Here's how much money you should have saved for retirement based on your age
Retirement is the dream of every worker, but it can also be a source of dread and anxiety because the money needed to do so in comfort is out of reach for many Americans.
According to a recent study by Northwestern Mutual, Americans felt they would need $1.26 million saved up in order to retire comfortably.
But most people have nowhere near that, even as they approach retirement. The median net worth (meaning all of the assets and minus liabilities) of Americans between 65-74 years old is $410,000, according to the Federal Reserve Board's 2022 Survey of Consumer Finances, which is its most recently available data. And that's including everything they own — a home, savings accounts, and their retirement funds. For Americans under 35, the median net worth is just $39,040.
More than half of Americans surveyed (51 percent) told Northwestern Mutual that they think they are somewhat or very likely to outlive their savings.
75 and older
$334,700
65-74
$410,000
55-64
$364,270
45-54
$246,700
35-44
$135,300
Less than 35
$39,040
Which is unsurprising considering the median average annual salary in the US is just $59,384, according to the Social Security Administration. So how are you supposed to save for retirement without winning the lottery or hoping for an unexpected inheritance? According the advice of numerous financial institutions, it's by setting savings goals early, sticking to them, and making sure your money makes money through compound interest and investments, even if you're watching Donald Trump's tariffs send the markets plummeting.
'I think whats important now — what happens every time we have a volatile market dip — is that people read the headlines and they get scared. The younger generation might see that and decide not to invest, and that's what I fear,' Catherine Valega, a Certified Financial Planner, told The Independent. 'Look at this as an opportunity to buy stocks. Increase your contribution to your 401k or a Roth IRA. Don't let the markets scare you off, because I'll tell you what — the billionaires are all buying while everyone else is selling.'
According to Fidelity Investments' retirement planning tips, a good rule of thumb for Americans looking to retire comfortably is to save 10 times your income if you're hoping to retire by age 67. That includes money in any retirement accounts or investments, CNBC reports.
Breaking that down further by decade, Fidelity recommends that by age 30, Americans should have the equivalent of your annual salary saved up. If you're making $55,000, aim to have $55,000 saved.
By the time a worker hits 40, they should, according to the investment company, have three times their income saved. By 50, that number should be six times their income, and by 60 it should be approximately eight times their income.
That breakdown tends to be the standard shared by many financial experts with some minor disparities.
Ally Bank's breakdown for retirement saving is similar to what's presented by Fidelity; at 30, have the equivalent of your annual income in the bank, by 40 have three times your income saved, at 50 aim for five times your income, and at 60 you're recommended to have seven times your income saved up for retirement.
'We want to save as much as we can, as soon as we can, and [be investing] as aggressively as we can,' Valega told The Independent. 'It's never too early or too late to start investing, quite honestly. If you missed the boat, lets get on it now.'
Both Fidelity and Ally advise that it's important to keep in mind that those benchmarks are guidelines, and that an individual's retirement goals and personal circumstances must be factored in. And if you're not on track, remember that most others aren't either — 17 percent of Americans, regardless of age, have less than their annual income saved for retirement, according to Northwestern Mutual.
how much Fidelity recommends you have saved if you want to retire at 67
Lifestyle is another important consideration. If a worker wants to spend their retirement traveling the world, eating good food, lavishing their loved ones with substantial inheritances, those goals need to be accounted for in advance.
Where a person retires can be just as important. Some areas of the country are more expensive to live in than others. Some are more prone to disasters. Florida has long held a reputation for being the locale of choice for retirees, but repairing home and property damage caused by flooding and hurricanes can quickly eat into one's retirement savings if they don't plan for those potential costs.
'I'm in New England, and we used to advise people to retire with $2 million to have a comfortable retirement,' Valega said, who works with fairly wealthy clients. 'Now I want my clients to have $3 and $4 million saved in their retirement accounts to maintain the type of life they're accustomed to. So it depends a lot on where you live, and where you want to live.'
White
$284,310
Hispanic
$62,120
Black
$44,100
Other
$132,200
Climate, activities, and proximity to loved ones all factor into those decisions, and thus must factor in to how one plans for their retirement. If a person has loved ones in several cities, they may want to plan to save up enough money to cover transportation for visits, or enough to afford a home or an apartment with a guest room.
