
We Reject Human Rights Watch Bias And Libellous Report Against Burkina Faso
Human Rights Watch behaves like any organic intellectual in the imperialist hegemony, fiddling around the edges and adjusting details. It plays approximately the same game as the European-based Cultic Empire.
The dawn of the Sahel Revolution has led to remarkable advances in defeating terrorism, poverty alleviation, regional integration and unity, and a reassertion of sovereignty and true independence. France and the United States and their allies have been antagonistic toward the Sahel Revolution, and have concurrently pursued a covert foreign policy, aimed at destabilising the Sahel States of Mali, Burkina Faso and the Republic of Niger, and murdering their leaders, as they did to past progressive leaders across Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean nations.
So why has international instruments like Human Rights Watch (HRW) and other Organisations and the corporate media so desperately wanting to interpret the foreign policies of France and US, toward Africa? This affinity for imperialist and neo-colonial-driven agendas are not limited to the Sahel or Africa. Human Rights Watch behaves like any organic intellectual in the imperialist hegemony, fiddling around the edges and adjusting details. It plays approximately the same game as the European-based Cultic Empire.
It is not the policy of the New African Charter International (NACI) to argue that Human Rights Watch is not among the recognized non-governmental organizations in the forefront of the global advocacy for promotion of human rights. But despite its claims to be an advocate of international human rights law, Human Rights Watch ill-intended mistakes and biased judgement and methodology applied on African issues are too numerous and too serious to ignore.
More precisely, Human Rights Watch repeatedly focuses on vilifying the leaders of Mali, Burkina Faso and the Republic of Niger, while ignoring rapid development in the social and economic sectors that is taking place in those progressive African countries. The US-based NGO has also ignored the fact that the ongoing terrorism war was imposed on the Sahel region by those foreign powers that initiated and spearheaded the genocide campaign in Libya, notably NATO members-states led by France, the US and Britain. As a result, it routinely judges the African continent in a manner that promotes colonial and imperialist-driven agendas, and discredits governments seeking sovereignty and total independence from foreign manipulative mechanism. It is this bias that lies at the root of the spurious attacks on the progressive and visionary governments of Mali, Burkina Faso and the Republic of Niger, by Human Rights Watch.
On 12th May, 2025 Human Rights Watch (HRW) released a report publication titled: 'Burkina Faso: Army Directs Ethnic Massacres.' The US-based NGO assumed that the Burkinabe military coordinated the massacres of more than 130 civilians, most of whom were Fulani speaking people living in the west of Burkina Faso. Mass killings of civilians by government security forces, militias, and Islamist armed groups amount to war crimes and other possible atrocity crimes, Human Rights Watch stated in the report.
The sad part of the report is that, no Human Rights Watch official or representative was present in where the said crime was assumed to be committed. No gainsaying the fact that recently, there were terrorist attacks on security bases in northern Burkina Faso, killing a large number of soldiers, and another in the south of the country that led to the massacre of civilians. Other military bases have been targeted as well, including also police and market places in the Sahel nation. The Djibo military base has suffered serious attacks by terrorist forces under the Al-Qaeda and its affiliate outfits. Many soldiers and civilians as well have been killed, and wounded in that security base.
Day-in-and-day-out terrorist forces are unleashing mayhem and heinous attacks in the Sahel region. There are attacks recorded in the South of Burkina Faso, killing scores of security men and women, and civilians in Bousgou, Salemboare and Yonde villages near the borders with the Republic of Togo. While these attacks are being clinically executed, there have been arrests of foreign mercenaries of European nationalities hired to advance the genocide campaign in the Sahel region. Recently in Nigeria, a British mercenary soldier was arrested and investigated for arms trafficking to West Africa.
These are facts, which the Human Rights Watch cannot dispute, but instead sit in well-dressed air-conditioned board rooms in New York and rely on hearsay to gather information, which it uses to spoon-feed the international community, as the truth and reality in the Sahel region.
The title of the May 12, 2025 report and its contents assert that the alleged massacre of Fulani people in Burkina Faso took place in March of this year, and was directed by the Burkinabe military. The fact is that the HRW and other western NGOs, and the corporate media are hell-bent on an intensive campaigned designed to promote international capitalist system in the Sahel region. As detailed in this latest report, the publication is fundamentally flawed, using lies, distortions, omissions, and egregious double standards to construct a fraudulent and libellous narrative of Burkinabe military attacks on the Fulani civilian population. The report adds Human Rights Watch's obsessive campaign to single out the progressive governments of the Sahel region for destruction.
