‘Our silence didn't protect him': daughter pleads for father on death row in Iran
Many of the wounded were too afraid to seek hospital care after reports of secret police patrolling wards, interrogating patients and detaining injured protesters. By helping, Babamiri, a 47-year-old fruit and vegetable farmer, did not see himself as a revolutionary but simply as someone doing what was right, says his daughter, Zhino.
'There was intense firing from the forces and many protesters were injured. Everyone was helping each other and he volunteered,' she says.
'I told him not to talk about it openly on the phone, but he said it wasn't dangerous to help injured people. He just couldn't watch young people bleed in the streets.'
Babamiri was arrested in April 2023 and questioned by the ministry of intelligence in Bukan. Zhino, 24, says the family initially believed it was a brief interrogation. 'I was told [by relatives] not to worry and that he'd be home soon,' she says.
Instead, he disappeared into solitary confinement and was initially denied access to a lawyer or contact with his family, the Kurdish Human Rights Network says.
Last week, the family heard from a lawyer that Babamiri had been sentenced to death, along with four other Kurdish men, after being charged with 'armed insurrection', 'leading and forming an armed group' and 'espionage for Israel'.
Zhino, who lives in exile in Norway, says the family have been horrified by the verdict. 'When I heard about the death sentence, I was numb. When I called my grandmother and aunt, they were crying loudly. I have never heard them cry like that.'
Since his arrest, Zhino says several people have come forward with stories of how her father helped save their lives.
'These charges have been fabricated. My dad is a simple farmer who loves the people of his community and his family. He is a man who loves poems, likes watching news and enjoys working out,' she says.
In July 2024, Iranian state media aired a video showing Babamiri confessing, alongside other men charged in the same case. Human rights groups say his conviction was based on a forced confession.
In a letter later smuggled out of prison to the family, Babamiri described enduring more than four months of torture, including waterboarding, electric shocks, mock executions, and beatings that left him partially deaf.
'When I first read the letter, I skipped the parts about torture. I couldn't bear to see what they did to him,' says Zhino.
Sign up to Global Dispatch
Get a different world view with a roundup of the best news, features and pictures, curated by our global development team
after newsletter promotion
Amnesty International says Babamiri's arrest in 2023 came during a wave of detentions and executions of students and activists after the 2022 protests, part of the Iranian regime's campaign to instil fear and maintain control.
Amnesty has also repeatedly documented the regime's arbitrary arrest and detention of Kurds – an ethnic minority in Iran – based on perceived affiliations with opposition groups, often without credible evidence.
'My dad and the others are paying the price for simply being born Kurdish,' says Zhino. 'They told him no one would care if he died and that he'd end up in a mass grave.'
Zhino says members of her family still living in Iran are fearful, and that she was advised by well-wishers to stay quiet after his arrest. 'I regret that. The silence didn't protect him and it almost broke me,' she says.
She has become an outspoken campaigner, co-founding Daughters of Justice, a group of Iranians fighting to save their imprisoned fathers.
In her most recent phone call with her father, he could not hear her. 'He kept saying, 'Zhino, are you there?'. I could hear him, but he couldn't hear me. I was crying. That moment haunts me.'
