logo
The real gold in industrial AI lies in the models: Vinod Krishnan, ESSAR

The real gold in industrial AI lies in the models: Vinod Krishnan, ESSAR

Time of India30-07-2025
In the age of digital disruption, where BFSI and retail race ahead with customer-facing innovations, industrial enterprises stand quietly in the background, seemingly slower, yet working on challenges that are infinitely more complex and consequential.In a candid conversation with ETCIO DeepTalks, Vinod Krishnan, Chief Digital and Information Officer at Essar, shared his hard-won lessons from decades of leading digital strategy, transformation, and innovation in India's industrial and infrastructure sectors. He offered a window into how industrial companies engineer resilience and growth, balancing ambition with pragmatism, and technology with business realities.
'In industry, you're solving a 10-year-old problem that will matter 5 years into the future. You need patience, perspective, and persistence, because the impact you create is profound and long-lasting,' said Vinod Krishnan, CDIO, Essar.
The untapped canvas of industrial digitization
'There's a book I recommend: Fusion Strategy. It says we've tapped only 25% of digitization's potential and the remaining 75% lies in industrial domains. That's our canvas,' said Krishnan.
Krishnan led with a fascinating observation: The real opportunity for digital transformation lies not in consumer sectors, but in the untapped potential of industries like mines, refineries, steel plants, and other operationally intensive environments.
Unlike retail and BFSI, industrial companies don't compete on instant gratification. Instead, their focus is on operational optimization, cost reduction per unit, and codifying decades of expertise into data-driven processes.
'Our business models have remained unchanged since the paleolithic era. Take mining, the process of extracting resources hasn't fundamentally changed. But how we optimize that process, that's where digital comes in,' he said.
Where the investments go
'If you ask me where the biggest shift has happened, it's in the value we place on data. Data comes first, everything else follows,' Krishnan said.
While cloud, AI, and cybersecurity are important, Krishnan was emphatic that data infrastructure forms the bedrock.
'Previously, expertise lived in the minds of people who'd been around for 30 years. But people retire, and knowledge walks out the door. Digitization is about codifying that knowledge, making efficiency systemic, not accidental,' he said.
Industrial organizations are channeling their budgets into:
Data acquisition and contextualization from OT and remote sitesEdge computing to bring computation closer to operationsInfrastructure to integrate local and remote data streams
'We're very ROI-driven. Every rupee must justify itself. But thanks to democratization of tools and lower costs, what used to seem out of reach is now feasible,' he said.
ROI lies in operational efficiency, not glamour
'In our world, the best ROI comes from areas with inefficiencies, because small changes ripple through the system,' he said.
For example, Krishnan recalled a transformation at a telecom infrastructure company where automated billing reduced manpower from 200 to just 20, in a complex, asset-heavy environment where each line item carried unique conditions.
Similarly, predictive maintenance and energy billing optimization have delivered tangible outcomes. 'We don't need a new payment gateway. We just need to shave off a few rupees here and there, and because we repeat these operations a million times, the value compounds massively,' he said.
Why edge trumps cloud
'We're an edge market. Mines and oilfields aren't in metropolitan hubs. OT data is local. Decision-making happens where the well is drilled, not at headquarters,' he said.
Krishnan explained why industrial enterprises rely heavily on edge computing:
Remote sites lack reliable, affordable connectivityOT systems use proprietary protocolsLocal autonomy is critical for uptime
'Cloud may evolve with better satellite connectivity, but today, edge is where the action is,' he said.
Why genAI & data monetization have limited appeal
Unlike B2C sectors, industrial companies don't see immediate, large-scale benefits from GenAI or data monetization. 'GenAI has use cases, like document analysis or dashboards, but it's not transformative here. Nice-to-have, not must-have,' Krishnan said.
Instead, the focus is on building reusable models, not selling data. 'Our competitive edge lies in the models we develop, not the data itself. Predictive maintenance, for instance, can be deployed in 50 places once perfected.'
Why does OT deserve more than just IT?
Given the unique vulnerabilities of OT environments, security investments lean heavily toward securing operational technology and the IT/OT interface. Krishnan said, 'Depending on the setup,
OT security
could account for 60%-80% of the security spend. IT is relatively straightforward, OT is where risks are greater.'
Talent and vendors
'Attracting top talent is hard. You can't keep a Nobel laureate on the bench for months. I call it the laser surgeon approach, pay top dollar, use them intensively, then move on,' he said.
Krishnan advocated for a pragmatic mix of in-house and external expertise.
Build a Center of Excellence (CoE) for model maintenanceOutsource model creation to specialists
'In industry, downtime can be catastrophic, even fatal. Resilience is about seamless load transfer and minimizing downtime, not self-healing gimmicks,' he said. Redundancy, hot standbys, and tested failover mechanisms take precedence over fancy 'chaos testing' or 'self-healing' narratives.
'Don't be discouraged when it feels like everyone else is moving faster. Industrial change is slower, but deeper. You're solving problems that have existed for decades, and your impact lasts longer,' he concluded. 'When a long-term industrial project finally delivers, the satisfaction is far greater than any quick, flashy win elsewhere.'
His advice to peers:
Focus on ROI-driven, operationally relevant use casesBe patient, industrial transformation is a long gestation processCodify expertise before it walks out the doorBuild a resilient edge infrastructure
Invest in OT security and pragmatic AI use cases
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Japanese engine for Australian frigates and Indian jets: A new era of Indo-Pacific defence ties
Japanese engine for Australian frigates and Indian jets: A new era of Indo-Pacific defence ties

