‘Got me': Liver King's downfall exposed in new Netflix doco
He's the muscle-bound 'barbarian' who claimed his enlarged physique was down to a stomach-churning diet of animal liver, testicles and fertilised chicken eggs.
Daring stunts including bench-pressing 185kg weights underwater, pulling trucks on chains and caveman-like hunting techniques earned Brian Johnson millions of followers online.
The married dad-of-two was raking in $100million (about $155million Australian Dollars) in sales annually from his supporters, known as 'Primals', who eagerly snapped up his offal-based pills.
But in 2022 it all came crashing down when the 'Liver King' – who boasts of building a $300million (AU $463million) empire – was revealed as a heavy user of anabolic steroids who spent $11,000-a-month (AU $17,000) to preserve his super-sized shape, The Sun reports.
Emails leaked by a social media influencer showed him seeking out 'pharmacy grade human growth hormones' that were described as being of a 'f***ing really, really high, super-expensive dosage'.
Reflecting on that moment, which followed years of stern denials of steroid use, disgraced Brian, now 47, told The Sun: 'There was no denying that man, I knew he got me.'
He also apologised to his followers and admitted to taking 120mg of testosterone a week.
His remarkable rise and fall is the focus of new Netflix documentary Untold: The Liver King, which reveals his path from bullied 'runt' to controversial influencer and shamed con artist.
And to the horror of critics, who have dubbed him a 'snake oil salesman', he also brags of a secret criminal past even before his Liver King days – adding he is still shamelessly flogging supplements around the world.
Growing up in Texas, Brian claims he always felt like an outcast – in part due to a speech impediment that left him a target for classmates.
'I was getting picked on, bullied, beat the f*** up,' he says. 'Nobody was there for me, I just felt powerless, the feeling of helplessness and [being] completely lost.'
Brian tells the documentary he felt alone. His father, a veterinary nurse in the US Air Force, died suddenly when he was an infant and without a male role model he was lost.
He began to idolise his older brother, who was tall, strong and able to grow facial hair, as well as action hero actors Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sylvester Stallone.
'Caveman cult'
Brian went on to fall for his future wife and 'Liver Queen', Barbara, with the pair having two sons.
He claims to have stumbled across the 'ancestral lifestyle' – the caveman-based way of life that saw him chomp down on three large bull testicles a day – while researching health remedies for his children.
'My kids were really f***ing sick,' he recalls, saying the family constantly had to race to the hospital due to them suffering worrying allergy reactions including anaphylactic shock.
Brian would claim eating the offal-only diet solved their mystery ailments and also cured psoriasis, helped pregnancy and aided weight loss up to 20kg (3st 2lb) in six months for others.
The lifestyle was based on 'nine ancestral tenets' – sleep, eat, move, shield, connect, cold, sun, fight and bond – which he claims are the 'life forces that have nourished our DNA for millions of years'.
There is no scientific proof to back up their claims.
His interpretation of the tenets would see him 'shield' himself by turning off WiFi at night, banishing phones from bedrooms and not using hormone-based fragrances to reduce any impact to fertility.
Consumption-wise, he followed a raw, uncooked meat-only diet – quipping that it was 'lots of balls, lots of penises' in one video.
He would also down up to 50 fertilised eggs at a time and scoff liver, tongue and testicles fresh from the carcass of a bull he had killed seconds earlier.
He also hoarded enough gunsto arm a small country, including flamethrowers, assault rifles, 12 gauge shotguns, pistols and explosive ammo.
'Muscled Andrew Tate'
By 2017, he was known as the 'Liver King' online. Four years later, he had millions of followers, appeared on popular podcasts including T he Joe Rogan Experience, and was making a fortune, The Sun reports.
His businesses boasted 12 per cent growth every quarter for five years running, more than 250,000 customers a month and annual sales in excess of $100million (AU $155million).
With this success and money, Brian – who was labelled by some a 'muscled Andrew Tate' after the ringleader of toxic masculinity – admitted: 'I felt new levels of invincibility, that level is dangerous… It was like doing cocaine.'
