Curriculum and assessment review to consider reducing number of GCSE exams
The interim report of the independent curriculum and assessment review has said it will consider whether the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) – a Government performance measure for schools in England – remains 'effective'.
The review said it will ensure the curriculum is 'inclusive' so children can see themselves represented in their learning and to help challenge discrimination.
The Labour Government launched a review of curriculum and assessment in schools and colleges – chaired by education expert Professor Becky Francis – just weeks after winning the general election in July.
The interim report, published on Tuesday, sets out the areas of focus for its final report which will make recommendations in the autumn.
It has said it will consider 'whether there are opportunities to reduce the overall volume of assessment at key stage 4 without compromising the reliability of results'.
'A frequently raised concern is the impact of an intensive, high-stakes assessment system on wellbeing, due to the pressure that exams can place on students,' the report said.
The review's polling of young people found that half of those who completed their GCSE exams or assessments in summer 2024 found it difficult (41%) or very difficult (10%) to cope with stress during the exam period.
The report added that there have also been concerns that exams – coupled with the volume of content needing to be covered and their use in accountability measures – can lead to 'teaching to the test' in some cases.
It said pupils in England 'typically sit between 24 and 31 hours of exams' in Year 11, which is comparable with Singapore, but significantly more than other high-performing jurisdictions like Ireland (16 hours).
But it has ruled out fundamentally changing the number of subjects that students study or are assessed on at GCSE.
The review also suggested that the EBacc may 'constrain the choice of students, impacting their engagement and achievement, and limiting their access to, and the time available for, vocational and arts subjects.'
The EBacc – a performance measure of schools which aims to ensure pupils take English, maths, science, a humanities subject and a language at GCSE – was introduced in 2010 under former education secretary Michael Gove.
The review heard that the EBacc was one of two 'main barriers to achieving breadth and balance' at GCSE.
The interim report said: 'The intention behind the EBacc to improve access to a comprehensive, academic curriculum for all should be acknowledged, but as the review progresses, we will also consider whether this remains the most effective means of achieving this objective.'
It comes after education unions have called for the EBacc to be scrapped.
In a speech to the annual conference of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) in Liverpool on Saturday, Prof Francis suggested that teaching time for some subjects – including the arts, design and technology and computing and ICT – in schools had reduced during the GCSE years.
But Prof Francis, chief executive of the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) charity, told headteachers at the weekend that existing national assessments and qualifications – including standard assessment tests (Sats) in primary schools, GCSEs, A-levels and T-levels – were 'broadly working well'.
The interim report from the review concluded that formal assessments are an 'important part' of primary school education.
But it said it will examine how the assessment of writing in Year 6 'can be improved to support high and rising standards', and it will review concerns about the grammar, punctuation and spelling assessment.
In September, Prof Francis launched a call for evidence on the curriculum and assessment system and the panel received more than 7,000 responses.
The panel heard concerns about exam resits for pupils who did not secure a pass in their maths and English GCSEs 'being expected repeatedly and rapidly'.
Students in England are currently funded to retake maths and/or English until they achieve at least a grade 4 – which is considered a 'standard pass'.
The panel concluded that the funding policy is 'not yet fully delivering its intended purpose'.
The review said the expectation for study of maths and English should remain, but 'with greater nuance in measures' to ensure that as many learners as possible can achieve positive outcomes.
The interim report from the panel said the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and trends in digital information 'demand heightened media literacy and critical thinking', as well as digital skills.
It added that global social and environmental challenges 'require attention to scientific and cultural knowledge and skills' in the curriculum that can equip students to meet the challenges of the future.
Prof Francis said: 'I have learnt much from our data analysis and research, and from the fantastic response to our call for evidence.
'The review panel and I have a clear picture of the present state of the curriculum and assessment system.
'We have a deep understanding of where the key challenges lie and where our efforts to improve the system will see the best result in ensuring all young people are able to achieve and thrive.
'This evidence gives us confidence in embarking on the next stage of the review which will see us do further analysis on these issues, including subject content.'
Shadow education secretary Laura Trott said: 'Soft bigotry of low expectations is back.
'In moving away from examinations and towards coursework, qualifications will be less rigorous and less credible.'
Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the ASCL, said: 'A number of important areas of focus have been identified for the next stage of the review.
'It is useful for there to be further consideration of the impact of performance measures, including the English Baccalaureate, on young people's choices and outcomes.'
He added: 'Our hope is that the EBacc will be scrapped and more done to facilitate the studying of creative subjects that have suffered since its introduction.'
Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'NAHT are pleased that the negative impact of the EBacc, the excessive volume of assessment from GCSEs,, the ineffective resit policy and the need for a range of vocational and technical qualifications post 16 are all acknowledged and will be subject to further exploration.'
But he added that school leaders will be 'disappointed' by the lack of plans to reduce Sats tests for pupils.
Mr Whiteman said: 'This is a missed opportunity to reduce the negative impacts, costs and resources required for phonics, the multiplication check and the grammar, punctuation and spelling tests, as well as the costs and time associated with these.
'Scrapping these unnecessary tests will not reduce standards.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Patriotism ‘always important' to Starmer, says No 10 amid flag row
Flags have been taken down in Tower Hamlets in east London as well as Birmingham. On Monday, St George's cross flags were pictured on the A1206 on the Isle of Dogs in the east of the capital, after campaigners attached them following an online movement called 'Operation Raise the Colours'. BirminghamLive also reported flags that have been flown in areas of the city have been removed by the local council. Asked what the Prime Minister's view is on the councils that have removed the flags, Sir Keir's official spokesman said on Monday: 'I think the PM has always talked about his pride of being British, the patriotism he feels. Where flags are attached to council-owned infrastructure without permission, they may be removed as part of routine maintenance Tower Hamlets Council 'I think he's talked about that previously […] not least recently in relation to the Lionesses' successful campaign in the Euros. 'Patriotism will always be an important thing to him.' Asked if Sir Keir is supportive of people who put up English flags, the spokesman said: 'Absolutely, patriotism, putting up English flags. 'We put up English flags all around Downing Street every time the English football team – women's and men's – are out trying to win games for us.' Residents saw Manchester Road in Tower Hamlets, east London, lined with St George's flags over the weekend but only a few remained by Monday. Walking along the busy inner city street on Monday lunchtime, one local resident who did not want to give his name said: 'They were all along the street, lots of them. It looked nice really. It was very colourful. 'I saw them late on Saturday. They just appeared and only noticed they have all gone now.' His neighbour said: 'They all went up at the weekend and have come down now.' She added that she did not feel threatened or scared, but it was definitely a 'very pointed act'. The local resident, who did not want to be named, said: 'It was right they should come down as I think it was after the demonstration about asylum.' She said 'it was not about community', adding that normally when you see flags go up it is around a celebration or about bringing people together. A St George's Cross flag near the A1206 in the Isle of Dogs (Jordan Pettitt/PA) 'There was no noise or trouble about it. They just went up and I did not see anyone take them down.' She added: 'It was OK. I know a lot of people like it and it was bright.' Another resident said: 'It was all along the road. It was nice. There was nothing wrong with it. 'It went all along to the Britannia Hotel.' He added it was 'good to see' because 'so much today is about division and I am just proud of being English'. The Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf has been at the centre of protests over asylum seekers in recent weeks. Tower Hamlets Council said it has a 'policy setting out which flags are flown from council buildings and on which occasions'. In a statement, the council added: 'We are aware members of the public have been putting up St George flags on various structures. 'While we recognise people wish to express their views, we have a responsibility to monitor and maintain council infrastructure. 'Where flags are attached to council-owned infrastructure without permission, they may be removed as part of routine maintenance.' A Birmingham City Council spokesperson said: 'We proudly fly the Union flag outside the Council House every day and recognise the importance of the Union flag and flag of St George as symbols of national pride. 'Brummies are proud to be British and proud that this is a welcoming city celebrating many different cultures. 'When it comes to items attached to lamp posts, it is normal council procedure for these to be removed on a regular basis, in line with our health and safety obligations. 'As has always been the case, people are free to fly or hang flags from their homes or gardens, but we ask that they are not attached to street furniture.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Raising VAT rates would let Rachel Reeves fill budget black hole and enable growth
