logo
Province rejects Halifax regional plan, says wetland setbacks 'impede' housing

Province rejects Halifax regional plan, says wetland setbacks 'impede' housing

CBCa day ago
The province has rejected Halifax's new plan guiding growth in the region, saying certain environmental rules will stall development.
But advocates and the city's deputy mayor say those rules are important to maintain a healthy municipality.
On Friday, Municipal Affairs Minister John Lohr said in a letter to Halifax Mayor Andy Fillmore that he could not approve the new regional plan that council passed in June.
The new plan would change a slew of bylaws and land-use planning documents across Halifax Regional Municipality, updating the current regional plan from 2014 that was last amended in May.
Lohr said while some proposals would help the housing situation in Halifax, "they didn't go far enough."
"Beyond that, the document included many proposals that appear intentionally designed to impede housing," Lohr said.
The minister said he was specifically concerned about new requirements for outlets that can accommodate electric-vehicle chargers in new homes or apartments, and increasing setbacks around watercourses and wetlands to 30 metres from 20.
"If developers can't figure out how to do a development that's not 30 metres away from a lake or wetland, well then we don't want those developments," Deputy Mayor Tony Mancini said Monday.
"The lakes are such a precious place. Why would we threaten that?"
In a release Monday, the municipality said HRM staff have been working with provincial staff for the past several months to address concerns about the regional plan.
Lohr's decision to "not approve any of the proposed amendments was not expected, given the ongoing collaboration with provincial counterparts leading up to and following the submission for approval," the release said.
Lohr's letter also said the plan made "minimal" zoning changes to allow more as-of-right housing, where structures that fit regulations can go up without development agreements. The minister did not specify where he would have liked to see more housing allowed.
Mancini said he has always been in favour of development, and the huge number of cranes around the city shows that construction is not slowing down.
Halifax has already made major zoning changes in the past few years to increase density in the urban core, allowing thousands of new as-of-right units, like through the Centre Plan and federal Housing Accelerator Fund.
"Saying there's not enough is not an answer. We need to know, you know, what specifically are you looking for that's not there?" Mancini said.
He also said a compromise could likely be reached on the electric-vehicle issue, such as keeping the outlet requirement for multi-unit buildings but not for single-family homes.
CBC News asked to speak with Fillmore on Monday, but the mayor's office sent a statement instead.
Fillmore said in the statement that he has heard "serious concerns" from the homebuilding industry that the new regional plan added "significant cost and regulatory burden" to development.
"In this context, it is not entirely surprising that the plan was rejected, given the province's focus on building homes," Fillmore said.
In his letter, Lohr said his department and the Department of Growth and Development will work with Halifax staff to review the policies and "develop a new, more practical, citizen-focused" regional plan, as well as the upcoming plan to guide suburban growth.
Jillian Ramsay, sustainable cities co-ordinator with the Ecology Action Centre, said increasing the watercourse setback was a "huge win" that was called for by multiple community groups.
She said Lohr's letter shows the PC government is committed to putting "developer interests over community needs."
"We're really disappointed to see the province is backtracking, especially in the face of all of the fires that we're having in the province right now, where wetlands act as fire breaks and need to be protected for the safety of our communities and for future developments as well," Ramsay said.
She said the regional plan already had a clause enabling people who wanted to build within the watercourse buffer zone to go through a development agreement option.
"It was almost barely a protection in its own right and it's still being walked back," Ramsay said.
This is the latest move from the province to intervene on municipal issues in Halifax.
Recent examples include Premier Tim Houston's direction for council to reverse its decision on a bike lane design, and consideration of strong mayor powers.
"This is a new environment for us where we have the province stepping in. You know, some say it's an overreach — they do have the authority to do that. Should they do it? There's another issue, but we've got to figure out how to make this work," Mancini said.
The PC government also required Halifax to put minimum planning rules in the regional plan itself, like allowing residential uses in most zones and removing bedroom-unit requirements.
It has also created 16 special planning areas around Halifax where the province controls new development, not the city. More than 57,200 new housing units are being built through those areas alone.
Council is expected to discuss Lohr's rejection of the regional plan at its next meeting on Aug. 19.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Quebec says Bill 21 opponents are trying to overturn established law
Quebec says Bill 21 opponents are trying to overturn established law

Globe and Mail

time17 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Quebec says Bill 21 opponents are trying to overturn established law

