The Best Cities To Live In, According To The Global Liveability Index
The release of the 2025 Global Liveability Index from the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) has seen a new city take the crown as the world's most liveable. After three years at the top of the rankings, Austria's capital Vienna has finally been usurped by Denmark's capital city, Copenhagen.
Welcome to the world's best city to live in. Copenhagen achieved near perfect scores across the board.
The EIU's annual index assesses 173 locations around the world, ranking their liveability based on a variety of indicators and criteria. This ranking attempts to quantify the challenges someone might face to their lifestyle in any of the given locations, to help assess which offer the best and worst living conditions.
Each city is measured across 30+ qualitative and quantitative factors in five categories described as stability, healthcare, culture and environment, education, and infrastructure. Qualitative factors are decided by a panel of expert EIU analysts and in-city contributors. Quantitative factors are based on the relative performance of a range of external data points. Each factor is then assigned a rating as acceptable, tolerable, uncomfortable, undesirable or intolerable.
The EIU Index then assigns a score to each category, which are compiled and weighted to create an easy reference 1-100 score, where 1 is intolerable and 100 is ideal.
Copenhagen has been crowned the world's most comfortable city to live in 2025, earning perfect scores for stability, education and infrastructure. Its overall Index score reached 98 of a possible 100.
Although Vienna has lost the top spot, it remains one of the great cities to live in—or just to visit.
It beats the longstanding leader, Vienna, into second place, although the Austrian capital also scored perfectly for education and infrastructure, as well as healthcare. Vienna shares second this year with Zurich, which ranked perfectly in both the education and healthcare categories. Another Swiss city, Geneva, ranked fifth overall, showcasing the dominance of Western European cities in the index with four of the top five positions.
The only city to break that European grip is Melbourne in Australia, which takes fourth spot with an overall score of 97 out of 100. The Southern Hemisphere comes into its own for the remaining top ten places with Australia's Sydney and Adelaide in sixth and ninth places respectively, Osaka in Japan in seventh and Auckland in New Zealand in eighth. Just sneaking into the top is North America's sole representative, Vancouver.
London remains the UK's most liveable city but has dropped out of the top 50 globally.
While Western European cities dominate the Index, it's notable that all the UK cities covered—London, Manchester and Edinburgh—have dropped down the rankings and sit well outside the top ten. This is due to a combination of political instability and growing civil unrest that has impacted scores. In 2025, London dropped from 45th to 54th place, Manchester from 43rd to 52nd and Edinburgh from 59th to 64th.
The reason for Vienna's fall from the top spot comes down to its declining stability score, impacted by a variety of factors including terrorism scares, one of which saw Taylor Swift's summer 2024 concert canceled.
The 2025 Global Liveability Index Top 10
Deputy industry director at EIU, Barsali Bhattacharyya commented, 'Global liveability has remained flat over the past year, and as in 2024, scores for stability have declined at a global level. Pressure on stability has led Vienna to lose its position as the most liveable city after a three-year stint. As in 2024, stability scores have declined for western Europe and the Middle East and North Africa. In this edition, they have also declined for Asia, amid intensified threats of military conflict for cities in India and Taiwan.'
While the average overall liveability score across the Index was consistent with 2024 at 76.1 out of 100, stability scores fell by 0.2 points overall. This comes amid huge global geopolitical tensions, civil unrest and a growing global housing crisis. Conversely, the Index has also seen overall gains in scores for healthcare, education and infrastructure.
There have been some very notable movements both up and down the Index in 2025. Canadian cities in particular have suffered, with Calgary dropping from fifth place in 2024 to 18th place in 2025 after a marked drop in its healthcare score. This has impacted all four Canadian cities in the Index after the well-publicized strain on the country's healthcare system thanks to a shortage of staff, among other factors. Toronto saw its ranking drop from 12th to 16th.
While those numbers don't look great, it's still important to look at them in context. Alongside the other 20 North America cities ranked, all reported the highest possible tier of liveability according to the Index's criteria, scoring above 80 out of 100. The highest U.S. city on the list was Honolulu in Hawaii, which ranked 23rd overall.
Improvements in healthcare and education have seen Middle Eastern cities like Al Khobar great improve liveability scores.
Moving up the Index, Al Khobar in Saudi Arabia's Persian Gulf saw the biggest leap, climbing 13 places from 148th to 135th thanks to improved healthcare and education. This reflects a trend across regions in the Middle East and North Africa, which saw the most significant global gains in overall liveability, largely driven by advancements in healthcare and education within cities in Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
Propping up the Index once again is war torn Damascus in Syria, which has seen no improvement in its liveability score despite the fall of ex-president Bashar al-Assad and subsequent regime change in December 2024. While this should increase its potential for improvement dramatically, the legacy of a years-long civil war will realistically take years to recover from.
Despite a regime change, years of civil war have left Damascus rooted to the bottom of the Global Liveability Index.
