
I just tested these Skullcandy x Bose earbuds, and my 2008 emo heart is happy
Besides being a blast from the past, the Method 360 ANC earbuds really benefit from this Bose sound. The bass is pumping, loud enough to be destined for the sticky dancefloors of yore. Don't think the bass overpowers detail, though — not at all. With a little EQ tweak, these earbuds can provide both electric bass and sharp detail.
While they have a few connectivity annoyances, for just $129, these earbuds are most definitely underpriced. I'd get them now before Skullcandy realises and bumps up the cost. I'll discuss everything in extensive detail in this Skullcandy Method 360 ANC review.
Price
$129 / £99
Connectivity
Bluetooth 5.3
ANC
Yes
Durability
IPX4
Battery
9/32 hours (ANC)
11/40 hours (No ANC)
Weight
2.7 ounces
Drivers
12mm
Dimensions
3.5 x 1.9 x 2 inches
Colors
Black, white, red, beige, leopard
Compatibility
iOS, Android
The Skullcandy Method 360 ANC earbuds are extremely cheap considering their sound quality: just $129 from Amazon U.S. and £99 from Amazon U.K..
This makes them some of the cheapest earbuds I've tested, but oh boy, they do not sound like it. They're miles better than the $129 Soundcore Liberty 5 and not even in the same ballpark as the relatively impressive $99 EarFun Air Pro 4.
I was actually gobsmacked when I found out how affordable these earbuds are. As I wrote above, the sound quality performs like earbuds double the price, if you can overlook the semi-cheugy design. At $129, they're the priciest earbuds on Skullcandy's roster (the Sesh and Rail buds are $69), but still very cheap when compared to rivals.
Complete with a carabiner ring, these Skullcandy earbuds are destined to be clipped to low-slung skater pants. Their home is a belt loop inhabited by a chain belt and the waistband of boxers that've seen better days. If you're wearing the Method 360 ANC earbuds and not listening to Limp Bizkit, what are you doing?
As someone who grew up on Fred Durst & crew, coloring my entire eyelid with a crumbly black pencil, and spending my allowance on spiky jelly earrings and fingerless gloves, the Skullcandy Method 360 ANC earbuds remind me of that simpler time. I think for me, the design of these buds is incredibly nostalgic and comforting, but for others, the design could be a major con.
On the side of each bud is a cute little skull (Skullcandy's logo, of course), which matches the logo on the charging case itself. The earbuds are a little big, so if you have super small ears, I'd recommend something dinkier like the AirPods 4. My ears err on the side of small and they were a little snug, but not uncomfortable. I switched out the ear tips for the smallest size, which helped with the snugness.
Now, the charging case. Probably the Method 360 ANC's most… unique feature. Some people might love this case, and others might hate it. I'm somewhere in the middle. I am prone to losing things — I sewed a pouch on the inside of my bag to prevent misplacing my AirPods — so for other absentminded folk, this overly large case could be a breath of fresh air.
For others, however, it's bulky and counterintuitive. Our Audio Editor, Tammy, was not a fan of the bulk. The case is a pretty massive 3.5 inches long, which is easy to find in a bag, but also not possible to fit in a pocket. Unless you've got super baggy skater pants, of course.
While controls have been an issue with other budget earbuds I've tried in the past, I had no headaches with the Method 360 ANC. I was able to customize my controls completely in the Skull-IQ app, including adding a volume control.
Although most of the Method 360 ANC's features are excellent, I'm going to discuss my one issue first. As with other non-native gear, I found the earbuds a little annoying to switch between devices, even after setting up multi-point connectivity.
When I removed the earbuds and did something else for a few minutes, once I put the earbuds back in, they didn't connect to my laptop or phone. I had to return the buds to the charging case, and then reinsert them. This is a little annoying, I suppose, but I also assume you're supposed to return the earbuds to the charging case after taking them out every time anyway.
Another minor annoyance is the lack of single-ear wear detection. Skullcandy claims that the Method 360 ANC have wear detection, and that's only half accurate. Yes, if you take out one earbud, that earbud pauses. But the other one doesn't. Only the removed earbud pauses, which is kind of pointless. My AirPods pause my music entirely when I remove one earbud.
While this isn't unheard of for $129/£99 earbuds, I'd like to see this as a toggleable feature on future versions.
Now that's out of the way, I'll discuss everything I do like about the Skullcandy Method 360 ANCs. Firstly, these earbuds have IPX4, which means they'll be able to withstand mild water like gentle rain or sweat. However, they're not completely waterproof so don't go dunking them in the sink.
