logo
The man behind Javier Milei's chainsaw

The man behind Javier Milei's chainsaw

Telegraph06-04-2025

Penetrating the bureaucracy of one of the world's most bloated states is like finding a way inside the fortress city of Minas Tirith, as imagined in The Lord of the Rings.
So spare a thought for the man whose job it is to slash and burn such a sclerotic civil service from the inside: Argentina's deregulation minister.
'It's insanity, it's like Lord of the Rings,' Federico Sturzenegger said, in reference to JRR Tolkien's capital city of Gondor, adding: 'It's like seven walls, you deregulate one and you find another.'
Mr Sturzenegger is in charge of carrying out the wishes of Javier Milei, Argentina's eccentric president, who has promised to shock the country back to life by shutting entire government departments and dragging the country out of years of Left-wing misrule.
Such is Mr Sturzenegger's eagerness he is said to have become an inspiration to Elon Musk, who has been tasked by Donald Trump to cut trillions of dollars in government waste under the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). Other leaders are also starting to pay attention.
Argentina's oversized state has over the years become a regulatory labyrinth: supermarkets were told what to stock and at what prices, while radical rent controls caused prices to surge and demand to fall off a cliff.
To tackle these laws, Mr Sturzenegger, who calls Margaret Thatcher his 'inspiration', was brought into the government in July 2024 to head up the new ministry of deregulation and state transformation, which has been moving at a phenomenal pace.
Some 672 regulatory reforms took place in the first year of Mr Milei's presidency, amounting to 1.84 deregulations per day, including weekends, according to analysis by the Cato Institute.
Mr Sturzenegger's fundamental argument for such a level of state transformation lies in the economy: inflation had soared to a staggering 300 per cent annually, while government spending and debt spiralled out of control.
The results of Mr Milei's and Mr Sturzenegger's 'shock therapy' – dubbed 'Chainsaw 1.0' – speak for themselves. Inflation and public spending are down, as is Argentina's debt burden, while confidence in the peso is rising. The country also exited recession towards the end of 2024 – a major milestone for Mr Milei's government.
Such is the perceived success of Argentina's deregulatory mission that it is being credited with inspiring Mr Musk's bureaucracy-slashing drive in the much-hyped Doge.
In fact, Mr Musk was acting directly on Mr Milei's advice, a diplomatic source told The Telegraph.
Asked whether Mr Milei and Mr Musk spoke frequently, Mr Sturzenegger, one of the president's most trusted lieutenants, was coy.
'Milei had several conversations with Musk and he told him what we were doing and how we were approaching this job. I speculate – just my speculation – those conversations made Musk understand how to use the state to reduce the state.'
Yet the relationship between the two bureaucracy slashers is hardly a secret: Mr Milei gifted Mr Musk a chainsaw on stage at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington in March.
'This is the chainsaw for bureaucracy,' Mr Musk declared.
As the former president of Argentina's Central Bank and a Harvard professor, Mr Sturzenegger, seems on the surface to be an establishment figure, the kind Mr Milei and Mr Musk are accustomed to rail against.
But he speaks about cutting the size of the state and deregulating Argentina's bureaucracy as a moral mission, claiming, much like Mr Musk, that government intervention makes people's lives worse, not better.
Even beyond their cost-cutting drive, the similarities are uncanny: both share a love of fantasy, with Mr Sturzenegger frequently comparing his mission to Lord of the Rings, while Mr Musk speaks about how The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy informs his world-view.
On a technical level, Mr Sturzenegger's ministry and Mr Musk's Doge also share similarities. The Argentine frequently refers to his 'chainsaw guys', who operate almost like a government black ops unit, identifying targets and slashing through decades of red tape.
Mr Musk, on the other hand, gave a band of tech protégés an extraordinary level of access to the government, including A-suite clearance to the General Services Administration, to slash spending.
Mr Sturzenegger and Mr Milei's project may even have wider global ramifications beyond just influencing the Trump administration.
Even Sir Keir Starmer has had a crack at tackling Britain's bloated state, abolishing NHS England, slashing foreign aid spending and planning 15 per cent cuts to the Civil Service.
But it is perhaps in Britain where Mr Musk and Mr Sturzenegger diverge: while the Tesla billionaire spent the summer attacking the UK's handling of the grooming gangs scandal and supposed lack of free speech, Mr Sturzenegger speaks of Thatcher as an 'inspiration'.
The former British prime minister is, to say the least, a contentious figure for Argentine politicians, given her role in the Falklands War. Mr Sturzenegger dismisses that, instead revering her economic reforms and referring to her biography as if it were the Bible.
He even compares his mission to Thatcher's: slashing regulation, promoting entrepreneurship and reshaping society in the name of freedom.
'She was an inspiration... in her quest for the free man and woman, in making society freer, but also in her style of government,' he said.
'You have leaders like Nelson Mandela, they're soft-spoken, they rally the masses on peace, then you have the joking guys, like Ronald Reagan, and the fighters, who are responsible for implementing a cultural change.
'I would put Lenin, Roosevelt, Thatcher in that category – and Milei.'
And unlike Mr Musk, who is reported to be on his way out of the Trump administration, Mr Sturzenegger is here to stay, explaining that drastic cuts were just part of phase one and that 'Chainsaw 2.0' was now under way.
'We used one cabinet meeting to decide what a libertarian should do and should not do, and what I have is my chainsaw guys go around the government and they say, 'Are you in the yes or the nos?' If you're in the nos, it goes,' he explained.
Around 20 per cent of Argentina's laws have been scrapped or changed, far below Mr Sturzenegger's target of 70 per cent, while 42,000 civil servants have been sacked.
'It's like air in a balloon that you're releasing. We're cleaning up on the basis of a framework that we've decided,' he said.
While the first phase undoubtedly brought some economic stability back to Argentina, it did not come without its challenges.
Tens of thousands of Argentine citizens have taken to the streets in recent weeks to protest against cuts to pensions. In March, pensioners were joined by football diehards to decry the changes, with police using water cannons and rubber bullets to disperse the protesters.
Critics argue the poor have paid the price for Mr Milei's policies as subsidies, benefits, pensions and social programmes have been cut.
The poverty rate remains high, although it fell from 53 to 38 per cent in the second half of 2024 – an enormous drop. Still, 11.3 million Argentinians live in poverty, including millions of children.
Mr Sturzenegger acknowledges that some cuts require state intervention to compensate those affected. But, he argues, most people don't need such protection and deregulation will ultimately lead to a stronger economy.
Yet, as the government embarks on its second wave of chainsaw-wielding reforms, the risk of deepening economic hardship remains.
The administration may have stabilised inflation and strengthened the peso, but it still faces pressing challenges, including securing an IMF loan to replenish foreign exchange reserves, needed to keep the peso stable and pay off debt.
Uncertainty around the IMF deal has weakened the peso by around 8 per cent in recent weeks.
The administration is in a race against time.
In 2024, Argentina's congress approved the sweeping ley bases bill, giving the government power to issue further deregulatory decrees for at least another year.
To accelerate the process, Mr Sturzenegger launched Report the Bureaucracy, a platform where citizens can highlight restrictive regulations, showing he remains resolute despite a public backlash.
'Argentina was a failed state being led by a dark administration,' he said.
'The people are the victims of this. The quest of the free man or woman is to get over the obstacles of the state. The state imposes more obstacles than the free world.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump responds to wild claims that Elon Musk took drugs at White House
Trump responds to wild claims that Elon Musk took drugs at White House

