Fight for the future: Science Town Hall gives Philadelphians a chance to question elected officials on budget cuts
The future of scientific inquiry and academic freedom is in jeopardy.
For the past four months, the scientific community has watched as the Trump administration continues its assault on science and higher education. Trump and his team decimate years of life-saving research through mass layoffs and abrupt funding cuts — interrupting progress and halting discoveries on the verge of a breakthrough.
In Philadelphia, we have seen universities targeted, ostensibly for their diversity, equity and inclusion programs, and many researchers and federal employees have lost grants and jobs. Even greater losses are expected if Congress approves the sweeping science cuts outlined in Trump's proposed budget, now under consideration.
This is a moment of urgent action. Protests and rallies are important, but they are not enough. We need our federal and state elected officials to hear from you, their constituents, about how the Trump administration's anti-science policies are affecting your lives — and livelihoods. Equally as important, we need them to tell us firsthand how they plan to stand up to the Trump administration and protect the scientific community in Philadelphia.
We are the group that brought 20,000 people together for the March for Science in 2017 under the first Trump administration and put on the Stand Up for Science rally earlier this year.
Like many in the Philadelphia area, our work at Philadelphia Science Action (PSA) and lives have flourished because of the vibrant science and higher education community. Philadelphia is known for its 'eds and meds', a city home to academic institutions, health system, and biotech companies.
All are crucial to a thriving economy in the Philadelphia region, as there are over 1,200 life sciences companies, close to 40 hospitals and health systems, and over 100 colleges and academic universities. Our livelihood, progress and innovative spirit depend on the health and science sectors thriving.
Which is why our organization, Philadelphia Science Action (PSA), is hosting a Science Town Hall with our Pennsylvania elected officials. PSA's mission is 'to promote science and scientific thinking for the advancement of society, and to champion evidence-based thinking and political dialogue.' We are the group that brought 20,000 people together for the March for Science in 2017 under the first Trump administration and put on the Stand Up for Science rally earlier this year.
We are demanding that our elected representatives take up the challenge of defending science in Greater Philadelphia by bringing the conversation to them. In partnership with the Science History Institute, Skype A Scientist and Start Talking Science, we are hosting a Science Town Hall at the Science History Institute from 6 to 8 pm on May 29.
Make your voice heard by speaking directly to your representatives
As our congressional representatives consider Trump's proposed budget — the blueprint for enacting his domestic agenda — they must recognize the grave consequences of allowing science and innovation to be gutted.
Thus far, Congress has failed to adequately protect our region, confirming cabinet appointees and placing our nation's health and future in the hands of those openly hostile to the public sector. Equally urgent is the responsibility of our state and local leaders to step up and strengthen support for science, research and innovation here at home.
As national leaders in research and innovation, Philadelphia and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania should be at the forefront of efforts to protect the freedom and sustainability of American science and higher education — not only because our region's economic strength and cultural vitality depend on it, but because we have long stood at the vanguard of advancing the public good through science.
That's why it's so important for the Philadelphia community to show up, speak out and get the answers they deserve.
The Science Town Hall will provide an opportunity for scientists, researchers, students, educators, clinicians, entrepreneurs and the community direct access to the elected officials who represent them. Attendees will have an open forum to voice concerns, ask questions and discuss with policymakers how they are supporting the Philadelphia scientific community.
