35 DHET employees suspended for sexual harassment and theft
The department of higher education and training (DHET) is grappling with a personnel crisis, with 56 employees currently suspended on various charges ranging from sexual harassment to fraud.
Rise Mzansi MP Songezo Siphiwo Zibi questioned former minister of higher education and training Nobuhle Nkabane about the suspensions.
Zibi also questioned the DHET having the second most number of suspended employees among all national government departments as of 31 December 2024.
Zibi initially asked about 35 employees who were put on suspension with full pay as at 31 January this year.
However, while only providing the breakdown for the 35, the department recently also revealed that in the 2024/25 year, 56 employees in total were suspended.
Scale of the suspension crisis
The inquiry revealed serious misconduct allegations across multiple salary levels and demographics in the DHET.
The suspended employees face various charges including sexual harassment, theft, fraud, assault and intimidation.
Several cases involve allegations against students, highlighting concerns about the safety of the learning environment.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa fires Nobuhle Nkabane, appoints new higher education minister
Financial impact
The suspensions are costing taxpayers significantly.
Monthly salaries for the 35 suspended employees range from R11 961 to R73 126, with most earning between R20 000 and R40 000 per month.
Over the past five financial years, the department suspended 157 employees in total.
The financial cost reached R31.7 million in salaries paid during this period.
Individual cases and charges
Among the most serious cases are multiple sexual harassment allegations.
The eight employees facing these charges are:
Ndlovu SP who earns R32 783.50,
Garside RPK, who faces 'allegations of sexual harassment against students in exchange for marks' and earns R30 274.50 monthly while suspended.
Mapadimeng J earning R25 663.87;
Vilana M earning R40,675 87;
Nkosi SM earning R21 466.00;
Maneli GM earning R43 469.25;
Mahlangu TM earning R24 348.0;, and
Mienies SC earning R22 334.00.
Several employees face fraud charges related to trade certifications.
Thobejane SN and Mokoena JP both face 'allegations of fraud in processing trade certifications' and earn R23 626 and R18 579.75 respectively.
Theft allegations feature prominently. Mdumbe PZ, Rigala B and Mbengo G all face theft charges.
However, Rigala B and Mbengo G had 'no adverse findings' against them despite the allegations.
ALSO READ: Five things you need to know about the new higher education minister Buti Manamela
Timeline concerns
The duration of disciplinary processes varies significantly.
Some cases have been finalised, while others remain pending.
Employee Vilana M's case status is 'unclear as the chairperson is on sick leave', despite earning R40 675.87 monthly.
The department's data shows average resolution times have improved dramatically.
In 2020/2021, cases took an average of 137.6 days to conclude. By 2024/2025, this dropped to 14.4 days on average.
ALSO READ: Outa concerned about new higher education minister
Five-year suspension pattern
The suspension crisis has escalated over recent years.
In 2020/2021, seven employees were suspended at a cost of R6.01 million.
This number peaked at 56 suspensions in 2024/2025, costing R6.07 million.
The 2022/2023 financial year saw the highest costs, with R10.55 million paid to 33 suspended employees.
The 2023/2024 period had the most suspensions at 48 employees, costing R7.65 million.
Departmental response to suspensions
Nkabane's former office acknowledged the severity of the situation.
According to the parliamentary reply, 'employees were placed on precautionary suspension due to various allegations of serious misconduct, ranging from sexual harassment and theft'.
The department attributes prolonged suspensions to several factors.
These include 'the complexity and severity of the allegation, sophisticated act of misconduct, shortage of investigators and the safety of witnesses'.
ALSO READ: Parliament concludes Seta panel never existed
Demographic breakdown
The suspended employees span various salary levels from Post Level 1 (PL1), referring to the entry-level position for teachers to SL14.
The majority are classified as black males and females, with some coloured and white employees also suspended.
Higher-level employees face more complex charges.
Ngubelanga LL, at salary level 14 earning R72 878.10, faces supply chain management irregularities.
Muswaba MM, at level 13 earning R73 126.73, faces misconduct allegations under Section 188A procedures.