Other cheaper earbuds have IPX5, like the EarFun Air 2 ($49) and EarFun Air 2 NC ($69), but this is really a negligible difference.
The ANC is very good; I couldn't hear any street noise or ambient office sounds like typing and talking. There are 'Stay aware on', 'Stay aware off', and 'ANC'. I wish Stay aware was a little more, well, aware. When I tried to have a conversation with this ANC mode, I couldn't hear properly and had to remove the earbuds.
Finally, there's a range of features in the app, like EQ customization Spotify Tap. Spotify Tap — hold down a touch control to launch Spotify and pick up where you last left off — is a great feature in a pinch, but I found myself gravitating towards manually selecting music myself. Also, of course, this won't work with Tidal, Apple Music or the like.
There's also a pretty bizarre feature: Take a Photo. This feature allows you to transform the earbuds into a remote control for your phone's camera. I have no wish to do this so never made use of it, but I suppose it's a good option to have… maybe.
As the Method 360 ANC earbuds are made in collaboration with Bose, I had high hopes about the music quality. And, thankfully, I was not disappointed at all.
To test the Method 360 ANC earbuds, I listened to a wide variety of music on Qobuz, our best streaming service for audiophiles.
Right off the bat, I could tell that these earbuds were very bassy. I fiddled with the EQ settings in the SkullcandyIQ app, and reduced the low end and increased the mids to counteract this. Of course, if you love bass, then this step is unnecessary, but I wanted to get the most detail out of my music as possible.
I listened to 'Fallen Alien' by FKA Twigs, which is an atmospheric, layered track with immersive percussion and almost cinematic synths. The choral sections were clear and seemed to surround my ears. I could hear every piece of audio detail, from the inflections in the lead vocal to the discordant bass and mids. The $129 earbuds did a fantastic job of both separating the instruments and detail, and also making the track sound harmonious.
Afterwards, I switched genre. I played '3AM (LA LA LA)' by Confidence Man, a track with an all-consuming, heady '90s synth and pulsing bass. The bass was insistent and strong, although there was a little tinniness in the mids. To fix this, I adjusted the EQ ever so slightly. This made the kick drum crackle a touch, but really not bad considering these are $129 earbuds.
To give the earbuds a thorough test, I wanted to play something really gritty and gristly. I opted for 'Endless, Nameless' by Nirvana, because what else? The bass growled in my left ear and the lead guitar screeched in my right. Neither instrument clipped or warped, and I could feel the raw vocal in my eardrums.
I'm sure you already know, but 'Bad Guy' by Billie Eilish has a really intimate, breathy vocal, where Billie's voice feels like it's right next to you. None of this detail was lost on the Method 360 ANC earbuds, and I could hear all the layers of bass that are often lost on inferior earbuds.
Where the Method 360 ANC earbuds excel is, of course, bass, but that doesn't mean they lack detail. I was never left longing for missed detail, and I could discern multiple layers of instruments in quite immersive tracks.
To test the Method 360 ANC earbuds, I tested them out on a work call. The earbuds have 2 mics within each earbud, so 4 overall, and Skullcandy's 'Clear Voice Smart Mic', which is described as an 'AI-enabled' feature that isolates voices.
My colleagues reported that I sounded crisp and clear, very similar to how I sound when I wear my usual AirPods Pro 2. I think for just $129/£99, this is an incredibly affordable way to get excellent call quality.
Unlike the Skullcandy Crusher Evo headphones ($199), which use the Skullcandy app, the Method 360 ANC earbuds are compatible with the Skull-ID app. This app is very pleasant to use: it has an attractive UI and it's easy to navigate. There's an easily accessible range of features on the homepage, including firmware updates. Here's a screenshot from the app.
The Skull-ID app is one of the better budget companion apps. It's more modern than the JBL app, but not as unique as the Soundcore app.
With ANC off, the Method 360 ANC earbuds will play for 11 hours, and then an extra 29 with the case, so 40 hours overall. With ANC off, the battery life reduces to 9 hours in the buds and another 24 in the case, so 33 hours overall.
In reality, I found that the battery was a little better than this. After listening for 5 hours, the earbuds only dropped to 75% battery. This battery life is the same as the EarFun Air Pro 4 ($99). While the Soundcore Liberty 5 earbuds are supposed to have 8 hours in the buds, in reality this was more like 5 hours. As a result, the Method 360 ANC earbuds are more reliable than the Soundcore offering.
Considering the Method 360 ANC earbuds are just $129, I think they're absolutely fantastic. Obviously they're not perfect — hence the 4-star rating — but they perform well above their price tag.
