logo
Life becomes a nightmare for hunderds of Welsh holiday let owners snared by hidden legal trap

Life becomes a nightmare for hunderds of Welsh holiday let owners snared by hidden legal trap

Thousands of holiday let owners in Wales have been left bewildered after being hit with massive council tax bills out of the blue. It comes as an industry survey suggests nearly half of the country's self-catering businesses are now losing money, or barely breaking even, after failing achieve new letting targets set by the government.
A little-known change in the law has seen many owners receiving council tax demands that often run into tens of thousands. Payments are often expected within seven days with the prospect of legal proceedings if they fail to settle.
The huge bills stem from a legal technicality over the number of nights a property has been let. Although many owners believed they have met new letting thresholds set by the Welsh Government, and so thought they would not be liable for council tax, they've been caught out by a legislative pitfall.
According to critics, it's left the holiday let sector in Wales on a 'cliff-edge'. The Professional Association of Self-Caterers (PASC) said it is currently dealing with hundreds of cases with more inquiries coming in every day from disbelieving owners bereft at the iniquity of the situation.
A Welsh-speaking family letting out the family home in Abersoch, Gwynedd, is facing a three-year bill for £21,000 despite meeting all of what they thought to be their targets. They say Cyngor Gwynedd is understanding but the situation is placing intolerable demands on the property's 85-year-old owner.
Meanwhile, a couple in Flintshire have received a demand for nearly £10,000. Colin and Rebecca Jones, from Afonwen, were left shocked to get a 'ridiculous' bill for a small two-person cottage just 8ft-9ft from the family home, a former mill with its old water wheel still in the garden.
'You can imagine the stress,' said Rebecca, an NHS personal assistant. 'It's horrendous. It's having a terrible impact on our lives and we're now having to look at all options, including annexing the properties and stripping out the cottage's kitchen.' Join the North Wales Live Whatsapp community now
Since launching their business in February 2022, Colin and Rebecca have met what they thought were their required targets. In the first year, they hit 164 nights – way over the 70-night threshold that apparently existed at the time.
When the bar was raised in April 2023, requiring owners to let their properties for at least 182 nights, they redoubled their efforts and, with price-cutting, they managed to meet the 182-night target in the subsequent two years. In the current financial year, they've so far let the cottage for 101 nights and are confident of reaching the target again.
Hitting the lettings threshold is important as it qualifies owners for cheaper business rates rather than more expensive second home council tax, which often come with an added 'second home' premium. As this premium is as high as 200% in some counties - effectively trebling council tax bills – it can make the difference between a business succeeding or failing
Colin and Rebecca were shocked to discover that, when assessed by the Valuation Office Agency (VOA), they were deemed to have failed to have met their letting targets. Like many owners, they believed that as the law only changed from April 2023, they only needed to reach the new letting thresholds from then on.
They hadn't realised the 182-night rule applies retrospectively - meaning they missed the threshold in the first year. This made them liable for council tax for each of the past three years.
Nicky Williamson, Wales policy lead at PASC Cymru, said she was not surprised so many people can't understand what's going on. 'We're getting lots of exasperated calls every day,' she said.
'It's very confusing and it's difficult for people to get their heads around what's happening. Assessments must be made on a daily basis, so we have situations where owners are getting notices on March 31 saying they met the 70-day target, followed by notices on April 1 saying they hadn't as the rules had changed.
'It's awful, a total minefield. But whether we like it or not, unfortunately it's the law. We're working with the VOA on this issue and, to be fair, they're doing their best within the legal limitations. But they're in a pretty impossible situation, now facing extra demands at a time when they're already dealing with huge backlogs.'
The upshot is that the 70-night target was an illusion for most holiday lets in Wales in 2022-23. The situation has been compared to a football match where, late in the second half, players are told the rules have changed and the goalposts have been shifted. Local authorities are not at fault – they can only act on VOA assessments of a property's status based on the law at the time.
The fall-out is sending shockwaves through a sector that's already struggling to meet the higher 182-night threshold. Of the estimated 22,000 short-term lets in Wales, feedback suggests around half are failing to hit the target.
For owners, the ramifications are disastrous. In a recent PASC Cymru survey, 47% of owners now paying premium council taxes said they are now losing money. In North Wales, only Wrexham Council doesn't charge a second home premium. Elsewhere, it ranges from 100% (double) to 200% (treble).
Councils justify the policy as a necessary measure to manage the proliferation of holiday and second homes, aiming to alleviate the housing crisis. But with tourism a major contributor to the Welsh economy, critics claim the approach risks hobbling the industry.
Nicky noted the typical holiday let in Wales is a two-bedroom cottage. 'The average turnover for these businesses is £20,000 which, after costs, returns an average profit of £3,000,' she said.
'So it's easy to see why nearly half of all lets are now losing money when faced with large council tax demands, some of them unexpected. Being moved to council tax from business rates is associated with around half of Welsh self-catering businesses becoming non-viable.'
Amongst the worst cases known to PASC involves a three-generation, Welsh-speaking family forced to give up their home of 50 years.
After buying a derelict farm, they developed it into a five-star holiday let complex with four cottages, focusing on family holidays for more than 20 years. When they received a back-dated council tax demand for £37,000, they had no option but to sell up.
Feeling misled
When recovering council taxes, local authorities have some discretion. However, Freedom of Information requests by PASC Cymru indicate few are applying it.
An exception appears to be Cyngor Gwynedd. According to the Abersoch owners facing a £21,000 bill, they're now stuck in an endless cycle of demands, followed by pleas for delays and clemency. Invariably these are agreed, only for renewed demands to arrive in the post a few weeks later.
They too met all their official letting targets – or so they thought. 'We are a Welsh family from the area who have owned this house since the 1930s,' said the owner's daughter, who asked not to be named.
'We are not someone who has bought into the area. This is a family home handed down the generations that we still use as well as letting it out.
'The council must have hundreds of owners in a similar position. They tell us they are waiting for the government to sort it out. In the meantime we're facing large and unfair bills.'
Many in the industry consider the rule changes amounted to retrospective legislation. Although VOA letters were sent to holiday let owners in October 2022, alerting them to the upcoming changes, awareness remains low.
Even had the sector realised the implications at the time, few businesses would have been able to shift gears and increase lettings to make up the difference, having missed the busy summer season. Many in the sector feel misled.
PASC Cymru said there's little holiday let owners can do. 'It's difficult to challenge the legislation,' said Nicky Williamson. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox
Feeling trapped
The VOA is encouraging all holiday let owners to continue paying their council taxes or business rates whilst any cases are reviewed.
A spokesperson said: 'Following Welsh Government's announcement of the new business rates criteria for self-catering properties, we wrote to all self-catering property owners in October 2022 to let them know about upcoming changes and how this would be assessed.
'If businesses feel they have been incorrectly assessed they can provide evidence for our teams to review. If a customer informs us that they are experiencing financial hardship we will prioritise their case.'
In Afonwen, Colin and Rebecca now feel trapped. As things stand, making a profit is difficult enough without large and unexpected bills. Mothballing their holiday let would not only depreciate the property, it would attract an empty home premium.
Like the second home equivalent in Flintshire, this currently amounts to 100% on top of standard council tax bills. From next year, Flintshire's empty home premium will be levied on a sliding scale ranging from 150%-300%.
In an attempt to stop the two properties being considered separate homes, one option being explored is to link them together via an extension, and stripping out the cottage kitchen. It's an approach that's been tried elsewhere in Wales but PASC Cymru said a legal precedent has yet to be set.
Colin, a quantity survey, is determined to fight for justice and has raised a formal complaint with the VOA. He said: 'This is not a second home, it is literally less than 10 steps from our back door. We do not go there for weekends or on holiday!'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Castell Coffi known for Welsh cakes nominated for award
Castell Coffi known for Welsh cakes nominated for award