Having stated the above, the New African Charter International takes a very strong exception to the biased, baseless, misleading, racist and hate-filled human rights report on Burkina Faso, which has been disseminated worldwide by US-based Human Rights Watch. The report should be seen here as nothing but selective, colonial and imperialist-driven, ill-intentioned and reminiscent of the game played in Libya, to kill Colonel Gaddafi in 2011, to destroy Libya, to unleash genocide wounds and loot natural resources and wealth of the North African nation. The question now is what really the intent in bringing out such a tendentious report that seeks to build a false narrative against Burkina Faso and other nations of the Sahel?
Since the dawn of the African revolution in the Sahel region, under the wise and visionary leadership of Presidents Asimi Goita (Mali), Ibrahim Traore (Burkina Faso) and Abdourahamane Tchiani (Republic of Niger), the corporate NGOs and media have gone wild to promote anti-African agenda, to incite ethnic violence and possible foreign military intervention in the region. The three Sahel leaders have been selected for red-tagging and target for online harassment and vilification. In Burkina Faso in particular, the issue is now assassination bid on the life of President Ibrahim Traore.
NACI agrees that the ongoing terrorist war in the Sahel or in any parts of the world should be a major concern, we are disappointed that the US-based NGO has failed to mention in all of its reports on the Sahel about the root causes of the ongoing terrorism in the region. The truth is that, violence between farmers and herders has a long history in West Africa. For Human Rights Watch to assume that the Burkinabe military is coordinating an ethnic genocide against Fulani civilians is fundamentally flaw, fallacious and violates Burkina Faso's sovereignty and territorial integrity. It is a sham and figment of imagination.
Human Rights Watch should understand that, Africans can no longer afford to witness another genocide on the continent. The 1994 Rwandan ethnic genocide is now history, and we do not want a repetition of such despicable act in any parts of Africa. We believe terrorism is the most egregious violation of human rights, and yet the authors of the Human Rights Watch's report have deliberately decided to bypass the fact that NATO members-states and their allies initiated and are behind the ongoing terrorist war in the Sahel region.
The report clearly reflected the view of France's former Economy Minister, Hon Thierry Breton, who once said: 'It was Emmanuel Macron's stupidity that opened the eyes of Africans. One thing is certain if France loses its colonies our children and grandchildren will go to Africa in search of their livelihoods. Immigration will change direction. Macron needs to go or France will suffer. Europe need to unite to fight this new African vision Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso and other countries will follow suit. If one of the puschists' heads falls, the others will abandon the vision. Africa has no history therefore, cannot run the world.' One only needs to take a look at the comments above to illustrate the ludicrousness of the Human Rights Watch's report.
The timing of the report puts the credibility of Human Rights Watch at its lowest ebb. We warn the HRW against attempt to dabble into the politics of the Sahel region, and refrain from setting a dangerous precedent in the work of international NGOs across Africa. Despite this report, we would like to assure the international community that no set-up conspiracy theory can distract the Sahel leaders from their responsibility of protecting and defending sovereignty and territorial integrity of the three countries that made up of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), which includes Mali, Burkina Faso and the Republic of Niger. Not even the aggressive rhetoric of France's former Economy Minister, Thierry Breton can distract the resolved of the Sahel leaders, to bail their region out of the mess left behind by colonial France and its puppets in the region.
Much as the New African Charter International is concerned, the report peddled around by Human Rights Watch does not reflect the actual situation in the Sahel region. It only succeeded in projecting the current situation in a gloomy and negative light with a political intent to justify US and France overt and covert attacks and plots to destabilize Burkina Faso and by extension, to assassinate President Ibrahim Traore.
