These are the best eye creams of 2025, tested and reviewed
While reporting this story, every dermatologist and esthetician I spoke with echoed Shamban's sentiment, explaining that using a high-quality eye cream is a good idea no matter your age: "Women as young as 18 should be using eye creams!" says Kimberly Austin, an aesthetician at the Los Angeles-based 7QSpa (Kim Kardashian is a client). "They promote a smoother, plumper and firmer appearance [to the area]. Plus, it's easier to maintain great skin than to reverse aging."
The best eye creams of 2025, tested and reviewed
Honorable mentions
How we tested
Factors to consider when choosing an eye cream
Eye creams we tested but didn't include
Eye cream FAQs
Meet the experts
Update, Mar. 10, 2025: We checked all product prices and availability. Our number one pick for best eye cream remains unchanged.
(back to top)
(back to top)
Over the course of a year, I tested 20 of the top-rated eye creams on the market. I rated them on hydration, absorption, value, texture, ease of use, scent and results.
(back to top)
Primary concerns: Before choosing an eye cream, ask yourself: Are you looking to eradicate puffiness, improve skin texture or brighten (and potentially lighten) dark circles? Once you have an answer, choose a product that addresses your primary concern.
Ingredients: Look for high-quality, clinically-proven ingredients like caffeine, vitamin C and retinol in concentrations powerful enough to be effective (i.e. they should be listed in the first five-ten ingredients).
Skin type: Is your skin oily or dry? Do you have sensitive skin? Understanding your skin type will help you choose the appropriate eye cream for you.
Price: Eye creams need to be used consistently in order to be effective. Choose a product you can afford to buy and replace regularly.
(back to top)
I tried two famous eye creams that make all the best lists — Revision Skincare D.E.J. Eye Cream and Augustinus Bader the Eye Cream — and, at $120 and $225, I found neither lived up to the hype, especially at their respective price points.
(back to top)
Eye creams aren't just there to prevent skin issues like fine lines and discoloration, they also help to treat them: As we age, the orbital area becomes a veritable cornucopia of "mature skin" problems — from puffy under-eye "bags" to dark circles to crepey eyelids to wrinkles, the best eye creams work not only triple, but often quadruple, duty. Research on the efficacy of eye creams shows that our skin responds to consistent application of targeted ingredients like retinol, vitamin C, niacinamide and hyaluronic acid. All skin is different, but, in concentrated doses, these ingredients have been shown to improve the texture and appearance of the under- (and over-) eye area over time.
If your skin concerns include treating puffy eyes and improving skin elasticity: "Generally look for antioxidants [like vitamin C] to protect and actives [like retinol] to correct," says Shamban. "You want to improve circulation and oxygenation in this area. Retinol, peptides/peptide complexes and ceramides — along with brighteners like niacinamide, vitamins C, E and K — are all top ingredients. Also look for tightening ingredients like caffeine and/or calming ingredients like green tea, calendula and chamomile. Any combination of these can be great for eye cream." Whatever cream — or gel — you choose, it should be thick and/or dense so it doesn't run into the eyes. Lastly, look for a gentle formulation without harsh ingredients like acids: "Some moisturizers may have concentrations of acids that are not as suitable for the eye area and can cause irritation," says Shamban.
Eye creams should mainly be applied to the area under the lash line (but not too close to the eyes), continuing to right above your cheekbone. You can — and I for sure do — use eye creams on your upper lids and on the sides of your eyes to treat the wrinkles there (also known as crow's-feet).
Eye creams are used in place of moisturizer in the areas I mentioned above, so it doesn't matter which goes first.
Every pro I spoke with recommended applying a pea-sized amount — eye creams tend to be concentrated, so you don't need a lot — dotted and dabbed carefully under the eye and along the top lid with the soft top of your ring finger. The most important rule to follow with eye cream: Never rub the area or sweep the product on in a way that drags or tugs at the skin in this area of the face, which is delicate and can be damaged more easily than you'd think. For best results, apply eye creams in the morning and at night.