On top of having thrumming, powerful Bose bass, the earbuds are capable of translating precise audio detail, too. Softer, airy vocals and high-frequency sound effects were still audible, and only improved by my custom EQ. I think Skullcandy has absolutely nailed the sound quality here, and for just $129? It's a steal.
If you can look past the slight connectivity issues and overly large charging case, then there's no reason why the Skullcandy Method 360 ANC earbuds can't be some of the best value wireless earbuds on the market today.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Android Authority
27 minutes ago
- Android Authority
I use a duress PIN to protect my data — here's how it works and why everyone needs one
Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority From two-factor authentication codes to conversations and photos, our phones contain a ton of sensitive data these days. We rely on PINs and biometrics for daily security, but I shudder to think what would happen if that data landed in the wrong hands. And while Android is secure enough against remote attacks and malware these days, what if I'm forced to unlock my phone and hand it over? GrapheneOS, the privacy-focused Android fork, offers a rare solution to this hypothetical: the ability to set a duress PIN or secondary password that wipes your device clean and leaves no trace of your presence. I've had a duress PIN set up on my phone for a while now. While it's not something I hope to ever need, knowing it's there gives me peace of mind. And even though I don't think Google will add a feature as extreme as this one to stock Android, I can definitely see a use-case for a less extreme implementation. Here's why. The duress PIN: What it is and why it matters Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority Most devices will lock you out after too many failed unlock attempts. But that doesn't mean your data is safe — what if you're forced to give up your password or the attacker guesses your PIN? This is where GrapheneOS' duress PIN flips the dynamic: it lets you set an alternate PIN or password that instantly triggers a silent and irreversible factory reset in the background. The duress PIN doesn't give you a second chance and will trigger anywhere you enter it: on the lockscreen, while enabling Developer options, or even while unlocking an app that requests authentication. And unlike a regular factory reset, a duress PIN will erase all encryption keys and your phone's eSIM partition as well. This makes it impossible for an attacker to access my data just by having physical possession of your device and knowledge of the PIN. I think the real strength of GrapheneOS' duress PIN lies in its subtlety. There are no confirmation prompts, no announcements, and no obvious signs that the wipe was intentional on your part. Of course, GrapheneOS is no longer a fringe operating system these days — it has even attracted the ire of law enforcement in some jurisdictions. In other words, a professional attacker might be aware of the existence of a duress PIN. But if you can enter it quickly enough, it achieves its intended effect: no data can be lifted from your phone. Why I use a duress PIN Mishaal Rahman / Android Authority Old vs new lock screen PIN entry screen UI in Android The idea of a duress PIN sounds like something out of a spy movie, but is it really necessary? The feature is admittedly only useful in fringe scenarios where I would know about an imminent risk to my phone's data. Take mugging, for example. If an attacker forced you to unlock your phone before they ran off with it, you could enter your duress PIN instead. Providing a duress PIN could mean the difference between losing a $1,000 device and having your bank accounts drained or your identity stolen. A duress PIN is useful to everyone, not just for those with something to hide. Even if you aren't forced to divulge the PIN yourself, I read an interesting suggestion on the GrapheneOS forum: what if you set an extremely simple or obvious sequence as your duress PIN? An amateur attacker is bound to try PINs like 1234 or 0000 when they get a hold of your device — and that will be enough to wipe the system for good, without any action on your part. You could even tape a note with the duress PIN to the back of your device and encourage them to enter it. Then there's the elephant in the room — using a duress PIN if you expect to get into trouble with law enforcement. This is a murky topic given that erasing your data could be counted as obstruction or even destruction of evidence. So you could get into more trouble than necessary, if you had nothing to hide. I think the latter is a bad faith argument as it ignores the potential and tangible threat of overreach. Still, I don't know if I would use my duress PIN if law enforcement ever asked me to unlock my phone. But for government dissidents and activists, I'm sure the feature can be invaluable if they know someone unfriendly is knocking on their door. What Android could learn from Graphene's duress PIN Andy Walker / Android Authority One of Android's biggest advantages is its robust support for multiple users. I find this feature especially useful on tablets, since they're typically shared devices. Each user in a household can log into their own profile, with their own set of apps and data. But getting to that profile currently requires multiple taps on most Android devices. Even on the Pixel Tablet, you need to select a specific profile before entering the unlock PIN for that user. But what if that wasn't the case? GrapheneOS can recognize when you enter a duress PIN to trigger a wipe, so why stop there? Imagine if Android could log you into a different user profile based on which PIN you've entered. In a situation where you're forced to unlock your phone, you could enter the