This is our chance to help shape the future of science, technology, engineering/education, math/medicine in Philadelphia and to influence the policies needed to protect our scientific community.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Technical.ly
03-08-2025
- Technical.ly
State rep: Federal cuts leave Pennsylvania torn between basic needs and big ideas
This is a guest post by state Rep. Mary Isaacson, an elected official serving Pennsylvania's 175th District in Philadelphia. Passing the state budget each year is much more than putting numbers on a spreadsheet. It's a reflection of our shared values. State lawmakers want progress for our state and the people who live here. Therefore, we — especially those of us in the House Democratic Caucus — look to fund our state universities like Penn State, Lincoln, Pitt and Temple that help shape the next generation of leaders, and to fund our institutions that promote innovation, like Ben Franklin Technology Partners. Unfortunately, when there is so much chaos and uncertainty in our federal government, we cannot count on federal funding like we have in previous years. The federal cuts we already know about will have devastating and rippling consequences. Pennsylvania simply does not have the resources to replace federal funding cuts for science. Rep. Mary Isaacson Pennsylvania simply does not have the resources to replace federal funding cuts for science, for example. These wanton cuts to funding will not just rob Pennsylvania of the opportunity to be pioneers in technology, scientific research and innovative startups; they'll also dim our ability to think outside the box to advance our state's future as we struggle to have people's basic needs met. We are now in a position where we are tasked with the impossible: continuing to fund programs that will keep Pennsylvania competitive and innovative while meeting the basic needs of Pennsylvanians, such as healthcare, food and affordable housing. This is not ideal as the state budget is supposed to carve a path for Pennsylvania's future success. However, it is quickly becoming a reality that we must make difficult decisions. To manage the continuing burden of federal dysfunction, state House Democrats continue reaching across the political aisle and across legislative chambers to protect the people of Pennsylvania in every way we can. For example, the House recently acted in bipartisan spirit to protect Pennsylvanians from immoral health insurance companies that are more interested in their bottom line than in helping patients. Everyone deserves easy and affordable access to healthcare. The House passed a package of bills in March that are designed to enshrine key elements of the Affordable Care Act, should federal lawmakers and the Trump administration repeal or change the federal healthcare law. House Bill 535, sponsored by Pittsburgh-area Rep. Dan Frankel, would prohibit Pennsylvania insurers from capping coverage benefits. House Bill 618, sponsored by Luzerne County Rep. Jim Haddock, would prohibit Pennsylvania insurers from denying or excluding coverage based on pre-existing conditions. House Bill 755, sponsored by Bucks County Rep. Perry Warren, would require Pennsylvania insurers to cover preventative healthcare services without cost-sharing. House Bill 404, sponsored by Wilkes-Barre-area Rep. Eddie Day Pashinski, would allow children to remain on their parents' private health insurance plan up to the age of 26. We need a serious, honest conversation in Pennsylvania — not just about what we fund, but about what we're being asked to replace. When we have to replace funding cut by the federal government for food assistance for senior citizens and healthcare for the poor and elderly, we will be hard-pressed to both feed people in need and fight for university lab funding for their groundbreaking research. Unless the federal government recommits to the basic safety net of healthcare, food and housing, we're going to be forced to make trade-offs that hurt real people and Pennsylvania's chances to be a leader in innovation and scientific research. This isn't about partisanship—it's about partnership. We need Washington, DC, to hold up its end so we can continue doing our job here in Harrisburg. And we need our communities to stay informed, engaged and vocal, because the stakes are too high to be decided in silence.
Technical.ly
31-07-2025
- Technical.ly
A growing movement of ‘nursineers' blends tech and medicine to fix healthcare from the inside
When someone asks Garett Craig what he does for a living, the answer usually raises eyebrows. 'Nursineer' is the clever portmanteau Craig, a 27-year-old Canonsburg resident, has coined to describe his dual role as both nurse and engineer. It's his way of explaining a career that doesn't yet have a standard title, but he's leading the way to change that. Craig had no plans to become a nurse when he began studying biomedical engineering at Duquesne University in 2016. However, when he was offered the chance to earn a dual degree in nursing and engineering in exchange for an extra 18 months of coursework, he took a leap of faith, betting the added education would benefit his future career. 'I'm the oldest in my family, and I was always looked at as the support person and someone that everyone relied on,' Craig told 'Healthcare was that perfect role [for me], because you have patients that are relying on you to be an advocate for them and to make the best decision for what their needs are.' After graduating in 2022, Craig worked as an artificial heart engineer for healthcare giant UPMC, supporting patients with LVADs, or mechanical pump implants used to assist a failing heart. That hands-on experience, combined with his current role as an application consultant for medical equipment company Brainlab, revealed a healthcare gap that Craig is now determined to bridge: the disconnect between clinical needs and the tools engineers design to meet them. '[Engineers] don't take into consideration the nurse on a midnight shift who's burnt out, or the patient who comes in and throws the [medical device] against the wall that wasn't durable enough to be dropped,' Craig said. 'That's a scenario they've never considered because they've never been through it.' Now, Craig is spreading the word about this hybrid role, speaking with universities, attending Pittsburgh's weekly life sciences meetup BioBreakfast and connecting with fellow nurse-engineers. He hopes to bring nursineering into the mainstream, making it easier for medical tech to align with the real-world needs of hospital staff. 