PSA weighs selling 20% stake in CK Hutchison's ports business: sources
[SINGAPORE] PSA International is exploring the sale of its 20 per cent stake in CK Hutchison's ports business, two people with knowledge of the matter said, joining the Hong Kong conglomerate in its controversial plans to sell.
Tycoon Li Ka-shing's CK Hutchison announced last month it would sell its 80 per cent holding in the business which includes two ports along the strategically important Panama Canal to a BlackRock-led consortium. The holding has an equity value of US$14.2 billion.
US President Donald Trump hailed the deal as a 'reclaiming' of the canal. Chinese state media, however, have criticised it as a betrayal of China's interests and the country's market regulator has launched an antitrust review.
Whether PSA, a ports operator wholly owned by Singapore state investor Temasek, ultimately decides to sell will depend on whether CK Hutchison goes ahead with the transaction, the two people said. CK Hutchison and the BlackRock-led consortium have agreed to exclusive talks for 145 days.
The people, who were not willing to be identified due to the sensitivity of the issue, declined to comment on a potential sale price for PSA's stake.
PSA declined to comment. CK Hutchison did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The deal between CK Hutchison and the BlackRock consortium encompasses 43 ports in 23 countries. The business has an enterprise value, which includes debt, of US$22.8 billion.
Overall the Hong Kong conglomerate has interests in 53 ports. Ports in Hong Kong and mainland China were not included in the deal.
PSA bought its 20 per cent stake for US$4.4 billion in 2006 and has looked at selling previously. Reuters reported in late 2022 that PSA weighed a potential sale. But the two sources said it put the process on hold months later after global shipping activity weakened.
Outside of its stake in CK Hutchison, PSA has 70 terminals in 45 countries, including its two flagship ports in Singapore and Belgium, according to its website. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Global equity funds see second weekly outflow on tariff concerns
Global equity funds posted outflows for a second straight week through May 28, as risk aversion rose following U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threats on EU imports and overseas-made iPhones, alongside a spike in long-tenor bond yields. Investors pulled out a net $7.52 billion from global equity funds during the week following a net $9.48 billion worth of sales in the previous week, data from LSEG Lipper showed. In a surprise move last Friday, President Trump threatened to impose 50 per cent tariffs on European Union imports starting June 1, but later postponed the measure until July 9 after a weekend call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. In particular, Asian equity funds witnessed a significant selling pressure during the week as they lost about $6 billion in outflows, the biggest amount for a week since August 2018. Investors sold U.S. equity funds of $5.46 billion but purchased $3.64 billion worth of European equity funds, marking their seventh weekly net purchase in a row. Global bond funds attracted $15.27 billion in net inflows during the week, marking a sixth straight week of gains. U.S. bond funds drew $6.98 billion, while European and Asian bond funds added $6.23 billion and $1.27 billion, respectively. Government and high-yield bond funds also recorded inflows of $1.9 billion and $1.51 billion, respectively. Meanwhile, investors pulled $36.52 billion from money market funds, reversing the previous week's $18.71 billion in inflows. Gold and precious metals commodity funds saw $1.3 billion in inflows, snapping a five-week streak of outflows. Among 29,627 tracked emerging market funds, equity outflows slowed to $183 million from $1.4 billion the previous week, while bond funds drew $885 million, notching a fifth consecutive weekly inflow.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
The AI job suck is the China shock of today
REARVIEW-mirror policymaking seems as unavoidable as it is self-defeating. President Donald Trump is falling into this trap with his focus on reversing the past quarter-century of trade policy — trying to put the toothpaste back in its tube. In attempting to undo the so-called China shock, he is missing the opportunity to preempt collateral damage from the coming artificial intelligence shock, which will reshape labor markets over the coming decade. Even relatively positive economic changes hurt some workers. As did the decline of America's manufacturing hubs, AI is likely to prove a challenge for millions of workers. At the more apocalyptic extreme, Anthropic chief executive officer Dario Amodei told Axios this week that AI could eliminate half of entry-level white-collar jobs and push unemployment as high as 20 per cent over one to five years. While I'm not expecting anything that dire, there are subtle signs — as The Atlantic's Derek Thompson pointed out last month — that the impacts may be already materialising in the unique and recent increase of the unemployment rate for recent college graduates to the highest since 2021. Brookings Institution research projects that about 30 per cent of the workforce could see at least half of their tasks disrupted by generative AI. That could include close to 19 million people in office and administrative support; 13 million in sales and related jobs; and 10 million in business and financial operations, according to Brookings' analysis of OpenAI and Bureau of Labour Statistics data. Geographically speaking, economists Scott Abrahams and Frank Levy found that such work is most concentrated in expensive coastal areas, including the Bay Area and the nation's capital. For the government, the key is to stand ready to provide help to those who need it. The wildly uncertain fallout from AI requires modern tools for monitoring