She now waits every day for news of his fate. 'I am scared to check my phone,' she says. 'I'm terrified I'll wake up to read my father's name [on the death list].'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Veteran journalist reveals his private talks with Trump
When history teachers of the future attempt to explain Donald J. Trump to bewildered students, they may reach for the usual adjectives — bombastic, disruptive, idiosyncratic, theatrical. But the most accurate descriptor might be simpler: Decisive. Not always right. Not always tactful. Not always early. But always decisive — on his own terms. Covering Trump over a two-decade span has taught me many things. Topmost amongst them: whatever else he is, Trump is a singular decision-making machine. His presidency, for all its chaos and contradiction, has revealed a consistent internal logic behind the madness — call it instinctual realism, or perhaps just gut-based governance. Either way, the former real estate mogul, reality TV impresario, and now, for the second time, commander-in-chief, has honed a seven-step process for making decisions that only Trump could pull off — and only Trump would dare try. And if this Trumpian process feels curiously designed for a live camera feed? Well, that's because it is. 1. Know Who to Ask (Even If It's a Golf Caddy) Conventional presidents lean on national security advisors and policy briefings. Trump? He'll ask the gardener at Mar-a-Lago if bombing Iran seems like a good idea. That's not a joke. Trump consults generals and cabinet members, to be sure — but also Bedminster Club members, business pals, restaurant servers, and occasionally his kids. These on-the-fly dialogues might seem random and unserious, but here's the kicker: Trump has a very high human intelligence radar. He knows how to extract insights from unexpected sources, and he values street smarts as much as Ivy pedigrees. 2. History Buff in a Red Hat Trump is not generally considered a scholar or an intellectual, and he has been derided for occasionally confusing historical facts or offering up sham data. Yet, as I have observed in private conversations with Trump and from his public statements, the president is surprisingly astute and knowledgeable about past events and the lessons they offer. Trump's fascination with his presidential brethren is genuine. He drops obscure facts about John Adams and Dwight Eisenhower with the glee of a 'Jeopardy!' contestant. His Oval Office décor is part war room and part presidential history museum. He channels Nixon's 'madman theory,' Reagan's crackerjack camera instincts, and even Clinton's political elasticity. This isn't mere cosplay. It's tactical. Trump sees history as both a cautionary tale and as a playbook. He studies the winners and the losers, not only to avoid short-term quicksand and grasp splashy successes, but to keep an eye on the long-term allure of his legacy. 3. Deadlines Are for Mortals Tell Trump on Monday that he needs to decide by Wednesday, and he'll circle back around on Friday… of the following month. The man does not operate on government time. Trump decides when he's ready and not a moment before. That nebulous schedule frustrates some staffers, foreign leaders, and journalists — but it's also part of his process. A swift Trump decision is a rare thing; he marinates, digests, delays. And then, in a snap, when everyone else has moved on, he acts. Trump's tacit motto? 'Make no decision before its time.' He is the sort of person who arrives late for a neighborhood tag sale and walks off with the priceless artifact. 4. Match the Method to the Moment Some bureaucratic choices are moral. Others are strategic. Trump doesn't pretend one size fits all. While Bush 43 sometimes made decisions by gut and Obama by measured deliberation, Trump toggles between instinct and data based on what the moment demands. When he sent bombs to Iran, it wasn't about ideology — it was about leverage. When he changes his tariff play, it isn't always about doctrine — it is about control. And his goal is to maintain that control for the remainder of his term and beyond. 5. Execution Is Everything For Trump, a decision isn't over when it's made — it's just beginning. Think of the 2023 catastrophe in East Palestine, Ohio, during the Biden Administration, when a train derailment spilled highly toxic chemicals into the region. Most politicians would have issued a brief statement from afar. Trump, in the middle of his presidential campaign, flew straight to the disaster site, connected the small-town tragedy to big-time governmental implications, and created a viral campaign moment that he would later echo with his iconic visit to a Pennsylvania McDonald's in October 2024, mere weeks before the 2024 presidential election. To Trump, therefore, implementation is as significant as the choice. His mind is a movie set. Every detail matters. The head shots, the applause lines, the backdrop, the lighting, the cast of characters. And Trump is not just the star. He's the director, the screenwriter, the cameraman, and the publicist. 