Club-wielding Kenyans vow to 'protect' Nairobi as protest marks deadly anniversary
Pro-government counter-protesters urge for back-up during a protest over the death of Kenyan blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody, in downtown Nairobi, Kenya June 17, 2025. REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya
Pro-government counter-protesters and riot police officers disperse people protesting over the death of Kenyan blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody, in downtown Nairobi, Kenya June 17, 2025. REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya
Pro-government counter-protesters run during a protest over the death of Kenyan blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody, in downtown Nairobi, Kenya June 17, 2025. REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya
A pro-government counter-protester holds a wooden club as he runs after a man protesting over the death of Kenyan blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody, in downtown Nairobi, Kenya June 17, 2025. REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya
Swaleh Aroko, a pro-government counter-protester talks on his mobile phone after a Reuters interview on how they dispersed people protesting over the death of Kenyan blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody, in downtown Nairobi, Kenya June 19, 2025. REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya
NAIROBI - When protests are expected in Kenya's capital Nairobi, Swaleh Aroko grabs a wooden club and heads downtown.
The 34-year-old from the city's Korogocho slum is one of dozens of stick-wielding young men who have taken to the streets to counter recent demonstrations triggered by the death of a blogger in police custody.
During protests over the past two weeks, Reuters reporters have repeatedly seen the men - labeled "goons" by the protesters - advancing alongside police officers toward groups of unarmed demonstrators, and beating them with sticks and rubber whips.
Their presence on the streets is heightening fears that violence will mar a large demonstration expected on Wednesday to mark the one-year anniversary of a mass protest that culminated in the storming of parliament and several deaths through police gunfire.
Last week, Aroko and another counter-protester, Ronald Otieno, spoke to Reuters, saying they wanted to rebut misinformation about their actions over the past two weeks.
Aroko, who described himself as a reformed criminal, said the men were not goons but rather patriots defending property in the Central Business District against a small portion of protesters who loot and cause violence.
"You go behind and start throwing stones, we'll take a cane to disperse you," he said. "We don't need to burn our country."
Aroko did not directly respond to questions about what actions he had personally taken against protesters except to say that he was protecting businesses. He acknowledged that "it was messy" but blamed protesters for the violence.
Police spokesperson Muchiri Nyaga said in a text message that the National Police Service "does NOT work with 'goons'" and was analysing videos of certain incidents "with a view of taking appropriate action".
According to Reuters reporters covering the protests, the demonstrators have mostly been peaceful, although there have been some instances of violence, including the torching of two vehicles on June 12 by unknown individuals. Protesters have also beaten up some of the counter-protesters.
'GOVERNOR'S BOYS'
Counter-protesters also mobilised during demonstrations last June sparked by government plans to legislate higher taxes.
After President William Ruto withdrew the legislation, the protests, some of the biggest in Kenya's recent history, fizzled out. But demonstrations broke out again this month over the death in police custody of teacher and blogger Albert Ojwang.
Human rights activists say the counter-protesters, who have also been seen riding around Nairobi on motorcycles, chanting "No protests!", amount to a militia they suspect was employed by powerful politicians and operates with support from the police.
Aroko and Otieno both said they were on "Team Sakaja", a reference to Nairobi County Governor Johnson Sakaja, a Ruto ally.
"It was our right as governor's boys to protect our city," said Otieno. He and Aroko did not elaborate on the nature of their ties to Sakaja.
Aroko denied that Sakaja or the city government were behind the counter-protests, which he said were financed by local businesspeople who "coordinate" with the police to protect private property.
He said he was paid 5,000 Kenyan shillings ($38.76) per protest.
Otieno, however, said they were acting at the request of county assembly members who had urged them to "come and protect our city". He declined to name them.
Sakaja did not respond to a Reuters request for comment but denied in a statement to local media any affiliation with groups "that exploit demonstrations to engage in criminal activity".
A spokesperson for Ruto did not respond to a request for comment.
There was no immediate response from the Nairobi chamber of commerce to a request for comment on Aroko's allegation of links between businesspeople and the counter-protesters.
Aroko and Otieno said they would be out on the streets again on Wednesday and warned protesters to stay in line.