First Post

time5 hours ago

  • First Post

Japanese engine for Australian frigates and Indian jets: A new era of Indo-Pacific defence ties

Japan's rise as a major arms exporter could give India the boost it needs to finally develop a homegrown fighter jet engine read more As Japan makes headway in maritime defence exports, India has been exploring potential aerospace collaborations with Tokyo, particularly in advanced jet engine technology. During a defence ministers' meeting in Delhi in May this year, India proposed a partnership with Japan on aero engine development, in what observers view as an effort to secure a high-performance powerplant for its Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) programme. There is a lot of speculation about the chatter focussing on Japan's IHI XF9 engine, developed for its own next-generation fighter aircraft by the Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Agency (ATLA) and IHI Corporation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The XF9 prototype reportedly delivers 11 tonnes of thrust without afterburner and 15 tonnes with afterburner, with design provisions for scalability up to 20 tons (ATLA, 2018). Its adaptability and modular architecture are seen as advantageous for the AMCA's operational requirements, which include sustained supercruise, agility and low observability. India's AMCA programme, led by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), aims to field a fifth-generation stealth fighter capable of competing with regional rivals such as China's J-20. While prototypes are expected to fly initially with US-supplied General Electric F414 engines, these are considered an interim measure, with India seeking a more powerful propulsion system in the 110–130 kN thrust range for production models. Collaboration on the XF9 or a derivative could merge Japan's materials science and manufacturing expertise with India's expanding aerospace base, potentially overcoming long-standing indigenous engine development challenges, a report said. Strategic and political hurdles Any transfer of XF9 technology would require navigating Japan's still-cautious approach to defence exports. Although Tokyo has relaxed restrictions in recent years, most notably allowing Patriot missile shipments to the US for onward transfer to Ukraine. Nevertheless, Japan's growing comfort with complex multinational defence projects, evidenced by its participation in the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP) with the United Kingdom and Italy, suggests that political will for such ventures may be strengthening. If Tokyo and Canberra can successfully manage the frigate programme, it would bolster confidence in Japan's capacity to deliver sophisticated systems abroad, potentially paving the way for more ambitious collaborations with partners such as India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Lessons from engine supply disruptions India's interest in diversifying its defence partnerships with Japan is partly informed by difficulties with Western suppliers. India signed a significant agreement with the United States in June 2023 to co-produce the more powerful GE F414 engine domestically for the Tejas Mk2, including an estimated 80 per cent technology transfer. While seen as a positive step, give the current geopolitical situation, India needs to actively pursue alternative suppliers as a hedge against potential bottlenecks. Options under consideration reportedly include France's Safran M88, already in service with the Indian Air Force's Rafales and Russia's Klimov RD-93MA, a modernised version of the MiG-series engine, another report said. Australia deal kindles hope for Japan Japan's ability to win and execute complex international defence contracts, as demonstrated in the naval sector, offers a useful indicator of its potential to deliver similarly sophisticated aerospace systems in partnership with India. The Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' (MHI) $6.5 billion frigate deal with Australia could mark a turning point in the regional defence perspective, particularly as nations look to diversify supply chains and reduce reliance on a limited number of Western suppliers, Financial Times reported. From export restrictions to a breakthrough For decades after the Second World War, Japan maintained a self-imposed ban on almost all arms exports, effectively confining its technologically advanced industrial base to serving only its Self-Defence Forces. This policy shift began in 2014, when Tokyo eased restrictions, yet major international contracts remained elusive. The most notable setback came in 2016, when Japan lost out to France on a $35 billion Australian submarine contract. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The tide appeared to turn with the announcement earlier this year that MHI had been chosen as Australia's preferred supplier for a new class of frigates. The upgraded Mogami-class frigate design met Australia's operational needs, including a smaller crew complement of 90 compared to competing European designs requiring around 120 personnel, longer cruising ranges and increased weapons capacity. Moreover, MHI was able to guarantee delivery of the first vessel by 2029, plugging a capability gap as the Royal Australian Navy retires its Anzac-class ships. While the upfront cost was higher, Australian officials reportedly calculated that the Japanese design would be more economical over its lifetime due to lower operating and personnel expenses and a longer hull life, The Financial Times said in a report. The deal, if finalised as planned next year, would be Japan's first international sale of a complete lethal defence platform since 1945 and could serve as a model for future exports of warships, missile systems and radar technologies. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Constraints on Japan's defence expansion Despite the milestone, Japan faces challenges in scaling up its defence production. Industry leaders have warned of capacity and labour shortages, particularly as Tokyo plans to increase defence spending to 2 per cent of GDP by 2027. Kawasaki Heavy Industries' chair Yoshinori Kanehana noted that red-hot demand had already strained production lines, with annual CH-47 Chinook helicopter orders nearly tripling from 2017 to 2024. He stressed that while the sector needed to expand capacity, recruiting and training specialised workers remained a significant hurdle, The Financial Times said. MHI's contract also involves producing the first three frigates in Japan, with the remaining eight to be built in Australia in partnership with Austal. Corey Wallace, an associate professor at Kanagawa University, cautioned that Japan's limited experience in managing overseas defence maintenance, services and supply chains could complicate the execution of such projects. Jennifer Parker of the Australian National University similarly told Financial Times that any delays could strain bilateral ties, though successful delivery could firmly establish Japan as a credible alternative supplier in the global arms market. Convergence of strategic interests The convergence of Japan's push to expand its defence exports, its proven industrial base and India's urgent need for diversified and advanced propulsion systems presents a window of opportunity for both countries. For India, securing Japanese engine technology could reduce dependence on Western suppliers, mitigate the risk of supply disruptions and accelerate the realisation of indigenous aerospace capabilities. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For Japan, a successful collaboration would demonstrate its readiness to supply cutting-edge systems beyond its immediate alliance network, reinforcing its position in the global defence market.