Ongoing investigations and suspension cases breakdown
Of the 35 suspended employees, 26 cases have been finalised, while eight remain pending disciplinary hearings.
One employee resigned during the process and two cases resulted in no adverse findings despite initial allegations.
Sexual harassment represents the most common charge, with eight employees suspended for various forms of harassment.
Theft allegations account for three suspensions, while fraud in processing trade certifications led to two suspensions.
Other charges include 3 cases of improper conduct, 2 cases each of assault and sabotage allegations, and individual cases of gross negligence, intimidation, falsifying documents, conflict of interest, and unauthorised possession of equipment.
Several cases remain unresolved. Disciplinary hearings for multiple employees are scheduled to conclude by various dates through September 2025.
Some employees await final determinations.
READ NEXT: R10k just to show up: Fear of 'Nkabane 2.0' as ANC Youth League leaders get hospital board positions
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
13 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
NPA reveals buyer of stolen R7 million transformer previously involved in fraud matter
JOHANNESBURG - The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has revealed that the buyer of the R7 million transformer stolen from the Laudium substation was previously involved in a fraud matter of more than R1 million. Katlego Molepo was denied bail for a second time on Tuesday by the Atteridgeville Magistrate's Court, where he faces charges of theft of critical infrastructure. ALSO READ: Alleged buyer of stolen transformer collapses in court after being denied bail He is accused of buying the transformer from four Tshwane municipal workers, who are also arrested and face the same charge. However, he is the only one who was denied bail. In court, Molepo fell to the ground, breaking out in a sweat and hyperventilating when the magistrate denied his second attempt to be released on bail. The State argued that he knew he was buying a stolen transformer because he paid for it with a private account. They opposed his bail and added that this was his second offence. In a written statement to EWN, the NPA confirmed that from 2020 to 2021, Molepo defrauded the Department of Labour by fraudulently claiming money through the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF). They added that on separate occasions, he claimed more than R250,000, R1 million, and more than R100,000. He was sentenced to five years direct imprisonment or a fine of R40,000.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
South Africa eyes diversification as jobs exodus looms over 30% US import tariffs
Zane Dangor, the Director-General (DG) of the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco), speaking with Simphiwe Hamilton, the director-general of the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (the dtic) during a press briefing led by Ministers Ronald Lamola and Parks Tau on the reciprocal US tariffs. Image: GCIS Banele Ginidza About 30 000 jobs in various sectors are likely to be impacted by the unilateral 30% import tariffs to be imposed by the United States on South African products, which is set to come into effect before the end of this week. This was announced on Monday as the government seeks to craft an export diversification strategy leaning heavily towards China's R20 billion market through the offered China-Africa Trade partnership and a special industrialisation memorandum of understanding exclusively with South Africa. Simphiwe Hamilton, the director-general of the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (the dtic), confirmed that thousands of jobs were on the line in a variety of industries that export goods to the US market. 'We base this on the ongoing consultation that we have with all the sectors of the economy, from automotive to agriculture, and all the other sectors that are going to be affected, and at this stage, we are sitting at approximately 30 000 jobs that could be affected by this,' Hamilton said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The dtic and the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) said the 20% increase on top of the basic 10% tariff may shave off 0.2% of South Africa's economic growth, with the reduction in growth depending on SA's ability to find alternative markets. Trade Minister Parks Tau said it was mildly comforting that 35% of SA exports remained exempted from the tariffs with the exceptions published in the previous US Executive Order to remain in force. The exceptions cover products such as copper, pharmaceuticals, semi-conductors, lumber articles, certain critical minerals, stainless steel scrap, energy and energy products. Tau said the impact of the tariff was still subject of scrutiny with various conclusions, citing AgriCulture South Africa reporting an understated impact than initially modelled. "Drawing a straight line is a mistake we all have been making over the past few months when we are saying the auto sector is going to be affected and can't export to the US market," Tau said. "But when you drill down to the detail, most of the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) in the country do not go into the US market. So you have to go to the OEM that goes into the US market to determine what percentage of products [is exported