We want to make it crystal clear that the Human Rights Watch deliberately dodged in its report the commitment of the Government of President Ibrahim Traore, to ensure law and order in areas of Burkina Faso held by Al-Qaeda terrorist outfit and its affiliates. Burkina Faso and the other Sahel nations, Mali and the Republic of Niger are committed to ensuring the fulfilment of their international obligations, and they need no one to inform or remind them of their human rights obligations in their countries. Since the Human Rights Watch believes it operates in more than 100 countries, it should now redirect its mission on peace, development, sovereignty and dignity of Africa, and to refocus on providing support to the Sahel nations in building institutions to protect human rights in the region. It should devote itself to monitoring human rights violations and environmental degradation by some European states against the people of Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean, and Asia regions.
We conclude by demanding the Human Rights Watch, to make a clear and unqualified apology and retraction for its missteps and biased report. We warn the US-based NGO against dispensing allegations without proof; rather than attacking the Burkinabe army for its successes in the frontlines against terrorism actions, we urge the Human Rights Watch to display sincere commitment to fair, ethical and competent reporting about Africa.
God save Africa!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Island Military Veterans Hope For US Action
, Editor, Marshall Islands Journal / RNZ Pacific correspondent United States military veterans in the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia and Palau received increased attention during the Biden administration after years of neglect by the US Veterans Administration. That progress came to a halt with the incoming Trump administration in Washington in January, when the new Veterans Administration put many programs on hold. Marshall Islands Foreign Minister and US military veteran Kalani Kaneko said he is hopeful of resuming the momentum for veterans living in the freely associated states. Two key actions during the Biden administration helped to elevate interest in veterans living in the freely associated states: The administration's appointment of a Compact of Free Association (COFA) Committee that included the ambassadors to Washington from the three nations, including Marshall Islands Ambassador Charles Paul, and US Cabinet-level officials. The US Congress passed legislation establishing an advisory committee for the Veterans Administration for Compact veterans. Kalani Kaneko was appointed as chairman to a three-year term, which expires in September. Kaneko said he submitted a report to the Veterans Administration recently on its activities and needs. The Foreign Minister said it is now up to the current administration of the Veterans Administration to take next steps to reappoint members of the advisory committee or to name a new group. Kaneko pointed out that in contrast to its virtually non-existent program in the Marshall Islands, FSM and Palau, the VA's program for veterans is "robust" in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands. Citizens of the three Compact nations enlist in the U.S. military at higher rates per capita than Americans. But when they leave the service and return home to their islands, they have historically received none of the benefits accorded to US veterans living in the United States. Kaneko and island leaders have been trying to change this by getting the Veterans Administration to provide on-island services and to pay for medical referrals of veterans when locally available medical services are not available. Kaneko said the 134-page report submitted in June contained five major recommendations for improved services for veterans from the US-affiliated islands: Establish a VA clinic in Majuro with an accredited doctor and nurse. Authorise use of the Marshall Islands zip code for US pharmacies to mail medicines to veterans here (a practice that is currently prohibited). If the level of healthcare in Marshall Islands cannot provide a service needed by a veteran, they should be able to be referred to hospitals in other countries. Due to the delays in obtaining appointments at VA hospitals in the US, the report recommends allowing veterans to use the Marshall Islands referral system to the Philippines to access the US Veterans Administration clinic in Manila. Support and prioritize the access of veterans to US Department of Agriculture Rural Development housing loans and grants. Kaneko said he is hopeful of engagement by high-level Veterans Administration officials at an upcoming meeting to review the report and other reports related to services for Compact nation veterans. But, he cautioned, because there is nothing about Compact veterans in President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill passed recently by the US Congress, it means fiscal year 2027 - starting October 1, 2026 - would be the earliest to see any developments for veterans in the islands.


