Air Force surprises troops with sudden deadline for reenlistment bonuses
With the Air Force retaining the vast majority of its enlisted force, the service has burned through its pot of money that many collect for reenlistment bonuses and set a deadline for Monday, May 19, for any airmen still hoping to cash in.
Announced Thursday, the deadline gives Airmen in some of the most high-demand jobs just five days to decide whether to extend their Air Force careers by several years. Those who decide after May 19 will no longer be eligible for a cash reward for reenlisting, which the service calls a selective retention bonus.
The Air Force has recorded a retention rate of 89.3% since the fiscal year's start in October, an Air Force official told Task & Purpose on Friday. That rate has created more demand for the money set-aside for reenlistment bonuses than in previous years.
Two factors, officials said, drained the available bonus faster than anticipated, the official said. The service opened the bonus program earlier in the fiscal year than it has in the past, and in 2024 the Air Force began allowing airmen to accept a selective retention bonus contract by reenlisting one year ahead of their scheduled end of service.
As a result, the Air Force expects to spend all of the $172 million provided by Congress for the bonus program early in fiscal year 2025, the official said.
On Thursday, the Air Force announced that its most recent selective retention bonus program will end more than four months before the close of fiscal year 2025, which runs until Sept. 30.
'Those who have accepted an SRB [selective retention bonus] prior to the close date will receive their full SRB bonus, including regular bonus payments for those opted into monthly installments,' an Air Force news release says.
In December, the Air Force expanded the number of AFSCs eligible for retention bonuses in fiscal year 2025 from 73 to 89. The career fields eligible for bonuses included maintenance, aircrew, cyber, medical and special operations, the service announced in January.
The size of bonuses vary by job and by the length of time an airmen agrees to reenlist for, but members in the most in-demand jobs who agree to the longest contracts could earn up to $180,000. The Air Force caps the total amount of money that airmen can receive in retention bonuses during their careers at $360,000.
The Air Force added AFSCs to the bonus program after analyzing which airmen had skill that were in high demand by the private sector, a service spokeswoman told Task & Purpose in December.
Army infantry officer calls new XM7 'unfit for use as a modern service rifle'
Attempted Fort Leavenworth prison break leaves military inmate tangled on fence
When Americans, Germans and POWs fought the SS from the walls of a castle
This Army combat medic fought off an active shooter and rendered first aid
This 53 aircraft 'elephant walk' has everything you'd need for a war in the Pacific
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
28 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Palantir reacts to controversial New York Times allegations
As the AI war between big tech companies continues to heat up, it'll be no surprise to see big moves being made - and toes getting stepped on. OpenAI is a perfect example of the type of disruptive tech company that will change the world, but not without some missteps on the way up. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter With OpenAI, the big complaint people have leveled is that its model steals people's content from the internet and uses it to train their Large Language Models, or LLMs, without permission from the people who created that content. In fact, The New York Times has sued OpenAI for this very thing. Now, The Times is calling out another tech company for a project it's completing for the U.S. government. That company is Palantir (PLTR) , the data analytics and AI software firm that's getting more and more attention lately, thanks to its steadily rising stock and AI expertise. According to The Times, a Palantir product called Foundry has been added to four federal agencies, including DHS and the Health and Human Services Department, as reported to them by government officials. Foundry is used to organize and analyze data, and The Times quotes sources that allege Trump could use it to further his own political agenda. While other big tech stocks have wobbled in the headwinds of President Trump's tariffs, Palantir has continued to prove itself as one to watch. Originally a data analytics and enterprise software company, Palantir has since moved into other markets, one being supplying defense contracting technology to the U.S. military. The New York Times report published May 30 states that in addition to Palantir's work with the Trump Administration using Foundry, Palantir has received more than $113 million in federal funding, according to public record, and that Palantir representatives are also in talks with the Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service about buying its technology. Related: Palantir stock makes history as analysts revamp price target "Mr. Trump could potentially use such information to advance his political agenda by policing immigrants and punishing critics, Democratic lawmakers and critics have said," The NYT story reads. "Privacy advocates, student unions, and labor rights organizations have filed lawsuits to block data access, questioning whether the government could weaponize people's personal information." The article also claims that some Palantir employees have been made uneasy by the company's decision to work with the Trump administration and that it "risks becoming the face of Mr. Trump's political agenda." Palantir addressed the NYT story in a tweet shared on X on June 3, denying the allegations. "The recently published article by The New York Times is blatantly untrue," the tweet reads. "Palantir never collects data to unlawfully surveil Americans, and our Foundry platform employs granular security protections. If the facts were on its side, The New York Times would not have needed to twist the truth." People had mixed reactions to the statement in the tweet thread, with some believing in Palantir and some less than convinced by what the company had to say. "Palantir is trusted by top military and intelligence organizations. How can people believe it has poor security protections?" said X user @sageozzeus. X user DanielvsBabylon was quick to point out the use of a specific word in the statement, saying, "'Unlawfully,' which means they operate in a legal grey area." Some users went into even more detail. "Stating that you don't 'unlawfully' surveil Americans is deliberately evasive," X user @DoniTheMisfit said. "It doesn't deny surveillance - it simply implies government authorization, which is not the same as public consent or constitutional legitimacy." "Likewise, referencing 'granular security protections' does not equate to individual privacy. It signals internal control over data - not limits on its collection or use. This isn't transparency - it's calculated language meant to deflect scrutiny while maintaining centralized access to sensitive information." Related: Palantir leader has shocking take on Elon Musk and DOGE The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Axios