The Quebec government says legal opponents challenging its secularism law at the Supreme Court of Canada are merely rehashing old, failed arguments in an effort to overturn established legal precedent. On Tuesday, Quebec filed 100 pages of legal arguments to the Supreme Court ahead of a hearing in which it will defend Bill 21 in court for a third time. The province won two previous decisions in the lower courts in Quebec, which led to the current appeal at the Supreme Court. Quebec's Bill 21, enacted in 2019, bans public sector workers, including teachers, from wearing religious symbols such as hijabs on the job. The province's goal is to promote secularism in Quebec, but critics argue it is an attack on minority rights. Record number of groups to speak at Supreme Court case against Quebec secularism law Quebec has won two court battles for overriding Charter rights to implement its secularism law. Now the fight hits the Supreme Court The Bill 21 case represents a landmark hearing at the Supreme Court, where the country's top court will consider governments' ability to override the rights and freedoms of Canadians in detail for the first time in almost four decades. The provincial government used Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the notwithstanding clause, to shield the secularism law from constitutional challenges on the basis of freedom of religion and other rights. The province's Tuesday filing says opponents are trying to circumvent its proper use of Section 33. In French, the filing says such arguments are asking the Supreme Court 'to amend established law.' Quebec further said its opponents are using legal arguments that have previously failed and that the challengers have not exposed errors in last year's Quebec Court of Appeal decision on Bill 21, which broadly upheld the provincial government's actions. The appeal court, Quebec said in its filing, 'conducted a detailed and meticulous analysis of all the arguments raised by the appellants and rightly dismissed them.' The key precedent is a 1988 case called Ford, where the Supreme Court considered Section 33 on a narrow legal basis but didn't delve in deeper questions about the notwithstanding clause. The Supreme Court at the time said the 'essential requirement' is for a government that uses Section 33 to name the Charter sections it aims to override. The basis of Quebec's Bill 21 argument is that the Ford decision is a precedent that should not be reconsidered. In Bill 21, Quebec stated it was using Section 33 to override the 10 sections of the Charter to which the notwithstanding clause can apply. But in the decades since Ford, and especially in recent years as more provincial governments have used Section 33 to shield laws, legal academics and others have argued there may be more for the top court to say about the notwithstanding clause. That includes whether it can be invoked pre-emptively, as Quebec did with Bill 21, or whether a court can declare rights have been violated even if a law is allowed to continue to operate because of Section 33. This week, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal said there is room for such judicial declarations. Last year, the Quebec appeal court came to the opposite conclusion. Six groups are appealing last year's Quebec Court of Appeal decision. They filed their legal arguments in mid-April. The appellants want the Supreme Court to overturn Bill 21. Among the arguments is a call to reconsider the 1988 Ford precedent. Further arguments include looking at other parts of the Charter, the Constitution, Canada's history and the limits of provincial powers to question the validity of Quebec's use of Section 33 in Bill 21. In Quebec's arguments filed Tuesday, the province said the Bill 21 case 'does not raise any new issues distinct from those considered in Ford.' Quebec then suggested that two of the appellants are effectively trying to rewrite Section 33 of the Charter 'to add conditions that are not found there.' A Bill 21 hearing has not been scheduled, but it could happen this winter. Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard Wagner has said it could be heard over three days. Most Supreme Court hearings take one day; rare cases occupy two days. The landmark Bill 21 case has attracted a record number of intervenors, as 38 outside groups will present written legal arguments to the court by mid-September. The federal government is also set to file its legal arguments at the same time, alongside six provincial attorneys-general, including Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta. Ottawa has previously expressed concern about provincial governments pre-emptively invoking Section 33.

Former CEO facing legal action from company over allegedly misusing funds
Former CEO facing legal action from company over allegedly misusing funds

CTV News

time17 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Former CEO facing legal action from company over allegedly misusing funds

