Curriculum and assessment review to consider reducing number of GCSE exams
A review will consider reducing the 'volume of assessment' at GCSE following concerns about the pressure that exams can place on pupils.
The interim report of the independent curriculum and assessment review has said it will consider whether the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) – a Government performance measure for schools in England – remains 'effective'.
The review said it will ensure the curriculum is 'inclusive' so children can see themselves represented in their learning and to help challenge discrimination.
The Labour Government launched a review of curriculum and assessment in schools and colleges – chaired by education expert Professor Becky Francis – just weeks after winning the general election in July.
The interim report, published on Tuesday, sets out the areas of focus for its final report which will make recommendations in the autumn.
It has said it will consider 'whether there are opportunities to reduce the overall volume of assessment at key stage 4 without compromising the reliability of results'.
'A frequently raised concern is the impact of an intensive, high-stakes assessment system on wellbeing, due to the pressure that exams can place on students,' the report said.
The review's polling of young people found that half of those who completed their GCSE exams or assessments in summer 2024 found it difficult (41%) or very difficult (10%) to cope with stress during the exam period.
The report added that there have also been concerns that exams – coupled with the volume of content needing to be covered and their use in accountability measures – can lead to 'teaching to the test' in some cases.
It said pupils in England 'typically sit between 24 and 31 hours of exams' in Year 11, which is comparable with Singapore, but significantly more than other high-performing jurisdictions like Ireland (16 hours).
But it has ruled out fundamentally changing the number of subjects that students study or are assessed on at GCSE.
The review also suggested that the EBacc may 'constrain the choice of students, impacting their engagement and achievement, and limiting their access to, and the time available for, vocational and arts subjects.'
The EBacc – a performance measure of schools which aims to ensure pupils take English, maths, science, a humanities subject and a language at GCSE – was introduced in 2010 under former education secretary Michael Gove.
The review heard that the EBacc was one of two 'main barriers to achieving breadth and balance' at GCSE.
The interim report said: 'The intention behind the EBacc to improve access to a comprehensive, academic curriculum for all should be acknowledged, but as the review progresses, we will also consider whether this remains the most effective means of achieving this objective.'
It comes after education unions have called for the EBacc to be scrapped.
In a speech to the annual conference of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) in Liverpool on Saturday, Prof Francis suggested that teaching time for some subjects – including the arts, design and technology and computing and ICT – in schools had reduced during the GCSE years.
But Prof Francis, chief executive of the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) charity, told headteachers at the weekend that existing national assessments and qualifications – including standard assessment tests (Sats) in primary schools, GCSEs, A-levels and T-levels – were 'broadly working well'.
The interim report from the review concluded that formal assessments are an 'important part' of primary school education.
But it said it will examine how the assessment of writing in Year 6 'can be improved to support high and rising standards', and it will review concerns about the grammar, punctuation and spelling assessment.
In September, Prof Francis launched a call for evidence on the curriculum and assessment system and the panel received more than 7,000 responses.
The panel heard concerns about exam resits for pupils who did not secure a pass in their maths and English GCSEs 'being expected repeatedly and rapidly'.
Students in England are currently funded to retake maths and/or English until they achieve at least a grade 4 – which is considered a 'standard pass'.
The panel concluded that the funding policy is 'not yet fully delivering its intended purpose'.
The review said the expectation for study of maths and English should remain, but 'with greater nuance in measures' to ensure that as many learners as possible can achieve positive outcomes.
The interim report from the panel said the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and trends in digital information 'demand heightened media literacy and critical thinking', as well as digital skills.
It added that global social and environmental challenges 'require attention to scientific and cultural knowledge and skills' in the curriculum that can equip students to meet the challenges of the future.
Prof Francis said: 'I have learnt much from our data analysis and research, and from the fantastic response to our call for evidence.
'The review panel and I have a clear picture of the present state of the curriculum and assessment system.