"Come peacefully," Aroko said. "Because the business community is ready for you. And the government here is ready for you. You can't burn Nairobi because of one person." REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
28 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Nigeria and Brazil sign $1 billion agreement to boost agriculture
A drone view shows ships and containers at the Port of Santos, in Santos, Brazil April 3, 2025. REUTERS/Amanda Perobelli/File Photo ABUJA - Nigeria and Brazil signed a $1 billion agreement on Tuesday to boost agriculture, food security, energy and defence in the West African nation, Nigeria's vice president Kasim Shettima said. Both countries aim to "deploy over $1 billion to deliver mechanised farming equipment, training, and service centres across Nigeria," Shettima said in a statement posted on X. Much farming in Nigeria is subsistence and land is owned by families or individuals which makes large-scale acquisition problematic. Nigeria also imports food for its 200 million plus population. "We are moving from subsistence to scale in agriculture, and in energy, we are taking long-overdue steps to attract serious investment into gas production, refining, and renewables," Shettima added. The agreements were signed in Abuja during a visit by Brazil's vice president Geraldo Alckmin to Africa's most populous nation. Shettima told his Brazilian counterpart that reforms embarked upon by President Bola Tinubu have helped reshaped Nigeria's economy. Nigeria is targeting a $1 trillion economy by 2030, with reforms to agriculture, energy, education, and public finance. The country has also asked banks to recapitalise to attract foreign investments. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
29 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyers point to Cassie's loving texts in trial defense
Sean \"Diddy\" Combs watches as his defense lawyer argues a Rule 29 motion after the government announced they had rested their case during Combs' sex trafficking trial in New York City, New York, U.S., June 24, 2025 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg Defense lawyer argues a Rule 29 motion before U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, after the government announced they had rested their case during Sean \"Diddy\" Combs' sex trafficking trial in New York City, New York, U.S., June 24, 2025 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg Prosecutor Emily Johnson stands to announce the government has rested their case before U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, as Sean \"Diddy\" Combs and his defense lawyers Marc Agnifilo and Nicole Westmoreland watch, during Combs' sex trafficking trial in New York City, New York, U.S., June 24, 2025 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg Sean \"Diddy\" Combs watches as prosecutor Emily Johnson announces the government has rested their case during Combs' sex trafficking trial in New York City, New York, U.S., June 24, 2025 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg NEW YORK - Sean "Diddy" Combs' lawyers spent a half-hour on Tuesday putting on their defense case at their client's sex trafficking trial, paving the way for jurors to hear final arguments before weighing the hip-hop mogul's fate. The defense included showing jurors text messages in which one of Combs' accusers, rhythm and blues singer Casandra Ventura, said she loved him and suggested she enjoyed participating in sexual performances known as "Freak Offs." Federal prosecutors rested their case against Combs earlier in the day, after more than six weeks of testimony. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to five counts of racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. He decided not to testify. Defendants in U.S. criminal cases are not required to present evidence, and judges instruct juries not to hold a refusal to testify against defendants. To win a guilty verdict, prosecutors must prove their cases beyond a reasonable doubt. The government's case against Combs included accusations that the Bad Boy Records founder forced two former girlfriends into sexual performances with male sex workers while he watched, masturbated and sometimes filmed. Witnesses included the former girlfriends Ventura, known as Cassie, and a woman known in court by the pseudonym Jane. Over several days of testimony, both said Combs beat them, threatened to cut off financial support, and threatened to leak sex tapes. Combs' lawyers have acknowledged that their client was occasionally violent in domestic relationships, but argued the "Freak Offs" were consensual. On Tuesday, defense lawyer Anna Estevao read jurors several messages, ranging from tender to sexually explicit, that Ventura sent Combs during their decade-long relationship. In one message from 2012, Ventura wrote Combs, "Besides making love, talking to you is my favorite thing." Five years later, Ventura told Combs in a series of messages that she missed him, asked him to send a picture of his genitals, and pledged to "be your little freak." Outside the jury's presence, Estevao told the court the messages showed Combs believed the "Freak Offs" were consensual. "That she's telling Mr. Combs that she will be his little freak is probative as to his state of mind as to whether or not she was willing to engage in this kind of sexual activity," Estevao said. One prosecution witness, forensic psychologist Dawn Hughes, had told jurors that victims of sexual violence often develop "trauma bonds" with their partners, making it difficult to leave abusive relationships. U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, who has overseen the trial in Manhattan federal court, is expected on Wednesday to meet with lawyers to discuss jury instructions. Closing arguments are expected to begin on Thursday, and the jury may not begin deliberating until late Friday or Monday. If convicted on all five counts, Combs faces a mandatory 15-year prison sentence and could face life behind bars. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
43 minutes ago
- Straits Times
US strikes may have set back Iran nuclear programme by just months, sources say
A satellite view showing the site of Iran's Fordow Fuel Enrichment plant, after the US struck the nuclear facility on June 21. PHOTO: REUTERS US strikes may have set back Iran nuclear programme by just months, sources say WASHINGTON - A preliminary US intelligence assessment has determined that US strikes over the weekend on Iranian nuclear facilities have set back Tehran's programme by only a matter of months, three sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters. The initial report was prepared by the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA), the Pentagon's main intelligence arm and one of 18 US intelligence agencies, said two of the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss classified matters. The classified assessment is at odds with the statements of President Donald Trump and high-ranking US officials - including Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. They have said the weekend strikes, which used a combination of bunker-busting bombs and more conventional weapons, essentially eliminated Iran's nuclear programme. Mr Trump has said the attacks were necessary to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran denies it is seeking such a weapon and says its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes. Mr Hegseth on June 22 said that the strikes had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear ambitions, while Mr Trump said Iran's crucial nuclear sites had been 'completely and fully obliterated.' Assessing the damage at the Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites is expected to be a difficult task, and the DIA is not the only agency tasked with the job. One source said the assessment was not universally accepted and had generated significant disagreement. A US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the US did not know the extent of the damage yet. Still, the initial assessment indicated the strikes may not have been nearly as successful as the Trump administration has claimed. One of the sources said Iran's enriched uranium stocks had not been eliminated, and in fact the country's nuclear programme may have been set back only a month or two. The Pentagon disputed the notion that the damage to Iran's nuclear programme was minor, though it did not dispute that the DIA assessment exists. 'Based on everything we have seen - and I've seen it all - our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons,' Mr Hegseth said, in a statement provided to Reuters. 'Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target - and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran; so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the President and the successful mission.' The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But in a statement to CNN, which first reported the intelligence assessment, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the conclusion was incorrect. 'This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong,' Ms Leavitt said, according to CNN. 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.' Initial military assessments can change as more information comes to light and it is not uncommon for opinions to vary across different US intelligence agencies. Democrats have previously said Mr Trump's claims that the weekend strikes eliminated or seriously set back Iran's nuclear program were not yet backed by evidence. 'There's zero evidence that I've seen that the nuclear programme was completely and totally obliterated as Donald Trump has claimed,' House of Representatives Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said on June 23. Classified briefings on the matter for members of the House of Representatives and Senate were cancelled on June 24. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
