Shein and Temu Warn Shoppers of ‘Price Adjustments' Next Week
The business models of low-priced e-commerce titans Shein and Temu will soon take a hit under President Donald Trump's new trade policies—and that spells higher prices for American shoppers, they say.
In letters to shoppers released this week, both China-founded firms dropped the hammer, saying they'd be upping prices on their impossibly cheap wares within the next week under the pressure of mounting tariffs and the closure of the de minimis exception.
More from Sourcing Journal
'Since we began serving U.S. shoppers, our goal has been simple: to offer great fashion at affordable prices while creating a positive impact in the communities we serve,' Shein said in a statement. 'Due to recent changes in global trade rules and tariffs, our operating expenses have gone up. To keep offering the products you love without compromising on quality, we will be making price adjustments starting April 25, 2025.'
Shein encouraged its users to 'shop now at today's rates,' adding that the company is doing everything it can to maintain affordability and minimize impact on consumers. 'Our team is working hard to improve your shopping experience and stay true to our mission: making fashion accessible for everyone.'
Meanwhile, Temu debuted a near-identical message to shoppers, saying it would be changing its pricing structure on April 25, as well. 'Our team is working extra hard to improve efficiency and stay true to our mission: to offer great product at affordable prices for everyone.'
It's estimated that the e-tail juggernauts collectively ship more than 1 million packages into the U.S. each day using the de minimis exception; of the 4 million parcels that enter the country using the trade tool, 2 million are from China, and at least 30 percent of all de minimis shipments are attributed to Shein and Temu.
But now that the sub-$800 duty-free loophole is closing on shipments originating in the PRC, de minimis packages from China will be subject to an informal Customs entry process. Each package that travels to the U.S. via international post (a la FedEx, UPS, or DHL) will now be subject to a tariff rate of 120 percent or $100—a rate that will increase to $200 after June 1.
This spells major trouble for both retailers, which have made their mark on U.S. shoppers with staggeringly low prices and comparably low shipping costs; Shein shoppers pay just $3.99 for standard shipping, which often takes less than a week to arrive at their doorsteps, and that fee is waived for orders over $9.90.
Finding itself at the center of a trade war may be a blow to fast-fashion phenom's London initial public offering (IPO) plans, which were approved by the U.K.'s financial watchdog Financial Conduct Authority on Friday. While Donald Tang, Shein's executive chairman, has said he's confident the company can pivot and isn't sweating the changes to U.S. trade policy, Shein spent $3.9 million on U.S. trade lobbying efforts in 2024 in an attempt to stave off the shift away from de minimis.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Senate to Keep Spectrum Sales in Tax Bill, Key Republican Says
A key Republican said senators have reached an agreement to reauthorize spectrum sales to internet companies that would generate billions of dollars in revenue toward funding US President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cuts and spending bill. Spectrum sales were included in the House version of the reconciliation package but the provision had drawn objections from South Dakota Republican Senator Mike Rounds, who previously said they risked undermining the US military's communications capabilities.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's travel ban could drive some African nations closer to America's adversaries
Donald Trump's travel ban, a purportedly security-focused measure largely targeting African nations and Muslim-majority countries, underscores his administration's ignorant and potentially destructive approach to a continent with growing global influence. In announcing the ban, Trump said it's meant to ensure the U.S. only allows people to enter who 'do not bear hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles.' Whereas the Biden administration took steps to ingratiate itself with African leaders and slough off some of the American paternalism that has driven some African nations closer to Russia and China in recent years, Trump's administration seems to have doubled down on an outmoded strategy of exploitation, conspiratorial brow-beating and ostracism. In just the first few months of Trump's second term, his administration has pressured African nations to permit Elon Musk's Starlink internet service to operate within their borders and has sought to use war-torn nations in Africa — including a country known for its human rights abuses — as landing spots for people booted from the U.S. as part of Trump's mass deportation plan. The president also personally turned the Oval Office into a screening room for bigoted conspiracy theories when he invited the president of South Africa to the White House and then bombarded him with false allegations of 'white genocide' being committed in his country. Needless to say, this hasn't helped the U.S. build on its rapport with African nations. And fundamentally, what that could mean for the U.S. is that a continent full of countries that American officials have pinpointed as crucial partners in our geopolitical strategies related to security and commerce could drift further toward our adversaries. That's certainly the vibe given off by the African Union Commission and its dozens of member states, which denounced Trump's travel ban and warned about its potential impacts. 'The Commission remains concerned about the potential negative impact of such measures on people-to-people ties, educational exchange, commercial engagement, and the broader diplomatic relations that have been carefully nurtured over decades. Africa and the United States share mutual interests in promoting peace, prosperity, and global cooperation,' the commission said in a statement, adding: 'The African Union Commission respectfully calls upon the U.S. Administration to consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned.' University of Michigan economics professor Justin Wolfers identified one clear way that Trump's travel ban could harm the American economy. 'One obvious economic implication of the latest travel ban is that genuinely international conferences will no longer be held in the U.S.,' he wrote on X. And that may just be the tip of the iceberg. It's also true that the materials used to make batteries in everything from cutting-edge cars to phones and computers most often come from African mines. Which is to say: Trump's cold shoulder toward African nations could have dire consequences for America's future, particularly with regard to the economy and U.S. national security. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DHS expedites 36 miles of border wall, waiving environmental laws
June 5 (UPI) -- The Department of Homeland Security on Thursday issued three new waivers for roughly 36 miles of a new border wall in Arizona and New Mexico. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem approved the waivers, which allow environmental laws to be disregarded for border wall construction. DHS said in a statement, "The Secretary's waiver authority allows DHS to waive environmental laws -- including the National Environmental Policy Act -- to ensure the expeditious construction of physical barriers and roads, by minimizing the risk of administrative delays." DHS said the waivers to expedite the border wall project "are critical steps to secure the southern border and reinforce our commitment to border security." The project list for border wall construction under these waivers includes three in the El Paso sector, one in the Yuma sector and three in Tucson. Funding is provided through U.S. Customs and Border Protection's Fiscal year 2020 and 2021 appropriations. President Donald Trump pushed for a border wall during his first term, promising that he would build a wall along the Mexico-U.S. border and that Mexico would pay for it. Mexico did not pay for it. About 500 miles of border wall was built during Trump's first term.