'It really doesn't matter to me what it's called,' Craig said. 'It just matters to me that there's someone who is a nurse and an engineer and is doing work with both of these backgrounds to improve all facets of healthcare areas.' In this edition of How I Got Here series, Craig talks about his passion for nursineering, the day-to-day realities of his job and why he's trying to build a community of people who share this hybrid skill set. This Q&A has been edited for length and clarity. Why are you passionate about nursineering? I typically say nursing is my purpose and engineering is my process. Nursing gave me the reason why I'm doing this project, why I'm making this device, why I am spending all this time and stress and sleepless nights. Nursing gave me the why, and that was because of the patients. Engineering gives me the process. Just being an engineer, I wouldn't have the connection and the understanding of these patients and what they're going through. With engineering, you're more focused on the product, the materials, the science and making it work. You don't get a lot of exposure to mental health, understanding what actually goes on in healthcare and the process that people go through to have a procedure done. There's so much more involved that you just don't get with engineering that nursing gave me. With that differing view, it really allows me to find empathy and connect with the patients or hospital staff. What does a typical day look like for you? No day is the same for me. A typical week could be: On Monday, I might do an admin day where I'm catching up on paperwork, submitting different forms for purchases or problems and emailing clients we work with, along with accounts, physicians and specialists within Brainlab, for questions, concerns and product feedback. Then on Tuesday, I might be going into the hospital to repair something broken. I might be walking in with the biomed teams, the surgeons, the coordinators, whoever would be involved, and just figuring out what went on, what happened, what needs to be fixed. That's more of the technical side of my role, installs, repairs, updates, trainings. Wednesday might be a meeting with some surgeons about potentially purchasing a new system. Now I'm wearing my sales hat, working with them, their purchasing teams and logistics teams, figuring out how we can get this to work. Thursday and Friday, I might be doing actual cases — that's my clinical side — lending support in the operating room during the procedure, helping the surgeon with the equipment, making sure everything is running smoothly and finding ways to optimize the products for them. Then on top of all that, I'm going to conferences, helping with setup, pitching new products and doing demos for surgeons, residents and med students. It's almost like three jobs in one. It constantly changes, and no week is the same. But for those who like being busy, doing things and working with many different people, it's a great fit. What advice would you give to someone breaking into the field? Say yes to everything and just figure it out later. It's a lot to manage, and you have to be organized and on top of things, but when you find something you like and just take those opportunities as they come, life can be truly one of those, 'I can't believe this is real, pinch me,' kind of feelings. How do you like to spend your free time? When I'm not doing my day job and trying to make this nurse engineer role a thing, I race vintage Formula cars. I like the fast pace, balancing all sorts of things at once and the chaoticness of being behind the wheel of a car. I'm also a student pilot. It kind of goes hand in hand. There are a lot of technical things involved and it's very detail-oriented, like the job that I have. And I'm a volunteer firefighter. The firefighting alone is truly amazing. You don't know it until you see it. If I'm not racing cars, flying planes or firefighting, I always take on new projects. I hate being comfortable. I like to be constantly growing and feeling stimulated, like there's something that's going to happen. I always say I want to feel like I'm at the beginning of a really good movie where you don't know what's going to happen. It's the adventure that really makes me wake up in the morning and function. What's next for you and nursineering? I want to develop a community or an association of nurse engineers. I want to put faces and names to this idea, make it a reality and start a new movement of clinically trained but also technically comfortable individuals who can walk into a hospital, instantly pick up on everything and start making change. I've been in contact with different universities to come in and start talking with students about this. There are universities other than Duquesne that are starting these dual degrees and combining nursing with other technical fields. My ultimate goal is to make this a movement and really see change.
Technical.ly
28-07-2025
- Technical.ly
Map: Where PA's $90B AI and energy money is going — and what doesn't match up
Some of the headline-grabbing investments announced at this month's Energy and Innovation Summit in Pittsburgh don't match what companies have actually pledged. National energy and tech CEOs joined Sen. Dave McCormick and other elected officials at Carnegie Mellon University on July 15 to announce more than $90 billion for various data center and energy generation projects. While many executives at the summit credited the Trump administration for paving the way for these investments, reporting from WESA found that several of the Pennsylvania-based projects were already underway before the second Trump administration began in January. A deeper dive into the full list of investments released by McCormick's office reveals that some of those figures do not align with the pledges companies actually made in their own announcements, either. For example, the release from McCormick's office says Constellation Energy will spend $2.4 billion to increase power generation at the Limerick nuclear power plant, but the company would not confirm that amount. McCormick's office did not respond to request for comment. That's just one of the discrepancies that found. Keep reading for a breakdown of the pledges made at the summit and where those investments currently stand.
