South Korea lays out roadmap for ETFs, probes exchange fees
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
In a busy week for South Korea's top finance sector regulator, the Financial Services Commission (FSC), it met with the country's new administration to submit a roadmap to approve local spot digital asset exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and proposed an investigation into transaction fees charged by domestic digital asset exchanges, according to local media reports.
U-turn on spot crypto EFTs
South Korea's new President, Lee Jae-myung, who swept to office after a June 3 snap election, is already beginning to follow through on his pre-election pro-crypto pledges, including lifting the domestic ban on spot digital asset ETFs.
These products, the subject of much debate and frenzied activity in the United States over the past few years, have been banned in South Korea since 2017 under the country's Capital Markets Act, which limits the scope of ETFs to financial investment instruments, currencies, and ordinary commodities—categories in which digital asset are not included.
However, in line with the new president's zeal for digital asset products, the FSC has submitted a plan to the State Affairs Planning Committee—a presidential transition team for the Lee administration—in which the regulator said it would prepare implementation measures for spot digital asset ETFs in the second half of this year, according to a June 19 report from local outlet Yonhap News Agency.
The roadmap also reportedly includes preparing rules to lift the ban on Korean won-based stablecoins. This would align with another of Lee's first acts as President, earlier in June, to introduce the Basic Digital Asset Act, which allows local stablecoins issuance whilst relaxing rules for digital asset exchanges.
Following Thursday's media reports of its proposed roadmap, the FSC issued a statement clarifying that the details of its filings to the planning Committee are not confirmed and 'have not been finalized.'
Meanwhile, further reports suggested that the FSC is also planning to investigate transaction fees charged by domestic digital asset exchanges, with the aim of reducing costs for young traders and investors. Investigating exchange fees
On Thursday, the Herald Economy reported that the FSC will be launching a probe into transaction fees imposed by local trading platforms, as part of President Lee's pro-crypto agenda.
According to the report, the FSC briefed the State Affairs Planning Committee on its plan to investigate digital asset exchange fees.
'We need to examine whether the current fees of domestic exchanges are an excessive burden on consumers and whether they are at an appropriate level compared to overseas cases,' an FSC official reportedly said.
South Korea has one of the largest digital asset adoption rates in the world, ranking 19th globally based on 2024 data from blockchain analytics platform Chainalaysis. FSC data from last year also estimated South Koreans held around 104 trillion won ($75.7 billion) worth of digital assets.
In order to support this booming market in the run-up to the election, President Lee pledged that he would lower digital asset transaction fees from the current 0.05% to 0.015%. According to Maeil Business Newspaper, Lee said this plan aimed to support young traders to 'grow their assets and live without worries.'
The FSC has taken up this challenge and, as part of the its examination into transaction fees, the regulator will be conducting a survey of digital asset exchanges on their current fee systems, charging methods and collected amounts, reported the Herald Economy. The survey is expected to focus on major domestic exchanges such as Bithumb, Upbit, and Coinone.
An FSC official told the local outlet that the regulator had not yet set a target commission rate and that it would establish policy standards 'through comparisons between domestic and foreign exchanges and analysis of user convenience.'
Watch: ASK ME ANYTHING! CoinGeek Weekly Livestream with Kurt Wuckert Jr.