The Manitoba Law Courts building in Winnipeg on Wednesday, May 8, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/John Woods A Winnipeg-based business that helps nonprofits fundraise with online raffles has filed a lawsuit against its co-founder, alleging he misused funds being held in trust for charities and other organizations. Nicholas Tenszen, who served as the CEO and president of Funding Change from June 1, 2021, to July 8, 2024, is facing legal action for an unspecified amount, including punitive damages, according to a statement of claim filed in Manitoba's Court of King's Bench earlier this month. The lawsuit alleges that Tenszen, 'who had complete access and control over Funding Change's finances and operations, including control over the trust funds and payroll,' processed payments directly to himself without the knowledge or consent of its board of directors from August 2022 to July 2024. The court filing says Tenszen used the trust funds to pay operational expenses of Funding Change, breaching the company's trust obligations and the terms and conditions of its licence issued by the Liquor, Gaming and Cannabis Authority of Manitoba (LGCA). This resulted in 'Funding Change being unable to pay charities raffle proceeds in a timely matter, or at all,' according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit claims that Tenszen also used funds belonging to Funding Change to pay for personal expenses and failed to pay company liabilities to the Canada Revenue Agency. A Winnipeg Police Service spokesperson said that no criminal investigation is ongoing and that no report has been received regarding the incident. The lawsuit says that after Funding Change discovered 'significant financial and other improprieties,' it disclosed the findings to the LGCA which prompted 'emergency financing in order to maintain the integrity of its obligations to charities and liquidity of its operations.' The company also revoked Tenszen's signing authority and he was removed as a director of Funding Change, according to the lawsuit. The court filing says he later resigned as its CEO and president. The lawsuit says the LGCA conducted an investigation into Funding Change from July 2024 to November 2024, concluding that the company made 'inaccurate and untimely payments of the trust funds' during the period in which the finances and operations were controlled by Tenszen. Funding Change's licence with LGCA was ultimately renewed, though it included 'special terms and conditions, including that (Tenszen) could not be responsible for financial decisions or for the management or operation of Funding Change's business,' per the statement of claim. '(Tenszen's) foregoing conduct was malicious, deliberate, in bad faith, for improper purposes, and was in wanton disregard of (Funding Change)'s rights and ought to offend the community's sense of fair play,' says the lawsuit. Tenszen could not be reached for comment. Funding Change's website said it has completed over 2,300 raffles with a wide range of organizations—such as sports teams, schools, parent councils, festivals and health foundations—with total raffle sales over $19 million. 'Funding Change is stronger than ever': chair In a statement obtained through the company's lawyer, Funding Change chair David Asper said the company is 'stronger than ever' following changes to its leadership and finances. 'We moved quickly to refinance the business so that no partner would be negatively affected, and we immediately resolved outstanding matters with the CRA and other creditors,' said Asper. Asper said Funding Change has also engaged with an accounting firm to complete a thorough and independent audit. Jamie Gowryluk has been appointed as the company's new president and chief operating officer. No statement of defence has been filed and the allegations have not been proven in court.

Black-owned business owners in Little Jamaica seek supports after dozens of stores close during LRT construction
Black-owned business owners in Little Jamaica seek supports after dozens of stores close during LRT construction

CTV News

time17 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Black-owned business owners in Little Jamaica seek supports after dozens of stores close during LRT construction

Dozens of Black-owned businesses have closed in Little Jamaica since the start of the Eglinton LRT construction 15 years ago, and it's time governments step up to support local shops, owners say. Traffic lanes are open and new wide sidewalks are ready for foot traffic to return, but it's not business as usual. This week is Rastafest on Eglinton Avenue West and organizers believe it's an ideal time to welcome many back to the neighbourhood. They want people to know even though the LRT isn't open, the construction has ended. 'No joke we have really good food down here, and you will not be disappointed,' said Kingston 12 owner Gordon Gennetho, who is taking advantage of the new sidewalk to cook delicious jerk chicken and specializes in Jamaican dishes. Since LRT construction began about 30 black-owned businesses between Marlee and Keele streets have closed. 'Literally the sidewalk was closed, 100 per cent closed, you couldn't get around, especially there was lots of dust so you couldn't even open the doors for the customers to come in,' Gennetho said. Gordon Gennetho, owner Kingston 12 Gordon Gennetho is the owner of Kingston 12 in Toronto's Little jamaica neighbourhood. Down the street, Maxwell Blackwood has been doing business in the area for 40 years. 'This LRT devastated actually this community and what is so troublesome about it, it just looks like they don't care,' said Blackwood, who owns Black Diamond Gallery and Art. 'Anyone can delay something but when they behave like nothing is happening, that's really troubling.' He and other black owned businesses are calling on all levels of government to support this historically and culturally rich area with Caribbean roots so that it remains vibrant. They say developers have moved in, buying up buildings, which is driving up rents. 'A lot of incentives are going to the developers who are building the condos, but not the business owners. The business owners need financial incentives so we can stay afloat, pay our rent, survive as business owners,' Masani Montague, owner of the production company Studio M and Rastafest, told CTV News Toronto. In an email to CTV News Toronto, Metrolinx said roads in the area of Little Jamaica were opened up in summer 2023. 'We understand that construction can be challenging for local businesses. To support businesses during construction, we created a Community Benefits and Supports program. To date, this program has provided $171.2 million to local businesses and social enterprises,' the provincial transportation agency said it also worked with local businesses to provide supports through three City-led programs and formed a Construction Liaison Committee in the area. 'We are thankful to local businesses for their patience during construction. Metrolinx will continue to support local BIAs and businesses and the LRT will bring thousands of people into communities across midtown, providing significant positive benefits to local businesses,' it added. Rastafest, meanwhile, will be running through the weekend in the community. Organizers say in addition to sales, activities, and a street market, attendees can expect lots of food and entertainment. It's an opportunity show off the people, the tastes, and the culture in Little Jamaica, they say.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store