His posts were becoming increasingly outspoken as he labelled fast food chains like Hungry Jacks 'the most brutal f***ing thing' and said feeding youngsters food from US restaurant chain Chick-fil-A, as well as chocolate and sweets was 'real child abuse'.
The family claimed child services were called on them for allowing one of their sons to crawl inside a dead cow and feeding him animal testicles.
But in November 2022, Brian's empire crumbled after the leak of emails about his steroid use – with online commentators quick to comment he was 'juiced out of his brain' and a 'filthy fraud'.
In an apology video, he admitted he had 'f***ed up' and blamed it on 'self-esteem issues', revealing his longing to 'be someone' since childhood and having experienced 'very little failure' in his life.
It fell flat among many former supporters, who labelled him a 'snake oil salesman' and fumed: 'You're not sorry for all the s*** you did, and the people you could have potentially hurt by eating balls.'
'Printed money'
But, as the new documentary reveals, this wasn't Brian's first scam either.
His criminal career began when he was working at vitamins company GNC as a teen.
He began conning the firm out of money with customer returns that he would then sell to other branches of the store, stealing receipts to back up his claims.
'With enough trial and error, all you had to do was make it work one time, and then you just repeat it… it worked every single time,' he shamelessly brags.
Brian evolved into making his own products and claims it escalated to the point where he 'used to print money, a lot of it' and turned his apartment into a 'f***ing chemistry lab' to make knock-off versions of the drugs.
'International drug trading, you know. Higher stakes, higher reward… my perception of risk is becoming distorted. I just never got caught,' he adds.
It's not known if Brian ever faced charges for that con but in January 2023, after the steroid use was exposed, he was hit with a $25million (AU $38.5million) lawsuit from former followers, alleging harm through deceptive advertising and marketing practices.
They claimed he orchestrated a 'cult-like, extreme and implausible regimented lifestyle' to earn millions from the sale of pills, powders and supplements.
But within months of being served, the main plaintiff withdrew the filing – suggesting a financial agreement was brokered away from the courts.
'I dug myself into this whole shame, sorrow, guilt, regret, I felt that man… nothing is more real that,' Brian would later admit.
Now the social media star claims to be 'born again' – still boasting 2.9million Instagram followers and 6.1million on TikTok – but now he eats fruit and vegetables too.
'I was so convinced by all the carnivore stuff, that that's what you needed to really kick ass in life. I'm convinced now that I was starving myself,' Brian says.
'I guess I want the world to know that I got it wrong, each passing day goes by I realise I don't know s***... an extreme approach to anything probably isn't f***ing working out.'
'I have this new freedom, I don't have to lie about anything,' he adds, while acknowledging he still sells supplements and has more than 302 retreats all over the world.
Some believe Brian has atoned for his mistakes, but not all are as sold – especially considering his refusal to fade away into the background.
One critic firmly insists he remains a 'snake oil salesman', adding: 'Of all the scammers, con artists and f***ing liars, the Liver King is the f***ing worst one of them.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
27 minutes ago
- ABC News
A game of deception and extraction: How influencers embody the logic of social media - ABC Religion & Ethics
If you want to know how something ends, consider how it begins. Social media, we were told, was about connection, a new frontier for community, dialogue and shared experience. But its origin story tells a different truth. These lofty ideals, if they ever existed, were championed by an anti-social Harvard drop-out who launched a site to rate women's appearances side-by-side. From its inception, this technology was less about connection and more about control, comparison and commodification. We were told that social media would connect us all. It was implied, therefore, that we were deficient in connection — that we needed a new media, a 'social' media, to bring us together. This media would strengthen communities, forge new ties among disparate peoples; they could find and bond with each other in our messy, lonely, world. If you want someone to buy something or use something, first tell them they are lacking. Social media told us what we lacked was each other . What we were given was a euphemism, an appeal to our longing for each other: used to build systems that monetise our attention, our trust and our behaviour. If there was ever any semblance of real connection on social media — if, for instance, in 2010, connection meant sharing images of your dinner or updating your status as Roman does in Easy A to 'is having an OK day and bought a coke zero at the gas station, raise the roof' — it no longer exists. In 2025, 'social' media is a marketing machine: if you're online, you're either marketing, being marketed to, or often, both . At the centre of this online circus is the influencer. Enter … the influencer These characters, the dramatis personae in this digital narrative, present themselves as relatable, authentic, just-like-you-but-a-bit-better, friends. But peel back the thick, thick layers of performance and what remains is simple: they are salespeople. Their job is to blur the line between personal expression and commercial transaction — to make persuasion look like friendship. Influencers are the foot soldiers of the algorithms that dictate the plot of these online theatrics. They execute the narrative demands of the platforms that created them — platforms