Daily Mail​

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump responds to wild claims that Elon Musk took drugs at White House

President Donald Trump answered a question about Elon Musk 's drug use while leading DOGE's efforts in Washington with a shrug on Monday. On Monday, Trump was asked about the May 30 The New York Times report that said while campaigning for Trump, Musk had been doing so much ketamine it was affecting his bladder, while also taking Ecstasy and psychadelic mushrooms. During Musk's goodbye fete in the Oval Office, which took place the day the Times' story came out, the billionaire was asked about the claims directly and responded by attacking the newspaper's 'Russiagate' reportage. 'Also, to be clear, I am NOT taking drugs! The New York Times was lying their a** off,' Musk wrote the next day on X. 'I tried *prescription* ketamine a few years ago and said so on X, so this not even news. It helps for getting out of dark mental holes, but haven't taken it since then.' During Monday's event, Trump was asked if Musk had drugs at the White House. 'I really don't know, I don't think so, I hope not,' Trump replied. He then added, 'I wish him well ... I just wish him well, very well, actually.' Trump and Musk had a remarkable falling out on Thursday that got so brutal, the SpaceX and Tesla head pushed that the president of the United States was named in the Jeffrey Epstein files. The president threatened to terminate Musk's government contracts. Musk said he'd support Trump's impeachment - and for him to be replaced by 40-year-old Vice President J.D. Vance. There were reports that said Trump planned to sell off the Tesla he purchased earlier this year to show support for Musk when liberals were boycotting and protesting at his businesses over his work leading DOGE, the Trump-created Department of Government Efficiency. 'I haven't heard that, I mean, I may move the Tesla around a little bit,' Trump told reporters Monday. He also said he'd keep Musk's Starlink system in place. Trump also said he never saw Musk get physical with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, which had also been alleged. 'No I didn't,' the president answered. 'They did have an argument, but I didn't see a lot of physicality there,' Trump said. There was, of course, cocaine found in the White House during the last administration, with the Daily Mail the first to publish pictures of the small bag. The FBI and the Secret Service investigated the discovered cocaine but a culprit was never found. The Biden White House pushed back when asked if it was possible the cocaine could have belonged to first son Hunter Biden, whose struggles with drug addiction were well known. The Biden family was enjoying a retreat at Camp David ahead of the Fourth of July holiday when the drugs were discovered in 2023. Since Trump took over, the FBI reopened a probe into the White House cocaine last month. The cocaine probe was among a number of investigations the FBI decided to reopen, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said on X.

