PMO asks PD for recovery-based loadshedding update
ISLAMABAD: The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) has sought an update from the Power Division on its proposed policy to legalize recovery-based loadshedding, amid continued penalties imposed by the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) on Distribution Companies (Discos) and K-Electric for implementing such load management practices in violation of regulatory laws.
This initiative is part of a broader reform agenda assigned to the Power Division by the Prime Minister, aimed at removing legal barriers to unscheduled power load shedding across the country.
However, the Ministry of Finance (MoF) has expressed reservations about the plan. It argues that while load shedding may help avoid high electricity costs in low-recovery areas, the government remains liable for capacity payments on unutilized electricity—making the overall economic rationale questionable.
HCSTSI condemns HESCO over increased load-shedding
At a public hearing on Fuel Cost Adjustment (FCA) last year, Nepra Chairman Chaudhry Waseem Mukhtar confirmed that revenue-based load shedding is currently illegal, which is why the regulator is penalizing utilities for enforcing it. He suggested that the government must legalize the practice if it intends to continue its implementation.
Following the Chairman's remarks, the Power Division began drafting a proposal titled 'Amendments in Legal Framework to Implement Economic Load Management in the Country.' The proposal aims to embed recovery-based and Aggregate Technical and Commercial (AT&C) loss-based load shedding into the legal and regulatory structure.
According to the Power Division, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif chaired a series of meetings on April 15, 18, and 25, 2024, during which he directed the division to review and suggest necessary amendments to existing laws and policies. A committee comprising representatives from the Private Power and Infrastructure Board (PPIB), Central Power Purchasing Agency (CPPA), Law Division, Nepra, and independent legal experts was formed to carry the initiative forward.
The Power Division circulated a draft summary to relevant ministries for feedback before submitting it to the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC), Cabinet Committee on Energy (CCoE), or the federal cabinet for approval.
In its feedback, the Finance Ministry noted the summary lacked empirical data to substantiate the claimed benefits. It stressed that while load shedding in high-loss areas may be justifiable to an extent, the fiscal impact of paying for idle generation capacity remains a major concern.
The Power Division, however, maintains that Discos are compelled to implement load shedding in high-loss areas due to economic constraints. With rising electricity costs from the central power pool, continuing to supply expensive power to areas with poor recoveries is financially unsustainable. Therefore, it argues, a structured and legally sanctioned load shedding mechanism is essential for the sector's financial viability.
Nevertheless, sources suggest that Nepra remains opposed to the proposed amendments and has raised serious objections.
The Finance Division reiterated its stance, emphasizing the need for the Power Division to present a detailed comparative analysis of the economic trade-offs involved. The Cabinet has asked the Power Division to clearly explain the advantages of such a policy, particularly in terms of cost avoidance and system sustainability.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Nepra's KE MYT decision: PD submits review motion
ISLAMABAD: The Power Division on Monday submitted the much-talked about review motion challenging the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority's recent Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) determinations for K-Electric (KE) for 2024-25 to 2029-30. The government is urging Nepra to revise key assumptions, performance benchmarks and profit margins in line with real-world data and standards applied to other power utilities. According to Power Division, Nepra allowed KE several cost items and profit margins that are more generous than those granted to other utilities across the country. As a result, electricity bills for Karachi consumers are set to rise disproportionately, and public finances will bear an unnecessary burden. Total financial impact is in excess of Rs 300 billion of the intervention identified for review by GoP in KE MYT. Power Minister, Sardar Awais Khan Leghari, in his tweet said that the power sector of Pakistan cannot afford any inefficiencies encouraged through tariff structure of any company, irrespective of whether it is private or public. 'Our review supports a sustainable and healthy environment in the distribution system of Pakistan in a responsible manner. Power Division hopes that the review process is carried out in a transparent and fair manner,' he added. The key concerns in the Review Petition are as follows: Supply (fuel and fuel related costs): Nepra set KE's fuel-cost rate at Rs. 15.99/kWh, whereas other utilities buy power at lower rates from the national grid. This gap shifts about Rs. 28 billion (FY 2024) and Rs. 13 billion (FY 2025) of extra costs onto the federal budget rather than onto KE customers. Recovery Loss Allowance: KE was permitted to include 'recovery losses' in its tariff even though its own records show it recovers more than the level Nepra allowed. No other utility received this special allowance. This adds roughly Rs. 36 billion in FY 2024 and Rs. 35 billion in FY 2025 to KE's revenue that consumers end up paying. Cumulative impact over a 7-year period is more than Rs 200 billion. Working Capital Allowance: NEPRA permitted KE a 24 percent markup on working capital, a much higher percentage than in its previous tariff and higher than any other power distributor. This increased KE's allowable revenue by about Rs. 2.4 billion in FY 2024 and is projected to total around Rs. 15 billion over the control period of 7 years Higher Allowed Distribution Loss: Nepra set KE's allowed loss at 13.90 percent, instead of the 13.46 percent KE had planned. Losses are electricity that is generated but not billed, due to leaks or theft, or kunda. Around 7 percent of all such leakages can be attributed to theft. By permitting a higher loss level, KE passes on an extra Rs. 3.1 billion in FY 2024, rising to about Rs. 21 billion over the control period. 