Tamil nadu and West Bengal in 2026. "Modi ji sent nutrition kits worth ₹450 crore for poor Tamil people. DMK handed over the contract to a single company and committed massive irregularities. There's a ₹4,600 crore sand mining scam. The Tasmac liquor scam alone amounts to ₹39,775 crore, this money could've built two classrooms in every primary school of Tamil Nadu," he said at the BJP's district and mandal-level office bearers' meeting in Madurai. Responding to Stalin's remark that 'Amit Shah cannot defeat DMK,' he said, 'Stalin Ji, you are right, I cannot defeat the DMK. But the people of Tamil Nadu can. The pulse of the public is clear — this time the people will uproot the DMK govt.' He said the Madurai meeting would be the starting point of the end of DMK's rule. Highlighting BJP's achievements, he said, "2024 was a milestone — Narendra Modi became Prime Minister for a third term. We formed a full majority government in Odisha for the first time, returned to power in Haryana for a third term, and registered a big win in Maharashtra. In 2025, we ended a 27-year drought by forming a government in Delhi. Now, it's Tamil Nadu and Bengal's turn." He challenged Stalin to release a report card on election manifesto. "DMK hasn't fulfilled even 60% of its manifesto. It's a 100% failed govt. Due to corruption in illicit liquor, poor people are dying. Caste violence is being instigated in the southern part of Tamil Nadu, and crimes against women and elderly are rising. The CM remains unconcerned," he added. Accusing the DMK govt of trying to rename Thiruparankundram hill as 'Sikandar Hill', he urged all devotees to participate in the June 22 Murugan meet in Madurai. "Stalin always asks, 'What has Modi done for Tamil Nadu?' Under the UPA, the state received ₹1.53 lakh crore in 10 years. Under Modi, it received ₹6.80 lakh crore — including ₹63,000 crore for roads, ₹77,000 crore for railways, and ₹3,500 crore for airports," he said. Praising Tamil Nadu people for their support during the Tiranga Yatras held after Operation Sindoor, Shah said they were no less than in any other part of India. "Madurai has a 3,000-year-old holy heritage. The Murugan meet scheduled for June 22 will show the exit door to the DMK in Tamil Nadu," he said. Earlier, Amit Shah visited the Meenakshi Amman temple and attended the core committee meeting. Chants of 'Aragora,' `Veeravel,' and 'Vertivel,' rent the air as he was welcomed by party cadres at the mandal and district functionary BJP leaders presented him with a symbolic 'Vel'. BJP state chief Nainar Nagenthiran said Shah's visit was a continuation of the momentum generated by 'Operation Sindoor'. Party women's wing national president Vanathi Srinivasan said Madurai was chosen for the meeting as it lies at the heart of Tamil Nadu and is the venue of the upcoming Murugan meet. The pontiff of Madurai Adheenam, Sri La Sri Harihara Sri Gnanasambanda Desika Swamigal, welcomed Amit Shah during his temple visit and submitted a representation to him.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Vishalgad Urs not held, yet 1,300 devotees went to fort for prayers at dargah
Kolhapur: Around 1,300 devotees visited Vishalgad to offer prayers at Hazrat Peer Malik Rehan's shrine on Sunday. The traditional four-day Urs, scheduled to begin on Sunday, was cancelled following restrictions by the state archaeology department. The Bakrid qurbani proceeded according to Bombay high court guidelines. While the Urs typically draws thousands of attendees, recent campaigns by right-wing organisations against encroachments have led to reduced attendance. The previous year's event was marred by violence over encroachment issues. The animal sacrifice ritual was conducted under strict protocols, requiring enclosed private premises. The area was surrounded by metal sheets to ensure compliance. Devotees from various regions queued early to climb to the fort, presenting identification such as Aadhaar cards for registration. The administration limited visits between 9am and 5pm, prohibiting overnight stays. All 1,300 registered visitors completed their darshan/prayers within the stipulated time. Sub-divisional officer Sameer Shingate, of the Pannala division, said: "Everyone left the fort before 5pm. Police bandobast and scrutiny will remain in place for three more days." Although the dargah trust officials proposed a modest Urs celebration, authorities implemented a complete prohibition. Kolhapur's superintendent of police Yogeshkumar Gupta said the administration has challenged the HC ruling permitting animal sacrifice at the fort in the Supreme Court. Right-wing groups opposed the HC decision, demanding the prohibition of both Urs and animal sacrifice at the historic 11th-century fort. These groups celebrated the administration's decision to ban the Urs as their success. Kolhapur: Around 1,300 devotees visited Vishalgad to offer prayers at Hazrat Peer Malik Rehan's shrine on Sunday. The traditional four-day Urs, scheduled to begin on Sunday, was cancelled following restrictions by the state archaeology department. The Bakrid qurbani proceeded according to Bombay high court guidelines. While the Urs typically draws thousands of attendees, recent campaigns by right-wing organisations against encroachments have led to reduced attendance. The previous year's event was marred by violence over encroachment issues. The animal sacrifice ritual was conducted under strict protocols, requiring enclosed private premises. The area was surrounded by metal sheets to ensure compliance. Devotees from various regions queued early to climb to the fort, presenting identification such as Aadhaar cards for registration. The administration limited visits between 9am and 5pm, prohibiting overnight stays. All 1,300 registered visitors completed their darshan/prayers within the stipulated time. Sub-divisional officer Sameer Shingate, of the Pannala division, said: "Everyone left the fort before 5pm. Police bandobast and scrutiny will remain in place for three more days." Although the dargah trust officials proposed a modest Urs celebration, authorities implemented a complete prohibition. Kolhapur's superintendent of police Yogeshkumar Gupta said the administration has challenged the HC ruling permitting animal sacrifice at the fort in the Supreme Court. Right-wing groups opposed the HC decision, demanding the prohibition of both Urs and animal sacrifice at the historic 11th-century fort. These groups celebrated the administration's decision to ban the Urs as their success.
