
HCTM-UKM first in Malaysia to offer ACL surgery as day-care
The Sports Injury and Arthroscopic Unit of HCTM's Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department will conduct the procedure on two patients scheduled for Monday (June 30). Leading the surgical team are Assoc Prof Datuk Dr Badrul Akmal Hisham Md Yusoff and Dr Muhamad Karbela Reza Ramlan.
ACL reconstruction surgery restores knee stability by replacing a torn ligament with a graft. The team will employ the Modified UKM Internal Bracing (MUIB) technique, which enhances graft protection and stability during recovery. 'This approach accelerates rehabilitation, allowing patients to resume daily activities sooner,' HCTM-UKM stated.
Traditionally, ACL surgery required several days of hospitalisation for post-operative monitoring. However, advancements in surgical methods, anaesthesia, and post-surgery care now enable same-day discharge. 'Patients rest briefly before going home, cutting hospital time, costs, and infection risks while speeding up recovery,' the hospital added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Serious health threat warning as haze returns
PETALING JAYA: As haze once again descends on parts of Malaysia, experts are sounding the alarm over its serious and far-reaching health consequences – from exacerbated respiratory conditions and increased hospitalisations to possible links with lung cancer. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) lecturer and consultant respiratory physician Assoc Prof Dr Ng Boon Hau said haze is strongly associated with the worsening of respiratory illnesses such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). 'The fine particles and toxic gases present in the haze can make breathing increasingly difficult, triggering symptoms such as coughing, wheezing and shortness of breath. 'Patients with asthma or COPD may experience more frequent and severe flare-ups during haze periods, sometimes requiring changes in medication or even hospitalisation,' he said. Ng also highlighted rising concerns over a potential uptick in lung cancer cases linked to haze exposure. 'While more research is needed to establish a direct link, prolonged exposure to airborne pollutants – particularly fine particulate matter like PM2.5 – has been associated with higher risks of developing long-term respiratory diseases and certain cancers,' he said. UKM respiratory unit head and consultant respiratory physician Assoc Prof Dr Andrea Ban Yu-Lin warned that chronic exposure to haze can lead to reduced lung function and ongoing airway inflammation. 'Children and the elderly are particularly vulnerable during haze season. 'Children's lungs are still developing and are more sensitive to air pollutants, while older individuals often have weaker respiratory systems and declining physiological function.' She added that individuals with chronic health conditions including asthma, COPD, interstitial lung disease, heart problems or obesity, face an even greater risk. Haze exposure can worsen these illnesses, sometimes resulting in severe symptoms that require emergency treatment or hospital admission. Backing this concern, she cited a local study conducted from January 2014 to December 2015. 'The study recorded a significant increase in respiratory-related hospital admissions during Southeast Asia's haze period. 'Over the 16 weeks of haze, hospitalisations nearly doubled, with more patients requiring intensive care. 'The haze not only led to more asthma and COPD admissions but also worsened chronic heart and lung conditions, especially in medically vulnerable individuals,' she said. Beyond respiratory health, UKM public health medicine specialist Prof Dr Sharifa Ezat Wan Puteh pointed out that the impact of haze stretches well beyond the lungs. 'Haze can reduce visibility and increase the risk of road crashes, especially during peak hours. 'It also traps heat, worsening already high temperatures and leading to heat-related illnesses,' she said. In agriculture, prolonged haze can reduce crop yields and may contribute to food insecurity, she added. On the health front, haze exposure can trigger a wide range of symptoms, including eye and skin irritation, throat dryness and general respiratory discomfort. She said fine airborne particles can settle on the skin, causing itchiness or dermatitis, while inhalation of pollutants can lead to coughing, breathlessness or chest tightness, particularly for those with pre-existing conditions. UKM lecturer and consultant respiratory physician Dr Nik Nuratiqah Nik Abeed advised the public to wear proper protective masks, such as N95 respirators and to limit outdoor activities. 'Stay hydrated to soothe the respiratory tract. Those with asthma or COPD must strictly follow their treatment plans to avoid complications,' she said.


