We haven't sold out: council to clarify seabed mine stance
Councillor Bonita Bigham says she's been accused of selling out to the seabed miners, and a public statement is needed.
Photo:
LDR / Te Korimako o Taranaki
Taranaki Regional Council is going public against accusations it has sold out to would-be seabed miners Trans-Tasman Resources.
The Australian company has a permit to mine the seabed off Pātea for an initial 20 years, seeking to extract iron, titanium and vanadium.
But Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR) can't begin mining until it gets discharge consents to pump 45 million tonnes of unwanted sediment a year into the ocean.
Iwi and community opponents of seabed mining spoke to councillors meeting on Tuesday morning, urging them to stand with their communities against the proposed mine.
But the regional council wants to hang on to any influence it might have in the government's new Fast-track process - and fears taking a public stand might block it from decision-making.
Councillor Bonita Bigham said Taranaki Regional Council (TRC) needed to state clearly what it's trying to achieve by staying neutral for now.
"I've been… attacked on social media [and] in private for not having a position," the Māori constituency councillor said.
"I've been accused of being a sell-out and having been bought out by TTR… I think this is a real risk to our reputation as an organisation."
Bigham said those in the room - including opponents - understood the reason for neutrality.
"But we've got 100,000 people out there who don't understand why we aren't saying something."
As previously published by Local Democracy Reporting, TRC has three likely ways to have a say on the fate of Trans-Tasman's application under the Fast-track Approvals Act
The council will help pick one of the four (or more) panel members that will approve or deny the seabed mining.
And TRC staff are almost certain they'll be a relevant local authority and be one of the few groups allowed to formally comment on Trans-Tasman's application - and on any consent conditions.
Councillor Susan Hughes KC advised elected members to be cautious even in their private lives.
"It's just a useful thing to remind ourselves that it's not helpful if we're expressing opinions we think are informal at a social gathering or something like that - it has the potential for coming back to bite us."
She advised councillors keep the discussion between themselves "so we don't risk undermining the effectiveness that we might otherwise wish to bring to bear on behalf of the regional council."
Council chair Craig Williamson said individuals could have personal discussions to help form their views, but agreed the council would issue a press release to make its position clear.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Process to manage conflict of interests in fast-track approvals process 'sound'
Ministers Chris Bishop, Simeon Brown and Shane Jones. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver The Auditor General says the process to manage conflict of interests in the fast-track approvals process was "sound", but also saw opportunities to "further strengthen conflict management". A report released today showed the findings by the Auditor General from an inquiry that looked at the overall systems and processes used to identify and manage the potential and actual conflicts of interests of the ministers involved in the Fast-track Bill. The process was investigated by the office after it became aware of "concerns about the transparency" of the decision making processes for which projects would be included in the Bill. Conflicts of interest was described as "perceptions of bias, predetermination, and undue influence". The report said those concerns can be heightened when a " decision-making process gives Ministers a broad margin of discretion and the decisions benefit private businesses". "This was the case with the fast-track approvals process." It did not look at the merits of the Bill, the design of the fast-track approvals process or decisions about projects. The report stated ministers and the Cabinet Office considered a broad range of potential conflicts, including family and close associates. Campaign donations were also clearly documented as conflicts and had a management plan. While the process was considered "sound" by the Auditor General, it noted a range of options to strengthen conflict management. Those included having ministers declare their conflicts of interest earlier in the process - ideally before receiving officials' advice on the applications and before they determined the list of projects to take to Cabinet. It also suggested considering whether it was appropriate for ministers to participate in Cabinet discussions given they had a conflict - even if they were not the minister responsible for the final decision. Minister Chris Bishop - one the of the key ministers in charge of fast-track - said he welcomed the findings, and thanked the Cabinet Office for its ongoing advice and support.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
We haven't sold out: council to clarify seabed mine stance
Councillor Bonita Bigham says she's been accused of selling out to the seabed miners, and a public statement is needed. Photo: LDR / Te Korimako o Taranaki Taranaki Regional Council is going public against accusations it has sold out to would-be seabed miners Trans-Tasman Resources. The Australian company has a permit to mine the seabed off Pātea for an initial 20 years, seeking to extract iron, titanium and vanadium. But Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR) can't begin mining until it gets discharge consents to pump 45 million tonnes of unwanted sediment a year into the ocean. Iwi and community opponents of seabed mining spoke to councillors meeting on Tuesday morning, urging them to stand with their communities against the proposed mine. But the regional council wants to hang on to any influence it might have in the government's new Fast-track process - and fears taking a public stand might block it from decision-making. Councillor Bonita Bigham said Taranaki Regional Council (TRC) needed to state clearly what it's trying to achieve by staying neutral for now. "I've been… attacked on social media [and] in private for not having a position," the Māori constituency councillor said. "I've been accused of being a sell-out and having been bought out by TTR… I think this is a real risk to our reputation as an organisation." Bigham said those in the room - including opponents - understood the reason for neutrality. "But we've got 100,000 people out there who don't understand why we aren't saying something." As previously published by Local Democracy Reporting, TRC has three likely ways to have a say on the fate of Trans-Tasman's application under the Fast-track Approvals Act The council will help pick one of the four (or more) panel members that will approve or deny the seabed mining. And TRC staff are almost certain they'll be a relevant local authority and be one of the few groups allowed to formally comment on Trans-Tasman's application - and on any consent conditions. Councillor Susan Hughes KC advised elected members to be cautious even in their private lives. "It's just a useful thing to remind ourselves that it's not helpful if we're expressing opinions we think are informal at a social gathering or something like that - it has the potential for coming back to bite us." She advised councillors keep the discussion between themselves "so we don't risk undermining the effectiveness that we might otherwise wish to bring to bear on behalf of the regional council." Council chair Craig Williamson said individuals could have personal discussions to help form their views, but agreed the council would issue a press release to make its position clear. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Sue Bradford and Tim Wilson Part 1
Tonight on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Sue Bradford and Tim Wilson. They discuss the shifting sta'te of affairs in the middle east, whether or not David Seymour absued his office with online harrasment of opponents of the Regulatory Standards Bill and if trespass notices given to victims of stalking are worth the paper theyre written on. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
