Woman Who Spent 17 Years in Prison After Being Wrongfully Convicted of Murder Dies in House Fire
American Sonia "Sunny" Jacobs, who spent 17 years in jail for murders she did not commit, has died after a fire broke out in her cottage in Ireland
She and her boyfriend were wrongly convicted after two police officers were fatally shot in Florida in 1976
After her release in 1992, Jacobs, whose story was captured in books and films, advocated for the abolishment of the death penaltyAn American woman who spent almost two decades in prison for murders she did not commit has died after a fire broke out in her home in Ireland.
Sonia 'Sunny' Jacobs, 78, and Kevin Kelly were found dead on Tuesday, June 3, after her cottage caught fire in a village in County Galway, the Garda, the local police force, said in a statement obtained by PEOPLE. Kelly was her caretaker, according to her nonprofit, The Sunny Center Foundation.
Emergency responders arrived after they received an alert about the fire at 6:19 a.m. local time and found both people dead at the scene. An investigation is ongoing, and the bodies were taken to University Hospital Galway's mortuary, police added.
'The results of the postmortems, along with the findings of the technical examination, will determine the course of the Garda investigation,' the department said.
The Chief Fire Officer of Galway Fire and Rescue Services did not immediately respond to PEOPLE's requests for comment.
The deadly fire is a heartbreaking ending to a life besieged by challenges.
In 1976, Jacobs was a 28-year-old mother of two young children when she and her boyfriend, Jesse Tafero, decided to catch a ride with Tafero's acquaintance, Walter Rhodes, in Florida, The Guardian reported.
During the car ride, Rhodes fatally shot two police officers and blamed the murders on Jacobs and Tafero, who were both sentenced to death, according to the outlet.
While Tafero died after a botched execution in 1990, Jacobs, the mother of his child, spent five of her 17 years in prison on death row, the paper reported. Jacobs was freed after an appeal court resulted in a new trial, and she accepted a plea deal in 1992, according to The Irish Times. After the murders, Rhodes admitted to shooting the officers, although he later retracted his confession, The Guardian reported.
Jacobs wasn't the only one to suffer. Her children, 10-month-old daughter Christina, nine-year-old son Eric, were in the car that life-altering day in 1976. After her arrest, they were raised by Jacobs' parents until the latter died in a plane crash, according to the paper.
Despite her family's trauma, Jacobs was determined to live a life of positivity. She built a platform campaigning against the death penalty.
'It was very important, that choice I made to heal, rather than to spend the gift of a new life that I had looking backwards at the wrongs that were done to me,' Jacobs told the Times in 2006. 'And I was able to share that with my children. It meant I am leaving them a legacy of hope and strength rather than defeat and pain.'
In 2012, she married Irishman Peter Pringle, whom she had met in 1998 while making an appearance at an Amnesty International event, the paper reported. They bonded over their shared history. Pringle, who died in 2023, was acquitted of the murder of two police officers during a robbery in County Roscommon in 1980, the Times reported.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
Jacobs' story was captured in her 2008 memoir, Stolen Time, and films, including an international play, The Exonerated, which was adapted into a movie starring Susan Sarandon.
She and her late husband created the nonprofit to support other people who have been wrongfully convicted.
'We are all doing life wherever we are,' she said, according to the foundation. 'Every day must be lived to the fullest under the prevailing conditions, with an eye toward betterment. In other words, don't wait until conditions are ideal, because you may never get there.'
Read the original article on People

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Status of Epstein Files After Musk Allegation Against Trump
Elon Musk joins President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 11, 2025. Credit - Jin Watson—Getty Images The breakdown in relations between President Donald Trump and his one-time ally Elon Musk has played out over social media in spectacular fashion, with the two engaging in a tit-for-tat spat. The row initially started over politics. Musk expressed his vehement disapproval of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and encouraging people to 'kill the bill.' Meanwhile, Trump maintained that the fall-out was prompted by Musk being upset over the removal of electric vehicle subsidies—a provision that made Tesla vehicles more affordable. But the fight has since taken a far more personal turn, bolstered by Musk's allegation that Trump is listed in the files related to the late financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk said in a post shared via his social media platform, X. He did not provide evidence pertaining to this. The accusation has spurred Democrats to chase the full unsealing of the Epstein files. California Rep. Robert Garcia and Massachusetts Rep. Stephen F. Lynch—Democratic members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform—sent a letter on June 5 to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Kash Patel. 'We write with profound alarm at allegations that files relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have not been declassified and released to the American public because they personally implicate President Trump,' read the letter titled 'Is Trump Suppressing The Epstein Files?' The White House responded, saying that the move by the Oversight Committee members was 'another baseless stunt that bears no weight in fact or reality.' Here's what to know about the Epstein files and the renewed push to declassify them following Musk's allegation. On Feb. 27, Bondi released more than 100 pages of declassified documents related to Epstein—as part of the Trump Administration's vow to be more transparent regarding the high-profile case. During the presidential election, Trump promised to appease the clamoring for the alleged 'client list' of Epstein's since his arrest and subsequent death by suicide in 2019. Though Bondi called this the 'first phase' of declassified files, people were underwhelmed by the published pages, as much of the text had been redacted. Bondi's release included Epstein's 'black book,' which had previously been published. It featured names like Trump and former President Bill Clinton, but as the New York Times reported, there were people in the book with whom Epstein had never even met, and thus listed names are not necessarily connected to Epstein's activities. One of the only never-before-seen documents included in the release was an 'Evidence List' of catalogued evidence obtained by investigators. Bondi blamed the FBI for the fact that the report was incomplete, suggesting in a published letter to Patel that the FBI had more information related to Epstein. Bondi ordered Patel to deliver the rest of the investigation documents and 'conduct an immediate investigation' to understand why she had only received parts of the files. There is much discussion as to whether a fully-fledged 'Epstein client list' even exists. Jacob Shamsian, Business Insider's legal correspondent who has covered the Epstein case for years, said via social media on Feb. 27: 'I should also point out that the 'Jeffrey Epstein client list' does not exist and makes no sense on multiple levels (you think he made a list???). But if Pam Bondi wants to prove me wrong, I welcome it.' Read More: Trump Attorney General Pam Bondi Blames FBI for Incomplete 'Epstein Files' Musks' allegations have brought the Epstein files back into the spotlight, but there were already calls for them to be published in full. In April, Trump was asked by a reporter about when the next phase of the files are due to be released, to which he responded: 'I don't know. I'll speak to the Attorney General about that. I really don't know.' Since then, Democrats have continued to push for more documents to be released. Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman of New York released a statement in May, 'demanding that [Bondi] promptly release the Jeffrey Epstein Files in full.' Spurred by Musk's allegation, Democrats including Garcia, Goldman, and Lynch are now renewing these calls for more transparency. But it remains to be seen whether or not the pressure will be enough for Bondi, Patel, or Trump to provide more answers. Trump's connection to Epstein dates back decades. In a 2002 interview with New York magazine, he famously said that Epstein was 'a lot of fun to be with.' 'It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump told the reporter. In July 2019, NBC News' TODAY released unearthed video footage believed to be from 1992, which showed Trump greeting Epstein at his Mar-a-Lago estate. The two men could be seen laughing as they engaged in conversation. After Epstein's 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Trump made strides to distance himself. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office in 2019, Trump said: 'I had a falling out with him [Epstein]. I haven't spoken to him in 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you.' Contact us at letters@
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CT Veterans Alliance to collect gently used books during D-Day of Remembrance rally
HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — The Connecticut Veterans Alliance will host a book drive during a D-Day of Remembrance rally Friday in memory of Sgt. Daniel R. Keegan to benefit Operation Paperback. The event will be on Friday at the Connecticut State Capitol Building from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. The book collection will benefit American troops overseas, veterans and military families. Requested genres include: Bestsellers Action Murder mysteries Fantasy Science fiction Business and investing Classics History Current events and nonfiction Children's books Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump sends Bessent and Lutnick to haggle with Chinese on tariff war after Xi chat
Three members of Donald Trump's cabinet will meet with Chinese officials in London on Monday in an effort to deescalate or resolve the unprovoked trade war which Trump started with Beijing two months ago. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he was 'pleased to announce' that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Lutnick would travel to London along with U.S. Trade Representative Jameson Greer for a sit-down with 'Representatives of China, with reference to the Trade Deal.' He added: 'The meeting should go very well. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' The president's announcement of yet more trade talks between Washington and Beijing comes just a day after a 90-minute phone call with Chinese president Xi Jinping, which Trump described as a 'very good' discussion of 'some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal.' A day earlier, he had complained that Xi was 'VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH' in a separate Truth Social post which was made as he was reportedly pushing for a leader-to-leader call with his Chinese counterpart. Last month, Trump cut the tariffs he'd imposed on Chinese imports from a whopping 154 percent to 30 percent after Bessent and Greer met with Chinese negotiators in Switzerland to deescalate the trade war the president had kicked off on April 2, the day he declared 'Liberation Day' to mark his decision to unilaterally tax American imports of goods from nearly every nation on earth. Trump and other administration officials have been frustrated by what they describe as China's failure to relax restrictions on the export of rare earth metals, which are used in manufacturing for advanced electric motors and other electronic products, including those with military applications, while China's government has bristled at a recent decision by the U.S. to impose export controls that will prevent American companies from selling Chinese buyers software used for semiconductor design, and by plans announced by Secretary of State Marco Rubio to to 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students' who are studying in the U.S. The meeting between American and Chinese negotiators will take place amid continued uncertainty as to the viability of Trump's expansive use of tariffs as a Swiss Army knife-type policy instrument under emergency powers he has claimed using a decades-old law, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Last month, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that President Donald Trump 'exceeded his authority' when he imposed his so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs on April 2. The court also struck down the tariffs Trump imposed on Mexican, Canadian and Chinese imports with the stated aim of combatting fentanyl and drug trafficking from those countries. That decision was put on hold by an appeals court while arguments play out in the case, but Trump and his allies are making plans to use other, more well-defined authorities to continue his use of import taxes as a way of driving manufacturing to return to American shores after decades of globalization and integration of supply chains. White House officials have been plumbing the depths of the U.S. legal code to find ways to get around judicial orders and carry out the president's plans despite the rulings of what they call have labeled the 'rogue judges' that have repeatedly ruled against Trump. Trump and his advisers are understood to be looking at invoking a never-before-used section of the 1974 Trade Act known as Section 122, which allows for a 15-percent tariff to be placed on imports for up to 150 days, in order to deal with trade imbalances with other countries. During that period, the White House would then start the process to impose alternative tariffs on individual countries' exports under Section 301 of the same 1974 law. Trump used Section 301 on multiple occasions during his first term to impose tariffs on some Chinese steel and aluminum imports, but using that authority takes time because it requires a notice-and-comment period. It's unclear whether the White House will seek to employ either of those alternate strategies while the case against Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs proceeds. Doing so might be seen by the appeals court — or the Supreme Court — as a concession that the Court for International Trade's decision was, in fact, correct. More follows...