
‘They strike, we dance' — Iranians damn the regime amid Israeli barrage
Cries of 'death to Khamenei' filled the night air in Tehran on June 15, rising above the thunder of Israeli airstrikes.
The same defiant chorus had echoed through the city the night before, as if the people were rehearsing for the fall of the very system they were raised to fear.
After five inconclusive rounds of talks between Iran and the United States, Israel launched its military campaign against the Islamic Republic's leadership last week — and ordinary Iranians are not rallying around the regime.
Advertisement
Instead, many are now mocking Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's fundamental miscalculation when he declared during President Donald Trump's first term, 'There will be no war, nor will we negotiate!'
Neither prediction held true.
A review of Persian-language outlets based outside Iran, which have broadcast a stream of comments and video updates from Iran residents in recent days, indicates that the conflict is widely seen as a war between Khamenei's regime and Israel, not as an attack on the populace.
Advertisement
Many of the callers are blaming Khamenei for 'dragging the people into a pointless war.'
'Ordinary Iranians are falling victim to the decision of one person: Ali Khamenei,' railed Farshid, who phoned in from Tehran.
'We are not compatriots with those who execute our kids,' exclaimed Artemis, who called Iran International — a London-based satellite channel popular among the Iranian diaspora — to voice her frustration with the regime's attempts to exploit Iranians' deeply held sense of patriotism and use it against Israel.
The Islamic Republic has long been hostile to Iranian nationalism, criminalizing the observance of ancient Persian holidays and preventing people from visiting the tomb of Cyrus the Great.
Advertisement
It takes a great deal of effort to turn such a patriotic people against their government — and yet the regime has achieved exactly that.
'We trust that Israel will not strike us [ordinary people],' said one caller to a Persian-language outlet. Another told BBC Persian, 'These attacks are not targeting the people, they [aim] to eliminate [regime] leaders.'
Social-media clips from the last few nights of airstrikes reflect similar sentiments among many Iranians, if not all.
In one June 14 video, young people dance as they watch the Israeli air raids through their window.
Advertisement
'They strike, we dance,' a woman comments.
A similar clip posted the same day shows a few friends casually discussing the attacks on their balcony as the sky above them lights up with kinetic engagement, while a June 13 video shows people drinking alcohol over a festive picnic as the sky lights up with anti-aircraft fire.
While callers understandably voice concern about civilian deaths, their comments cannot be mistaken for sympathy with the theocracy.
The majority see the Islamic Republic as the instigator — not Israel.
This growing divide between the people and the regime's anti-Israel fixation has been evident, especially among Iran's young people.
'No to Gaza, no to Lebanon, my life for Iran' was the youth protest chant of 2009; by 2018, their cries sharpened to 'Death to Palestine.'
Soccer fans in Tehran repeated such anti-Palestinian slogans in the wake of Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 massacre, as did a group of students whose school administrators tried to lead them in a 'Death to Israel' chant.
Advertisement
Despite the challenges of polling under repression, various surveys have consistently shown that most Iranians reject the regime's anti-Israel foreign policy.
A 2022 poll by the Paris-based Ipsos Group found that a majority of Iranians support better relations with Israel, while a 2021 study by the Netherlands-based GAMAAN research foundation revealed that most Iranians oppose the regime's 'Death to Israel' rhetoric.
Pro-Israel sentiment has become so widespread in recent days that authorities have announced a crackdown on those posting content deemed to be 'in support of the Zionist terrorist regime' — a crime carrying a prison sentence of up to five years.
State media have reported the arrests of at least 60 people across seven provinces for uploading videos of the attacks or for 'welcoming the Israeli strikes.'
Advertisement
Some are being held on Israel-linked espionage charges — and are reportedly facing death sentences.
With the regime's propaganda machine in full gear and suppression intensifying, Washington must pursue maximum support for the Iranian people.
The Islamic Republic's claim that it is merely defending the national interest has collapsed, and Iranians are making it clear — even in the face of arrest and execution — that Khamenei's war is not theirs.
