Labour's war on sheep needs to end
Ms Rayner should listen to those who really understand our rural ecology: hill farmers (such as James Rebanks, author of English Pastoral) and the Moorland Association. The latter has appealed to her to halt the campaign against sheep, which is destroying ancient farming practices and making wildfires on the scale of Los Angeles more likely. Seven years ago, wildfires in the Manchester region caused pollution that afflicted millions. Now fire chiefs have warned that conflagrations due to lack of grazing and land management are increasing. This is an environmental and human disaster waiting to happen.
The official prejudice against sheep is unwarranted. It seems to be inspired by zealots like George Monbiot, who claim that overgrazing by 'the white plague' has ruined our uplands – ignoring the evidence that sheep-farming has been an integral part of English agriculture for centuries. No less arbitrary is the talk of carbon emissions. Why single out sheep, merely because they are visible, rather than animals kept out of sight on intensive megafarms?
On these islands we are particularly good at rearing sheep. Last year, the Welsh flock stood at 8.4 million, or a little over 2.6 sheep per person. Even these prodigious numbers are down from their peak – there were more than 12 million in the 1990s. There remain around 70 per cent more sheep in Wales than the entire United States, a country over 470 times larger. Ovines do very little harm and a great deal of good.
Elsewhere, sheep grazing is not seen as a cause of climate change, but a prophylactic against its effects. Ms Rayner should take wildfires seriously, rein in Defra and get behind this British success story. How about lamb for lunch, Deputy Prime Minister?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economist
an hour ago
- Economist
'Comrade' is making a comeback in China
DURING THE decades when Mao Zedong ruled China, it was common for people to address each other as tongzhi: 'comrade'. Like its English equivalent, the word has an egalitarian ring, as well as a hint of revolutionary fervour. But after Mao's death in 1976, and the market reforms that followed, the term tongzhi started to feel a little dated. Less ideological greetings took its place: like xiansheng ('mister'), meinu ('beautiful woman') and laoban ('boss').
Economist
an hour ago
- Economist
Why Britain's police hardly solve any crimes
Britain | Crime and no punishment Illustration: Giacomo Gambineri W HEN STAN GILMOUR started out as a 'regular street bobby' in 1993, he remembers picking up 'multiple burglaries a day'. It was nearly all 'traditional crime' back then: 'you know, the whodunnit, broken window, property gone, search for the suspect'. There were no mobile phones or CCTV cameras, which meant lots of knocking on doors and learning to 'manage the crime scene' to yield clues. Our survey finds that Britons are pessimistic about the country's cohesion The police are better; the politicians are worse The LIBOR saga reflects badly on the courts Compromise rarely leads to contentment. But it nearly always leads to costs Matthew Holehouse, our British political correspondent, asks what might happen if Britain made voting compulsory Their main union has become a platform for activists' causes
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Starmer hails ‘historic day' as Modi visits for signing of UK-India trade deal
At the Prime Minister's country residence Chequers, Sir Keir said the deal marked a 'step change' in relations. Mr Modi said they were 'writing a new chapter' in the UK and India's shared history. The deal is set to be worth £6 billion in investment from Indian and UK companies into the British economy, and is expected to have a £4.8 billion impact on the UK's gross domestic product (GDP). The two leaders have also agreed to increase efforts to tackle illegal migration and organised crime. Sir Keir said: 'I'm really pleased and privileged to welcome you here today on what I consider to be a historic day for both of our countries, and the delivery of the commitment that we made to each other.' Mr Modi, speaking via a translator, described the UK and India as 'natural partners'. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds and his Indian counterpart Piyush Goyal then formally signed the trade agreement in the great hall of Chequers. At a joint press conference in the hall, Sir Keir was invited by Mr Modi to visit India in the near future. The Indian prime minister also paid tribute to the British victims of the June plane crash outside of Ahmedabad airport, and described Britons of Indian origin as a 'living bridge' between the two countries. The ongoing England-India Test cricket clash is a 'great metaphor for our partnership', Mr Modi said, adding: 'There may be a swing and a miss at times, but we always play with a straight bat.' A brief translation error resulted in Sir Keir asking if he needed to repeat a section of his speech. But Mr Modi indicated he understood, with Sir Keir replying: 'I think we understand each other well.' As their statements drew to a close and the two leaders began to leave the room, Mr Modi jokingly asked if Sir Keir would play the grand piano next to them in the room. Sir Keir, who is known to have played several musical instruments including the piano, laughed at the suggestion. The UK-India trade deal is understood to be the largest of its kind for its economic impact on Britain. It will see tariffs on an array of British goods reduced from an average of 15% to 3%, with the aim of boosting the £11 billion of imports into the south Asian nation. Whisky tariffs will be slashed in half and will fall further over successive years, while other industries including soft drinks, cars and cosmetics are also expected to see cheaper duties. The deal is expected to result in 2,200 jobs across the country and £6 billion investment by British and Indian businesses. The UK and India are also bolstering co-operation on tackling corruption, fraud, organised crime and illegal migration, by sharing criminal records and other intelligence. But the deal has not given the UK as much access as it would have liked to India's financial and legal services industries. The agreement promises some benefits for the UK's financial services, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves understood to have pushed on behalf of the sector in discussions with her Indian counterpart. But more wide-ranging access was not agreed, and talks continue on a bilateral investment treaty aimed at protecting British investments in India and vice versa. The two nations also continue to discuss UK plans for a tax on high-carbon industries, which India believes could hit its imports unfairly. Negotiations on the deal began when Boris Johnson was prime minister in 2022, and were concluded in May this year. Shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said it had only been made possible 'because of Brexit delivered by the Conservatives'. The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has said that the signing 'sends a powerful signal that the UK is open for business and remains resolute in its commitment to free and fair trade'. Chief executive Rain Newton-Smith added: 'A trade agreement with India – one of the world's fastest-growing economies – is a springboard for long-term partnership and prosperity. UK firms can take advantage of this new platform to scale, diversify and compete on the global stage.'