30 minutes ago
- Axios
Dollar General sees uptick in middle- and higher-income customers
Customers spent more per trip at Dollar General last quarter, a sign that higher-income shoppers may be looking to save — and possibly stocking up ahead of expected tariffs. Why it matters: Dollar stores have been struggling as Americans turned to budding alternatives such as same-day delivery from the likes of Amazon and Walmart. Driving the news: Dollar General Tuesday raised its earnings forecast for the first time since the 2022 fiscal year, after beating revenue expectations with sales jumping 2.4% at stores open at least a year. The discount retailer set its all-time quarterly sales record of $10.4 billion as average transaction amounts rose 2.7% in the quarter spanning most of February, March and April. CEO Todd Vasos said on an earnings call Tuesday that while the company's core customer "remains financially constrained," Dollar General has seen more activity from both middle- and higher-income customers. Zoom in: The company is also avoiding a big blow from tariffs. Less than 10% of the company's goods come directly from foreign markets, Vasos said. It is mitigating impacts where it can, though Vasos said the company expects tariffs to result in some price increases "as a last resort." Yes, but: While the average customer spent more per trip, the number of customers visiting Dollar General stores declined by 0.3%.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Why Do We Feel So Poor?' —Middle-Class American Says Every U.S. State Pays More Than the UK And We Have Lower Costs, Yet Brits Still Live Better
"Why do we feel so poor?" That's the question that launched one of the most relatable rants in the r/MiddleClassFinance subreddit — and it wasn't some vague complaint. It came with receipts. The original poster opened with a stat that sounds almost unbelievable: "Every state in the US has a higher median income than the UK." Yet somehow, they wrote, "we feel like it's not enough." "We're making more, most of our costs are lower, taxes are lower," they said. "How do people in the UK survive on so little when food, housing, and transportation costs more over there?" Don't Miss: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. It's the kind of post that feels like it came from the dinner table after a long day of paying for things — groceries, childcare, student loans, and another unexpected dentist bill — and still feeling like you're behind. And then came the part that hit a little harder: "If the US is a third world country, where else is it better?" The poster wasn't just venting. They were pointing out what looked like a contradiction. If Americans earn more and spend less — at least on paper — why does everything still feel like a financial uphill climb? They even argued that America has a leg up when it comes to early retirement, writing, "I've never heard of anyone in the middle class in other countries be able to retire in their 40s or early 50s, yet it's very possible here in America." So, are they right? Trending: Statistically, yes. Median household income in the U.S. was $74,580 as of the most recent census data. In the UK, it's around £34,963 ($44,400). Even the lowest-earning U.S. states like Mississippi still come out ahead in raw income. But that's where the logic starts to fray. One Redditor who had lived in both countries chimed in with what seemed like the missing piece: "In the UK, people make it work on less not because life is cheaper... but because the government fills in more of the gaps." Healthcare is free at the point of use. Public transit is subsidized. Childcare isn't a second rent payment. And while rent and food can be expensive, there's at least a safety net to catch people when they fall. Over in the U.S., falling can mean falling hard. Another user, a business owner, broke it down like this: "We directly pay $45k a year for insurance that by US standards is on the 'better' end... and we have to budget about 10k a year for medical expenses." They also had two kids attending public universities in Texas — "reasonable" by U.S. standards — but still, "it's 50k out the door to pay for it."They described themselves as higher earners, but said, "This is a hit. There are zero social safety nets in my state." So yes, Americans might earn more. But they're also covering more ground alone. Income doesn't equal insulation. And that's the nuance buried under the numbers. One medical emergency, one layoff, one school bill too big to split — and suddenly, that higher income doesn't feel like it buys you much at all. It's not that the original post was wrong — if anything, it might've understated the issue. Americans do make more. Things do cost less. But many still feel poor because, frankly, they're carrying the cost of survival without the stabilizers. When nothing is guaranteed — not health care, not housing, not education — that "higher median income" doesn't feel like wealth. It just feels like a number that doesn't tell the whole story. And if people making more in every state still feel like they're just barely staying afloat? That probably answers the question better than any chart ever could. Read Next: Many are using retirement income calculators to check if they're on pace —Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article 'Why Do We Feel So Poor?' —Middle-Class American Says Every U.S. State Pays More Than the UK And We Have Lower Costs, Yet Brits Still Live Better originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