New Straits Times
2 days ago
- New Straits Times
Hospital awards RM25.6mil catering contract to non-halal certified firm
KUALA LUMPUR: Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz (HCTM) in Cheras awarded a three-year catering contract worth RM25.64 million to a company that did not possess halal certification from the Malaysian Islamic Development Department (Jakim). However, the Auditor General's Report 2/2025 said the company, identified as 0267299-T, won a tender to "provide halal food to HCTM patients" from February 2024 to February 2027. The report noted that the company aimed to streamline the status of its main kitchen, which had received halal certification from Jakim. The report said that the technical evaluation committee did not recommend 0267299-T, citing the company's failure at the technical evaluation stage as it lacked both halal and Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) certifications. The committee said the company failed the technical evaluation due to lack of experience and not having enough food servers and trolleys for the hospital. Nonetheless, the company was selected because it met the financial evaluation committee's criteria, the audit said. Only two out of 12 bidders passed the technical assessment stage, and 0267299-T was among the 10 companies that failed after scoring 53 per cent. The technical committee recommended company 0797329-A as it scored highest, at 87 per cent. "The audit review found that the company that was offered the contract, namely 0267299-T, failed the technical assessment but was still brought to the Financial Assessment Committee," it said. The company was ranked fourth in having a cheaper price. Although it passed the financial committee stage, it was not recommended. "The pre-tender committee was unable to make a recommendation that could be most profitable, reasonable and provide the best value-for-money to Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. "This is because no tenderer passed and was recommended by both the technical and financial evaluation committees. "Therefore, the pre-tender committee recommended company 0912013-P with the justification of the lowest price offer and meeting the minimum specification score," it said. In response to the audit, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), which oversees HCTM, said the previous patient food supply contract was nearing its end, and the tender committee had to proceed with the new tender to avoid service disruption. UKM also said that 0267299-T had applied for HACCP certification on Sept 24 last year, but the audit process could only be carried out after renovation works at HCTM were completed. The report did not include UKM's response to 0267299-T's lack of halal certification. The company was not recommended by the technical evaluation committee after its linear accelerator (Linac) machines failed to meet integration requirements with HCTM's existing systems. As a result, key medical equipment, including the Linac machines, CT simulators and contrast injectors, faced delays. Although scheduled for delivery by Sept 18 last year, the Linac machines had yet to arrive at the time of the audit, marking a 122-day delay. "The delay in the supply of (this equipment) within the stipulated timeframe has affected services at HCTM. "The delay in starting treatment has had an impact on patient survival, with 20 patients experiencing waiting periods ranging from one to eight weeks," the audit said. In the report tabled in parliament this morning, the auditor-general found "serious irregularities" in UKM's procurement process, involving three tenders worth RM58.45 million. The irregularities occurred when the tender procurement committee selected companies that were not recommended by the technical evaluation committee, financial evaluation committee, or pre-tender committee.


Malay Mail
2 days ago
- Malay Mail
Hospital gave tender to company that failed to deliver cancer treatment machines on time, delaying patients' treatments by months
KUALA LUMPUR, July 21 — A delay in the delivery of critical cancer treatment equipment by a firm has affected patient health care at the Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz (HCTM), revealed the Auditor-General's Report. In an audit report released today, the National Audit Department found that the firm, identified as 0074062-D, failed to provide a linear accelerator (Linac) radiotherapy system as well as a CT-Simulator and Contrast Injector to HCTM on time. The Linac and other supporting equipment were initially scheduled for delivery on September 18, 2024. However, by the time the audit report was concluded on January 17 this year, the Linac machine was yet to be delivered to the said hospital. The report stated that the delay has jeopardised health treatment for at least 20 patients, which was reportedly postponed for up to eight weeks. According to the audit report, the firm failed to supply the equipment on time because the new Linac unit did not meet the technical integration requirements with HCTM's existing system, known as ARIA. 'This technical incompatibility meant that no testing and commissioning work could proceed, further stalling installation and operation,' the report stated. The company then in June last year, asked to postpone the completion of its tender to Feb 12, 2025 due the technical incompatibility, which was approved by HCTM. However, the firm asked for another deferment in December to an unspecified date, which HCTM rejected. Despite the issue, 0074062-D was awarded the contract by the hospital's tender procurement committee. During the tender process, although company 0074062-D met the technical and financial evaluation thresholds, it was not recommended for appointment by the pre-tender committee, technical assessment committee and financial assessment committee. The report stated that the technical assessment committee specifically highlighted that the equipment proposed by the company did not comply with integration requirements for the hospital's existing ARIA system. Despite these concerns, the tender procurement committee proceeded to award the contract to company 0074062-D, overriding the collective recommendations of the evaluation committees. HCTM stated that the tender procurement committee selected company 0074062-D because it fulfilled 90.36 per cent of the technical assessment criteria, submitted the second-lowest bid at RM22 million, and offered the lowest maintenance cost at RM960,000 per year. This was compared to RM1.09 million per year quoted by the lowest bidder in the tender process. However, the National Audit Department found that the explanation unsatisfactory as the report showed the cost saving decision was made despite one company - 0050470-K - submitting a bid for just RM370,000 more than the winning bid, but with the highest score in the technical assessment at 98.05 percent. Apart from the cancer treatment equipment procurement, the Audit Department also raised concerns over two other tenders approved by HCTM — one for catering services and another for lift upgrades. In the catering tender, a RM25.6 million contract was awarded to a company that lacked experience and failed to meet key technical requirements, including having halal certification. Despite not being recommended by the financial assessment committee, the company was chosen due to having sufficient capital. Notably, none of the bidders fully met both technical and financial criteria. Meanwhile, a RM10.8 million contract for lift upgrades was given to company 0726241-U, which had a 'sick project' record — a clear breach of tendering guidelines for major works. Although the hospital claimed that further reviews showed some of the firm's questionable projects were completed on time, the Audit Department maintained that the company should have been disqualified from the start.