
When it comes to tech adoption in wealth management, many hands make light work
Keeping up with innovations in wealth management can be a full-time job. New technology has made the industry more efficient, better at serving clients and more adaptable to changing needs. But these advancements have increased pressure on wealth management firms and advisors to keep pace and ratcheted up the risks of getting left behind in a competitive marketplace.
Today, clients receive highly customized service, content and products. Although they might not have consciously noticed the shift, many are enjoying richer and more meaningful conversations with their advisors, who are more informed about the client's needs and goals, and better equipped with personalized recommendations and solutions.
Technology is fuelling this progress. New tools enable lower operating costs for wealth management firms and free up advisors from time-consuming research and administrative tasks. In turn, advisors can spend more time with their clients, understanding their goals and thus growing their own businesses. That all opens the door to revenue growth and margin expansion.
There's only one sticking point: keeping up with the latest technology is a time-consuming and costly task.
Advisors are under constant pressure to upgrade systems to meet client demands. Wealth management platforms must be adaptable to changing markets and regulation.
It would be difficult for any one firm or individual advisor to develop these capabilities on their own. Luckily, they don't have to, as an entire ecosystem of companies and groups has taken shape.
The first and arguably most important part of that ecosystem is technology and service vendors. These companies, many of which fall into the growing category of 'fintechs,' provide services designed to enhance internal operations and the client experience.
That means wealth management firms and advisors don't need to be technologists. Instead, they need to build internal technology platforms with a modular design that enables something close to plug-and-play integration of external technology tools.
Once that architecture is in place, companies only have to decide which fintech firms they want as partners, and how deep those partnerships should be.
On the first front, partner due diligence is becoming a make-or-break function. By integrating fintechs, wealth management firms are betting on the future, but they must develop a repeatable process to assess not only the vendor's technology offering but also their future strategy, architecture and culture to enable a long-term partnership.
Firms often use a scorecard to evaluate partners' cultural alignment, investments, innovation and use of artificial intelligence for productivity. The goal is to ensure partners are meeting or exceeding the firm's needs and contributing to its overall objectives.
Through partnerships, firms can expand capabilities rapidly, with each partner contributing its own complementary expertise.
Vendors aren't the only partners who can help wealth managers keep up with the pace of change. Wealth management firms and individual advisors should also be active in industry groups that can provide critical insights and best practices on regulatory changes and emerging technology.
The perfect example of how partnerships can help wealth managers navigate industry change is the recent move to T+1 trading. To make the difficult transition to next-day settlement, wealth management firms called on the services of a wide variety of vendors and partners who provided the technology to accelerate back-office functions.
Firms also connected through industry associations to share best practices. This ensured advisor productivity and guided the entire transition, making it manageable for the industry.
No firm could have made this leap on their own. Fortunately, the old saying is true: many hands make light work.
Donna Bristow is chief product officer, wealth management, at Broadridge Financial Solutions in Toronto.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
22 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Previewing Q2 Earnings Expectations
The expectation is for Q2 earnings to increase by +5.1% from the same period last year on +3.8% higher revenues. This will be a material deceleration from the +11.9% earnings growth in Q1 on +3.6% revenue growth. In the unlikely event that actual Q2 earnings growth for the S&P 500 index turns out to be +5.1%, as currently expected, this will be the lowest earnings growth pace for the index since the +4.3% growth rate in 2023 Q3. We have been regularly flagging in recent weeks that 2025 Q2 earnings estimates have been steadily decreasing, as shown in the chart below. The magnitude of cuts to 2025 Q2 estimates since the start of the period is larger and more widespread compared to what we have become accustomed to seeing in the post-COVID period. Since the start of April, Q2 estimates have declined for 14 of the 16 Zacks sectors (Aerospace and Utilities are the only sectors whose estimates have increased), with the largest cuts to Conglomerates, Autos, Transportation, Energy, Basic Materials, and Construction sectors. Estimates for the Tech and Finance sectors, the largest earnings contributors to the S&P 500 index, accounting for more than 50% of all index earnings, have also been cut since the quarter got underway. But as we have been pointing out in recent weeks, the revisions trend for the Tech sector has notably stabilized in recent weeks, which you can see in the chart below. We see this same trend at play in annual estimates as well. The chart below shows the Tech sector's evolving earnings expectations for full-year 2025 A likely explanation for this stabilization in the revisions trend is the easing of tariff uncertainty after the more punitive version of the tariff regime was delayed. Analysts started revising their estimates lower in the immediate aftermath of the early April tariff announcements, but appear to have since concluded that those punitive tariff levels are unlikely to get levied, helping stabilize the revisions trend. The chart below shows current Q2 earnings and revenue growth expectations in the context of the preceding four quarters and the coming three quarters. The chart below shows the overall earnings picture on a calendar-year basis. In terms of S&P 500 index 'EPS', these growth rates approximate to $254.04 for 2025 and $287 for 2026. The chart below shows how these calendar year 2025 earnings growth expectations have evolved since the start of Q2. As you can see below, estimates fell sharply at the beginning of the quarter, which coincided with the tariff announcements, but have notably stabilized over the last four to six weeks. Key Earnings Reports This week The Q2 earnings season will really get going when the big banks come out with their June-quarter results in about a month. But we will have officially counted almost two dozen quarterly reports from S&P 500 