In order to actually manage to save up all the money needed to retire in relative comfort, financial experts suggested using a 50/30/20 budget frame work. According to the 50/30/20 framework, people should, after taxes, take 20 percent of their income and put it toward savings and debt repayment, and 50 percent should go to needs, while 30 percent should go to wants.
The money set aside for savings ideally should be placed into high yield savings accounts, retirement accounts and investments into the stock market. Taking advantage of compound interest — that is, interest that builds on interest earned — is a top recommendation from virtually all of the major retirement planning experts.
amount Americans believe they need to retire comfortably
'Given that we have more uncertainty than ever, I think it's so important to get money working for you in stocks and assets like real estate. You do want to be smart — if it comes down to someone enjoying a luxury like a trip or investing a few hundred bucks, I'd probably tell you to go with the investment,' Valega said.
A good place to start, according to Fidelity, is investing in a standard index fund that tracks the S&P 500, as its more diversified than buying individual stocks like a day trader might. Most major brokers have S&P 500 fund or ETF like Vanguard.
Perhaps the most important tip that financial experts have recommended has less to do with the technical side of budgeting and investing and more to do with perspective. All of this advice — saving more than a million dollars, hitting decade benchmarks, navigating the stock market — can seem daunting, but setting short term goals can help alleviate some of that stress, since the worst thing you can do is nothing at all.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
These 10 Historical Figures Are on U.S. Money. Here's When Harriet Tubman Will Join Them
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: American currency as we know it today has been in circulation since 1792. Founding Fathers, past presidents, and a selection of other notable historical figures appear on the country's paper bills and coins. There are ongoing efforts to add women like Harriet Tubman and Eleanor Roosevelt to U.S. money. The history of U.S. currency and the many distinguished individuals featured on American paper bills and coins is a long, winding road. Upon its founding in 1776, the United States had what was known as Continental currency in circulation for many years. Nearly two decades later, in April 1792, the U.S. dollar was created as the official American currency. The fictional Lady Liberty was the main symbol on U.S. coins at the time, but in 1909, Abraham Lincoln became the first U.S. president to appear on American money. Founding Fathers and other deceased presidents, including Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin, have since joined him. In recent years, the general public has taken an interest diversifying the people depicted on their money. New designs are being considered for cash and coins to represent a wider breadth of historical symbols and figures who have helped define America. While Harriet Tubman's portrait is set to be the new face of the $20 bill (a rollout that's still several years away), images of Martin Luther King Jr.'s 'I Have a Dream' speech, Marian Anderson's 1939 opera concert at the Lincoln Memorial, and a portrait of Eleanor Roosevelt are planned for the reverse side of the new $5 bill. The Treasury has also announced suffragists Lucretia Mott, Sojourner Truth, Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Alice Paul are expected to be featured on the reverse side of the $10 bill. Of all the redesigns, the $10 bill is expected to be the first, but it won't be ready until 2026 and will take until 2028 to be in circulation. Beyond these major redesigns, the U.S. Mint regularly releases special edition coins that often promote notable Americans. For example, the January 2025 release of the American Innovation $1 Coin, a series honoring innovation and inventors in each state, features naval engineer Raye Montague. Another series, American Women Quarters, celebrates the achievements of women, including journalist and suffragist Ida B. Wells, Girl Scouts founder Juliette Gordon Low, and tennis player Althea Gibson. To help you keep track of which famous faces regularly appear on U.S. money, we've assembled a rundown of the people and unique features on standard currency, from the penny (it's not going anywhere just yet) to the $100 bill, as of this year. To mark the centennial of President Abraham Lincoln's birth, the Lincoln penny was produced and issued in 1909. Designed by Victor David Brenner, it was the first U.S. coin that featured a portrait and the first to include the motto 'In God We Trust.' Two wheat stalks flanked the denomination's reverse side for decades (leading to this version's nickname, the wheat penny), along with the words 'United States of America' and the Latin phrase E Pluribus Unum, which translates as 'Out of many, one.' Since 2010, the tails side has featured the Union shield. This marks the most recent of the Lincoln penny's three major redesigns, with earlier overhauls in 1959 and 2009. This May, the U.S. Mint announced plans to stop producing new pennies, though the 1-cent coin will still be in circulation. In 1938, artist Felix Schlag won a U.S. Mint competition to redesign the five-cent coin. His entry for the