New fare-capping scheme proposed for Wellington
Photo:
RNZ / Bill Hickman
A new fare-capping system could encourage an extra 300,000 trips on Wellington's public transport system each year, says mayoral candidate Andrew Little.
Under the proposed new scheme, bus and train users would pay for up to eight trips a week - and any additional trips would be free.
The plan was announced this morning - outside a rain-soaked Island Bay bus stop - as a joint policy alongside regional council candidates Daran Ponter and Tom James.
Little said the move would help lower the cost of living, reduce congestion and encourage public transport use.
"If you're a regular bus user - four days a week you take your bus to work - the fifth day you take the bus you'll get that for free.
"Any travel you do in the weekend - you might go and see a Phoenix game, you might go and see [the] Hurricanes playing - you'll get that for free as well," Little said.
Little said he was a regular bus user, but had passed up his usual express service into Wellington City in order to make the announcement.
Ponter said the cap on bus and train fares was expected to cost up to $4.5 million each year - which the regional council would try to find "internally".
"We can afford that if we juggle other things that we do.
"Bus use in the Wellington region has grown by 110 percent since Covid, but we're still keen to maximise use on public transport. This proposal will really benefit those people who regularly use public transport by incentivising them further," Ponter said.
The candidates said they were unified in their commitment to continue the implementation of a safe cycle network alongside expanding public transport use in the city.
"You only have to look down Adelaide Road to see cycle lanes and bus lanes working superbly," Ponter said.
He said the regional council was poised to add additional buses to cope with the estimated 300,000 extra trips the plan could bring.
"We have an order of articulated buses for the number two route - precisely to deal with these types of circumstances - a route that is growing significantly and will come under additional use as the consequence of a policy like this," Ponter said.
Labour regional council candidate Tom James said - if elected - the candidates would also be looking at other policies to help the reduce the cost of public transport further.
"Auckland Transport works with businesses to subsidise their employees use. We'll be looking at teaming up with the private sector to reduce bus fares even more and also looking at places like New South Wales where they have brought in an all day off peak [fare] on their Friday.
"We'll be considering further proposals like that to further encourage people to take the bus and train," James said.
Daran Ponter, Andrew Little and Tom James in Island Bay this morning
Photo:
RNZ / Bill Hickman
Island Bay locals greeted the proposal with cautious enthusiasm this morning.
Regular public transport user David Barnes said the system would "make a big difference" across his weekly costs.
"I think it's a great idea. It would bring Wellington into common practise with Auckland and other overseas cities and it's a direct incentive to use public transport.
"It would save a lot of people money and probably not cost that much more because all those services are already running. I can't see any downsides," Barnes said.
Veterinary regulator Kelly Etuata said she was in full support of the initiative and was encouraged that Little was "listening to the community".
"With people that are normally catching the bus everyday to get to work - with the cost of everything these days - it probably does help a little bit," Etuata said.
Island Bay resident Paul Brownie said something needed to be done to rein in the price of Wellington's bus services.
"It really needs to be done in Wellington. The bus fares are ridiculous. The per section fares just don't make any sense anymore.
"I was just over in Brisbane and they have a cap of 50 cents per journey. So we were basically travelling around Brisbane all day for a dollar a day.
"You can't even get from one bus-stop to the next in Wellington for a dollar. The pricing scheme here is just way out of touch," Brownie said.
Brownie said he was optimistic that the public transport system could cope with any added demand.
"The service certainly has improved in the last six to 12 months to what it was a couple of years ago where - particularly on this run - you were getting two or three buses in a row cancelled. Last thing people want to be doing is standing at bus-stops for half an hour waiting to get home," Brownie said.
He said the proposal would put a "definite plus" in the candidates' column when weighing up his votes for council.
"As long as, if what they're proposing, actually happens. If they're going to put it as an election campaign then they have to stump up and actually do it.
"Our roads around Wellington are not getting any wider and easier to drive around so if we can take a bit more traffic off the roads then it's got to be a good thing," Brownie said.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Electricity Authority not 'chocolate teapot', Shane Jones says
Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The Electricity Authority has proven itself not to be a "chocolate teapot", the associate energy minister says. In a bid to make energy more affordable, the authority will require generators to offer the same price to all retailers - and ban the bigger power companies from giving themselves discounts . The government said the change would increase competition, giving consumers more choices . Associate energy minister Shane Jones - who has previously been heavily critical of the authority and has threatened to end it unless it flexed its authority - was pleased. "The EA (Electricity Authority) have proved that they're not totally a chocolate teapot. Anything that shrinks the cost of energy and secures greater security, I think Kiwis should be happy." Jones accused big electricity companies of currently operating as if they had more power than Cabinet. He said the change was a surgical instrument - and in future he would like to see a sharper instrument taken to the gentailers' (companies that are both generators and retailers) corporate makeup. Labour leader Chris Hipkins. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Meanwhile, Labour was also backing the move to level the playing field between big power companies and smaller outlets. Leader Chris Hipkins said he wanted to see what kind of enforcement there would be behind the new rule. "I think there probably needs to be more teeth behind it, and I think that they actually need to go further than that - but it is a good start." The change came out of the Energy Competition task force, which was set up last August in response to the winter power crisis . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
How does the Reserve Bank actually set the OCR?
