
Police wrong to join Pride march, judge rules
Linzi Smith, 34, a gender-critical lesbian, brought a case against Northumbria Police after officers, including Vanessa Jardine, the head of the force, took part in last year's parade in Newcastle.
Ms Smith argued that it was wrong to allow uniformed officers to actively participate in an event that promoted gender ideology and was supported by transgender activists.
Responding to the ruling, Ms Smith said: 'I am delighted with the judgment of the court. It is terrifying to live in a community where the police have abandoned their duty of impartiality and embraced a highly controversial political cause.'
In the legal claim, officers were accused of joining in the march; stationing a police van decked out in Pride colours at the event and associating with messaging that supported gender ideology.
The hearing was told there was also a Northumbria Police static display staffed by uniformed officers and a transgender Pride flag incorporating the force's insignia.
Ms Smith argued that while she accepted it was necessary for the Pride march to be policed it was wrong for officers to actively participate because it breached their professional oath to operate with impartiality.
Allowing the judicial review, Mr Justice Linden said: 'The fact that the officers had publicly stated their support for transgender rights by taking part in the 2024 march would be likely to give the impression that they may not deal with the matter fairly and impartially.'
He went on: 'It is not hard to imagine circumstances in which the officers in question might be called on to deal with a clash between gender critical people and supporters of gender ideology, and therefore situations where the former had cause for concern as to whether they were being dealt with impartially.'
The court also heard how during the march there were pro-Palestinian protesters chanting slogans such as: 'From the River To The Sea, Palestine Will Be Free', 'No Pride in Genocide' and 'Toute le monde deteste la police'.
The case was supported by Kathleen Stock, a gender-critical professor, and Harry Miller, co-founder of the campaign group Fair Cop, which seeks to 'remove politics from policing'.
Professor Stock said: 'For me, the sight of the Northumbria Police either participating in Pride marches, supporting Pride events in public statements, or using or encouraging the use of Progress or rainbow flags, emblems, lanyards or other symbols associated with trans causes in a public-facing way, conveys its support for gender ideology.
'If that is not the force's intention, it is certainly its effect.'
It is not clear how the ruling will impact on the force's plans to police this year's event, which is taking place this weekend.
Mr Miller said: 'The significance of this ruling means that in future the police will attend events like this at their peril.
'But it is sad that we had to go to court to challenge something that was so blindingly obvious.'
He said the ruling should bring an end to police officers attending such events and wearing associated livery.
'The clarity in the ruling should have a profound effect on Chief Constables across the UK,' Mr Miller told the Telegraph.
'Pride is political in the same way that any protest is political. Police engagement should therefore be solely operational. No lanyards, flags, whistles or painted cars. Just good, honest bobbies remaining polite and keeping the peace.'
In his concluding remarks the judge said the findings only related to the 2024 event, adding: 'It will be a matter for the Defendant to consider, in the light of what I have said in this judgment, whether her current proposed approach to the 2025 Event should remain as it is.'
In a statement following the ruling, a spokesman for Northumbria Police said: 'The officers, staff and volunteers of Northumbria Police are dedicated and passionate about providing each and every person of our wonderful region with an outstanding policing service.
'In doing so, we recognise not all communities share the same level of confidence in policing for a variety of reasons. We want to ensure everyone knows that we are absolutely here for them when they need us.
'Part of that is us being visible in those communities and playing an active part in our force area. Throughout the year, we will have an important role to play in a variety of events, including parades and festivals.
'During these events while our primary aim is to keep people safe, it also provides us with an opportunity to engage with people including those who may have less confidence in policing. It is vitally important they feel supported and we continue to build their trust in us.
'That is why we felt it important to challenge the case which was brought against us and which has implications for wider policing.
'We will work through the ruling to understand the implications, while staying true to our values of fairness, visibility, and support for all.'
Other forces are currently looking at the ruling to see how it could impact on their approach to the policing similar events.
Gavin Stephens, chairman of the National Police Chiefs' Council, said: 'Every week police officers and staff will as part of their duties take part in thousands of events up and down the country, from community events at village halls through to large scale events like carnivals, parades and festivals.
'However, we recognise that policing must also maintain its impartiality, including in the types of events it supports and plays an active part in.
'We are working through the detail of this judgment and will ensure this decision is communicated to forces for them to consider.
'We are also working with the College of Policing on broader guidance which will help local forces make decisions around participation in events to maintain their impartiality.
'Policing values all our communities and will continue to police in a way that aims to build trust and confidence, including among those who have less confidence in our service.