Jefferson Nickel replaced the Buffalo Nickel that same year. From its initial production to today, the nickel continues to be one of the most popular coins in circulation among collectors. The obverse side, or heads side, shows President Thomas Jefferson's portrait with the inscriptions 'In God We Trust' and 'Liberty.' The reverse is a portrait of his Monticello plantation, along with the inscriptions E Pluribus Unum and 'United States of America.' In honor of Franklin D. Roosevelt's death in 1945, the Roosevelt dime was quickly secured and minted the following year. It replaced the Mercury dime, the version of the 10-cent coin that had been in circulation since 1916. Despite the fact that President Roosevelt led the nation through the Great Depression and most of World War II, the Roosevelt dime was actually issued in honor of his personal and philanthropic fight against polio, which led to the founding of the March of Dimes. Designed by Chief Engraver John R. Sinnock, the Roosevelt dime features the president's portrait with the word 'Liberty' on the left and 'In God We Trust' sitting below. The reverse side features a freedom torch surrounded by olive and oak branches, the symbols for peace and victory. As with other U.S. coins, the phrases 'United States of America' and E Pluribus Unum appear. The Washington quarter was first minted in 1932 in celebration of President George Washington's 200th birthday. The bicentennial committee originally wanted a temporary Washington half-dollar issued to honor the first president, but when Congress got involved, half-dollar plans were scrapped. Instead, the Washington quarter permanently replaced the Standing Liberty quarter. Although the committee vied for sculptor Laura Gardin Fraser's design of Washington's portrait, then–Treasury Secretary Andrew W. Mellon ultimately got his wish and chose the design of sculptor John Flanagan. Starting in 2022, Fraser's portrait made it on the quarter at last. The design notably features Washington facing to the right instead of the left as in Flanagan's version. For decades, an eagle and an olive branch graced the quarter's back side, but since 1999, there have been a slew of reverse side designs. This has included images to honor all 50 states as well as various national parks, historic sites, and American territories. Prominent women in history—such as actor Anna May Wong, aviator Bessie Coleman, and singer Celia Cruz—have also appeared. For one year only, in 2021, the quarter's reverse side depicted a scene of Washington crossing the Delaware. John F. Kennedy became the face of the half dollar in 1964, a year after his assassination. The obverse side of the 50-cent coin features a portrait of Kennedy designed for his presidential medal, while the reverse shows the Presidential Seal. Before JFK, the coin previously portrayed Benjamin Franklin and, from 1916 to 1947, 'Walking Liberty.' Although the Kennedy half dollar was mainly produced for annual coin sets starting in the early 21st century, the U.S. Mint began ordering them for circulation again in 2021. Designed by Glenna Goodacre, the Sacagawea Golden Dollar shows the Lemhi Shoshone woman carrying her infant son, Jean Baptiste. Thomas D. Rogers Sr. designed the reverse side of the coin, which features a soaring American bald eagle. Although the coin, issued from 2000 to 2008, was minted as a 'Golden Dollar,' it doesn't actually contain any of the precious metal. Other historical figures have appeared on additional versions of the dollar coin. This includes Susan B. Anthony as well as the first 41 presidents, with the exception Jimmy Carter, as part of the Presidential $1 Coin Program. Dollar coins are no longer in production, but you might still spot them (and use them!) in circulation. It wasn't until the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 that currency became standardized for the country's economic stability. By then, much of the design components of the $1 bill were already set in place—its color, borders, and phraseology—as they had long been in use. As one of the oldest U.S. currency designs still in use today, the $1 bill features an image of George Washington (based on Gilbert Stuart's Athenaeum Portrait) on the obverse, while the reverse shows the Great Seal of the United States. The design dates back to 1963, though Washington first graced the dollar in 1869. Before Abraham Lincoln's portrait first debuted on the $5 bill in 1914, seven other men secured a transitory spot on the denomination, including Founding Father Alexander Hamilton, Oncpapa Chief Running Antelope, and President James Garfield. The bill's current image of Lincoln is based on Anthony Berger's 1864 portrait of the president. In 1928, the reverse side was redesigned to feature the Lincoln Memorial after previously depicting a vignette of Christopher Columbus sighting land. In 2008, the $5 bill debuted a high-tech redesign to deter counterfeits. Its front includes the color purple, an imprint of The Great Seal of the United States to the right of Lincoln's face, and a band of stars. On the back, the bold purple '5' watermark at the bottom right stands most conspicuously, along with a sprinkle of yellow 5s to the top right, among its security features. Prior to Alexander Hamilton, a variety of notable figures appeared on the $10 bill, including politician Daniel Webster, explorers Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, and President Andrew