The official cash rate is now set by a monetary policy committee. Photo: RNZ The Reserve Bank will update the official cash rate (OCR) on Wednesday. But have you ever wondered how it goes about making the decision? John McDermott is now executive director of Motu Economic and Public Policy Service but was previously assistant governor and head of economics at the Reserve Bank. He spoke to RNZ this week about how the process works. The OCR is now set by a monetary policy committee, made up of three members of the Reserve Bank's staff - current governor Christian Hawkesby, assistant governor Karen Silk and chief economist Paul Conway. They are joined by external members professor Bob Buckle, economist Carl Hansen and professor Prasanna Gai. McDermott said the way the OCR was set had changed a little with the introduction of the formal committee. It was introduced in 2018, the year before McDermott left the bank. Before that, the Reserve Bank governor was the sole decision maker. Now, the committee aims for a consensus decision but sometimes goes to a vote. But McDermott said the overall approach would be broadly the same. He said there would be three key stages: Looking at what was happening overseas, assessing the situation in New Zealand and thinking about how the decision could be communicated with the right impact. He said the process would usually take about a week. "Staff will have been working on it for a lot longer than that. They'll put together a whole bunch of information on it for the committee to digest." There would normally be two days of "information pooling" meetings, and two days of deliberation meetings, with decision meetings after the deliberation meeting, according to the committee handbook. McDermott said attention would turn first to what was happening in the rest of the world. "What are the key conditions with our trading partners? How's that affecting New Zealand? Probably a lot of detail on the US, a lot of detail on China … probably an equal amount of detail on Australia." He said the committee would then look at financial markets. "Bond markets, equity markets, how does that flow over to New Zealand's access to capital? "It's important to get that setting, once that's established it'll be looking at New Zealand in detail." He said the second day of deliberations would look at recent data. "The minutiae of the data. What's going on with concrete sales or electronic car transactions … hopefully there will be some discussion of what's going on with businesses." He said that would usually involve looking at the results of interviews with various businesses about what they were experiencing. "When you look at the political elements, does that match with what businesses are telling you?" He said the committee would also need to look at banks' willingness to lend and the ability of firms to access capital. "Once you've gone though that it's all about what's happened and what's the environment when we're in. What does that mean for the future? How do you project forward given this is what's happening? What do we expect for inflation output and interest rates …. That will be the core element of the forecasts." He said different members of the committee would bring different experience and judgment, and opinions on what elements should be given more weight. Reserve Bank governor Christian Hawkesby. Photo: "After that process the committee is probably asking the staff, whom they've been leaning on heavily during the week, to not be there. The committee itself will ask what do we think about that, what are the risks? This is what the forecast looks like, this is the decision we think kind of makes sense." He said the committee would consider what the markets would do in response to a decision, and whether they would be shocked by anything that was decided. "What will that do to the prices that matter? And in interest rates, are we going to get the kind of reaction we want? "You should see the results of that in the press conference - this is what we did, this is why we did it ... trying to shape expectations and manage how that is delivered to the country." He said markets had sometimes "got it wrong" and priced in things that the Reserve Bank did not expect to happen. In that case, it would need to clarify the way it saw things. "But by the same token, if you think the financial markets have got it right and you want to validate those expectations you have to be careful not to say something stupid where the markets misunderstand you … you don't want to shock the markets by accident." The handbook said the decision about the appropriate monetary policy settings would be made the morning of the release so that there was less risk of sensitive information being leaked. McDermott said the committee would have to decide which data it needed to pay attention to and what it could set aside as not relevant. If data was volatile, it could sometimes set it aside and decide to come back to it for the next update. Something like a movement in the oil price would have an impact in the short term but then prove immaterial in the medium term. The bank would need to communicate that price increases as a result of something like an oil spike were not going to persist, he said. "With the increase in goods and services tax, prices will go up but they'll go up one time - that's not inflation - so we're going to look through that. But every time the bank or the monetary committee looks through something, it is really important that it explains that it is looking through something." McDermott said the geopolitical environment made rate setting hard at the moment. "There's tariffs that are playing out. What are they doing? Who's paying them? How are they affecting supply chains? Are they going to be the same next week as this week? There's a lot of noise and so you've got to be very disciplined in how you work through that." He said it was also important to be upfront when a judgment was wrong. "It's really important that central banks, when they've made a mistake, just front up and say 'look we made this judgment. We were clear on the judgment we made and it hasn't panned out that way so we're changing how we view things'. I think there's been a reluctance to do that in recent times … and I think that's a shame because it really is important." The Reserve Bank said, when the economic outlook could be at a turning point, the committee might use a "hawks and doves" exercise. "One MPC adviser would play the role of the 'Hawk', presenting all analysis that would support contractionary monetary policy, and then another would play the role of the 'Dove', presenting all analysis that would support expansionary monetary policy. This exercise aims to challenge the status quo and encourage wider deliberations." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Electricity Authority not a 'chocolate teapot', Shane Jones says
Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The Electricity Authority has proven itself not to be a "chocolate teapot", the associate energy minister says. In a bid to make energy more affordable, the authority will require generators to offer the same price to all retailers - and ban the bigger power companies from giving themselves discounts . The government said the change would increase competition, giving consumers more choices . Associate energy minister Shane Jones - who has previously been heavily critical of the authority and has threatened to end it unless it flexed its authority - was pleased. "The EA (Electricity Authority) have proved that they're not totally a chocolate teapot. Anything that shrinks the cost of energy and secures greater security, I think Kiwis should be happy." Jones accused big electricity companies of currently operating as if they had more power than Cabinet. He said the change was a surgical instrument - and in future he would like to see a sharper instrument taken to the gentailers' (companies that are both generators and retailers) corporate makeup. Labour leader Chris Hipkins. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Meanwhile, Labour was also backing the move to level the playing field between big power companies and smaller outlets. Leader Chris Hipkins said he wanted to see what kind of enforcement there would be behind the new rule. "I think there probably needs to be more teeth behind it, and I think that they actually need to go further than that - but it is a good start." The change came out of the Energy Competition task force, which was set up last August in response to the winter power crisis . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