decoy PIN. This would open a seemingly functional but heavily sandboxed version of your phone, hiding your banking apps, private messages, or work accounts. I think it straddles the line between handing over everything and Graphene's nuclear option of wiping the device entirely. Android might never adopt the duress PIN, but what about a decoy? Of course, you will need more than this level of plausible deniability if you get into any serious trouble. But for airport checkpoints where you might be asked to give up access to your device, a decoy PIN might be enough to avoid scrutiny. Or if you need a stowaway profile for files and data you don't necessarily want in your primary profile, a secondary PIN could bring you there. The GrapheneOS community's stance on decoy PINs is that redirecting to a secondary profile is not as secure as triggering a full device reset, which is the current duress PIN implementation. For a project that takes security seriously, simply logging into a different profile is only a half-measure. Will Google ever adopt a feature like GrapheneOS' duress PIN? It's unlikely, but on the plus side, Android's built-in Lockdown mode is a step in the right direction. In the US, courts have ruled that you can be compelled to provide a fingerprint, but not a password. By disabling biometrics, Android's Lockdown mode provides some protection against legal coercion. If that's not enough for you, GrapheneOS might just be the answer. Follow
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Apple's New Artificial Intelligence (AI) Strategy Could Be a Genius Move
Key Points Apple's artificial intelligence strategy appears to have been a failure so far. AI features haven't been a huge selling point for its iPhones -- at least, not yet. Apple could buy a generative AI company to accelerate its AI development timeline. 10 stocks we like better than Apple › It's no secret that Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) has been a laggard in the artificial intelligence (AI) arms race. It has been outpaced every step of the way by its Android competitors. Additionally, the gap only seems to be getting wider and wider. However, Apple may be implementing a new strategy that could be a genius move. On the conference call for the fiscal third quarter of 2025, ended June 28, Apple CEO Tim Cook commented about the company's new AI strategy, and it may be enough to vault Apple from an AI laggard to an AI leader. Apple could be open to acquiring a generative AI company During Apple's quarterly conference call, Cook said Apple is open to acquiring an AI company. If it acquired an AI leader, then it could rapidly accelerate its development pace. He also mentioned that it's not focused on a specific size, which could indicate management could be going after one of the larger generative AI companies. Some of the businesses on the short list that Apple could acquire are OpenAI, Perplexity, and Anthropic. These three tend to be among the best generative AI models that aren't already associated with a parent company (like xAI's Grok or Google's Gemini). However, an acquisition for these wouldn't come cheap. All three of these companies are currently private, so we have relatively limited data to establish the value of the company. According to the most recent reports for each company, OpenAI was last valued at $300 billion, Anthropic at $170 billion, and Perplexity at $18 billion. At the end of Q3, Apple's cash and short-term investments totaled over $55 billion. So, while it could probably flex its muscle and scoop up OpenAI or Anthropic at an extreme price tag, an acquisition of a company like Perplexity is probably more likely. This also would make the most sense, as OpenAI is currently partnered with Microsoft and Anthropic is linked to Amazon. With Perplexity's relatively low valuation compared to its peers, Apple could scoop it up in an all-cash deal and immediately be in a great position in the AI arms race. I wouldn't be surprised to see a deal like this get announced within the next year, and it may not be with Perplexity; it could be with another generative AI competitor. However, I think this route is likely as Apple has already fallen well behind its peers in this realm. But the question is, does Apple need AI to sell its products? Apple's revenue growth is already returning despite its AI product lineup During Q3, Apple did something it hasn't done in some time: produce double-digit revenue growth (as long as you round up). Apple has been stuck in a rut since 2022, and now it's finally showing some signs of life, despite having little AI featured compared to its peers. The question then becomes: Do AI features matter to consumers? This could be a hotly debated topic, as most users likely aren't using the AI capabilities of Android phones, and Apple users may not care. But there could be a time someday when users are comfortable using AI features, and the specific AI model on a phone becomes a huge selling point. We're not there yet, so Apple still has some time to catch up in the AI arms race. However, we'll reach that point eventually, and if Apple doesn't do something major, like acquire an AI company, it could be left in the dust over the long term, even if it isn't feeling the pain right now. I think Apple's new strategy could be genius if it makes a move to acquire a company like Perlexity, and the entire investment thesis surrounding Apple would improve overnight. But if it fails to do so, Apple could be on the outside looking in a few years from now. Should you buy stock in Apple right now? Before you buy stock in Apple, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Apple wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,563!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,108,033!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,047% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Keithen Drury has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Apple's New Artificial Intelligence (AI) Strategy Could Be a Genius Move was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
