logo
Medicaid Cuts: New York Governor Issues Warning to Republicans

Medicaid Cuts: New York Governor Issues Warning to Republicans

Newsweek15 hours ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul on Friday issued a plea to Senate Republicans to reject the House-passed "big beautiful bill" because of concerns that it could severely impact the most vulnerable Americans as a result of changes and cuts to programs such as Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the nation's largest nutrition aid program.
Why It Matters
The House budget proposal, which is the centerpiece of President Donald Trump's economic agenda nicknamed "One Big Beautiful Bill," aims to trim federal spending while offering significant tax cuts. The bill calls for hundreds of billions of dollars in Medicaid reductions, expanded work requirements for health and nutrition programs, and cost shifts to states.
With nearly 1.5 million New Yorkers potentially losing health coverage, safety net hospital closures on the horizon and millions at risk of increased food insecurity, the bill's fate in the Senate holds high stakes for New Yorkers and recipients of these services nationwide.
The bill advanced to the Senate after passing in the House 215-214, with two Republicans siding with Democrats in voting against the bill while two others didn't vote at all and one voted "present."
New York Governor Kathy Hochul holds a press conference following a roundtable discussion about federal DOGE layoffs on March 3, 2025, in New York City.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul holds a press conference following a roundtable discussion about federal DOGE layoffs on March 3, 2025, in New York City.What To Know
Among her various concerns, Hochul highlighted the restriction of health care access as a result of Medicaid and Affordable Care Act (ACA) cuts and the reduction in food security because of SNAP benefit cuts as the chief concerns among her many objections to the bill.
She also pointed to the risks to the "safety and reliability" of the state's power grid and the significant challenges to education with cuts to the federal loan program and the reduction of Pell Grants.
"Taken together, these provisions represent a regressive shift that threatens to widen educational disparities, destabilize community colleges and minority-serving institutions and undermine national efforts to promote affordable higher education," Hochul wrote.
New York's seven GOP representatives turned their backs on their constituents by passing a budget that guts Medicaid and takes a sledgehammer to our health care system.
I've worked hard to expand health care access, and I'm not backing down now.https://t.co/ofH3h4KVcJ — Kathy Hochul (@KathyHochul) June 2, 2025
Hochul also hit out at the decision to merely increase the State and Local Tax (SALT) cap rather than entirely scrap it. She said it hurts higher-income states that end up benefitting relatively less than smaller states across the country.
She criticized New York Republicans in the House who voted in support of Trump's bill, saying they refused to "advocate for the best interests of their state." Among the seven Republican representatives from New York, only Andrew Garbarino did not support the bill, choosing not to vote.
The bill would slash $13.5 billion annually from New York's health care sector, primarily through reductions in Medicaid and Affordable Care Act marketplace funding, according to official state figures.
Nearly 1.5 million New Yorkers face the loss of health insurance, and rural and safety net hospitals may be forced to close as a result of the cuts.
Representative Andrew Garbarino, a New York Republican, leaves a House Ethics Committee closed-door meeting in the Longworth House Office Building on November 20, 2024, in Washington.
Representative Andrew Garbarino, a New York Republican, leaves a House Ethics Committee closed-door meeting in the Longworth House Office Building on November 20, 2024, in Washington.The bill also seeks to shrink SNAP benefits by $267 billion over a decade, tightening eligibility and shifting more costs to states beginning in 2028. Nearly 3 million New Yorkers could see reduced food aid, and the administrative burden on the state could exceed $2.1 billion per year.
New requirements would mandate that parents of children age 7 and older work to maintain benefits, a significant change from the previous exemption for parents of children under 18.
These are also just some of the concerns a handful of Republican senators have raised as the chamber prepares to vote on the House-passed version of the bill.
Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Josh Hawley of Missouri have voiced opposition to Medicaid cuts.
Other skeptical Republicans, such as Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, have voiced concerns about economic aspects of the bill, including the potential to increase the country's debt limit by $5 trillion, which also set off Elon Musk and inspired the tech mogul to initiate a war of words with the president on Thursday.
What People Are Saying
New York Governor Kathy Hochul, in a letter to Senate Republicans: "As Governor of New York, I am writing to you ahead of the Senate's consideration of the House reconciliation legislative package to underscore the detrimental impact this bill would have on my state. If enacted, the proposed bill would gut New York's healthcare system, strip families of crucial nutrition benefits, trigger billions in economic losses through the removal of clean energy tax credits, stagnate growth in education and critical technology sectors, and continue to unfairly tax hard-working New Yorkers by failing to fully repeal the SALT cap. Passage of this legislation would worsen the affordability crisis and inject further instability into an already fragile economy.
"If New York Republicans in the House refuse to advocate for the best interests of their state, I will. As Governor, I must stand up for middle-class New Yorkers who cannot afford the consequences of this budget. I urge you to reject the House proposal and instead work with Leader Schumer on a bipartisan reconciliation package that delivers for working families, invests in the future, and reflects the real needs of the people we serve."
Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, in an op-ed for The New York Times: "If Congress cuts funding for Medicaid benefits, Missouri workers and their children will lose their health care. And hospitals will close. It's that simple. And that pattern will replicate in states across the country."
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat: [The bill is a] "reckless, regressive and reprehensible GOP tax scam."
House Speaker Mike Johnson, on the passage of the bill: "Today, the House has passed generational, nation-shaping legislation that reduces spending, permanently lowers taxes for families and job creators, secures the border, unleashes American energy dominance, restores peace through strength, and makes government work more efficiently and effectively for all Americans."
What Happens Next
The Senate is scheduled to debate the bill before July 4, aiming to meet that deadline at the president's insistence despite having until the end of September to pass the bill. The final legislation is expected to reflect alterations from ongoing negotiations.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's winning at the Supreme Court. Justice Jackson warns about `troubling message'
Trump's winning at the Supreme Court. Justice Jackson warns about `troubling message'