Tax rises appear increasingly likely. Polly Toynbee discusses some possible tax changes, including VAT (Both left and right agree taxes must rise. Time for Labour to get creative, 12 August). My view is that a 2.5 percentage point rise in the average VAT rate is the most viable option to raise sufficient revenue without reducing growth. Toynbee also discusses possible changes to inheritance tax and the introduction of a wealth tax. These policies may be redistributive but are unlikely to raise substantial revenue. As an example, Norway currently imposes a wealth tax that raises less than 3% of its non-petroleum tax revenue. Given the urgent need for revenue, a VAT raise is likely to be the UK's best option. First, VAT raises significant revenue, at about 17% of total UK tax revenue. This means that a 2.5 percentage point increase may raise as much as £21bn yearly. This is roughly five times more than what it is expected the government will raise from the stricter taxation of non-domiciles. Second, VAT poses limited harm to growth. Since it also applies to people who are outside the labour market, it dampens work incentives less than income taxes do. A VAT rise may partially replace the government's failure to reform disability benefits. In addition, increases in VAT do not reduce incentives to save, as costs go up by the same ratio today and in the future. And third, VAT can be quite progressive. While new savings are unaffected, old savings that people spend in the future are subject to VAT increases. Most importantly, while the VAT rate is flat, using the revenue to support public services disproportionally benefits the poor. This means that raising sufficient revenue may be most important for BergLecturer, Trinity College, University of Cambridge Anent Polly Toynbee's tax suggestions for Labour, if it regains its heart, may I add two. The best taxes not only raise money but also do societal good. So why not use one to address climate, inequity and safety issues, by taxing cars by their weight and annual mileage as reported at the MOT test? Both relate directly to their energy SeatonEmeritus professor of environmental medicine, University of Aberdeen
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Labour MSP defies Scottish Secretary in call for wealth tax
A wealth tax is a form of taxation which is designed to collect money from an individual's total assets as opposed to specific levies on income or property. Proposed wealth taxes have included a levy on cumulative wealth - including everything from property, to investments, to art. The idea of the policy is that it could make the tax system fairer by directly targeting accumulated assets. The policy has recently emerged as a key dividing line in the parliamentary Labour Party in both Westminster and Holyrood. READ MORE: Last week, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray dismissed the idea of the UK Government implementing a wealth tax, saying that there was 'no silver bullet' to the country's economic woes. Speaking to the Comedian Matt Forde at the Edinburgh Fringe, Mr Murray said '[A wealth tax] doesn't work. The Laffer curve [an economic theory which explains the correlation between taxation and government revenue] is there for everyone to see. 'So, yes, you can bring in a wealth tax, because it might make you feel principally better. You might bring in £200 million but the cost of doing that would be huge because there is just flight, whether we like that or not.' Scottish Secretary Ian Murray last week publicly denounced the idea of a wealth tax (Image: PA)Contradicting Mr Murray, Ms Villalba said of the Laffer curve: 'this theory, though influential, is unfounded.' She went on to say that she believes that 'all financial wealth originates from human labour'. 'It would therefore take a mass exodus or nationwide risk to life for wealth creation in a country to cease.' 'We need only look at the hit private profit would have taken during the pandemic had the state not stepped in to shore it up to see the primacy of human labour evidenced. 'A significant proportion of wealth is in immobile assets like land, property and British-based businesses…This wealth cannot up sticks and leave with an individual. The resources remain in the country and are subject to taxation. 'We know we won't lose wealth creation as long as we have a fit and able population to do the work. 'In fact, the greatest risk to wealth is workforce shortages caused by a public health service on its knees, an undervalued public education system and a cost-of-living crisis deterring new parents. In short, the greatest risk to wealth is continuing to let it go untaxed.' The Scottish Greens have also recently made fresh calls for a wealth tax in response to 'soaring' CEO pay. Discussing new figures which showed that some British Executives' pay had reached over 100 times that of the average worker, MSP Maggie Chapman said: 'A wealth tax is now a necessity, to make sure that those who have enriched themselves the most pay their fair share.' Rachel Reeves refused to be drawn on a wealth tax when quizzed by journalists earlier this month. She said the UK Government had to 'get the balance right on taxation' but stressed the 'number one priority' was growing the economy.