'This is the cornerstone of good policing and especially neighbourhood policing. Our desire to ensure we recognise and provide good policing for all communities will remain unchanged.'
Newcastle United ban
Earlier this year Northumbria Police apologised to Ms Smith, who is a season ticket holder at Newcastle United, following an investigation that took place when she expressed gender critical views on social media.
She was accused of being transphobic by a complainant who told Newcastle United that trans people would not feel safe sitting near her.
A hate crime investigation was launched and she was banned by the club.
Northumbria Police later admitted crucial elements of their investigation into the claims were not acceptable.
It said that while there was no misconduct by its officers, the way they handled her case and similar hate crime reports in future should be subject to further training.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
10 minutes ago
- BBC News
UK condemns Hong Kong cash offer for help in arresting activists
The UK has condemned the latest cash offer from Hong Kong authorities for people who help in the arrest of pro-democracy activists living in Britain. In a joint statement, Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper described the move as "another example of transnational repression".People are being offered between $25,000 (HK$200,000) and $125,000 for information leading to the arrest of 19 individuals, all of whom are pro-democracy activists living abroad. China has denounced as "interference" criticism over this type of appeal, which it has made three times previously. The 19 people are accused of violating Beijing's national security law imposed in 2020 in response to the 2019 anti-government protests that rocked the city for amounts on offer vary depending on the individual. Among the highest offers on the list are those for Choi Ming-da and Fok Ka-chi, who Hong Kong police said operated a social media channel named "Tuesdayroad". Politician Nathan Law – who had been a lawmaker on the Legislative Council of Hong Kong – and activist and commentator Yuan Gong-Yi also appear on the lists. The first such rewards were issued in July and December 2023. They targeted Nathan Law - who told the BBC that his life became more dangerous after a bounty was announced - and Simon Cheng, a former UK consulate employee detained in 2019 in a high-profile case. The third series of rewards targeted six pro-democracy activists living in the UK and Canada, including Tony Chung, the former leader of a pro-independence group. A special visa scheme introduced in 2021 saw around 150,000 Hong Kong residents move to the UK, according to the Home Office. In November last year a Hong Kong court sentenced dozens of pro-democracy leaders to years in jail for subversion, following a controversial national security their statement in response to the latest bounty, Ms Cooper and Mr Lammy said "this government will continue to stand with the people of Hong Kong, including those who have made the UK their home. We take the protection of their rights, freedoms, and safety very seriously."Their joint statement added: "The UK is committed to human rights, the rule of law, and the safety of all individuals in the UK. That's why we have taken further steps to complete the severing of ties between the UK and Hong Kong extradition systems by removing Hong Kong from the Extradition Act 2003."


Sky News
34 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump issues warning to leaders as he arrives in Scotland
Why you can trust Sky News Donald Trump has landed in Scotland for a four-day trip including high-level meetings - praising Sir Keir Starmer as "a good man" but calling illegal migration a "horrible invasion" that is "killing Europe". Crowds gathered at Prestwick Airport in Ayrshire amid a major security operation for the US president's visit. Mr Trump told reporters: "I like your prime minister. He's slightly more liberal than I am... but he's a good man... he got a trade deal done. It's a good deal for the UK." The pair are expected to discuss potential changes to the UK-US trade deal which came into force last month. Trump left Air Force One to head to Turnberry, one of his Scottish golf courses. Part of the trip will include the opening of another course in Aberdeenshire, billed as "the greatest 36 holes in golf". "There's no place like Turnberry. It's the best, probably the best course in the world. And I would say Aberdeen is right up there," the US president said. " Sean Connery helped get me the [planning] permits. If it weren't for Sean Connery, we wouldn't have those great courses," he added. During the trip, President Trump will also hold discussions with Scotland's First Minister John Swinney and EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who is keen to secure a trade deal with the US. Mr Trump told reporters there was "a good 50-50 chance" of an agreement with the EU but added there were "maybe 20 different" sticking points. EU diplomats say a deal could result in a broad 15% tariff on EU goods and half of the 30% Trump is threatening to impose by 1 August. The US president touched on illegal immigration and gave European leaders a stark warning. "You better get your act together or you're not going to have Europe anymore. You got to get your act together," he said. "But you're allowing it to happen to your countries and you got to stop this horrible invasion that's happening to Europe. Immigration is killing Europe." 1:30 He was also scathing about the installation of wind turbines across the continent. "Stop the windmills. You're ruining your countries," he said. "It's so sad. You fly over and you see these windmills all over the place, ruining your beautiful fields and valleys and killing your birds." Domestically, Mr Trump faces the biggest political crisis of his second term in office over his administration's handling of files linked to disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who died in prison in 2019. He faced another round of questions after stepping off Air Force One. "You're making a big thing over something that's not a big thing. I'm focused on making deals, not on conspiracy theories that you are," he said. Mr Trump added that "now's not the time" to discuss a pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's imprisoned accomplice. 17:35 👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 While the president's visit did attract some enthusiastic flag-waving supporters at Prestwick Airport, he is also likely to trigger a number of protests, prompting Police Scotland to call in support from other forces in the UK. The Stop Trump Scotland group has planned demonstrations on Saturday in Edinburgh, Aberdeen and Dumfries. About 70% of Scots have an unfavourable opinion of Mr Trump, while 18% have a positive opinion, an Ipsos poll in March found. Mr Trump is staying at his Turnberry property on Scotland's west coast this weekend, before travelling to Aberdeenshire on Monday, where he will open a second 18-hole course. He is due to return to the UK in September for a state visit hosted by the King - the first world leader in modern times to undertake two UK state visits.