USA Today

time27 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump's winning at the Supreme Court. Justice Jackson warns about `troubling message'

Trump's winning at the Supreme Court. Justice Jackson warns about `troubling message' Jackson, one of the court's most liberal justices, wrote that her colleagues may be unintentionally showing preferential treatment for the Trump administration. Show Caption Hide Caption Ketanji Brown Jackson lights up stage at Broadway musical "& Juliet" Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson treated "& Juliet" fans to a special performance for one night only! WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump is on a winning streak of getting quick assistance from the Supreme Court after lower courts have put the brakes on his policies. That's prompted one of the three liberal justices to write that the court is sending a 'troubling message" that it's departing from basic legal standards for the administration. 'It is particularly startling to think that grants of relief in these circumstances might be (unintentionally) conveying not only preferential treatment for the Government but also a willingness to undercut both our lower court colleagues' well-reasoned interim judgments and the well-established constraints of law that they are in the process of enforcing,' Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote. Jackson was dissenting from the conservative majority's decision to give Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency complete access to the data of millions of Americans kept by the U.S. Social Security Administration. Once again, she wrote in a dissent joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, "this Court dons its emergency responder gear, rushes to the scene, and uses its equitable power to fan the flames rather than extinguish them." A district judge had blocked DOGE's access to 'personally identifiable information' while assessing if that access is legal. Jackson said a majority of the court didn't require the administration to show it would be 'irreparably harmed' by not getting immediate access, one of the legal standards for intervention. "It says, in essence, that although other stay applicants must point to more than the annoyance of compliance with lower court orders they don't like," she wrote, "the Government can approach the courtroom bar with nothing more than that and obtain relief from this Court nevertheless." A clock, a mural, a petition: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's chambers tell her story In a brief and unsigned decision, the majority said it weighed the 'irreparable harm' factor along with the other required considerations of what's in the public interest and whether the courts are likely to ultimately decide that DOGE can get at the data. But the majority did not explain how they did so. Jackson said the court `plainly botched' its evaluation of a Trump appeal Jackson raised a similar complaint when the court on May 30 said the administration can revoke the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans living in the United States. Jackson wrote that the court "plainly botched" its assessment of whether the government or the approximately 530,000 migrants would suffer the greater harm if their legal status ends while the administration's mass termination of that status is being litigated. Jackson said the majority undervalued "the devastating consequences of allowing the Government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending." The majority did not offer an explanation for its decision. More Supreme Court wins for Trump In addition to those interventions, the Supreme Court recently blocked a judge's order requiring DOGE to disclose information about its operations, declined to reinstate independent agency board members fired by Trump, allowed Trump to strip legal protections from 350,000 Venezuelans and said the president can enforce his ban on transgender people serving in the military. Jackson disagreed with all of those decisions. The court's two other liberal justices – Sotomayor and Elena Kagan – disagreed with most of them. More: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson can throw a punch. Literally. The court did hand Trump a setback in May when it barred the administration from quickly resuming deportations of Venezuelans under a 1798 wartime law. Two of the court's six conservative justices – Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito – dissented. Decisions are expected in the coming weeks on other Trump emergency requests, including whether the president can dismantle the Education Department and can enforce his changes to birthright citizenship.

