
How Kier Starmer's government is scoring with the public one year since the North East turned red
I'm actually talking about how he won the Labour leadership in April 2020, and has admitted he thought about stepping down after defeat at the Hartlepool by-election the following May - rather than any indication that he's considering his future as Prime Minister, following the mess made of welfare reforms this week.
It is a reminder that he's succeeded in turning things around before.
Then, surely more than anything, he benefited from Conservative implosion.
But the late spring of 2021 is also seen as a turning point, when he moved away from a message of unity following Jeremy Corbyn's leadership, and took on the left of his party, moving it to the centre ground - from where he won a thumping majority of MPs at last summer's general election.
However, any impression that he had the backing of a 400-strong army of loyal 'Starmtroopers' has now been well and truly shattered, with a rebellion against the government's plans for the benefits system leading to the low point of his premiership so far.
Labour MPs from the North East and North Yorkshire were at the heart of some extraordinary scenes in the Commons on Tuesday 1 July.
York Central's Rachael Maskell, author of the final amendment trying to block the bill, claimed it would lead to "Dickensian cuts" to support for some of the most vulnerable people in society.
Shortly before the vote, Disability Minister Stephen Timms then announced a final huge concession - changes to eligibility for Personal Independence Payment would not take effect until after the conclusions of a review he's leading.
Blyth and Ashington MP Ian Lavery angrily declared, "This is crazy, man. This is outrageous, man," about the handling of the situation.
City of Durham MP Mary Kelly Foy said: "I popped out for a banana earlier on, and when I came back in, things had changed again, so I'm even more unclear on what I'm voting on."
That prompted laughter from colleagues in the Commons, but there's been little reason for ministers to be amused, even if Rachel Reeves' tears at PMQs the following day were due to a "personal issue."
Despite the capitulation on the contents of the welfare bill, eight Labour MPs from our region still voted against it.
Most of them are firmly left-wing, part of a relatively small caucus that remains within Labour's parliamentary ranks.
And, with some timing, we've now seen the announcement of plans to form a new left-wing party, involving Mr Corbyn.
It's not wise, though, to get too carried away at this stage - who remembers Change UK?
The biggest threat to Labour surely remains Reform UK, as evidenced in May's local elections in our region, and with opinion polls suggesting they would make huge gains across the North East and North Yorkshire if a general election was held now.
Chris Eynon, who came second in Sunderland Central last year, told us: "the Red Wall is very, very prime for the taking for the Reform party."
They won their first seat on North Tyneside Council this week, though also lost one to the Liberal Democrats in County Durham.
That came after one of Reform's councillors resigned within days of being elected, because he also worked for the council and you're not allowed to do both.
It's the kind of mishap that opponents will hope to see repeated in the coming months and years, as Reform are really tested for the first time, running Durham County Council and nine others around the country.
Of course the final years of Conservative rule at Westminster became defined by a certain level of chaos.Former Berwick MP Anne-Marie Trevelyan was moved between six different cabinet or ministerial roles within five years.
She told me this week that the Tories need to gradually rebuild confidence, trying to re-assert themselves as "the sensible party".
Of course Labour pledged to bring stability, when they all but swept the board in the North East on their way into government last summer.
Bridget Phillipson was the country's first confirmed MP that night, thanks to the speedy Sunderland counting system.
She became one of the Prime Minister's key lieutenants as Education Secretary, and we spoke to her today (4 July) after she made a speech to teachers in the North East about making sure children are ready to start school.
On the election anniversary, she told us, "We haven't got everything right and I think we'd be the first to acknowledge that, but I'm really proud of the achievements of the last year," pointing to investment in schools, free breakfast clubs, and childcare places within her remit.
On room for improvement, she seemed to agree with analysis that ministers haven't been good enough at setting out a real narrative and vision, saying the government should be "clearer in communicating what we're doing".
That surely applies to any focus on supporting regions like the North East to tackle regional inequalities - what the Conservatives used to call "levelling up".
More quietly, Labour have looked to work closely with regional mayors, and tweaked borrowing and value-for-money rules to allow longer-term investment.
We've seen the announcement of the Tyne and Wear Metro being extended to Washington, but also the cancellation of plans to upgrade the A1 in Northumberland.