Jackson. But starting in 1929, Hamilton became the statesman of choice, and the imprinted portrait you see of him today is based on a 1805 painting by John Trumbull. As the nation's first Treasury secretary, Hamilton is one of two non-presidents to be featured on U.S. paper currency (the other is Benjamin Franklin). While Hamilton's portrait is seen on the front, the reverse shows the U.S. Treasury Building. Although a great deal of new technology, such as watermarks and color-shifting ink, has been added to the $10 bill, the biggest change for this denomination is still to come. In 2015, the Treasury announced a woman would replace Hamilton as the new face of the denomination in 2020. However, due to security concerns, the redesign has been delayed until 2026. As a man who wanted to abolish paper money, President Andrew Jackson would've found it quite ironic that his face sits on the $20 bill. While he is seen on the denomination's front side, adorned with watermarks and green and peach hues, the White House is imprinted on the backside. In 2016, it was announced that abolitionist Harriet Tubman would replace Jackson as the new face of the $20 bill starting in 2020, but two years later, then–Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin announced the decision would be halted until 2028 for security reasons. President Joe Biden's administration said it was 'exploring ways to speed up' the release of the Tubman $20 in January 2021, but the change isn't scheduled to take effect until 2030. Since 1913, Civil War hero and the 18th U.S. President Ulysses S. Grant has been the face of the $50. While many people wonder why Grant was chosen to be on this particular bill, no one really knows the answer. The reverse side of Grant's portrait features the U.S. Capitol, though the earliest iterations included images of Panama, a merchant, and a battleship. Blue and red colors were added on both sides of the bill beginning in 2004, and micro-printed words such as 'Fifty' and 'USA' surround Grant's face, along with a watermark of the American flag to his right. Benjamin Franklin had many titles—Founding Father, inventor, diplomat—but U.S. president wasn't one of them. Still, Franklin began gracing one of the most desirable of denominations, the $100 bill, starting in 1914. A massive redesign in 2013 features Franklin slightly to the left of a quill pen, inkwell, and the Declaration of Independence, along with holographic watermarks and black light technology. The reverse side presents an image of Independence Hall in Philadelphia, the first building outside of Washington D.C. to be seen on any American money. You Might Also Like Nicole Richie's Surprising Adoption Story The Story of Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Her Mother Queen Camilla's Life in Photos
35 minutes ago
Karine Jean-Pierre leaves Democratic Party after serving in Biden's 'broken White House'
Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has left the Democratic Party and is now an independent, according to a press release announcing her new book, "Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines." The release from Legacy Lit, an imprint of the Hachette Book Group, said Jean-Pierre has chosen to "look beyond party lines" and is embracing "life as an independent," a decision it indicated she did not come to lightly. Jean-Pierre, who served in the Biden administration, is somewhat vague about why she no longer identifies as a Democrat, writing that she feels the current political moment necessitates "freeing ourselves of boxes." "Until January 20, I was responsible for speaking on behalf of the President of the United States," Jean-Pierre said in a statement on Wednesday. "At noon on that day, I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country." Jean-Pierre became White House press secretary on May 13, 2022, after Jen Psaki left the role, and she served in that role through the end of former President Joe Biden's term, also becoming senior adviser to the president. She was the first Black woman and openly gay person in the position, and she worked in positions under former President Barack Obama and Vice President Kamala Harris as well. Her departure from the Democratic Party comes as the party looks to regain momentum following 2024 election losses. "I determined that the danger we face as a country requires freeing ourselves of boxes," she said in the release. "We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically. We need to be clear-eyed and questioning, rather than blindly loyal and obedient as we may have been in the past." "Freeing ourselves of boxes is truly at the heart and soul of my new book, Independent," she added. Still, Jean-Pierre faced criticism in the lead-up to Biden's withdrawal from the 2024 presidential election amid questions about his health and ability to serve in office for another term. Publishers say that in the book, Jean-Pierre will provide a closer look into the White House as Biden stepped off the 2024 ticket due to "the betrayal by the Democratic Party that led to his decision." The book is set to come out on Oct. 21, nearly a year after the 2024 presidential election.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republican senators face Wall Street worries over megabill's retaliatory tax