South Wales Argus

time3 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Castell Coffi known for Welsh cakes nominated for award

Castell Coffi, owned by Ian and Leigh Crawford, in Caldicot, has been nominated for the Best of Welsh Business Awards in the South East Wales section. The ceremony will take place at Maes Manor, in Blackwood, on September 7, and customers can vote for their favourite. Owner Ian Crawford said: "Well, it's about time these Welsh cakes won something! "Please vote on the link for us if you have a minute. "We have plans to brand our Welsh cakes as people are going nuts over them. "I always knew my mother's recipe would be popular but they sell out every day and there are times during the day when people are buying them in advance because I can't cook them fast enough." Castell Coffi, situated in Caldicot Business Park, has gained fame for its homemade Welsh cakes made from a family recipe. Since opening earlier this year, the shop has attracted customers from across the country. It has also become a "celebrity hotspot", with renowned visitors such as actor and director Mackenzie Crook and comedian Omid Djalili. The shop was recently voted the best coffee shop in Gwent on TripAdvisor. It is open on weekdays from 9am to 4pm, serving coffee, homemade Welsh cakes, toasties, paninis, fresh sandwiches, and cakes. One reviewer said: "Fabulous coffee shop catering largely for local workers. "Really friendly staff, great coffee, but omg, those Welsh cakes. "Heavenly."