title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why Trump's bombing of Iran will only bolster North Korea's nuclear resolve
As Israel and the US hit Iran 's nuclear infrastructure over the past 12 days, the fallout extended beyond the Middle East. Another US adversary, North Korea, was almost certainly watching from the sidelines, quietly analysing the assault and drawing conclusions about its own nuclear programme. The American bombing of three fortified underground nuclear facilities over the weekend in particular would have served as a real-life case study for Kim Jong Un 's regime. The US and its Western and Asian allies have long regarded Iran and North Korea as parallel nuclear threats – two heavily sanctioned states suspected of developing nuclear weapons under the guise of civilian programmes – and used diplomatic and economic coercion as well as international pressure and surveillance by the UN nuclear watchdog to deter them from going nuclear. While North Korea has responded by pushing decisively through the nuclear threshold – testing weapons, developing delivery systems and declaring itself a nuclear power – Iran has not. Pyongyang's decision now appears to have spared it from the kind of military vulnerability Tehran is experiencing. This reinforces its logic, analysts say, that half-measures invite war while full nuclear capability prevents it. 'Watching Iran's nuclear sites being bombed by the United States in all likelihood only reinforces North Korea's thinking that it made the right decision to develop nuclear weapons and that it did not negotiate them away during past talks with the United States, including during the Hanoi summit,' Rachel Minyoung Lee, a senior fellow for the Stimson Centre's Korea Program and 38 North, tells The Independent. Kim has always been clear that North Korea could never give up its nuclear weapons, but Pyongyang has still expressed a great interest in Israel 's war on Iran and the US involvement in it. This, Lee says, is 'unusual'. Its foreign ministry has issued two statements so far denouncing the Israeli and US strikes on Iran. On 19 June, it accused Israel, supported by the US and its Western allies, of being a 'cancer-like entity' threatening peace in the Middle East and globally and warned that its actions could risk triggering a 'new all-out war' in the region. "The international community is strictly watching the US and Western forces fanning up the flames of war, taking issue with the legitimate sovereign right and exercise of the right to self-defence of Iran, the victim," it added. In another statement on 23 June, released after the US bombing of the nuclear facilities, it strongly denounced Washington for 'violently trampling down the territorial integrity and security interests of a sovereign state'. The foreign ministry called on the 'just international community' to censure and reject the 'confrontational acts' of Israel and America, blaming them for escalating tensions in the Middle East through Israel's 'ceaseless war moves and territorial expansion' backed by Western powers. 'Interestingly, these statements, while critical of Israel and the US, lack any expression of support for Iran, indicating North Korea is keeping its distance from Iran,' Lee claims. 'This is probably because it feels it has nothing to gain by coming across as too pro-Iran, and it does not see its key ally Russia getting too deeply involved in the conflict.' Pyongyang and Tehran, sharing a fierce anti-West posture, have a long history of ties. They established diplomatic relations in 1973 and first cooperated militarily during Iran's 1980-88 war with a West-backed Iraq when Pyongyang sold Scud B and Scud C ballistic missiles to Tehran. The missiles would become the foundation of Tehran 's current missile arsenal. In more recent times, North Korea has been accused of assisting Iran in developing its missile capabilities despite denials by both nations and efforts by international bodies to curb proliferation. In April this year, a high-level North Korean delegation visited Iran for an undeclared reason. The delegation, led by minister for external economic relations Yun Jong Ho, was speculated to have discussed the sharing of nuclear expertise, given Iran's interest in advancing its programme amid sanctions. 'The Kim regime will be learning from Iran's mistakes,' Leif-Eric Easley, professor of international studies at Ewha Womans University in Seoul, says. What Iran is suffering now is a textbook example of what can happen when you are not a nuclear weapons state but are getting close, he argues. 'The North Korean case is very different. Pyongyang's nuclear programme is much more advanced, with weapons possibly ready to launch on multiple delivery systems, including ICBMs.' That distinction matters. Iran's programme is vulnerable to strikes, Pyongyang isn't – at least not in the same way. He says that in Iran's case, Israel aggressively exploited Tehran's strategic and tactical errors, using superior intelligence, technology and training to degrade air defences, high-value personnel and retaliatory capabilities. South Korea, Pyongyang's closest adversary, 'is more risk-averse than Israel', he adds, 'and China and Russia are better positioned to help Pyongyang than Tehran'. Pyongyang withdrew from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, or NPT, in 2003, just two months before the US invaded Iraq on the pretext of dismantling its non-existent nuclear weapons