to the US] to then determine impact. Last month, US President Donald Trump stated that the 30% tariff was "necessary to correct the many years of South Africa's Tariff, and Non Tariff, Policies and Trade Barriers," blaming Pretoria for what he called "unsustainable Trade Deficits against the United States." However, Tau and Dirco Minister Ronald Lamola said the calculation of US-SA "trade deficit" ignored the substantial US trade surplus in services, as well as the complementary nature of the bilateral trade and investment relations between the two countries. "South African exports do not compete with US producers and do not pose a threat to the US industry," they said in a joint statement. As a result, the government has embarked on the diversification of markets and strengthening trade and investment partnerships with various trade partners, targeting markets across Africa, as well as in Asia, Europe, Middle East, and Americas. "Our announcement on the Clean Trade and Investment Partnership with the European Union in March has unlocked a R90 Billion Investment Package that has been initially committed," read the statement. "This Clean Trade and Investment Partnership also aims to unlock new market access opportunities for South Africa, including the export of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) by Sasol and the exports of hybrids and Electric Vehicles. "While facing global trade challenges, South Africa is proactively building a more resilient agricultural sector. We've made significant progress in opening up vast new markets like China and Thailand, securing vital protocols for products like citrus and others." The government said that with China alone being a $200bn market, South Africa was confidently expanding its reach and creating new opportunities for agricultural producers. "We're making significant inroads into new, high-growth markets across Asia and the Middle East, including the UAE, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. We have also developed a number of Trade and Investment Packages with a number of countries, including Japan that aim to unlock new market access opportunities," it said. "While the current measures present challenges, it also presents opportunities to build and accelerate the implementation of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement and to develop new partnerships in markets that have remained untapped, including ASEAN and Turkiye." BUSINESS REPORT
The South African
5 days ago
- The South African
Major court battle looming over City of Cape Town rates
The City of Cape Town is heading into a potential legal battle over its recently implemented 'city cleaning levy,' with civil rights organisation AfriForum preparing to challenge the charge in court. This legal challenge follows the North Gauteng High Court's recent decision to overturn a similar levy imposed by the City of Tshwane, declaring it 'invalid and unlawful.' AfriForum successfully argued that Tshwane's R194-per-month fee amounted to illegal double taxation, violating both constitutional and municipal regulations. Now, AfriForum is setting its sights on Cape Town's version of the charge, which came into effect on 1 July. The group has instructed its legal team to initiate proceedings, calling the levy a 'fundraising ploy' that mirrors Tshwane's flawed approach. Unlike Tshwane's flat-rate levy, Cape Town's cleaning fee is calculated progressively based on property values and applies to all property owners. The City insists the charge forms part of its 'pro-poor budget,' which includes R40 billion in infrastructure investment over the next three years. Officials maintain the levy is a necessary tool to fund core services and improve urban cleanliness. However, critics argue the fee lacks a proper legislative basis and serves more as a revenue-generation mechanism than a targeted service fee. The South African Property Owners Association (SAPOA) and the Cape Town Collective Ratepayers' Association (CTCRA) have both expressed strong opposition. 'This is not just about Cape Town,' said a CTCRA spokesperson. 'If this levy is allowed to stand, it sets a dangerous precedent for municipalities across the country to impose similar charges without transparent legal justification.' In Tshwane's case, the court found the city had violated Section 229(1) of the Constitution and Section 74(1) of the Municipal Systems Act, which limit how municipalities can raise revenue. AfriForum CEO Kallie Kriel argues that Cape Town's cleaning levy falls into the same constitutional trap. 'The City is using the levy as a disguised tax to plug budget gaps caused by mismanagement,' Kriel said. 'We believe the courts will agree.' SAPOA has already filed for a judicial review of the levy, while the CTCRA is applying to join the proceedings as amicus curiae (friend of the court). If the court rules in their favour, the City could be ordered to refund residents – mirroring Tshwane's outcome. While Cape Town argues the fee is vital for maintaining essential services, opponents view it as a test case for municipal accountability and financial transparency. The outcome could reshape how South African cities structure service charges and tax residents. As legal filings proceed, Cape Town residents and property owners remain in limbo, uncertain whether the cleaning levy will be upheld – or scrapped, with refunds to follow. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
