logo
The framing of the shrew: California students photograph mammal never caught on film

The framing of the shrew: California students photograph mammal never caught on film

The Guardian26-01-2025

In a 7,000ft-high marshy spot in the cold, rugged eastern Sierra mountains, two groups of mammals scurried around at night. One was going about their normal nocturnal routine of hunting worms. The other was hoping for a glimpse of an elusive creature: the Mount Lyell shrew, the only known California mammal never photographed alive.
The three young student scientists faced a tight timeline. They baited 150 pitfall traps – small cups dug into the earth to catch wandering creatures – with cat food and mealworms and monitored them across a 600ft area, checking each trap every two hours for any signs of their goal. They slept no more than two hours at a time. Shrews have such a fast metabolism that they die in traps quickly, one of the reasons this species had never been photographed or studied live.
Despite initial skepticism, they caught five shrews within the first 24 hours, working mostly during the night and early morning. They filmed and photographed the tiny creatures, and clipped tiny flaps of skin from the animals' ears for genetic testing later to confirm they'd caught the right species.
When he held one, Prakrit Jain, a 20-year-old student at University of California, Berkeley, and intern at the California Academy of Sciences, noticed how remarkably small and light the animals were. Less than 4in long, the lightest shrew was just a gram-and-a-half – about the weight of two paper clips. 'It was very different from holding a mouse or a hamster,' he says. 'These shrews are almost the size of an insect.'
First described a century ago, the tiny burrowing animal hadn't been seen in 20 years – and virtually nothing was known about it. The Mount Lyell shrew lives in a small range in the high Sierra Nevadas, and is considered a species of special concern, due to threats from the climate crisis to their high-altitude homes. But there have been no field studies of the animals, and the only specimens ever gathered have been dead.
'It was kind of a crazy idea,' says Vishal Subramnyan, a student at UC Berkeley and a content creator at the California Academy of Sciences. 'California is one of the most well-studied places in the world, and yet there's a mammal species in California that's never been photographed alive. That was shocking to us.'
The 22-year-old teamed up with Jain and his friend Harper Forbes, 22, a student at the University of Arizona. With only a month before the snows arrived in the winter, they had to move fast to put together an expedition. The group received a permit from California's department of fish and wildlife and headed east from the Berkeley campus in early November. (As high schoolers, Jain and Forbes had previously discovered two new-to-science scorpions in the Bay Area.)
Having photos and video of the shrew helps scientists know more about the species – and can help efforts to conserve it. Mammal specimens are often studied as skin or skeleton, or a whole animal preserved in alcohol. While those are useful to preserve animals for future study, they don't capture the way the animal appears in real life – because the skin loses its shape, and the preserved specimens in alcohol lose the color. 'Because we were able to get good photos of a few of these species, it becomes easier to identify these things in the field,' says Jain.
Shrews are a group of species that are very overlooked, but there's an extraordinary diversity within the group, Jain says. 'Many, many species of shrew are known from only a single specimen, or only known from a single locality, or have not been seen in decades,' he says. 'So if we struggle to find a shrew in a place like California – one of the best studied places in the world – you can only imagine how the shrew diversity of places like south-east Asia and central Africa, for instance, can just be so under-appreciated.'
Sign up to Headlines US
Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
Because they have such a high metabolism, shrews eat nearly constantly. They can consume their body weight or more of insects every single day – meaning in their habitats, they can have a big impact on small insects. 'There's few other animals I can think of in the ecosystems where shrews live that have a similarly high impact on the insect numbers simply just by consuming them,' Jain says.
As the climate warms, the animals are squeezed into a smaller area to maintain their habitat. The shrew probably arrived in California during the last ice age, and as the ice receded it settled into a high mountain area. But studies estimate that 50% to 90% of the Mount Lyell shrew's habitat will disappear by 2080 – putting the species in serious danger. They are also eaten by larger nocturnal predators such as owls, hawks, snakes and weasels.
Photos can not only catalog biodiversity in a rapidly changing planet, they can also help the public understand and foster a connection with an animal. 'If we look at the extinction crisis and the types of animals it's impacting, a lot of animals are disappearing without any documentation,' says Subramnyan. 'An animal like the Mount Lyell shrew, if it was not photographed or researched, could have just quietly disappeared due to climate change, and we'd have no idea about it at all.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mystery as six gray whales found dead after unusually high influx into San Francisco Bay
Mystery as six gray whales found dead after unusually high influx into San Francisco Bay

The Independent

time30-05-2025

  • The Independent

Mystery as six gray whales found dead after unusually high influx into San Francisco Bay