members by then. All of those reports will be from companies with fiscal quarters ending in May, which we and other research organizations count as part of the June-quarter tally. We have seen such fiscal May-quarter results from four S&P 500 members, including last Wednesday's strong release from Oracle ORCL. We have another six S&P 500 members scheduled to report results this week, including Accenture ACN, Lennar LEN, and others. Oracle shares were up significantly following the beat-and-raise quarterly release, which came after two consecutive quarterly reports that market participants had found disappointing. Oracle's cloud growth appears to have finally arrived, with fiscal 2026 cloud revenues expected to grow by +40%, up from the fiscal 2025 growth rate of +24% (Oracle's fiscal year ends in May). As noted earlier, the stock has spiked on the earnings release and is now up +29.3% this year, handily outperforming the S&P 500 index (up +2.1%) and the Zacks Tech sector (up +2.5%). Shares of IT consulting firm Accenture have been under pressure lately, reflecting a challenging operating environment for its end-markets. The stock is down -11.4% this year, which compares to a +2.1% gain for the S&P 500 index and a +2.5% gain for the Zacks Tech sector. The issues in the Accenture story, in a generalized qualitative sense, pertain to the negative effects on corporate IT budgets of the ongoing tariff uncertainty and the deflationary effects of AI-driven operating efficiencies. One could argue that Accenture's scale lends its results considerable stability, particularly in comparison to other peers like India-based Infosys, TCS, and Wipro. But these macro headwinds nevertheless limit the stock's near-term upside potential. The company is scheduled to report results on June 20 th, with estimates essentially unchanged over the last two months. Lennar, the homebuilder, is scheduled to report results after the market's close on Monday, June 16 th. The homebuilder is expected to bring in $1.97 per share in earnings on $8.24 billion in revenues, representing year-over-year changes of -41.7% and -5.97%, respectively. This is a challenging environment for Lennar and other homebuilders, with demand hindered by affordability concerns and elevated mortgage rates. The stock was down after each of the last five quarterly releases and has lost roughly a fifth of its value this year (down -20.3%), which compares to the Zacks Construction sector's -1.9% decline and the S&P 500 index's +2.2% gain. Q2 Earnings Season Scorecard As noted earlier, we have already seen fiscal May-quarter results from four S&P 500 members, which we include in our Q2 tally. Total earnings for these four index members that have reported results are up +4.7% from the same period last year on +8.6% revenue gains, with 75% of the companies beating EPS estimates and all beating revenue estimates. The comparison charts below put the Q2 earnings and revenue growth rates for these index members in a historical context. The comparison charts below put the Q2 EPS and revenue beats percentages in a historical context. We are not drawing any conclusions from these results, given the small sample size at this stage. But we nevertheless wanted to put these early results in a historical context. 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days Just released: Experts distill 7 elite stocks from the current list of 220 Zacks Rank #1 Strong Buys. They deem these tickers "Most Likely for Early Price Pops." Since 1988, the full list has beaten the market more than 2X over with an average gain of +23.5% per year. So be sure to give these hand picked 7 your immediate attention. See them now >> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Accenture PLC (ACN): Free Stock Analysis Report Oracle Corporation (ORCL): Free Stock Analysis Report Lennar Corporation (LEN): Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (


CTV News
25 minutes ago
- CTV News
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately US$11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share' — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership,' the two companies said. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51 per cent ownership by Americans.' The Japan-based steelmaker had been offering nearly $15 billion to purchase the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in a merger that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, yet he expressed optimism in working out an arrangement once in office. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' said Trump, although it was unclear what he meant by suggesting that the federal government would determine what U.S. Steel does as a company. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' Still, Nippon Steel has never said it was backing off its bid to buy and control U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction. Trump reserves the authority to issue further actions regarding the investment as part of the order he signed on Friday. Associated Press writer Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report Josh Boak, The Associated Press


CBC
27 minutes ago
- CBC
Information about TFSA contribution limits now available, says the CRA
The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) says it has resolved an issue that prevented people from seeing how much contribution room they had left in their tax-free savings accounts (TFSAs). That information first became unavailable on April 17. CRA spokesperson Charles Drouin told CBC News in an email that the federal agency introduced a new data validation process this year to ensure that tax information submitted to them is accurate. "Upfront validations now advise these filers of errors with their information return submission in real-time and prevent the submission of invalid returns," Drouin wrote. He said the new system would ultimately improve the quality of the data the Canada Revenue Agency receives and allow for any errors to be corrected faster. But he added that "stricter validations and new processes caused delays in receiving and processing the information returns. As a result, there have been delays in processing TFSA annual information returns this year." Each year, Canadians 18 or older get more contribution room in their tax-free savings accounts, which shield investments from taxes. In 2025, for example, the new contribution limit was $7,000. If someone was 18 in 2009 – the year the the savings accounts were introduced – has lived in Canada since then and never contributed to their TFSA, their total contribution limit would be $102,000 as of Jan. 1, 2025. If someone didn't properly track their contributions over the years, though, they could risk going over their limit, which comes with a one per cent interest penalty per month for those funds over the limit. The CRA website notes that posted contribution limits do not take into account any contributions to the TFSA made since Jan. 1, 2025.