Senate Republicans have a new headache as they wrangle President Donald Trump's megabill toward a final vote: panic on Wall Street over its proposed new retaliatory tax on certain foreign investment in the US. Corporate interests are pushing back against the bill's escalating taxes against foreign investors from countries that impose 'discriminatory' taxes on multinational business. The House included the retaliatory tax in its version of Trump's tax bill, but several Republican senators told Semafor they are weighing changes to make sure the provision doesn't stifle job creation in the US, especially in manufacturing. The House-passed tax was crafted in response to a global minimum tax plan from the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, which wants to stop multinational corporations from taking advantage of tax loopholes in jurisdictions where they operate. Trump has criticized that proposal, vowing countermeasures — and Republicans don't like the global tax, either. Still, some Republicans worry the new tax risks embroiling the US into a tit-for-tat tax war that causes blowback for companies trying to invest domestically. 'In terms of implementation, I'm going to have to get more comfortable with it. Going into it in its current form, I'm not comfortable,' Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., a staunch ally of Wall Street who serves on the tax-writing Finance Committee, said in an interview. Tillis said the possible chill on foreign companies' investment in the United States is 'why we've got to look at it … we've got to be smart about that.' The wonky yet critical fight has bubbled up over the past week as investors pored over the House bill in anticipation of potential Senate amendments. In its most basic form, the retaliatory tax would top out at 20% on corporations and individuals headquartered in countries that impose taxes deemed unfair by the United States, including global minimum corporate taxes and digital service taxes. Senators are diving into the House-passed foreign tax language, referred to as 'Section 899″ in the bill, after investors started airing their worries. Some Republicans are inclined to agree with a Wall Street Journal editorial arguing that the proposal can succeed — if other countries back off a global tax framework and avoid retaliatory taxes. There are plenty of others arguing the opposite point, though. 'I am certainly hopeful that senators will recognize that this provision will not impact bureaucrats in London, England, or Paris, France. It's going to impact American workers in places like Paris, Ky., and London, Ohio,' said Jonathan Samford, who leads the Global Business Alliance. 'It is a punitive and discriminatory tax aimed at major US employers who are guilty of nothing more than being founded abroad.' Others urging the Senate to rethink the House approach include the American Enterprise Institute, which wrote a rebuttal to the WSJ that senators 'should be cautious about enacting broad, discriminatory taxes on foreign investment, regardless of their intent.' Business publications have written multiple stories in the past week highlighting alarmed investors. GOP senators said they could change the bill but are making no commitment yet. 'There are some issues that have been raised there and we are looking at it,' Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, told Semafor. 'The issue has been raised, and we are evaluating.' Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., said 'there's a lot of nervousness about how it could be used' and that while Republicans want to push back against the global tax plans, they also 'want to make sure there's not some unintended consequences.' There are a couple problems with removing the retaliatory tax section; among them, it raises $116 billion in revenue, which means removing it would blow a further hole in the deficit. Not to mention that the House likes it. Responding to the kerfuffle on Wall Street, Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith, R-Mo., said on Wednesday that the bill arms 'President Trump with retaliatory countermeasures' and urged the Senate to quickly 'pass this bill and protect Americans from economic bad actors around the world.' Because of those factors, several senators told Semafor they expect the provision to ultimately stay in, albeit perhaps with some tweaks. Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said he expected the provision to survive the upper chamber because it prevents countries 'from supporting President Biden's global plan.' Republicans said the conference hasn't fully explored the issue yet, but that more and more people are talking about it in the Capitol. Many supporters of the retaliatory tax section say it's aimed at avoiding an escalating capital war with other countries rather than starting one. 'It's more to protect our guys from having to pay taxes unfairly in other countries,' said Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., adding that he, too, expects the provision to remain intact. We're saying, 'Hey, if you are in another country, you tax our companies, we're going to tax your companies.' So it's actually to prevent that.' Section 899 is one of the intra-GOP fights we'll be watching closely as the Senate draws closer to releasing its version of the megabill. The Wall Street freakout over the proposal hasn't been enough to totally derail it. Yet Crapo's comment that the committee is reviewing it means that it's not totally safe yet, either. Some analysts are calling Section 899 a 'revenge tax,' according to MarketWatch.