built not for connection and truth, but for squeezing every morsel of attention out of the audience as possible. Out of you . Influencers form so-called 'parasocial' bonds with their followers. Parasocial bonds are one-sided relationships designed to feel 'authentic', intimate and personal, but which are in reality strategies of marketing co-dependency to convert intrinsic human need into profit. In this light, 'para' might as well stand for para- sitic , given the way this dynamic drains the audience of its most precious resource: time. These commercial actors, these merchants, surreptitiously deceive their followers by disguising their intent as care and guidance. Influencers convince their followers that they simply aim to help and serve — they just want to help you get your house in order. Whether it's supplements, diet tips, morning routines, Stoicism, lads' holidays to Afghanistan, self-help advice, every post is a sales pitch. The influencer's power lies in their ability to disguise commercial intent as information provision, to blur the line between personal expression and advertising. The result is a highly effective form of trickery: a follower believes they're receiving genuine guidance, when they are in fact being sold something — often underpinned by ulterior motives or undisclosed sponsorships. History isn't short on charlatans, quacks or snake oil salesmen. But today's influencer is more powerful and more pervasive. They speak over experts. They shape public opinion. And in many cases — vaccine hesitancy being just one example — they're winning. It's only 'content', after all … Influencers, many of whom shy away from the term (perhaps because of an awareness of its negative connotations), sometimes prefer to be referred to as 'content creators'. Creators of 'content'. It all seems rather innocuous. It's just content, after all. Content never hurt anyone, did it? Content is merely a benign, ethereal, substance, isn't it? In fact, what exactly is this content, anyway? What is this content that we are being force fed? Well, advertising, mostly. Advertising a lifestyle, a product, a belief system or an identity, a pursuit or hobby, a charity or a cause. A point of view or an ideology. We are advertised fake 'transformations', unhealthy diets, quack science on everything from the benefits of saunas and the importance of protein (has anyone else wondered why the cottage cheese is sold out at the moment?) to the unfounded dangers of vaccinating children — as if one of the greatest achievements in modern science is something to be suspicious of. Influencers are anything but friends. Nor are they neutral acquaintances. They're specialists in online manipulation and the attending offline effects. In fact, many influencers are so talented that they convince their followers that they are experts — and not only experts, but experts willing to convey their expertise pro bono and altruistically. And thanks to their more relatable appeal, influencers can compete, and win, against actual experts — thus spreading inaccurate information or worse. Influencer Brian 'Liver King' Johnson attends the UFC 276 event at T-Mobile Arena on 2 July 2022 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo by Jeff Bottari / Zuffa LLC / Getty Images) The real-world ramifications of this can be disastrous — ranging from genocide to a rise in communicable diseases, to false or misleading 'bro science' about whichever 'wellness' fad is trending. And when it all goes wrong, an influencer unlike an expert, can throw up their hands and claim they're just a regular person, just giving their opinion — 'do your own research'. There's no real accountability, no check and balance on their power. There's no skin in the game. No concrete consequences for an influencer's negative actions. The result is a system where influence is high, but responsibility is low. These realities facilitate influencers having a fundamentally insincere relationship with their followers. Take Brian Johnson, otherwise known as 'Liver King', who convinced many of his followers his physique was built on an ancestral lifestyle, and not thousands of dollars' worth of performance enhancing drugs and supplements. He sold an ideal he didn't live by and profited from the deceit. He is but one extreme example in a broad-spectrum dishonesty part of a continuum where influencers blur the line between image and reality, often at the expense of those who trust them. Smoke and mirrors This seems to be what 'influencing' is: a game of deception and extraction. Perhaps (para) social media was always destined to become this. A host network for quackery and fakery. A mirror held up to us by a small, always on, aluminosilicate glass device — not to connect us, but to sell us back to ourselves. It began with comparison, with ranking humans against one another, turning people into objects to be judged on screen, and that cold logic never went away. Today, the same machinery, the unseen architecture dictating so much of these nefarious activities, drives influencers to package their lives as 'content' and compels audiences to 'consume' it in the hopes of filling a chasm that social media itself created. Cui bono ? Not the audience, drained of time, attention and trust. Not the public, misled by pseudo-experts with no accountability. The beneficiaries are those who profit from the illusion — platforms that sell our data, advertisers that sell us solutions to problems we didn't have, and influencers who sell themselves as friends. The only remedy is for users to be more discerning. To reject unsolicited advice masquerading as care. And to ask, seriously and soberly: Do these people really have your best interests at heart? Samuel Cornell is a PhD candidate in public health at the University of New South Wales. Prior to his academic studies and career, he briefly served in the Royal Navy.