Minister insists fuel supplies not under threat despite oil refinery closure
Minister insists fuel supplies not under threat despite oil refinery closure

Powys County Times

time4 hours ago

  • Powys County Times

Minister insists fuel supplies not under threat despite oil refinery closure

An energy minister has insisted fuel supplies will not be under threat after no buyer was found for one of Britain's largest oil refineries. State Oil – the parent company of Prax Group, which owns the Lindsey refinery in North Lincolnshire – collapsed into administration last month, putting hundreds of jobs at risk. Michael Shanks pledged to support the workers who are facing redundancy, but said there is little action the Government can take to improve the statutory redundancy offer. Speaking in the Commons, he said: 'We have worked urgently to ensure the safety of the refinery site, the security of fuel supplies and to protect workers. 'This has also allowed time for bidders to express an interest in the site. 'Following a thorough process, the official receiver has rigorously assessed all the bids received and concluded that sale of the business as a whole is not a credible option.' He added: 'A package has been offered to all those directly employed at the refinery, which guarantees their jobs and pay over the coming months. 'And alongside the usual support that is offered to workforces in insolvency situations, the Government will also immediately fund a comprehensive training guarantee for those refinery workers to ensure they have the skills needed and the support to find jobs, for example, in the growing clean energy workforce.' The Lindsey site is one of only five large oil refineries remaining in the UK after the recent closure of the Grangemouth plant in Scotland. Prax Group is led by majority owner and chairman and chief executive Sanjeev Kumar Soosaipillai, who bought the Lindsey oil refinery from French firm Total in 2021. Shadow energy minister Andrew Bowie, who tabled the urgent question, claimed 625 jobs are at risk as he pressed the minister for an update on its investigation into the collapse of the company. He also asked: 'What, if any, assessment has been made into the UK's resilience given the steep reduction in our refining capacity over the past six months? 'What, if any, assessment has been made on the increased reliance on imports that will be necessary as a result of the reduction in British refining capacity?' Mr Shanks said fuel supplies had 'adjusted' in the past few weeks, adding: 'Our assessment suggests there isn't an immediate risk to fuel supplies locally or in the wider area, but we'll continue to monitor that.' On the investigation, he said: 'There is not much I can update the House on at the moment, because the insolvency service is carrying out that investigation.' Conservative MP Martin Vickers, whose Brigg and Immingham constituency includes the oil refinery, said he wanted to see 'the maximum support given to those workers'. Mr Shanks replied: 'We have looked and pushed and pushed to see if there is more action Government can take to change or to give any additional payments. 'It's not possible for Government to do that, not least because the insolvency service has to follow very specific rules in terms of creditors and what their parameters are to operate in the event of an insolvency. 'But I do think the owners of this company have profited from this business, and they should do the right thing by the workforce that delivered that for them.'

Ryanair tells widow her dead husband needs to apply for refund
Ryanair tells widow her dead husband needs to apply for refund

Telegraph

time5 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Ryanair tells widow her dead husband needs to apply for refund

A widow was left in tears when Ryanair refused to refund her late husband's £827 flights. Yvonne Shield, 44, tried to cancel Colin Shield's flight from Edinburgh to Venice after he died in April. He had booked the flights last year and was due to fly in September to represent Scotland at a powerchair football match. Mr Shield was tetraplegic after an accident 14 years ago, and required two essential carers to accompany him on the flight, whose tickets he had paid for. After his death from a brain bleed, Ms Shield contacted Ryanair customer support to get the flights refunded, but she said she was told she could not get the money back for the carers' tickets as Mr Shield had booked them. She was promised a refund of only £258 for his ticket but said she has not received that either. When Ms Shield got back in touch to chase the refund, she was reportedly told they could not disclose any information unless they speak to the original booker, despite being informed that the booker had died. Ms Shield said she provided Ryanair with her husband's death certificate and proof that she is the executor of his will, but that the airline refused to speak with her. Ryanair apologised and said Ms Shield was 'regrettably incorrectly advised wrongly' by their customer service agent. Ms Shield, from Glasgow, said: 'Colin passed on April 12 and I contacted them in April. I filled out the form to get a refund for Colin and the carers. They authorised part of the refund but they didn't send it. 'They said their policy is to refund only Colin's ticket, not the carers'. But I've not had it, there's nothing. She added that when she chased the refund she was told 'they have to speak with the booker', although she, and her sister, had informed them that the booker had died. Ms Shield explained she cannot get in contact with the carers who were booked as passengers 'because the contract ended', but added that 'they didn't pay for the tickets'. The Ryanair help agent told her they 'can't disclose any information with someone not tied to the booking' and so ended the chat. Ms Shield said the 'lack of empathy' from Ryanair has been upsetting, and caused her to 'burst into tears' She added: 'The fact they're not even giving me the money back is infuriating. It's like bashing your head on a brick wall. They're trying to speak to someone that isn't here, it's an unreasonable request. 'It's the lack of empathy, lack of understanding, it's not a bog-standard person going on a flight, it's a disabled person. If you had a family member who died, surely you would think it's all cancelled.' A Ryanair spokesman said: 'Mrs Shields attempted to submit a refund request on April 26 and was advised to submit a death certificate and proof of executorship. 'On 30 Jun, Mrs Shields was informed that a refund (£257.58) was issued and was regrettably incorrectly advised by a customer service agent who wrongly believed that the other two passengers on the booking were not entitled to a refund. 'Our customer service department would be happy to further assist this passenger to correct this customer service agent's error and assist this passenger with their refund.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store