PwC India targets three-fold revenue growth by 2030, 20,000 new jobs
PwC India targets three-fold revenue growth by 2030, 20,000 new jobs

Business Standard

time6 hours ago

  • Business Standard

PwC India targets three-fold revenue growth by 2030, 20,000 new jobs

PwC India is targeting a threefold revenue growth over the next five years and aims to create 20,000 additional jobs by 2030, the advisory firm said in a press statement on Tuesday. Releasing its Vision 2030, PwC India said it would expand into tier 2 and tier 3 cities and deepen its focus on key business areas such as digital transformation, sustainability, risk and regulatory, cloud, and cybersecurity to help clients stay ahead of disruption. The Big Four firm will invest 5 per cent of revenues annually in technology, innovation, and capability building, and 1 per cent of revenues towards upskilling people and partners. 'We are focused on building a future-ready workforce by expanding access to learning, prioritising women in leadership, and creating inclusive growth journeys that allow our people to thrive — from the campus to the boardroom,' said Sanjeev Krishnan, Chairperson, PwC India. PwC said its growth strategy is anchored in six 'Go Long' sectors, which include financial services, healthcare, industrial manufacturing, auto, technology, and media and telecom. These sectors, it said, represent the biggest opportunities for transformational impact. The firm said in its press statement that the future success of its clients in these sectors will demand bold reinvention of business models, operations, technology, and resource use. 'Vision 2030 for us is about building on India's growth potential and making bold shifts in our business. We are expanding into tier 2 and 3 cities, enhancing our sectoral depth, and embedding digital and technology capabilities at the heart of our offerings,' Krishnan added. Highlighting how it was evolving from a traditional services firm to a more modern, delivery-focused model driven by deep sector expertise and cutting-edge technologies such as generative AI, PwC India said it views the next five years as a pivotal period for India to lead, shape, and build its future towards becoming Kal Ka Bharat — India of tomorrow. 'We see growth shifting toward emerging domains, grounded in human needs. These domains will shape future markets and create unique opportunities for us to support our clients — and our country. This is our moment to lead and define what's next,' Krishnan said. PwC has a presence across all major cities in India, with nearly 900 partners and a team of 30,000 professionals.