'We have a deep understanding of where the key challenges lie and where our efforts to improve the system will see the best result in ensuring all young people are able to achieve and thrive.
'This evidence gives us confidence in embarking on the next stage of the review which will see us do further analysis on these issues, including subject content.'
Shadow education secretary Laura Trott said: 'Soft bigotry of low expectations is back.
'In moving away from examinations and towards coursework, qualifications will be less rigorous and less credible.'
Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the ASCL, said: 'A number of important areas of focus have been identified for the next stage of the review.
'It is useful for there to be further consideration of the impact of performance measures, including the English Baccalaureate, on young people's choices and outcomes.'
He added: 'Our hope is that the EBacc will be scrapped and more done to facilitate the studying of creative subjects that have suffered since its introduction.'
Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'NAHT are pleased that the negative impact of the EBacc, the excessive volume of assessment from GCSEs,, the ineffective resit policy and the need for a range of vocational and technical qualifications post 16 are all acknowledged and will be subject to further exploration.'
But he added that school leaders will be 'disappointed' by the lack of plans to reduce Sats tests for pupils.
Mr Whiteman said: 'This is a missed opportunity to reduce the negative impacts, costs and resources required for phonics, the multiplication check and the grammar, punctuation and spelling tests, as well as the costs and time associated with these.
'Scrapping these unnecessary tests will not reduce standards.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
State Pension's future under review amid retirement shake-up
The State Pension is facing a dramatic overhaul under a Government shake-up of retirement rules. The changes could see millions of future retirees having to wait longer to claim and receiving different levels of payment. Ministers have launched a wide-ranging review of the entire pension framework – looking at when people should be entitled to receive the state pension, how much they should get, and whether the current system is financially sustainable for the long term. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) confirmed that the second phase of its Pensions Review will examine 'the balance of all three pillars of the UK system – state, occupational and personal wealth'. It is expected to ask fundamental questions about how these components should work together to ensure a financially secure retirement for everyone. Full details and the panel leading the review are yet to be published. The review comes at a time of growing concern that the triple-lock guarantee – which ensures the state pension rises every year in line with wages, inflation or 2.5%, whichever is highest – is pushing up pension payments at an unsustainable rate. Rachel Vahey, head of public policy at AJ Bell, said: 'Pensions minister Torsten Bell recently ruled out scrapping the triple-lock guarantee, but as the state pension grows ever closer to the frozen personal allowance threshold it could be that the Government is finally forced to address the question of how much the state pension should really offer, at what age, and how it can increase payments sustainably each year.' The announcement comes hot on the heels of a new Pension Schemes Bill, which lays the groundwork for major changes, including the creation of massive collective investment funds – dubbed 'megafunds' – to deliver better returns for savers. Ms Vahey said the review could be the most significant shake-up since the Turner Review 20 years ago, which brought in automatic workplace pension enrolment and transformed saving habits in the UK. 'It's now 20 years since the Turner Review was published,' she said. 'That comprehensive look at the UK's retirement system ushered in a new regime for pensions, resulting in the introduction of landmark automatic enrolment reforms which changed pension saving in the UK forever.' Those reforms have seen more than 11 million people newly enrolled in workplace pensions since 2012, bringing the total number of active savers to around 20 million. But experts warn that while the number of savers has surged, many still aren't putting enough aside for a comfortable retirement. Ms Vahey said: 'Not enough people are saving enough money for their later life, and although automatic enrolment has gone a long way to create millions of new pension savers, instead of resting on our laurels we now need to take a good look at whether they are saving a sufficient amount of money to realise their retirement ambitions.' The review is also expected to probe the interaction between the state pension and private savings – including personal assets – raising questions about whether those with higher wealth might ultimately be expected to rely less on the state. Ms Vahey added: 'While details of this new Pension Review are thin on the ground at this stage, it has the potential to be as significant and could have far-reaching implications for people saving for their retirement.' Campaigners are urging the Government to set out full terms of the review as soon as possible to give millions of savers clarity on what's coming. Ms Vahey said: 'The Government now needs to clearly set out the terms of this review as soon as possible to give savers and the industry certainty over its plans.'