'Law & Order' Margin: KE received a special 2 percent margin to offset security costs in Karachi—a perk not granted to any other utility, even those operating in equally or more volatile regions. Moreover, Law & Order in Karachi has improved considerably over the last few years, and thereby there exists no reason for such a margin. This margin adds approximately Rs. 14 billion in FY 2024 and up to Rs. 99 billion over the multi-year period to KE's revenue requirement. Retention of 'Other Income': KE is allowed to keep money from fines imposed on its contractors, interest on bank deposits, and profits from side businesses. In effect, consumers have already paid for the assets that generate these incomes, so these funds should reduce KE's costs to customers, not pad its revenue. Effectively, it is being proposed that any such gain on assets that has been financed by consumers needs to be shared with consumers. Transmission (Moving Power from Grid to KE): High transmission loss Target & skewed sharing; NEPRA allowed KE a 1.30 percent loss target, even though KE's historical losses are closer to 0.75 percent. KE keeps 75 percent of any savings if it performs better than 1.30 percent, passing only 25 percent of savings to consumers. This encourages inefficiency and keeps bills high. Financial impact is about Rs. 4 billion in FY 2024, rising to roughly Rs. 28 billion over the control period. Excessive Return on Equity (RoE): KE was granted a 12 percent RoE in U.S. dollars (about 24.46 percent in rupee terms). Other national utilities (like NTDC) receive only 15 percent RoE in rupees. This difference costs consumers around Rs. 4 billion in FY 2024 and approximately Rs. 37 billion over the control period. Distribution (delivering power to homes & businesses)- High distribution - RoE disparity: KE's distribution arm was allowed 14 percent RoE in U.S. dollars (about 29.68 percent in rupees). By comparison, other Discos like FESCO get only about 14.47 percent RoE in rupees. This adds roughly Rs. 3.7 billion in FY 2024 and Rs. 35.6 billion over the control period to KE's revenue. Distribution Loss & Special Allowance: KE was granted an extra 2 percent 'law & order' margin on top of its allowed losses, even though Karachi's security situation is similar to or better than other regions. KE also keeps 25 percent of any savings if it performs better. These practices cost consumers about Rs. 14 billion in FY 2024 and up to Rs. 99 billion over the multi-year period. Working Capital Markup: A 23.91 percent markup was approved for KE's distribution working capital—far higher than any other utility. This adds about Rs. 0.8 billion in FY 2024 and roughly Rs. 10 billion over the control period to KE's revenue requirement. Generation (KE's Own Power Plants), Payments to Idle Power Plants (Take-or-Pay): Nepra approved capacity payments to several KE power plants (BQPS-I, KCCP, KGTPS, SGTPS) even though these plants will run at minimal or no output because KE sources cheaper power from the national grid. Consumers and the government pay for capacity that is not used. This costs about Rs. 12.7 billion in FY 2025 and roughly Rs. 82.5 billion over the multi-year period. Favorable indexation &RoE for KE's plants: Under a hybrid 'take-or-pay' model, KE's plants keep full inflation adjustments (indexed to U.S. CPI or USD/PKR), while independent power producers (IPPs) do not receive equally generous terms. RoE for KE's plants was set at 17 percent (using PKR 168/USD), higher than typical IPP terms, costing Rs. 7 billion in FY 2024 and about Rs. 57.3 billion over the control period. This will result in overall higher bills for Karachi customers; KE's allowed costs, profit margins, and extra allowances will cause Karachi consumers' electricity bills to rise significantly compared to other regions. Several KE cost items—especially the inflated fuel benchmark and payments to idle plants—are effectively covered by the government, stretching public finances. The determinations are unfair treatment & efficiency discouraged: Granting KE advantages not given to other utilities creates a 'two-tier' system. This discourages KE from boosting efficiency, and it undermines transparent, consistent tariff-setting nationwide. The Government maintains that all utilities should be treated equally. KE should not receive special cost or profit allowances unavailable to other power companies and tariffs must reflect actual costs and reasonable returns. Extra allowances for inefficiency and high profit rates must be removed to keep bills affordable. For regulatory accountability Nepra should revise assumptions, benchmarks, and profit margins so they align with real performance data and the standards used for other utilities. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
ECP may summon PM, Punjab CM over LG polls delay
ISLAMABAD: The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) can summon Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Chief Minister Punjab Maryam Nawaz over continuous delay in local government elections in the country's federal capital and the largest province. This was stated by Chief Election Commissioner Sikandar Sultan Raja, Monday, heading a five-member full bench of the ECP, during the hearing on delay in LG elections in Punjab. 'The ECP cannot keep its eyes closed over this delay,' he told Punjab Local Government Minister Zeeshan Rafique. 'There should be some progress till next hearing of this case—if there's no progress, then we will issue an order regarding LG elections in Punjab—that would be embarrassing for you,' the CEC told the minister. 'Your party is in government in Punjab and at the centre. The local government elections have not been held in both the areas. On the other hand, local government elections in three provinces have been held,' Raja added. Punjab LG minister offered to share the draft of Punjab LG rules with the electoral body. The matter involving Punjab LG elections is pending with the related committee of the provincial government, he said. 