Times
38 minutes ago
- Times
Trans guidance from equality watchdog may foster distrust, SNP warns
Proposed transgender guidance from Britain's equalities watchdog will foster 'distrust' and lead to 'social policing of bodies', the SNP has warned. Ministers said the draft changes to the code of practice from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), made after the Supreme Court ruling that women are defined by biological sex under equalities law, 'may lead to abuse'. In a submission to the EHRC's consultation, the Scottish government repeated its acceptance of April's Supreme Court judgment, which came after it lost a legal challenge brought by campaigners. However, it raised concerns about proposals of how it should be implemented in practice, leading For Women Scotland, the group that won the case, to accuse the devolved government of echoing messaging from 'transactivist groups it heavily funds'. The EHRC draft guidance includes a biological definition of sex and states that this should be the basis for granting access to single-sex facilities and services. In practice, this would mean trans women being barred from female-only spaces. In the submission, the Scottish government said: 'We note that the impact of the guidance may lead to situations where some members of the public will take it upon themselves to judge appearances and assume someone's sex based on their perception of that person's sex or gender identity. 'This sense of distrust in others and social policing of bodies is detrimental not only for trans and non-binary people, but for those who are born male or female who may not fit into society's current expectations of what a man or woman looks like, which change over time, and in different contexts and places.' The SNP has faced criticism for its failure to implement the Supreme Court ruling, with a series of policies that allow gender self-ID still in operation throughout the public sector. These include guidelines for teachers, which state that biological boys should generally be allowed to participate in girls' sports and workplace guidance, which says trans staff should be allowed to use the toilets or changing facilities they feel most comfortable with. Ministers pledged to act once the final guidance is published, but faced claims they were attempting to delay a politically contentious issue until after next year's Holyrood elections. The submission added: 'Encouraging a situation where authority is given to question someone's biological sex and ask for proof thereof may lead to abuse if not done appropriately. 'At the same time this places an undue burden on individuals, requiring untrained staff or providers to make assumptions or judgments about whether a person appears to present as trans, which is potentially discriminatory and unfair.' The submission called for an emphasis on 'inclusion as opposed to exclusion,' noting that examples provided in the planned code update mainly 'provide guidance on where and how transgender people can be excluded from services and associations'. Trina Budge, a For Women Scotland director, said: 'This is a substandard response from the Scottish government, which fails to address the EHRC's specific questions, choosing instead to focus on areas raised by the transactivist groups it heavily funds. 'The government says it has accepted the Supreme Court's ruling and it may have done so far as keeping women's representation on public boards for biological women only, but it seems to be expecting the EHRC to tell it how to shoehorn men who say they are women into any other single-sex provision allowed under the Equality Act. 'We're not sure if the government is wilfully misunderstanding that this is not legally possible or if it intends to continue to defy the judgment of the Supreme Court. ' Tess White, the Scottish Conservative equalities spokeswoman, accused the SNP of putting 'women and girls in danger'. She said: 'The SNP aren't just failing to implement the Supreme Court's verdict, they now appear to be criticising the EHRC. 'The judgment from the UK's highest court was crystal clear, yet the nationalists are still desperately stalling for time and trying to pass the buck. This doesn't just send the wrong message, it puts women and girls in danger. 'The Sandie Peggie case shows exactly what happens when organisations pander to gender extremists instead of standing up for women's rights. 'Scots won't be fooled by the SNP's blatant attempts to run down the clock. John Swinney must act now and order all public bodies to follow the law and provide single-sex spaces.'