programme, amid concerns Washington was planning an attack on North Korea next. Iran signed the NPT in 1968 and ratified it in 1970 – when it was still ruled by a Western-backed monarch – pledging not to pursue nuclear weapons and accepting International Atomic Energy Agency inspections to maintain the peaceful nature of its nuclear programme. Tehran's nuclear capabilities were further limited when it signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with the US under president Barack Obama as well as UK, France, Russia and China. The deal was designed to limit Iran's nuclear programme beyond the requirements of the NPT in exchange for sanctions relief. In 2018, during Donald Trump's first presidency, the US unilaterally withdrew from the deal. Kim has long regarded nuclear weapons as an existential insurance policy and the West's treatment of Iran over the years would have only hardened that view. 'North Korea has nuclear weapons but Iran does not, making it impossible for the United States and its allies to handle the North Korean nuclear problem the same way that they are handling Iran's,' Lee says. 'When North Korea comes under, or detects an attack, it could use nuclear weapons against South Korea, Japan, and US bases in Guam. North Korea's 2022 nuclear doctrine stipulates that it can use nuclear weapons if a hostile forces' nuclear and non-nuclear attack has been carried out or is imminent." Going forward, North Korea could boost its military ties with Iran and assist Tehran in enhancing its missile capabilities. It could also seek to break its diplomatic isolation by building an anti-US coalition with Iran, Russia, and China. "Pyongyang could provide important assistance in helping Iran reconstitute destroyed missile production facilities, including at new sites to avoid scrutiny, perhaps," Ankit Panda, of the US think tank Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told Reuters. Whether it would be interested in substantively cooperating on any effort to rebuild or accelerate Iran's nuclear weapons programme was less certain, given the political and military sensitivities over such technology, he said.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
US marine jailed for seven years for sexual assault in Japan
A court in Japan has sentenced a US marine to seven years in prison after finding him guilty of sexually assaulting a woman in Okinawa last Cpl Jamel Clayton, 22, attacked the woman in her 20s, choking her from behind and attempting sexual intercourse, the court case is one of a string involving US servicemen based in the Okinawa archipelago, where more than half of the 54,000 US soldiers serving in Japan are crimes committed by American personnel have sparked anger and protests by locals in Okinawa, the largest of which took place 30 years ago, when tens of thousands took to the street following the rape of a 12-year-old girl. In the last year alone, there have been four sexual assault cases involving US service members in Okinawa, including air force member Brennon Washington, who was given five years for the rape and kidnapping of an underage girl by a court in December in Tuesday's case had asked for 10 years for Clayton, according to Stars and Stripes, which covers US military had denied all the charges against him. His defence had pointed to the young woman's "intoxication" and inconsistencies in her story during the trial earlier in judges at Naha District Court gave Clayton, of Ohio, seven years in prison after finding the victim's testimonies had "a high-level of credibility throughout", Kyodo news agency sentencing, Judge Kazuhiko Obata described the attack as "vicious", with the woman being choked for one to two minutes, Stars and Stripes to Kyodo, the woman sustained injuries to her eyes which took two weeks to opposition to the US bases goes beyond just the criminal cases, extending to aircraft noise and have been previous efforts to move the US bases to less populated parts of Okinawa, but many locals want them removed however, say Japan's military alliance with the US is too strong for that to happen. And they say Tokyo needs Washington given the challenges it faces, be it China's growing claims over disputed waters and islands, or North Korea's missile tests.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Japan protests against new Chinese structure in East China Sea
TOKYO/BEIJING, June 24 (Reuters) - China has initiated the installation of a new structure on the west side of the geographical equidistance between Japan and China in the East China Sea, the Japanese foreign ministry said on Tuesday, adding it has lodged a protest with China. The ministry said in a statement "It is extremely regrettable" that China is pressing ahead with unilateral development when the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf in the East China Sea have not yet been delimited. Japan requests that China cease its unilateral development and to resume talks on the implementation of a 2008 agreement, in which the two countries agreed to cooperate on natural resources development in the East China Sea, it also said. There was no immediate response from the Chinese foreign ministry to Reuters' inquiries on the matter. Japan's ties with China have been plagued by a territorial dispute over a group of Japanese-administered islands in the East China Sea, called the Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China, as well as the legacy of Japan's past military aggression.