Six gray whales have died in the San Francisco Bay Area region in the last week, officials have said. With the additional deaths, the total number of stranded whales this year has reached 15. Of those, 14 are gray whales, according to the California Academy of Sciences and partners at The Marine Mammal Center. 'In 2025, 14 gray whales and one minke whale have died in the greater San Francisco Bay Area region, with the cause of three of the gray whale deaths determined to be suspect or probable vessel strikes,' the academy wrote in a press release Thursday. 'The Academy and partners at the Center have not responded to this many dead gray whales since the height of the Unusual Mortality Event in 2019 (14 individuals) and 2021 (15 individuals).' However, the cause of the deaths of the other whales who died between May 21 and Wednesday are undetermined. Those animals died in multiple locations, including Berkeley, Point Reyes National Seashore, and Alcatraz. 'Necropsy response efforts and data collection have been challenging for a number of cases due to inaccessible locations that hinder full post-mortem investigations, as well as poor tissue quality from advanced decomposition, and the lack of available locations to tow for further investigation,' the academy noted. However, there have also been an unusually high number of sightings around the bay, including 33 individual gray whales. That's more than five times the number of whales that were sighted last year. Of those, approximately one-third have stayed in the Bay Area for at least 20 days, some of which were emaciated. Researchers are still working to determine what's driving the massive spike in sightings, and it is expected that gray whales will remain in the area for another one or two weeks before continuing their annual northern migration to feeding grounds in the Arctic. Dozens of gray whales have died along Mexico's Baja California peninsula since the year's start, and only five mother and calf pairs were identified in Laguna San Ignacio, where wintering whales gather. One of the main causes of death for whales on both coasts are vessel strikes, and the academy and the center pointed out gray whales can be even tougher to spot in the water than humpbacks and other coastal whales. To reduce the risk, they've altered ferry lanes based on sighting data and increased communication via the U.S. Coast Guard, so boaters can be 'whale aware.' If people do see a whale in the bay, they can report the sighting using the Whale Alert app, and people who find dead marine mammals are asked to contact the Academy's department of Ornithology and Mammalogy.

Do you thrive on three hours sleep? You might have 'short sleeper syndrome', scientists say
Do you thrive on three hours sleep? You might have 'short sleeper syndrome', scientists say

Daily Mail​

time23-05-2025

  • Daily Mail​

Do you thrive on three hours sleep? You might have 'short sleeper syndrome', scientists say

We're all regularly told of the benefits of getting at least seven hours of sleep a night. But a new study has revealed that a small group of people can thrive on as little as three hours of slumber. While the rest of us would likely nod off at our desks, or start snoring on the train, they appear bright-eyed and bushy tailed. Now, experts have pinpointed a new genetic variant linked to 'short sleeper syndrome'. And it could help to develop treatments for sleep disorders such as insomnia and sleep apnoea. So, are you one of the lucky few who can flourish on just a few hours of kip? 'Our bodies continue to work when we go to bed, detoxifying themselves and repairing damage,' co-author Ying-Hui Fu, a neuroscientist at the University of California in San Francisco, told Nature. 'These people, all these functions our bodies are doing while we are sleeping, they can just perform at a higher level than we can.' Since the turn of the millennium Professor Fu and her team have been analysing the genes of short sleepers – people who can get by on six hours or less per night. So far they have identified five mutations in four genes that can contribute to the trait. This includes in one gene that helps to regulate circadian rhythm – the internal clock responsible for regulating our sleep-wake cycle. A part of the latest study, the researchers searched for new mutations in the DNA of a naturally short sleeper who slept an average of 6.3 hours per night. They discovered one in SIK3, a gene that produces a particular type of protein which sends chemical signals to other proteins to change their function. Mice engineered with the same genetic mutation also slept less, the researchers found – though not by much. These animals typically snooze for around 12 hours a day, and those with the genetic mutation slept for around 31 minutes less. The researchers found that the genetic mutation might shorten sleep by supporting the brain's ability to regulate itself and maintain a stable environment. WHAT IS 'SHORT SLEEPER SYNDROME'? Short Sleeper Syndrome (SSS), or Familial Natural Short Sleep (FNSS), is a condition where individuals can function normally with less sleep than most people, typically between four and six hours per night. However, some can thrive on as little as three hours of slumber every day. They often wake up feeling refreshed and alert, without needing to nap or sleep longer on weekends. SSS is not considered a sleep disorder, and individuals with SSS don't typically experience negative health consequences from their short sleep duration Since the mice only lost a fraction of their sleep, it indicates that the SIK3 mutation is not a major cause of reduced sleep needs, Clifford Saper, a neurologist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, said. However, it clearly does have some impact. 'This work fits very well with what is known about SIK3, and that may help us understand the basis for sleepiness,' he said. The researchers hope that finding enough mutations in naturally short sleepers could get a better idea of how sleep is regulated in people, which could lead to treatment for sleep disorders. Famous faces that didn't get much sleep include Winston Churchill and Margaret Thatcher, who allegedly got by on just four or five hours' slumber. However, for the average person, this is ill-advised. A 2022 study found that getting less than five hours of shut-eye per night in later life could raise the risk of getting a chronic illness by a fifth. Researchers looked at 7,864 British people, who were asked at the age of 50, 60 and 70 how much sleep they got on an average weeknight. These people were tracked over 25 years to see if they developed any of a list of 13 common chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease or dementia. People aged 50 getting five hours of sleep a night or fewer, compared to those sleeping for seven hours, were found 20 per cent more likely to develop one of the 13 illnesses for the first time. But they also had a higher risk of going on to get two or more of these diseases. It shows a lack of sleep is not only linked to illness in later life, but to multiple illnesses which people live with at the same time, raising their risk of hospitalisation and disability. Jo Whitmore, senior cardiac nurse at the British Heart Foundation, which helped to fund the research, said: 'This research adds to a growing body of research that highlights the importance of getting a good night's sleep.' ABOUT CIRCIDIAN RHYTHMS Our internal circadian rhythms, or circadian clock, is responsible for waking our bodies up in the morning and ensuring they get a good night's rest. In a healthy person, cortisol levels peak at around 8am, which wakes us up (in theory), and drop to their lowest at 3am the next day, before rising back to its peak five hours later. Ideally, this 8am peak will be triggered by exposure to sunlight, if not an alarm. When it does, the adrenal glands and brain will start pumping adrenaline. By mid-morning, the cortisol levels start dropping, while the adrenaline (for energy) and serotonin (a mood stabilizer) keep pumping. At midday, metabolism and core body temperature ramp up, getting us hungry and ready to eat. After noon, cortisol levels start their steady decline. Metabolism slows down and tiredness sets in. Gradually the serotonin turns into melatonin, which induces sleepiness. Our blood sugar levels decrease, and at 3am, when we are in the middle of our sleep, cortisol levels hit a 24-hour low.