It's the Republicans, Not Musk, Who Are Serious About Cutting Spending
It's the Republicans, Not Musk, Who Are Serious About Cutting Spending

Wall Street Journal

time44 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

It's the Republicans, Not Musk, Who Are Serious About Cutting Spending

Elon Musk and House Republicans both promised to tackle federal spending. It turns out only one of them was serious, and it wasn't Musk. Musk, who broke with President Trump this week after labeling Republicans' reconciliation bill a 'disgusting abomination,' might claim some authority. As leader of the Department of Government Efficiency, he was the public face of Trump's assault on government.

'Right down the line': Medicaid reform in 'big, beautiful bill' divides lawmakers by party
'Right down the line': Medicaid reform in 'big, beautiful bill' divides lawmakers by party

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

'Right down the line': Medicaid reform in 'big, beautiful bill' divides lawmakers by party

Medicaid reform in President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" has drawn a partisan line through Congress. Democrats have railed against potential Medicaid cuts since Trump was elected, while Republicans have celebrated Medicaid reform through the reconciliation process as an efficient way to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse in the welfare program. Fox News Digital asked lawmakers from both ends of the political spectrum to react to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act's Medicaid reform. The results were as expectedly divided. "This is all B.S., what the Democrats are doing," Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., told Fox News Digital. "They're pushing the agenda that we're cutting 10 million people off Medicaid. It's people that actually shouldn't be on it, illegals that shouldn't be on it. We're reforming it." The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a nonpartisan federal agency that has been ridiculed by Republicans, estimated this week that Trump's "big, beautiful bill" would leave 10.9 million people without health insurance, including 1.4 million who are in the country without legal status in state-funded programs. But Republicans are holding firm in their defense of Medicaid reform, which Republicans say only cuts benefits to illegal immigrants, those ineligible to receive benefits who are currently receiving benefits, duplicate enrollees in one or more states and those who are able but choosing not to work. "The people who would not continue to get Medicaid benefits under this bill were not qualified to get them in the first place," Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., told Fox News Digital. Democrats continue to sound off on the healthcare threat of eliminating 10 million people from Medicaid. Not a single House Democrat voted to pass Trump's championed legislation, which includes fulfilling key campaign promises like cutting taxes, immigration reform and American energy production. "These burdensome regulatory requirements for proving that somebody has obtained or sought work are going to mean millions of people will go without healthcare, and the restrictions on food assistance are equally an obstacle to people meeting their everyday needs," Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said. Blumenthal added he is "very, very concerned about these seemingly cruel and unproductive ways of raising money simply to finance tax cuts" for "wealthy billionaires." New Jersey Democratic Sen. Andy Kim said he is happy to have an "honest conversation" about government efficiency and saving taxpayer dollars, but that's not the reality of this bill. "People are struggling, and I feel like, in the richest, most powerful country in the world, we should be able to make sure that people can have the basic needs they need to be able to survive," Kim said of Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., told Fox News Digital there is "nothing beautiful" about Trump's "big, beautiful bill." "This is horrific, and it adds massive amounts to our debt, compromising our ability to [fund] the fundamentals in the future, foundations for families to thrive — health care, housing, education, good-paying jobs. That's what we should be doing here, not doing massive tax cuts for billionaires and paying for them by tearing down programs for ordinary families," Merkley said. The national debt stands at more than $36.2 trillion as of June 5, according to the Fox Business, based on data from the Treasury Department. The CBO's report this week also estimated Trump's bill will cut taxes by $3.7 trillion while raising deficits by $2.4 trillion over a decade.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store