6. Frame It Before They Do One of the oldest lessons in politics remains one of the most important: define yourself before others do. Trump follows this directive with religious fervor — only his church is built with social media posts and mugshot merch. Trump not only makes decisions, he narrates, reframes, rebrands, and rewinds them. The media can chase the story, but Trump keeps control of the narrative. This is why he never fears flip-flopping, a conundrum that has felled many a politician in the past. For Trump, flips-flops are for the weak, but changing your mind is for the strong — if you know how to sell it. And no president, other than FDR or Clinton, has ever sold decisions quite like Trump. 7. Trust the Gut In the end, after all the Oval Office powwows, the family meetings, the phone calls with foreign leaders, the Fox News hits, the Mar-a-Lago tête-à-têtes, Trump always returns to the one thing he trusts the most: his instincts. Trump may experience the same doubts as any president who must make global-scale decisions. But when judgment day arrives, Trump follows his internal compass. Sometimes that leads him into storms. Sometimes it lands him a bullseye. Either way, he owns it. When Trump makes mistakes, he doesn't obsess, he pivots past them. And while other presidents may anguish over moral reckonings and political consequences, Trump is confident that decisive leadership is the real virtue. Better to act and adjust than dither and decay. So, what does it all add up to? It's not 'Game Theory.' It's not 'Decision Points.' It's not even 'The Art of the Deal.' It's Trumpian, modern, perhaps uniquely American. The result is a presidency that operates like a casino floor, a cable set, a boardroom, and a battlefield — all at once. Call it chaotic, call it clever, call it dangerous, but don't call it accidental. Because, as strange as it may seem, this is the plan. And whether President Trump ultimately will end up as a transformational leader or a foundering maverick, one thing's clear: Trump is the decider's decider. And he's still not done deciding. Mark Halperin is the editor-in-chief and host of the interactive live video platform 2WAY and the host of the video podcast 'Next Up' on the Megyn Kelly network.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Two Israeli rights groups say their country is committing genocide in Gaza
Two prominent Israeli rights groups on Monday said their country is committing genocide in Gaza, the first time that local Jewish-led organizations have made such accusations against Israel during nearly 22 months of war. The claims by B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel add to an explosive debate over whether Israel's military offensive in Gaza — launched in response to Hamas' deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attack — amounts to genocide. The Palestinians, their supporters and international human rights groups make that claim, and the International Court of Justice is hearing a genocide case filed by South Africa against Israel. But in Israel, founded in the wake of the Holocaust, even the government's strongest critics have largely refrained from making such accusations. That's because of the deep sensitivities and strong memories of the Nazi genocide of Europe's Jews, and because many in Israel view the war in Gaza as a justified response to the deadliest attack in the country's history and not an attempt at extermination. Shattering a taboo in Israel The rights groups, while prominent and respected internationally, are considered in Israel to be on the political fringe, and their views are not representative of the vast majority of Israelis. But having the allegation of genocide come from Israeli voices shatters a taboo in a society that has been reticent to criticize Israel's conduct in Gaza. Guy Shalev, director of Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, said the Jewish-Israeli public often dismisses accusations of genocide as antisemitic or biased against Israel. 'Perhaps human rights groups based in Israel, and coming to this conclusion, is a way to confront that accusation and get people to acknowledge the reality,' he said. Israel asserts that it is fighting an existential war and abides by international law. It has rejected genocide allegations as antisemitic. It is challenging such allegations at the International Court of Justice, and it has rejected the International Criminal Court's allegations that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant committed war crimes in Gaza. Both face international arrest warrants. Israel's government on Monday didn't immediately comment on the reports by B'Tselem and PHRI. Israeli officials largely blame civilian deaths in Gaza on Hamas, saying it uses civilians as shields by embedding militants in residential areas. The reports echo international claims The rights groups, in separate reports released jointly, said Israel's policies in Gaza, statements by senior officials about its goals there and the systematic dismantling of the territory's health system contributed to their conclusion of genocide. Their claims echoed those of previous reports from international rights groups like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. Like other rights groups, B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel have not been allowed into Gaza during the war. Their reports are based on testimonies, documents, eyewitnesses and consultations with legal experts. Hamas' attack on Israel that started the war sparked a shift in the country's policy toward Palestinians in Gaza from 'repression