This is reflected in the significant jump to the second and third worst ranked cities, Tripoli in Libya and Dhakar in Bangladesh.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Dutch government recommends children under 15 stay off TikTok and Instagram
THE HAGUE, Netherlands — The Dutch government advised parents on Tuesday not to have children under 15 use social media platforms such as TikTok and Instagram , citing psychological and physical problems among children using them, including panic attacks, depression and difficulties sleeping. The Ministry of Health also encouraged parents to limit how long their children spend using electronic devices, keep phones and laptops out of bedrooms, and have 20 minutes of screentime followed by two hours of outside play.
Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
Dutch government recommends children under 15 stay off TikTok and Instagram
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — The Dutch government advised parents on Tuesday not to have children under 15 use social media platforms such as TikTok and Instagram, citing psychological and physical problems among children using them, including panic attacks, depression and difficulties sleeping. The Ministry of Health also encouraged parents to limit how long their children spend using electronic devices, keep phones and laptops out of bedrooms, and have 20 minutes of screentime followed by two hours of outside play. The advisory 'gives children the time to further develop digital resilience and media literacy,' Vincent Karremans, caretaker deputy minister for youth and sport, said in a letter to parliament. Karremans is one of several ministers who remained on after the Dutch government collapsed earlier this month pending October elections. Both TikTok and Instagram require users to be at least 13 years of age. The guidelines, which are not legally binding, distinguish between 'social media' sites like TikTok and Instagram and 'social interaction platforms' such as messaging services WhatsApp and Signal. The social media sites have 'significantly more additive design features' that have a negative impact on children, the government said. Children can use the messaging services from age 13, the year most Dutch children start secondary school, according to the recommendations. Last year, Australia became the first country in the world to ban children under 16 from using social media. Denmark and France are considering similar legislation and Sweden issued recommendations about limiting screentime for kids last year. A group of experts, put together at the request of the Dutch parliament, found that intense screentime and social media usage can result in physical and psychological problems in children. Dutch schools have banned students from using tablets, cell phones and smart watches, with some exceptions, such as classes on media literacy. In May, some 1,400 doctors and child welfare experts in the Netherlands signed a public letter, calling on the government to ban children under 14 from having cell phones and restricting social media usage until age 16. In February, Dutch Queen Máxima said that her youngest daughter, Princess Ariane, had eyesight problems from spending too much time on mobile devices.
Gizmodo
3 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Night Shifts May Raise Your Asthma Risk—If You're a Woman
Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease that often causes sudden and intense shortness of breath. The disease impacts around 339 million people worldwide, and in the U.S. nine people on average die from asthma every day. Researchers in the U.K. have found that women who work night shifts are more likely to have moderate or severe asthma than women who work during the day. The study, published Monday in the journal ERJ Open Research, does not reveal any such tendency in men working nightshifts, and could hold important implications for public health guidance. The team had previously shown that permanent night shift workers in general are more likely to suffer from moderate-severe asthma compared to day workers. Scientists also know that asthma is more prevalent and severe in adult women than adult men. 'Since increasing numbers of females are becoming shift workers it is important to determine if shift work-associated asthma risk is higher in females,' the researchers wrote in the study. Shift work refers to scheduled working periods that fall outside of traditional daytime hours. 'Our main aim was to investigate sex differences in the association between shift work and asthma.' The researchers did so by analyzing data belonging to over 274,541 working people from the U.K. Biobank, a biomedical database open to health researchers. From this initial pool, they found that 5.3% had asthma, and 1.9% of those had moderate or severe asthma. The team then looked into whether the people in these categories worked during the day, during nightshifts, or a mix of both. The researchers found that female shift workers in general are more likely to suffer from asthma, and women who only work nightshifts have 50% higher likelihood of developing moderate or severe asthma than female daytime workers. Furthermore, the risk increases 'with both number of monthly night shifts and longer lifetime duration of night shift work,' they explained. Interestingly, the data did not reveal any differences in the prevalence of asthma in men based on their work schedule. 'This type of research cannot explain why shift work and asthma are linked,' Robert Maidstone, a co-author of the study and a researcher at the University of Manchester's School of Biological Sciences, said in a university statement. 'However, it could be because shift work disrupts the body clock, including the levels of male and female sex hormones. High testosterone has previously been shown to be protective against asthma, and so lower testosterone in women could play a role. Alternatively, men and women work different types of shift jobs, and this could be a factor.' Among women not taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT, a treatment for menopausal symptoms), postmenopausal women working only night shifts were almost twice as likely to have moderate-severe asthma than female day workers. This suggests that HRT might protect nightshift workers from asthma, though the researchers admit that more studies are needed to confirm this. 'This research suggests that working nightshifts could be a risk factor for asthma in women, but not in men. The majority of workers will not have an easy option of switching their shift pattern, so we need further research to verify and understand this link and find out what could be done to reduce the risk for women who work shifts,' explained Florence Schleich from the European Respiratory Society, who was not involved in the study. Moving forward, the researchers aim to investigate how sex hormones might influence asthma prevalence among shift workers. Perhaps this line of research will also shed light on what drives the respiratory disease, given that the exact cause remains a mystery.