(back to top)
Dr. Ava Shamban, board-certified cosmetic dermatologist
Kimberly Austin, aesthetician at 7QSpa in Los Angeles
(back to top)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
a minute ago
- Boston Globe
N.H. Governor Kelly Ayotte signs bills banning gender-affirming care for minors
Proponents have said the ban is an important way of protecting children from treatments they believe to be harmful and irreversible. But opponents say the new law discriminates against transgender youth, removing treatments they view as life saving, and interfering with doctors' ability to make appropriate medical decisions with families. Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up Violations of the new law will go before New Hampshire's board of medicine, which can take administrative disciplinary action. Advertisement The new law also allows someone who was harmed by receiving this care to bring a lawsuit against the person who provided the care and violated the law. The new ban comes as legislative efforts targeting transgender people have grown in recent years. Last year, New Hampshire lawmakers passed a bill banning gender-affirming genital surgeries for minors, even though providers have said such procedures are exceedingly rare in New Hampshire. All of the other New England states have laws protecting access to gender-affirming care, according to the Movement Advancement Project, a Colorado-based think tank that promotes equality. Advertisement Some New Hampshire families with transgender children have been warily watching as the bill advanced and, in some cases, have been Republican lawmakers in New Hampshire who championed the ban were encouraged by a But some attorneys say there are still avenues for pursuing a possible legal challenge of New Hampshire's new law. That could include a challenge based on the New Hampshire constitution, arguing that the intent of the law was to harm transgender people, or a challenge on the basis of parental rights, according to Chris Erchull, a senior staff attorney at GLAD law. Ayotte also signed a second bill banning gender-affirming surgeries for minors. The bill explicitly prohibits 'transgender chest surgery' for minors as part of a gender transition. Violating the law is classified as unprofessional conduct and would be subject to discipline by the board of medicine. The law also allows minors to sue for damages if they received such a treatment in violation of the law. And the attorney general can bring a suit to enforce compliance with the law. Amanda Gokee can be reached at


CNN
2 minutes ago
- CNN
UCLA loses federal research funding in administration's ongoing fight with top universities
UCLA is the latest major institution of higher learning to see promised research funding snatched away by the Trump administration, the university's leader said in an open letter to students and faculty Thursday. 'This is not only a loss to the researchers who rely on critical grants,' wrote Chancellor Julio Frenk. 'It is a loss for Americans across the nation whose work, health, and future depend on the groundbreaking work we do.' Grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health are included in the suspensions, Frenk said, but did not provide an amount of how much funding is in peril. The Los Angeles Times reported that roughly $200 million in grants awarded to UCLA are being suspended, citing a partial list of suspended grants provided to them by a source. A spokesperson for the National Science Foundation declined to provide specific figures, saying grant awards are being suspended 'because they are not in alignment with current NSF priorities and/or programmatic goals.' 'We will not fund institutions that promote antisemitism,' said a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the National Institutes of Health. 'We will use every tool we have to ensure institutions follow the law.' The Trump administration has repeatedly cited antisemitism – especially in the context of contentious pro-Gaza protests on campuses – as a reason to deny promised funds to universities, including Harvard and Columbia. Harvard is fighting the funding decisions in court, while Columbia agreed to a settlement with the government that restored its grants. The funding cut comes days after the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division announced it found UCLA in violation of federal law by 'acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students.' While the formal notice to UCLA said the federal government 'now seeks to enter into a voluntary resolution agreement,' Attorney General Pam Bondi sounded less conciliatory. 