and control to destruction and annihilation,' B'Tselem said. The group has long been outspoken about Israel's treatment of Palestinians. It halted cooperation with the military nearly a decade ago, saying the army's investigations into wrongdoing weren't serious, and it has accused Israel of being an apartheid state. The PHRI report was a detailed, legal-medical analysis focusing on what it called the step-by-step dismantling of Gaza's health and life-sustaining systems including electricity, clean water and access to food. Its report says Israel has committed three of the acts of genocide defined by international law, including 'deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.' The Israeli rights groups said repeated statements by Israeli officials and the military endorsing the total destruction, starvation and permanent displacement of Palestinians in Gaza, combined with policies on the ground, have demonstrated that Israel is intentionally trying to destroy Palestinian society. A 'painful' conclusion The term 'genocide' strikes a chord in Israel, where Israelis grow up learning about the Holocaust and hearing survivors' harrowing stories, while promising it would never happen again. The 1948 Convention of the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide was drawn up in the aftermath of World War II and the murder by Nazi Germany of 6 million Jews. It defines genocide as acts 'committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.' 'As the grandson of a Holocaust survivor, it's very painful for me to be reaching this conclusion,' said Shalev from PHRI. But after growing up in a society where the Holocaust was so important, it demands some kind of responsibility, he said. Until now, Israeli criticism of the war in Gaza has been focused on Netanyahu and whether his wartime decision-making has been politically motivated and delayed the return of hostages — 50 of them still in Gaza. Broader scrutiny of Israel's conduct in Gaza has been limited for multiple reasons. Despite the vast destruction and death in the territory and Israel's growing international isolation, most Israelis have believed for much of the war in its righteousness. And with most Jewish Israelis serving in the army, it's difficult for most people to fathom that their relatives in uniform could be carrying out genocide. Some soldiers, however, have refused to fight in the war. Jeffrey Herf, a historian who has published much on antisemitism, said the allegation of genocide doesn't take into account that there is a war between two parties. He said it ignores Hamas as a military force and Israel's right to defend itself. Israelis' focus is on the hostages, not Palestinians After groups like B'Tselem in recent years accused Israel of apartheid, more mainstream voices in Israel also picked up the claim, although in less sweeping ways. Israeli historian Tom Segev said he's not sure the new reports and their allegations will have an impact on the public. 'The major thing for Israelis is a question of the hostages, not necessarily the fate of the population in Gaza,' he said. But he said what's happening in Gaza is undermining the ideological and moral justification for the existence of Israel. The rights groups said the international community hasn't done enough to protect Palestinians and are calling on the world, including Israelis who have stayed silent, to speak up. 'We have an obligation to do everything we can to speak the truth about this, to stand by the victims,' said Sarit Michaeli, the international director for B'Tselem.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
U.N. nuclear watchdog chief says Iran ready to restart technical conversations
SINGAPORE, July 25 (Reuters) - Iran has indicated that it will be ready to restart technical-level discussions on its nuclear programme with the United Nations nuclear watchdog, IAEA head Rafael Grossi said on Friday. The International Atomic Energy Agency has said it must be allowed to resume inspections after Israeli and U.S. airstrikes last month that aimed to destroy Iran's nuclear programme and deny it the capacity to build a nuclear weapon. Rafael Grossi said in Singapore that Iran must be transparent about its facilities and activities. He told reporters alongside a public lecture that the IAEA had proposed that Iran start discussions on "the modalities as to how to restart or begin (inspections) again". "So this is what we are planning to do, perhaps starting on technical details and, later on, moving on to high level consultations," Grossi said, adding that technical teams sent to Iran for talks will not include inspectors yet. On Wednesday, Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said Iran had agreed to allow a technical team from the IAEA to visit in the coming weeks, but not to go to the nuclear sites. Tehran, which denies seeking to build a nuclear weapon, has said access to the bombed sites poses security and safety risks. Grossi said he had no further information from Iran on the status and whereabouts of its stock of some 400 kg of highly enriched uranium. "This is why it is so important that we engage as soon as possible and that we can start our inspection," he said. (This story has been corrected to remove the attribution of the phrase 'So this will not include inspections yet' to Grossi in paragraph 6)