SBS Australia
42 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
How Pakistani women in Australia are celebrating Eid al-Adha
SBS Urdu 09/06/2025 09:42 Eid al-Adha is being celebrated in Australia with traditional enthusiasm, where community members are enjoying feasts and barbecues while also remembering those in need. Shafaq Jaffery is celebrating Eid al-Adha with community friends. (Supplied) Shafaq Jaffery is celebrating Eid al-Adha with community friends. (Supplied) Rukhshanda Zaman sees Eid as a time of sacrifice and compassion, using the occasion to teach her children about its deeper meaning. Shafaq Jaffery is not only taking part in the festivities but also turning the celebration into a moment of service. She is organising a special screening of the Pakistani film Love Guru to raise funds for those in need. Rukhshanda says that even while living in Australia, she upholds Eid traditions with deep devotion. According to her, the true message of Eid al-Adha is sacrifice, gratitude, and sharing joy with others. Shafaq adds that the spirit of Eid lies in spreading happiness, which is why she has woven this charitable effort into the heart of her celebrations. ___________ Listen Wednesday or Friday program at this link. SBS Urdu is on Instagram , Facebook and YouTube. Our SBS Audio app is available for Apple and Android devices. Listen on Spotify Podcast, or Apple Podcast. ۔

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
MasterChef star Poh Ling Yeow ‘set to quit the show' in ‘judges shake-up'
MasterChef Australia judge Poh Ling Yeow is reportedly set to be replaced on the beloved Channel 10 show. An insider has claimed that the fan-favourite judge could be set to walk away from the show at the end of the season that's currently airing. It's believed that Channel 10 executives are hoping to get original contestant Julie Goodwin to step into Yeow's role. 'Julie would be a fantastic judge. Fans love her,' a source told New Idea. 'While no one wants to see Poh leave, everyone would welcome Julie back with open arms.' Goodwin originally beat Yeow to the title during the very first season of the competition all the way back in 2009. She later made a return to the show in 2022 before appearing as a guest judge in 2023. It's believed she loved being able to step into the role of a judge for the first time and would be keen to return full-time. The rumours come after Yeow shared in the last that she didn't always feel as though judging others came naturally to her, admitting that she sometimes thinks about being a contestant again. 'I don't want to sound ungrateful, but I love the chaos (of being a contestant) and there's nothing quite as exhilarating as just having days on end where you do not know what's going to happen,' she said about her time as a MasterChef competitor in 2009 and 2020. 'Even when I'm standing … at the top of the room (as a judge), I sometimes fantasise about being a contestant again,' Yeow added. 'I constantly run through the challenges that I have just delivered and think about what I would do in that situation. That's how much I miss and love it.' Poh joined the judging panel last year alongside newcomers Jean-Christophe Novelli and Sofia Levin, as well as existing judge Andy Allen. Speaking to Poh previously admitted that she's still struggling to get her head around the judging role. 'I'm still feeling so in the deep end, to be honest,' she said. 'It is so difficult. I knew it was going to be hard, but I didn't quite realise just how hard it was gonna be.' 'It is a little bit related to me feeling self-conscious, and I don't really like to use the words 'impostor syndrome,' it's more that … I feel like I don't know that much,' she said.