Janatan Sayeh, a Tehran-born research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, focuses on Iranian domestic affairs and the Islamic Republic's regional malign influence.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
HS2 opening to be delayed beyond 2033
The opening of HS2 will be delayed beyond the planned date of 2033, the Government will confirm. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is expected to tell Parliament on Wednesday afternoon there is 'no reasonable way to deliver' the high-speed railway on schedule and within budget. The project has already suffered repeated delays and soaring costs despite being scaled back. Ms Alexander will tell the Commons she is drawing a 'line in the sand' over the beleaguered rail project, as the Government attempts to reset how the UK delivers major infrastructure. Ministers plan to learn from the mistakes of HS2 so that they do a better job when it comes to projects like Northern Powerhouse Rail and the Lower Thames Crossing, it is understood. 'HS2 has made Britain a laughing stock in terms of its ability to deliver big infrastructure projects, and it has to end,' a Government source told the PA news agency. 'This will set out the way we will do that.' The result of two reviews into HS2 are expected to be announced alongside the Transport Secretary's statement. The first of these is an interim report by Mark Wild, the chief executive of HS2 Ltd, who was appointed late last year. He will assess the construction of the project from London to Birmingham. A second, wider review into the governance and accountability of HS2 Ltd, led by James Stewart, will also report back. This is expected to set out what has gone wrong with the project, and what ministers can learn for future infrastructure projects. The Transport Secretary is also expected to address allegations of fraud by contractors to HS2 Ltd which have emerged recently. Earlier this week, it emerged HS2 Ltd reported a sub-contractor working on the rail line to HMRC following an internal probe. During the statement, Ms Alexander is set to announce a new chair of HS2 Ltd. The current chair, Sir Jon Thompson, previously announced he would stand down in the spring of this year. His replacement will be Mike Brown, according to The Daily Telegraph newspaper. Mr Brown is the former commissioner for Transport for London, who helped to oversee the delivery of Crossrail, the transport project which became London's Elizabeth line. HS2 was originally due to run between London and Birmingham, then onto Manchester and Leeds, but the project was severely curtailed by the Conservatives in power because of spiralling costs. The first phase was initially planned to open by the end of 2026, but this was pushed back to between 2029 and 2033. In 2013, HS2 was estimated to cost £37.5 billion (at 2009 prices) for the entire planned network, including the now-scrapped extensions from Birmingham. In June last year, HS2 Ltd assessed the cost for the line between London and Birmingham would be up to £66 billion. Concerns about the costs of the stunted project have persisted. Revelations in November last year that HS2 Ltd spent £100 million on a bat tunnel aimed at mitigating the railway's environmental impact stunned Westminster, and were singled out by Sir Keir Starmer for criticism.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump meets with military leaders over Iran, after PM insists he wants peace
Donald Trump met with top military advisers over Israel's conflict with Iran, just hours after Sir Keir Starmer insisted the US President was interested in de-escalating the fighting. Mr Trump met with his National Security Council in the White House's situation room shortly after a series of sabre-rattling social media posts, and following his abrupt exit from the G7 summit in Canada. After the high-level meeting, news reports soon followed that the US President was considering joining in Israel's strikes on Iran. Sir Keir earlier said 'nothing' he had heard from the US president suggested Washington was poised to get involved, as western leaders continue to press for de-escalation between the two, long-time foes. But Mr Trump then suggested Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was an 'easy target' whom the US could 'take out' if it chose. Writing on his Truth Social platform, Mr Trump said: 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. 'But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin.' Without further explanation he also wrote 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' on the platform. And he suggested the US had 'complete and total control of the skies over Iran'. Mr Trump spoke to Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday, according to a White House official. Israeli military spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin said strikes were taking place around Tehran early on Wednesday after planes had targeted missile launch and storage facilities on Tuesday night. Air raid sirens have been heard in parts of Israel while the US State Department announced it was closing the embassy in Jerusalem for the rest of the week. Iran's Revolutionary Guard said the latest attacks included the use of a hypersonic Fatah missile, while Israel claimed it had killed General Ali Shadmani who it described as Iran's most senior remaining military commander. Mr Trump left the G7 conference in Canada a day early to deal with what he called 'big stuff' and urged Iranian citizens to evacuate from Tehran, which triggered speculation that American forces might join Israeli strikes. Asked whether the US could get involved as the conflict threatens to spiral into all-out war, Sir Keir told reporters with him at the conference in Kananaskis: 'There is nothing the president said that suggests he's about to get involved in this conflict. On the contrary, the G7 statement was about de-escalation.' In a statement on Monday, before Mr Trump's departure, leaders reiterated their 'commitment to peace and stability' but stopped short of calling for a truce between Israel and Iran. In Westminster, not long after the American president's social media posts, Defence Secretary John Healey suggested Mr Trump was 'leading the calls' for a diplomatic solution to the conflict. Speaking at the Royal United Services Institute's land warfare conference in central London, Mr Healey said British Typhoon fighter jets could be used to help the UK's allies in the region. He said: 'The deployment of Typhoons and other military assets the Prime Minister has announced are part of the moves to reinforce de-escalation in the region, to reinforce security in the region, and may also be used to help support our allies.' Elsewhere, Israel's ambassador to the UK, Tzipi Hotovely, told LBC her country is 'absolutely not' intending to institute regime change in Iran. 'We are in this military operation for one reason, to defend Israel, to defend the region, to defend the world and to make sure that Iran won't have nuclear capabilities,' she added.


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Israel's war against Iran is America's war, too
Israel's Operation Rising Lion has so far unfolded brilliantly. Within two days, Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up The goal of Israel's military campaign is to disable Iran's illicit nuclear weapons program once and for all. It waited to strike until after the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear watchdog, reported that Iran Advertisement But it isn't only Israel that has an overwhelming justification to act against Iran. The United States does, too. Advertisement The radical and apocalyptic Islamists who rule Iran hate America as much as they hate Israel. They have been waging war against the United States for 45 years, a war that began when they invaded the US embassy in Tehran and abducted dozens of American diplomats. In the decades since, the Iranian regime has killed many Americans, attacked US targets, and repeatedly proclaimed its aspiration of ' Start with the body count. Iran is responsible — directly or through proxies — for the deaths of many hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans. In 1983, Iran-backed terrorists During the Iraq War, Tehran armed Shiite militias, training them to attack US troops with devastating roadside explosives that, Advertisement These weren't random acts of violence. They were the fruit of a long-standing Iranian strategy to sap American willpower and intimidate its allies. And they have been accompanied, time and again, by explicit calls from Iranian leaders to attack and destroy America. In the 1980s, the speaker of Iran's Parliament, Hashemi Rafsanjani, On at least a dozen occasions, Iranian government spokespersons or media outlets have Given that history of hatred, fanaticism, and slaughter, can anyone disagree with Trump's repeated declarations this week that 'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon'? Some voices not with a cease-fire but rather a 'real end' to Iran's nuclear-weapons quest — or with the regime 'giving up entirely.' He's right. The brilliance of Israel's operation has handed the president the chance to achieve a permanent solution to one of the longest-festering sores in international affairs. He must not squander it. Advertisement Trump likes to describe himself as a peacemaker. At this hour, the best hope for peace lies in shattering Iran's nuclear threat — for good. Jeff Jacoby can be reached at