The recent spending review promised investment in 350 deprived areas around the UK, which it's expected will mean funding for things like youth clubs, libraries and community-run grocers, in an effort to bring visible change.
That does feel similar to the last government's various funding pots for local regeneration schemes.
More widely, Labour ministers argue they have set their own direction by making "tough decisions."
It's too early for much data to show whether they've set the country on the right course.
But, for example, the future of the two-child benefit cap was a controversial topic when I interviewed Bridget Phillipson a week into her new government role last July, and it's an issue that remains to be resolved now.
Another fight with Labour MPs looks likely - particularly with expected welfare savings now lost, the Chancellor having pledged not to raise taxes on "working people", and little sign of roaring economic growth materialising.
The next year doesn't look much easier.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
32 minutes ago
- Times
Keir Starmer's Labour as chaotic as Tories, voters say
M inutes after Rishi Sunak stood in the pouring rain outside Downing Street in May last year and announced a general election, Sir Keir Starmer urged the public to vote Labour to 'stop the chaos'. Less than 14 months later, and a year after winning a landslide victory, the vast majority of the public (72 per cent) think his government is at least as chaotic as the previous Conservative one. This includes more than a third (37 per cent) who think it is more chaotic. The damning indictment for the administration, which was supposed to see 'no drama Starmer' put the grown-ups back in charge, caps off a terrible anniversary week for the prime minister. And things, according to an exclusive Sunday Times poll by the think tank More in Common, seem likely to get only worse.

ITV News
40 minutes ago
- ITV News
Shona Robison urges Prime Minister to follow Scotland on taxation
Scotland's Finance Secretary said Labour needs a 'new direction' as she called on the Prime Minister to look north of the border for a more progressive tax system to protect public spending. Ms Robison said that if Labour had followed the Scottish model, where higher earners pay more tax, Labour would not be in the 'complete fiscal mess that they are in now.' Her comments come after Sir Keir Starmer's Government was forced into a last-minute climbdown in order for welfare legislation to pass its first parliamentary hurdle earlier this week. In a late concession on Tuesday evening, ministers shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit. These changes are expected to put pressure on other parts of the Government's finances. Ms Robison said: 'People voted for a Labour government last year because they wanted change from the Tories – but after a year of attacks on the incomes of pensioners, the poor and the disabled, they are rightly wondering exactly what, if anything, is different. 'When Keir Starmer took office, he could have chosen to ask people on higher incomes to pay a little more in tax in order to protect public spending. 'Choosing instead to target the vulnerable is not leadership – frankly, it is political cowardice. 'If Keir Starmer had done in England what the SNP have done in Scotland with taxation, Labour would not be in the complete fiscal mess that they are in now. 'After a year of mistakes, Labour needs a new direction – and they should look to Scotland. By asking people on higher incomes to pay a bit more in tax, we have ensured a majority of taxpayers pay less than they would elsewhere in the UK, and are able to unlock more spending for services like the NHS, as well as cut poverty by introducing a Scottish Child Payment, and ensure that everybody can benefit from important services like free tuition and free prescriptions.' She added: 'Labour used to tell Scotland that we didn't need independence and we just needed to get rid of the Tory government – but the last year has completely demolished that argument. 'No Westminster government will ever deliver the truly fair society which I believe the vast majority of people in Scotland want to live in – and that is why independence is the best future for Scotland.' Scottish Labour's economy, business and fair work spokesperson Daniel Johnson MSP said: 'SNP ministers have a brass neck to think they can lecture anyone after their atrocious financial mismanagement. 'The SNP use higher taxes on Scottish nurses and firefighters as a substitute for economic growth, waste billions on out-of-control prison and ferry projects, and have created multibillion-pound black holes in the public finances. 'Labour is delivering the largest funding settlement in the history of devolution, with £50 billion for Scotland's NHS, schools and public services this year alone. Despite that, the SNP are now gearing up to make cuts to fill their fiscal black hole. 'The SNP government has the money, they have the powers, but they are out of ideas, out of excuses and out of time. 'Next year, we have the chance to kick out this SNP Government that cannot be trusted with taxpayers' money.'