'We will try to get the required legislation done as soon as possible,' Rafique said. The CEC responded that the ECP can summon the PM and the CM Punjab over delay in LG elections in Islamabad and Punjab. The case was adjourned but the next date of hearing was not fixed. Presently, the local bodies are in place in Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan and cantonment boards but LG elections in Punjab and federal capital have been facing an inordinate delay since 2021. The local bodies term in Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) expired on 14 February 2021, and in Punjab on 31 December 2021. The ECP is bound to hold LG elections within 120 days of the expiry of local bodies' term, under Section 219(4) of the Elections Act 2017. This law provides that the ECP shall hold elections to the local governments within 120 days of the expiry of the term of a local governments of a province, cantonment or ICT. Article 218(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan provides that it shall be the ECP's duty to organise and conduct the elections, and to make such arrangements as are necessary to ensure that an election is conducted honestly, justly, fairly and in accordance with law, and that corrupt practices are guarded against. The ECP says that whenever it finalises the LG polls' preparations, the LG laws are amended by the governments concerned, causing delay in the elections. According to the poll body, it carried out delimitation exercises four times in Punjab and five times in ICT for LG elections before the LG laws were amended each time by the governments concerned, shortly after the related polls schedules were issued. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
No high population growth blackmail, please
EDITORIAL: Ahsan Iqbal, the Minister for Planning Development and Special Initiatives, on the occasion of the launch of Asian Infrastructure Report 2025 by the Chinese-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) remarked on the need to revisit the major criteria for resource distribution, notably population, under the 2010 National Finance Commission award. Three extremely disturbing observations are in order. Firstly, the last NFC award was 25 years ago and this in spite of Article 160 of the constitution which stipulates that 'within six months of the commencing day and thereafter at intervals not exceeding five years, the President shall constitute a National Finance Commission consisting of the Ministers of Finance and Provincial Governments, and such persons as maybe appointed by the President after consultation with the Governors of the Provinces.' Thus while three NFC awards subsequent to the 2010 award should have been agreed and implemented all administrations representing the three national parties have been unable to reach a consensus and instead have relied on Clause 6 which states that in the event that an order has not been issued by the President because there have been no recommendations by the NFC 'the President may, by order, make such amendments or modification in the law relating to the distribution of revenues between the Federal Government and the Provincial Governments as he may deem necessary or expedient.' Secondly, the consensus on 2010 NFC award was reached after the Punjab government agreed to a percentage decrease in population as the major criteria — an agreement supported by the then Punjab Chief Minister Shehbaz Sharif for reportedly the then PPPP-led government's agreement to amend the constitution to allow for a third-time prime minister. Population component of the award was reduced to 82 percent, poverty and backwardness 10.3 percent, revenue collection or generation 5 percent and inverse population density 2.7 percent. This, in turn, accounted for Punjab's share to decline from 57.88 percent to 51.74 percent, for Sindh share to rise from 23.28 percent to 24.55 percent, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to rise from 13.54 percent to 14.62 percent and Balochistan's share to rise from 5.3 percent to 9.09 percent. There is a need to further reduce the population component of the NFC award as correctly stated by the Planning Minister as the NFC must not incentivise population growth, which is considered a major reason behind the lack of focus of all provincial governments to reduce population growth and thereby improve the percentage benefitting from social and physical infrastructure. In fact, the opposite has happened; in order to maximize the share of resources under the NFC, the number of seats in the National Assembly and quotas in federal job allocations the population figures have been grossly exaggerated. The result is that the results of all censuses carried out post-1972 (the third census was conducted, replacing the planned 1971 census due to political circumstances) have been contested and rejected by various parts of society in various parts of the country. They have been rejecting the results of censuses as being flawed, if not entirely false. Nevertheless, one can draw a lesson or two from India where the share of population in distribution of resources was significantly reduced in the NFC; and other criteria such as distance factor, tax generation, fiscal discipline, infrastructure index, forest and ecology, etc., have been introduced in the NFC. The number of seats in the Lok Sabha (lower house of parliament) stands frozen (initially frozen by Indira Gandhi for 25 years and the freeze then extended by another 25 years by Atal Behari Vajpayee. It is due to expire within the present tenure of the incumbent government); and it is unlikely to be changed on the basis of the upcoming census. In this regard, it is important to note that a number of political parties have demanded prime minister Narendra Modi give a categorical assurance in Parliament that the freeze on the number and state-wise distribution of seats in Lok Sabha will be extended for another 30 years beyond 2026. It is therefore desirable in our own national interest as well that the weight of population within the NFC formula is reduced significantly to arrest the proclivity to overstate and grossly exaggerate the population figures at the time of the national census. Needless to say, carrying out national census and announcing NFC award every 10 years are constitutional obligations and it is matter of national shame that successive governments in the country have miserably failed in fulfilling this mandatory obligations under the supreme law of the land, the supreme law that they swear to uphold under the sacred oath that they take upon assuming office of the State. They must not ignore the fact that population growth is a huge liability. In other words, a large population base with high population growth is a ticking time bomb, to say the least. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