DIIs pip FIIs in Indian stocks ownership, like BFSI: Motilal Oswal
DIIs pip FIIs in Indian stocks ownership, like BFSI: Motilal Oswal

Business Standard

time2 days ago

  • Business Standard

DIIs pip FIIs in Indian stocks ownership, like BFSI: Motilal Oswal

Motilal Oswal on Ownership analysis, DIIs, FIIs: Motilal Oswal Financial Services' (MOFSL) latest ownership report shows a structural shift in market control -- domestic institutional investors (DIIs) now own a larger share of India's top companies than foreign institutional investors (FIIs), a trend that has been steadily gaining ground since 2021. Indian investors outpacing foreign money DIIs – which include mutual funds, insurance companies, and pension funds -- poured $19.7 billion into Indian stocks last quarter, far ahead of the $5.4 billion invested by FIIs. This heavy buying, along with record monthly mutual fund SIP flows of over $3 billion and steady retail participation, pushed DII ownership in the Nifty 500 to a record 19.4 per cent, up 170 basis points (bps) from last year. FII ownership stayed flat at 18.8 per cent. 'The structural shift in institutional ownership continues to strengthen as DII holdings reach new peaks and surpass FII holdings in Nifty 500 companies,' the report said. Promoters – company founders or controlling shareholders – cut their stakes to a record low 49.3 per cent, with analysts noting that buoyant markets provided 'an attractive opportunity for several promoters to liquidate their stakes.' Retail investors' share held steady at 12.4 per cent, broadly unchanged for three years. Same balance overall, different sector moves When measured as a share of free-floating stock, FIIs now own 37.2 per cent of the Nifty 500, down 150 bps from last year, while DIIs own 38.3 per cent, up 210 bps. The overall FII-DII ratio stayed level at 1:1 quarter-on-quarter (Q-o-Q) – but beneath the surface, they are moving in different directions by sector. DIIs increased stakes in 20 of 24 sectors, with the biggest gains in retail, public-sector banks, consumer goods, cement, utilities, private banks, technology, and engineering/manufacturing services (EMS). FIIs added to infrastructure, NBFC (non-lending), telecom, and media, but trimmed positions in utilities, retail, automobiles, oil & gas, and cement. BFSI still the big foreign bet The banking and financial services sector (BFSI) remains FIIs' favourite, with allocation rising for the third straight quarter to 34.9 per cent – a seven-quarter high. This is 420 bps higher than BFSI's weight in the Nifty-500 index. Private banks alone accounted for $215 billion of total FII holdings, led by HDFC Bank ($99.9b) and ICICI Bank ($68.4b). Other top FII allocations were technology (9.2 per cent), oil & gas (7.2 per cent), automobiles (7.1 per cent), and healthcare (6.2 per cent). On a quarter-on-quarter basis, FIIs also boosted telecom, oil & gas, NBFC non-lending, capital goods, and automobile holdings. Domestic fund favourites DIIs' largest exposures were to BFSI (27.5 per cent), consumer goods (9.2 per cent), technology (9 per cent), oil & gas (8.7 per cent), and automobiles (7 per cent). They are overweight in consumer goods, oil & gas, PSU banks, and metals, but underweight in private banks, NBFCs, and real estate. HDFC Bank is also the largest holding for DIIs at $55.8 billion, followed by Reliance ($46.6 billion), ICICI Bank ($43.3 billion), ITC ($42.5 billion), and Infosys ($27.5 billion). By company size Large-caps make up two-thirds of the Nifty 500's market value. DII holdings in this segment hit a record 20.7 per cent, while FII and promoter stakes fell to record lows of 21.5 per cent and 47.3 per cent, respectively. Retail ownership in large-caps dropped to a record low of 10.5 per cent. Mid-caps saw stronger retail participation at 14.2 per cent, while small-caps remained popular with retail investors at 21 per cent. Analysts noted that 'higher retail participation' has been consistent in smaller companies. PSU stakes ease In public-sector units (PSUs), FIIs cut stakes by 30 bps to 17.7 per cent and DIIs by 20 bps to 18.6 per cent. Promoter stakes in PSUs – often held by the government – rose 60 bps to 54.7 per cent amid some consolidation. That said, the report suggests that DIIs' dominance in Indian markets is now firmly in place, supported by steady domestic inflows, while FIIs are selectively increasing exposure to high-visibility sectors like BFSI and telecom. 'The net shift in holdings during the quarter was primarily marked by gains in DII ownership, accompanied by a reduction in promoter stakes,' MOFSL said. With promoters selling and domestic funds stepping in, the ownership mix of Indian equities is evolving – a change that could influence how the market reacts to both local and global events.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store