NZ Herald
5 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Round three - United States and China hold economic talks as trade truce nears end
The Trump Administration has been trying to win concessions from many countries before an August 1 deadline for reimposing tariffs announced in April. Those levies were suspended in order to reach trade deals. Over the last week, the Trump Administration has announced deals with some of America's biggest trading partners in quick succession. Last week the US and Japan finally agreed to a deal that included a 15% tariff on Japanese imports and a pledge from Japan to invest US$550 billion in the US. Today, Trump announced that he had also reached a deal with the European Union, whose economies rely on exports to the US. The deal would put a 15% tariff on many European exports, including cars. One of the biggest unknowns is what will happen with China, which remains one of America's largest source of imports. After a tit-for-tat period of tariffs and retaliation, the two nations have come to something of an uneasy truce after talks in Geneva in May, and in London in June. Today, before he met with European officials, Trump implied that some kind of trade arrangement with China might be close at hand. 'We just struck a deal with Japan as you know, and we're very close to a deal with China,' he said. This will be the first meeting between the countries without an imminent crisis, like the tariff standoff or China's economically crippling ban on rare earth exports this year. Trade experts said the list of potential topics for discussion was long, ranging from Trump's push to get China to stop the flow of fentanyl to the US, to America's concerns about its purchases of Russian and Iranian oil, and recent exit bans that have prevented US citizens from leaving China. US officials appear to be looking forward to more ambitious trade talks in the months to come. Those could include Chinese purchases of American products, steps to open the Chinese market and, potentially, Chinese investment in the US. They are also likely seeking to lay the groundwork for a potential meeting between Trump and Xi Jinping, the Chinese leader, this year. Administration officials are considering a trip to Beijing before a meeting of Asian and Pacific countries in South Korea in October or potentially connecting Trump and Xi on the sidelines of an international meeting. Michael Pillsbury, a former government official who has advised the Trump Administration on China, said this would be Trump's sixth summit meeting with Xi. Each of those summits had a minimum of two hours of dialogue, and Trump went prepared with specific dealmaking requests, he said. 'The President feels it's better to deal face to face,' he said. Trade experts are also wondering whether US technology controls or an agreement to transfer ownership of TikTok may be on the negotiating table. On CNBC last week, Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Commerce, said that the US had submitted a proposal to China for transferring ownership of TikTok to American companies, and that the Administration was waiting for the Chinese response. The topic was 'not officially' part of the trade talks, he said, 'but unofficially, of course'. Tensions between the US and China started to spiral after Trump announced his 'Liberation Day' tariffs in early April. China was the only country to immediately retaliate, matching Trump's tariffs of 34% with 34% tariffs on American products. Beijing also set up a licensing system to restrict exports of seven rare earth elements that are processed almost exclusively in China and used in electric cars, smart bombs and other high-tech devices. Trump then responded by ratcheting up tariffs on Chinese products to a minimum of 145%, which brought much of the trade between the countries to a halt. The previous rounds of negotiations secured a temporary truce that included China's relaxing its restrictions on shipments of valuable rare earth minerals and magnets needed by US manufacturers. In return, US officials agreed to roll back limits on exports of US products and technology, including ethane and airplane parts, as well as the proposed visa restrictions. US tariffs on Chinese imports were scaled back to 30%, while China has 10% tariffs on American products. The truce is scheduled to expire on August 12, after which tariffs would rise by 10%. However, Bessent has been optimistic that the truce could be extended. In an interview on the Fox Business Network last week, Bessent said that 'trade is in a good place' with China. He added that he hoped to begin having broader discussions with his counterparts about rebalancing the Chinese economy and encouraging China to curb purchases of Russian and Iranian oil. Bessent said China was in a manufacturing slump and faced a residential real estate market crisis. He argued Beijing must focus on building a consumer economy. 'They can't export their economic problems to the rest of the world; they need to solve them,' Bessent said. US companies continue to have a rash of criticisms about doing business in China, including the country's newly established rare earth licensing system. The processing time for licences is long, American firms say, and China requests proprietary and sensitive business information as part of the applications. In a survey released this month, members of the US-China Business Council said strained relations and tariffs between the two countries remained their biggest concerns. But they also said Chinese policies favouring domestic companies were eroding confidence in doing business in the country. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Alan Rappeport and Ana Swanson ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES


NZ Herald
5 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Economies race to avoid steeper tariffs before Friday, US and China hold talks tomorrow in Sweden