trends in employment and wages. In the China shock, the negative outcomes were concentrated in manufacturing communities. By failing to appreciate the scope of the problem early, policymakers allowed parts of the country to fall into a self-reinforcing cycle of decay, engendering a sense of unfairness and lighting a fire under a populist backlash in American politics. In contrast, the Abrahams and Levy study shows that a generative AI shock could nudge workers away from expensive coastal cities to places such as Savannah, Georgia, or Greenville, South Carolina, which offer affordable housing and economies that are less exposed to the job losses. One source of forward-looking data is online job postings, which can be mined for keywords related to AI, Abrahams told me this week. Such data is far more comprehensive than it was in earlier shocks, and it reveals in real time the areas where companies are expanding and replacing workers — and, equally important, the areas where they aren't. As Abrahams pointed out, AI's impact may play out in large part through job-leavers that go unreplaced, rather than large and obvious layoffs. In terms of the latter, improved disclosure would help. Kevin Frazier, the AI Innovation and Law Fellow at the UT Austin School of Law, has suggested updating the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, which generally requires companies to provide 60 days advance notice of closures and layoffs of 50 workers or more. Frazier has suggested that medium and large-sized firms be required to disclose 'widespread integration of new AI tools', whether or not the new technology corresponds with immediate job cuts. Though compliance could be a challenge, this would add a layer of forward-looking visibility. Frazier also wants to change the WARN policy to capture more layoffs and give communities and policymakers more time to respond. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Second, the US should make preparations to provide a strong response to any visible labour market disruptions, including getting its fiscal house in order. While some people believe that AI will eventually be so disruptive that it demands a version of Universal Basic Income, the near-term solution is likely to look like an improved and probably costlier version of Trade Adjustment Assistance, the programme rolled out during John F Kennedy's presidency to help workers sidelined by trade. That programme was too bureaucratic and small to blunt a development as big as the China shock. Any new effort would have to cut down on red tape and be better funded. Frazier has suggested businesses themselves be required to pay into rainy-day-type funds for worker retraining. Third, policymakers should make it easier for workers to move for new opportunities. Many lost jobs will be replaced by new and even better ones, but we can't take for granted that the labour supply will automatically migrate to the sectors and regions with the greatest opportunity. In fact, one key takeaway from the China shock literature is that, while the labour market migrated, many individuals didn't. David Autor, David Dorn and Gordon Hanson have found that incumbent workers were 'largely frozen in the declining manufacturing sector in their original locations'. It's not clear why so many stayed. Personal ties may have motivated some, but others may have faced financial constraints — a problem exacerbated by today's housing affordability crisis. As for Trade Adjustment Assistance, it provided only a laughable relocation allowance of no more than US$1,250, a figure that should be much larger if it's going to promote labour mobility. Finally, the US must ensure that the next generation is equipped with the skills of the future, including general AI literacy as well as domain expertise around AI and robotics engineering. The future is also likely to place a premium on the general critical thinking skills and emotional intelligence that liberal arts degrees engender. While the payoffs of higher education may become less clear, it's likely to remain essential to America's success. Policymakers can support it through thoughtfully allocated student and research grants, and immigration policies that bring the best inventors and entrepreneurs to our country. Unfortunately, Trump has paid short shrift to the AI challenge. He's spending much of his time pursuing a policy of ex post protectionism, seemingly trying to reverse the outcomes of a shock that the US inadequately prepared for a quarter century ago. Instead, if he wants to leave an economic legacy, he should take steps to ensure that AI maximally benefits Americans by mitigating the inevitable dislocations along the way. Left unaddressed, America could face another populist backlash against uneven labour market outcomes, and the Republican Party may well find itself on the wrong side of this one. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Olam secures US$1.85 billion loan
[SINGAPORE] Agribusiness giant Olam has secured a US$1.85 billion loan for general corporate purposes, said the company on Friday (May 30) via a bourse filing. The loan, which was taken by Olam Agri – the company's food, feed and fibre operating group – has a three-year tenor and will be disbursed in two tranches. The first tranche is a US$1.6 billion conventional loan, while the remaining US$250 million will be issued as an Islamic loan. For the conventional tranche, the lead arrangers are ANZ, BBVA, BNP Paribas, ING, Intesa Sanpaolo, Natixis, as well as First Abu Dhabi. These are the banks responsible for arranging and syndicating the loan. HSBC is the conventional tranche's facility agent, which is responsible for managing the loan's day-to-day activities and the relationships between the borrower and lenders. For the Islamic tranche, the lead arranger and investment agent is Dubai Islamic Bank. Shares of Olam rose 1.1 per cent, or S$0.01, to close at S$0.90 on Friday.