Supreme Court just gave DOGE access to Social Security data. Here's what personal information is at stake.
Supreme Court just gave DOGE access to Social Security data. Here's what personal information is at stake.

NBC News

time13 hours ago

  • NBC News

Supreme Court just gave DOGE access to Social Security data. Here's what personal information is at stake.

The Supreme Court on Friday granted the Department of Government Efficiency access to Social Security Administration data that includes sensitive personal information of millions of Americans. The decision comes as the federal government sought a stay, or temporary suspension, after a federal judge blocked DOGE's access to that data in April. The nation's highest court granted an emergency application from the Trump administration to lift that injunction; the case is expected to proceed in lower courts. In its decision, the Supreme Court concluded the Social Security Administration may give DOGE access to agency records while the case plays out 'in order for those members to do their work.' Both the White House and the Social Security Administration called the Supreme Court decision a victory. In a statement, White House spokesperson Elizabeth Huston said it will allow the Trump administration to 'carry out commonsense efforts to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse and modernize government information systems.' Likewise, Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano in a statement said the agency 'will continue driving forward modernization efforts, streamlining government systems, and ensuring improved service and outcomes for our beneficiaries.' Yet others expressed grave concern in reaction to the decision, including Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, advocacy groups and plaintiffs in the case against DOGE and the Social Security Administration. 'This is a sad day for our democracy and a scary day for millions of people,' said the coalition of plaintiffs including American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; the American Federation of Teachers; and the Alliance for Retired Americans, who are represented by Democracy Forward. 'This ruling will enable President Trump and DOGE's affiliates to steal Americans' private and personal data,' they said, while vowing to 'use every legal tool at our disposal' to prevent the misuse of public data as the case moves forward. Millions of Americans' sensitive data at stake The dispute focuses on how much access DOGE should have to Americans' personal data. The plaintiffs filed an initial complaint in early March, stating the Social Security Administration had 'abandoned its commitment to maintaining the privacy' of the sensitive personal information of millions of Americans under DOGE's influence. The Social Security Administration collects and stores some of the 'most sensitive' personally identifiable information of millions of Americans, ranging from seniors to adults to children, the complaint notes. When applying for a Social Security number, the agency requires the disclosure of place and date of birth, citizenship, ethnicity, race, sex, phone number and mailing address. It also requires parents' names and Social Security numbers. But the agency is also privy to other personal data, including personal health information, the complaint notes. That includes: driver's license and identification information bank and credit cards birth and marriage certificates pension information home and work addresses school records immigration and naturalization records family court records employment and employer records psychological and psychiatric health records hospitalization records addiction treatment records records for HIV/AIDS tests The Social Security Administration also collects tax information, including total earnings, Social Security and Medicare wages and annual employee withholdings. DOGE has not only accessed the agency's sensitive and protected information; it has also publicly shared it, according to the complaint. The actions of the defendants, including the Social Security Administration, DOGE and leaders including former head Elon Musk, have deprived Americans of privacy protections guaranteed by federal law and made their personal information vulnerable, the complaint alleges. In her dissent, Jackson, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, notes that records show 'DOGE received far broader data access' than the Social Security Administration usually allows in fraud, waste and abuse investigations. Typically, those investigations start with high level, anonymized data, with more access to more detailed information only granted as necessary. Justice Elena Kagan also dissented in the 6-3 decision. 'The government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now – before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful,' Justice Jackson wrote. While litigation is pending, the government has asked to temporarily suspend the lower court's temporary limitations on DOGE's access to Social Security data, she noted. 'But the government fails to substantiate its stay request by showing that it or the public will suffer irreparable harm absent the court's intervention,' Justice Jackson wrote.

Poll: Trump's latest approval rating falls
Poll: Trump's latest approval rating falls

Daily Mail​

time18 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Poll: Trump's latest approval rating falls

A new poll shows that President Donald Trump's approval rating has fallen after his public feud with Elon Musk over the spending bill he is trying to push through Congress. Trump's approval rating is now at 47 percent, according to the latest Daily Mail tracking poll conducted with J.L. Partners. The majority of Republicans, 59 percent, side with Trump, while just 12 percent side with Musk. Twenty-eight percent of Republicans remain unsure. Twenty-six percent of unaffiliated Americans also support Trump, with 20 percent siding with Musk. A plurality of Democrats now side with Musk, with 35 percent now backing him rather than just ten percent who support Trump. The majority of Democrats and unaffiliated Americans, each at 54 percent, are also uncertain about who to side with, suggesting room for each figure to grow their support. Despite Musk's threat on Thursday to create a new political third-party, there is still minimal support among American voters for the idea. Just four percent of voters signal support for a Musk party while 42 percent support a Democratic candidate and 35 percent support Republicans. After hardcore Trump supporters publicly called for Musk to get deported, just 30 percent of Americans support the idea while 35 percent of opposed. Musk left the White House at the end of May ending his time as a special advisor to Trump and spearheading his effort to cut government waste, fraud, and abuse with his DOGE team. But voters are increasingly skeptical about the success of his efforts. Forty-one percent view Musk's DOGE as a failure and 33 percent view it as a success.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store