Where do other US trade talks stand? South Korea: Extra pressure Seoul is racing to reach a deal with Washington, as Tokyo's success in landing an agreement has 'amped up the pressure for South Korea', a government source told AFP. Local media reported that Seoul was preparing to propose more than US$100 billion in investment as part of a broader agreement, with expected participation by major firms such as Samsung and Hyundai Motor. The South Korean Government did not confirm this. South Korean officials have outlined proposals to deepen collaboration in sectors like shipbuilding, semiconductors, and batteries. National Security Adviser Wi Sung Lak has told reporters that the two countries are in 'the final and most crucial phase of negotiations' to avert Trump's proposed 25% duty. India: Cautious optimism Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal told Bloomberg Television last week that he was optimistic his country could reach an agreement with the US to avert Washington's 26% tariff threat. Goyal insisted there were not any sticking points in the US-India relationship or in trade talks and clarified that immigration rules - including those around H-1B visas for skilled workers - had not come up in negotiations. Despite Goyal's remarks, local media reported the prospects of an interim deal before August 1 had dimmed. Taiwan: Working hard Taiwanese Premier Cho Jung Tai said last week that officials are 'working hard' on negotiations, amid worries that an unfavourable tariff level could hit the self-ruled island's economy. Vice-President Hsiao Bi Khim said Taipei's negotiating team was 'working almost 24 hours a day to achieve trade balance and Taiwan's industrial interests, and even to further deepen co-operation'. Canada, Mexico: Deal unclear Although Canada and Mexico were spared from Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs announced in April, goods from both countries entering the US generally face a separate 25% duty if they fall outside a North American trade pact. This figure stands to jump to 30% for Mexico come August 1, while the level for Canada was set at 35%. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said her Administration was 'doing everything' possible to avert the duties and that she would speak with Trump if necessary to try to reach a pact. Trump told reporters at the weekend there was no deal with Canada so far. Brazil: Political nature Brazil is girding for a virtual trade embargo on its planes, grains, and other goods if Trump's threatened 50% tariff on its exports takes effect on August 1. The US runs a trade surplus with Latin America's biggest economy, which was not originally expected to face steeper tariffs under Trump's 'reciprocal' duties plan. Trump has not attempted to hide the political motivation in targeting Brazil, citing a judicial 'witch hunt' against his right-wing ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro, when he unveiled the tariff rate. The political nature of the spat makes a last-minute deal appear less likely. Tariff categories Here is a summary of duties Trump has introduced in his second term. Global tariffs US 'reciprocal' tariffs - imposed under legally contentious emergency powers - are due to jump from 10% to various steeper levels for a list of dozens of economies. The hikes were to take effect on July 9 but Trump postponed them days before imposition, marking a second delay since their shock unveiling in April. A 10% 'baseline' levy on most partners, which Trump imposed in April, remains in place. Certain products like pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and lumber are excluded from Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs but may face separate action under different authorities. This has been the case for steel, aluminium, and soon copper. Gold and silver, alongside energy commodities, are also exempted. Canada, Mexico Canadian and Mexican products were hit by 25% US tariffs shortly after Trump returned to office, with a lower rate for Canadian energy. Trump targeted both neighbours over illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking, also invoking emergency powers. Products entering the United States under the USMCA North American free trade pact, covering large swathes of goods, are expected to remain exempt - with Canadian energy resources and potash, used as fertiliser, to still face lower rates. China focus Trump has also taken special aim at China. The world's two biggest economies engaged in an escalating tariffs war this year before their temporary pullback. The countries imposed triple-digit duties on each other at one point, a level described as a trade embargo. After high level talks, Washington lowered its levies on Chinese goods to 30% and Beijing slashed its own to 10%. This pause is set to expire on August 12, and officials will meet for further talks tomorrow in the Swedish capital of Stockholm. The US level is higher as it includes a 20% tariff over China's alleged role in the global fentanyl trade. Beyond expansive tariffs on Chinese products, Trump ordered the closure of a duty-free exemption for low-value parcels from the country. This adds to the cost of importing items like clothing and small electronics. Autos, metals Trump has targeted individual business sectors too, under more conventional national security grounds, imposing a 25% levy on steel and aluminium imports which he later doubled to 50%. The US President has unveiled plans for a 50% tariff on copper imports starting August 1 as well and rolled out a 25% tariff on imported autos, although those entering under the USMCA can qualify for a lower rate. Trump's auto tariffs impact vehicle parts too, but new rules ensure automakers paying vehicle tariffs will not also be charged for certain other duties. He has ongoing investigations into imports of lumber, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and critical minerals that could trigger further duties. Legal challenges Several legal challenges have been filed against the tariffs Trump invoked citing emergencies. The US Court of International Trade ruled in May that the President had overstepped his authority, but a federal appeals court has allowed the duties to remain while it considers the case. If these tariffs are ultimately ruled illegal, companies could possibly seek reimbursements. -Agence France-Presse