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
The Government is about to revive one of New Labour's biggest success stories
The cash boost for early years support comes as ministers prepare to bring back a revamped version of Sure Start - the family hubs introduced under Tony Blair's Labour government Parents will get help to give their children the best start in life with £400 million of extra funding for early years and reception classes, the Sunday Mirror can reveal. The cash boost comes as ministers prepare to bring back a revamped version of Sure Start - the family hubs introduced under Tony Blair's Labour government. Up to 1,000 Best Start Family Hubs will be rolled out across every area of the country, to provide help with parenting skills, early development and childcare. The hubs and early years support will be linked up through the government's "Best Start in Life" strategy - which aims to make sure tens of thousands of children are ready for school at age 5. Sure Start centres helped millions of young children across England. At its peak in 2010, there were about 3,600 centres operating. Survey data from 2011-12 estimates more than 2.5million children under four years old were registered at Surestart Centres - about 90% of that age group. And the Institute for Fiscal Studies found the better health, education and social care outcomes for families enrolled in the programme generated £2 of financial benefit for every £1 in costs. Today, some 1 in 3 children start formal school at age five without the basic skills they need to learn - with many still in nappies or not able to hold a pencil. From next September English and Maths Hubs will be expanded to reach more than 100,000 reception-age children. And reception teachers will get specific training to help teach young children maths basics. A Labour source said the new raft of hubs would 'build on the legacy of Sure Start' - taking some of the things the old scheme did well, but not uniformly - and spreading them out to all areas. Hubs will be able to tailor their support to the needs and nuances of local communities. For example, Sure Start centres in Sunderland would provide specific sessions for fathers to bond with their children, because the area had a lot of dads who did shift work. Before becoming an MP, Education Secretary Bridget Philipson ran a domestic violence refuge in Sunderland - and was impressed by how well Sure Start linked up with other support services in the region. 'I know from experience that when children and families get the right help early on, it can change the course of a child's life,' she told the Sunday Mirror. 'But for too long, too many children have started school already behind – struggling with speech, language and the basics before they've even had a chance to get going. 'Our Plan for Change is putting that right by putting firepower behind proven programmes that work, alongside council targets to make early development a priority in every community — because being ready to learn by the age of 5 shouldn't depend on where a child grows up. 'From early language to stronger maths and literacy in reception, this package will help give every child the foundations they need for the rest of their life." TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak said: 'Sure Start transformed lives - helping children and parents across the country. 'One of the Tories worst acts in government was the way they systematically closed Sure Start centres and stripped away local services. 'This new investment in family hubs is much-needed. 'Rebuilding what was destroyed under the Conservatives will take sustained funding to meet the true cost of high-quality early years care and supporting the workforce .' Matt Buttery, CEO of Triple P UK, said: "This investment in Best Start Family Hubs is a hugely welcome and positive step forward for families across the country. By building on the proven legacy of Sure Start and expanding access to trusted, evidence-based parenting and early years support, these Hubs will help parents feel more confident and equipped to give their children the very best start in life. "However, if the government wants to end the postcode lottery, it must truly transform the digital offer for parents, making support available whenever and wherever parents need it most. "Triple P research shows that while most parents see parenting as the most important job they will ever do, 75% feel a stigma attached to asking for help. A national digital rollout of evidence-based parenting support could be a game-changer -- breaking down barriers, tackling stigma, and providing parents with the proven strategies and confidence they need to navigate modern parenting challenges, all from the comfort and ease of their own homes." Dan Paskins, executive director of Policy, Advocacy and Campaigns at Save the Children UK, said: "Focusing on family services for the under-fives will be vital in securing better outcomes for children, and we welcome the Best Start In Life announcement. "We know from our work in local communities that bringing together parenting, healthcare and education support services in one place is an approach which works, so we are pleased to see the UK Government making it easier for families to get the help they need. "With ministers now demonstrating an increasingly ambitious plan for children in the UK, we hope this drive for change continues when the child poverty strategy is released in Autumn. This must include scrapping the two child limit to Universal Credit, which is the only meaningful way to reduce the UK's record child poverty rate." Cllr Arooj Shah, Chair of the Local Government Association's Children and Young People Board, said: 'Councils want to ensure every child gets the best start in life, and we are pleased government has acted on our call to expand family hubs to all local authorities. 'Family hubs are an important opportunity for councils and partners to support families and to help them gain access to a range of vital services in their local area. 'We want to ensure the expansion sees fully integrated local support for communities. To do this, we need long term, sustainable funding, and local flexibility to ensure services meet local need.'