Why perfume could be bad for you
Why perfume could be bad for you

Telegraph

time21-05-2025

  • Telegraph

Why perfume could be bad for you

Wearing perfume or using a fragranced body lotion could be bad for health, a study suggests. Ingredients in perfume have been shown for the first time to interfere with a protective invisible cloud around human skin that is thought to clean and filter the air we breathe. The scents are themselves harmless to human health but by interfering with the protective cloud that clings to our skin they could be diminishing the benefits it provides, scientists believe. Researchers at the University of California Irvine and Max Planck Institute discovered the skin cloud in 2022, which is technically known as an 'oxidation field'. They found that ozone in the air reacts with natural oils on the surface of our skin, such as squalene, a chemical which keeps skin supple, and creates short-lived particles called OH radicals through a process called ozonolysis, which form a protective bubble around the body. OH radicals are highly reactive and neutralise toxic molecules which has earned them the nickname 'detergents of the atmosphere' for their cleaning properties. They target pollutants in the air but also help clean surfaces. A study of four volunteers, published in the journal Science Advances, investigated what happens to the chemical cloud when people have no products on their skin, after they apply perfume, when wearing lotion and after dabbing scented essential oils on their skin. Data show that the perfume used in the study, the unisex CK One, diminished the cloud by 86 per cent, and the lotion, Unilever's Neutral Sensitive Skin, by 34 per cent. 'Affects human health' 'This study has determined that the human oxidation field generated by people exposed to ozone indoors is substantially disrupted when personal care products are worn,' the authors write. They add: 'Given that the human oxidation field influences the chemical composition of air in the breathing zone and close to the skin, it affects our intake of chemicals, which, in turn, affects human health.' Experiments found that the ethanol which makes up most perfumes diminishes the cleansing aura by converting the OH radicals into other products quickly and therefore wicks away the cloud. However, the tested lotion interferes with the cloud by preventing the crucial OH radicals from being made in the first place. Prof Jonathan Williams, of the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz, Germany, co-author of the study, told The Telegraph: 'For both these applications, the result was to actually suppress the OH field, but the suppression seems to occur through two different mechanisms. 'There may be other methods, maybe there's other ways you can influence it, but I think we've shown that, at least in those two cases, it reduces the oxidation field.' However, he added that it remains unknown whether the diminishing of the chemical body cloud is a health net positive or negative when considering every chemical and environment. 'What we've discovered here is really the phenomenon that there is an oxidation field and it can be manipulated by various forms – at least these two,' Prof Williams said. 'But I really, unfortunately, cannot give a clear message to the public of whether I recommend on a health basis to wear or avoid perfume or lotion because there is not enough information to base a recommendation.' The scientists found that not all nice smelling chemicals have a significant impact, however. Linalool, a citrus-scented essential oil which makes up about a third of lavender oil, only reduces the OH cloud by about ten per cent. 'This demonstrates that the ozonolysis of linalool, in the absence of ethanol, may not have a large impact on the OH concentration inside a room,' the scientists said. The implications for health remain unknown and will be the subject of further research, but previous studies have shown that having a plentiful supply of the chemicals that make up the protective cloud is linked to better airway function, lower inflammation, reduced biological stress, healthier blood vessels and improved blood pressure.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store