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Thousands gather for anti-austerity demonstration in London
Thousands of people have gathered to 'send a message' to the Government with a demonstration over spending cuts and welfare reform. Campaign group The People's Assembly said it expected trade unionists, campaigners and activists to attend the event in central London on Saturday. MPs Jeremy Corbyn and Diane Abbott are among those expected to give speeches at a rally in Whitehall. The organisers accused the Government of making spending cuts that target the poorest in society. Representatives from the National Education Union, Revolutionary Communist Party, Green Party and the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union could all be seen at the march's start point in Portland Place. The large crowd then set off towards Whitehall shortly before 1pm. Many of the protesters were holding placards that read 'Tax the rich, stop the cuts – welfare not warfare'. Other signs being held aloft said 'Nurses not nukes' and 'Cut war, not welfare'. A People's Assembly spokesperson said: 'The adherence to 'fiscal rules' traps us in a public service funding crisis, increasing poverty, worsening mental health and freezing public sector pay. 'Scrapping winter fuel payments, keeping the Tory two-child benefit cap, abandoning Waspi women, cutting £5 billion of welfare by limiting Pip and universal credit eligibility, and slashing UK foreign aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP, while increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, are presented as 'tough choices'. 'Real tough choices would be for a Labour government to tax the rich and their hidden wealth, to fund public services, fair pay, investment in communities and the NHS.' The People's Assembly said it is bringing together trade unionists, health, disability, housing, and welfare campaigners with community organisations under the slogan: No to Austerity2.0. There will be also be speeches from trade union leaders, disability rights activists, anti-poverty campaigners and groups calling for more investment in the NHS and other public services. The spokesperson added: 'We face a growing threat from the far right, fuelled by racism, division and failed politics. We need to see people's lives improve, we need to see the vulnerable cared for and an end to child poverty. 'On June 7, we march for education, for our NHS, for welfare, for refugees, against hate, and for a society in which our children can flourish.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Thousands gather for anti-austerity demonstration in London
MPs Jeremy Corbyn and Diane Abbott are among those expected to give speeches at a rally in Whitehall. The organisers accused the Government of making spending cuts that target the poorest in society. Representatives from the National Education Union, Revolutionary Communist Party, Green Party and the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union could all be seen at the march's start point in Portland Place. The large crowd then set off towards Whitehall shortly before 1pm. Many of the protesters were holding placards that read 'Tax the rich, stop the cuts – welfare not warfare'. Other signs being held aloft said 'Nurses not nukes' and 'Cut war, not welfare'. A People's Assembly spokesperson said: 'The adherence to 'fiscal rules' traps us in a public service funding crisis, increasing poverty, worsening mental health and freezing public sector pay. Thousands of people were taking part in the march (Lucy North/PA) 'Scrapping winter fuel payments, keeping the Tory two-child benefit cap, abandoning Waspi women, cutting £5 billion of welfare by limiting Pip and universal credit eligibility, and slashing UK foreign aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP, while increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, are presented as 'tough choices'. 'Real tough choices would be for a Labour government to tax the rich and their hidden wealth, to fund public services, fair pay, investment in communities and the NHS.' The People's Assembly said it is bringing together trade unionists, health, disability, housing, and welfare campaigners with community organisations under the slogan: No to Austerity2.0. There will be also be speeches from trade union leaders, disability rights activists, anti-poverty campaigners and groups calling for more investment in the NHS and other public services. The spokesperson added: 'We face a growing threat from the far right, fuelled by racism, division and failed politics. We need to see people's lives improve, we need to see the vulnerable cared for and an end to child poverty. 'On June 7, we march for education, for our NHS, for welfare, for refugees, against hate, and for a society in which our children can flourish.'