'DOJ will force UCLA to pay a heavy price for putting Jewish Americans at risk and continue our ongoing investigations into other campuses in the UC system,' Bondi said in a statement. It is not just the Trump administration that has tangled with UCLA over charges of antisemitism. A group of Jewish students filed suit against the university last June, saying the school allowed discrimination against Jews to flourish following Israel's military operation in Gaza in response to the October 7 attacks. The lawsuit said UCLA leaders waited days before responding to a group of pro-Palestinian protesters that refused to allow students to enter campus unless they agreed to 'a statement pledging their allegiance to the activists' views.' UCLA settled the lawsuit earlier this week for $6.45 million, with more than $2 million of the total going to designated 'organizations that combat antisemitism and support the UCLA Jewish community.' UCLA also agreed it is prohibited from 'knowingly allowing or facilitating the exclusion of Jewish students, faculty, and/or staff' from university programs and activities.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trendy coffee choice sparks controversy when allergic child nearly takes a sip
A teenager's innocent coffee choice recently sparked an online debate after it nearly exposed a severely allergic child to a nut allergen. In a Reddit post, an 18-year-old wrote that the trouble began after she carried a hazelnut coffee to her friend's house for a study session. Advertisement She claimed the drink was only for her — but her cup of joe caused a stir. 'After a while, I got up to go to the toilet,' the student recalled. 'When my back was turned, my friend's little sister (8), who is allergic to hazelnut, tried to drink my coffee.' The Redditor's boyfriend quickly intervened, telling the 8-year-old girl that she couldn't sip the drink, according to the post. 'When I explained to her that the coffee has hazelnut, my friend got very upset at me, saying I shouldn't bring over something that could endanger his sister,' the young woman added. Advertisement A hazelnut allergy is one of the most common types of known tree nut allergies, according to For individuals with tree nut allergies, beverages made with real hazelnut extract can be life-threatening, according to WebMD. A hazelnut allergy is one of the most common types of known tree nut allergies, according to New Africa – The most severe reaction, anaphylaxis, can cause the body to go into shock and may be fatal without immediate treatment like an Epinephrine injection, as Fox News Digital has previously reported. Advertisement The 18-year-old admitted that the thought of an allergic reaction didn't occur to her when she got the drink. 'I just didn't think it would happen since she's always asked before eating any of my sweets and candies,' she said. On Reddit, people were split over the sticky situation, though most of the commenters took the teen's side. Advertisement 'The 8-year-old should not be sipping other people's drinks at all,' one person wrote. 'Especially if she has a serious food allergy. Who was supervising her?' 'Why is an 8yo drinking coffee (also without asking)?' another person asked. 'Assuming from your story that she is only affected by ingesting nuts (as opposed to airborne).' Others felt the original poster overstepped by bringing a nutty beverage into the child's home in the first place. 'It's generally considered a bad idea to bring something that someone is allergic to into their home – even if you thought they wouldn't eat it/touch it,' one user said. 'Cross contamination is real and dangerous.' 'There should be special attention given to any food that is out [and available] when a child has a serious allergy.' Another wrote, 'The child shouldn't have [taken a drink of] your coffee, sure, but what if you had spilled it somewhere communal or something and exposed the child that way?' Diane Gottsman, a Texas-based etiquette expert, weighed in on the debate. Gottsman, who owns the etiquette-focused Protocol School of Texas, called the situation 'unfortunate.' Advertisement She told Fox News Digital, 'If the person bringing in the hazelnut coffee knew there was an allergy, they should not have brought the coffee in.' 'But often the person bringing in the allergen does not know unless they are alerted by the family member.' Speaking from personal experience, Gottsman said that her own adult daughter has a serious nut allergy and takes precautions. Advertisement Others felt the original poster overstepped by bringing a nutty beverage into the child's home in the first place. JCM – Ultimately, children don't reason the same way adults do, which is why adult supervision matters. 'A parent can teach a child to not share foods or drink without permission … [but] when it comes to a child, they are young and do not have the same type of reasoning skills,' she said. 'While the person who brought in the hazelnut did not do it intentionally, it could have still been dangerous.' Advertisement At 18 years old, the Redditor is still learning the ropes of adulthood – and Gottsman chalked up the error as a simple accident, though it could have had serious consequences. 'There should be special attention given to any food that is out when a child has a serious allergy,' she concluded. 'While the person who brought in the hazelnut did not do it intentionally, it could have still been dangerous.'