Facer is back on Wear OS 6, and worth the reinstall
Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority After going quiet for a while due to compatibility issues with Wear OS 5, Facer's finally back with full Wear OS 6 support, and it's a notable upgrade. The app supports Google's Watch Face Format (WFF), which means faces sync directly from the phone app to your watch, without extra installs or app juggling required. All-in-all, the revamped app experience brings some welcome usability improvements. Do you use Facer, Pujie, KWCH, WatchMaker, or other custom watch face apps? 2673 votes Yes, all the time. 41 % Sometimes, if I find a face that works for me. 24 % No, I don't like the faces on them. 17 % No, I'd never heard of them before. 18 % I tested the new Facer update on a Galaxy Watch Ultra, and right from setup, it's clear things have been smoothed out. Syncing faces is practically instant. Once I tapped on my pick, it immediately showed up on my watch. The friction-free process goes a long way toward making the app feel like a proper part of the platform instead of a third-party workaround. It also makes it dangerously tempting to save entirely more faces than necessary. The upgraded Facer app introduces a friction-free process of instant syncing between your watch and the app. Of course, Facer's massive face library is still the main draw. Whether you're into minimalist analog layouts or over-the-top animated options, there's something for everyone, and of course, plenty you won't like at all. I tend to gravitate away from the branded faces personally, but I was also the only child I knew who found SpongeBob incredibly irksome. If you're after a name-brand look, there are new licensed options for everything from Star Trek to Barbie, and the library at large is robust and rapidly growing. The big technical upgrade behind Facer's Wear OS 6 update is support for Google's Watch Face Format (WFF). WFF is the standard that lets watch faces run smoother, look sharper, and sync directly from your phone without extra hassle. It means more dynamic animations, cleaner complication data, and better power management options. With that said, WFF does come with some trade-offs. Designers have to work within Google's rules, which can limit customization compared to older formats. While it's a step toward a more consistent, reliable experience, it does mean less creative freedom, and some developers are discouraged by the parameters. Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority As a user, I've found plenty of designs I love, even if the library hasn't yet caught up with the previous breadth of offerings. WFF faces feel smoother, more responsive, and less taxing on the watch overall. Battery life is always a big concern with custom faces, and Facer addresses that with its new Power Impact label. This manifests as a simple lightning bolt gauge that shows up green on more efficient designs. I appreciate having that info up front, as power is always my top priority when setting up my smartwatch. To that end, I mostly stick to static or simpler faces during longer days, very occasionally swapping in animated ones when I'm going to be around the house (and my charging dock) and don't care as much about longevity. Facer even highlights a section of faces with optimized ambient modes, which helps stretch battery life when keeping the Always-On display active. The Power Impact label helps users sort watch faces based on how they affect battery life. One new addition to the app is the 'Looks' tab, which is Facer's take on a style feed. The tab lets you browse full setups that include a face, a strap, and styling notes. You can apply everything with one tap or shop the exact strap through the app. This feature has only rolled out to iOS users so far and is slated to arrive on Android phones in September. I'll be honest, I'm not usually one to dress my wrist like I do my outfit, but if you like to match straps to faces, the Facer watch band store makes that super easy. There are a bunch of material types available in a range of colors, all for under $20. Premium users also get further discounts. Speaking of Premium: Facer is still free to try, and there are some free designs I genuinely love, but a lot more faces are locked behind a paywall. If you anticipate only buying one or two, one-off purchases are straightforward. However, a premium subscription unlocks the full face catalog and gives you access to all the licensed designs. Right now, there's a launch promo of $14.99 for the first year (normally $39.99 annually), plus 50% off watch bands and some free face promo codes. I've been on the fence about paying for watch faces before, but with this kind of variety, I can see the value. You can also pay for Facer Plus to access an ad-free experience and a larger Watchbox for a one-time fee (right now $4.99). I will say, the ads on the app are pretty obnoxious, so the ad-free experience alone is tempting. Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority After a few days of rotating through designs, testing out 'Looks,' and keeping an eye on battery life, the update makes a solid case for giving Facer your time and potentially your money. The app's comeback on Wear OS 6 feels more consistent and reliable. It's still a third-party app, and there's always going to be a slight gap between it and native experiences, but that gap is smaller. Is it worth subscribing just for customization? That'll depend on how often you switch up your look. Am I currently into this Harry Styles face? Maybe. Follow