Thunder injuries: Will Nikola Topic, Thomas Sorber, Brooks Barnhizer play Summer League?
Fresh off an NBA championship, the Oklahoma City Thunder will experience some serious whiplash. Less than a month separates the 2025 NBA Finals and the start of the 2025 Summer League. Let's say the consequences of both environments are opposites.
All intrigue revolves around the Thunder's injury statuses. They drafted Thomas Sorber with the No. 12 pick and Brooks Barnhizer with the No. 44 pick. Both suffered season-ending foot injuries in their final college seasons. Sorber had surgery in February, while Barnhizer was ruled out in the same month.
Nikola Topic is also another name to watch. The 19-year-old missed his first season after he suffered a partially torn ACL in May 2024. That dropped his draft status to the 2024 NBA draft No. 12 pick, which the Thunder cashed in on to take him.
After being out for over a year, most assume Topic will play at least some of the Thunder's Summer League. He attended Sorber's and Barnhizer's introductory press conference. Here's an injury update on all three players:
Nikola Topic
Mark Daigneault declined to comment on Topic's status. Instead, Thunder PR said they will release the Summer League roster at a later date. That should tell us whether or not the 19-year-old will finally make his OKC debut.
Thomas Sorber
Sorber said the Thunder will take his injury day-to-day. He also kept his status close to the vest. The 19-year-old suffered turf toe that caused him to undergo surgery.
Brooks Barnhizer
This was the only confirmation. Barnhizer had a foot injury that ended his collegiate season in February. He said he's good to go and will play in Summer League. He knocked off any rust in his 16 predraft workouts. He also mentioned that the Thunder were his first workout and that stuck with him throughout the other 15.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Proposed Trade Between Lakers and Pacers Shows What's Wrong With NBA
Proposed Trade Between Lakers and Pacers Shows What's Wrong With NBA originally appeared on Athlon Sports. After losing in the NBA Finals to the Oklahoma City Thunder, the Indiana Pacers are expected to remain one of the better teams in the Eastern Conference, although they will clearly take a step back with Tyrese Haliburton ruled out for the season with a torn Achilles. Advertisement Andrew Nembhard is more than capable of taking over playmaking duties, although Indiana is simply losing an All-NBA player. Regardless of position or role, that will hurt. As a result, the Pacers have already been included in trade rumors. Bennedict Mathurin, Obi Toppin, and Jarace Walker have all been included in speculation. For now, speculation is just that, although there is some merit to their making a trade. Mathurin's value is at an all-time high, Toppin is a movable salary who will get them back under the luxury tax after they extend Myles Turner, and Walker has not blossomed in Indiana and could use a change of scenery. While mock trades can be realistic, one from The Wrightway Sports Network simply misses the point. Advertisement Full Mock Trade Details: Los Angeles Lakers Receive: 2026 first-round pick, 2027 first-round pick, 2029 first-round pick, 2030 first-round pick, Myles Turner, Bennedict Mathurin Indiana Pacers Receive: Austin Reaves First of all, this trade doesn't work. Turner is expected to sign a contract worth roughly $35 million per season this summer, so the Pacers would send out around $45.1 million while taking on only $13.9 million in Reaves. On top of that, Indiana can't trade back-to-back picks, so two of those selections would have to be changed for swaps, not outright trades. The Lakers have long been linked to Turner despite the Pacers seeming hell-bent on keeping him in town, and the desire seems to go both ways. While Reaves would be an excellent fit in a Haliburton-less backcourt, four picks (or swaps) is way too much for a second or third option, and Turner and Mathurin are more than just matching salary, although they don't even do that. The proposed trade is a sobering reminder that the NBA offseason can quickly go off the rails with speculation and creativity, although a degree of realism is required, especially for a team that just made the Finals and shouldn't be eager for a total restructure of the roster. Advertisement Check out the All Pacers homepage for more news, analysis, and must-read articles. Related: Rick Carlisle Sends Emotional Message to Tyrese Haliburton After Pacers' Finals Loss Related: Tyrese Haliburton Gets Brutally Honest About Injury, Pacers Losing Finals This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 24, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Indiana Pacers Not Picking in 2025 NBA Draft is Genius
Why Indiana Pacers Not Picking in 2025 NBA Draft is Genius originally appeared on Athlon Sports. On Wednesday, all eyes will be on the Barclays Center as teams draft top talent in the first round. After finishing fourth in the Eastern Conference, the Indiana Pacers were given the 23rd overall pick. Advertisement However, during the NBA Finals, Indiana made a trade with the New Orleans Pelicans, sending the 23rd pick--as well as the rights to Mojave King--in exchange for their 2026 first-round pick back. New Orleans received the pick from the Toronto Raptors in the deal that sent Brandon Ingram to Canada, and the Raptors originally acquired the pick in the trade that landed the Pacers Pascal Siakam. While the 2025 draft class is laden with talent, the 2026 class, headlined by AJ Dybantsa and the Boozer Twins, is expected to be even better. After it was revealed that Tyrese Haliburton won't play next season due to a torn Achilles, there is a solid chance that the Pacers will find themselves picking earlier than expected, ahead of 23rd, like they would this year. Advertisement Not only does missing out on a guaranteed contract this summer offer some flexibility to the Pacers, but they could add an even better player next summer. The Pelicans will pick eighth and 23rd this year, while the Pacers boast only the 54th overall pick in the second round, which is set for Thursday. While Indiana did not know that Haliburton would miss all of next season when they made the deal, it ended up working out better for them than initially thought, and after a presumed down year next season, they should be able to hit the ground running in 2026-27 with long-term success in mind. Related: 3 Indiana Pacers Stars Named in NBA Trade Rumors Related: Proposed Trade Between Lakers and Pacers Shows What's Wrong With NBA This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 25, 2025, where it first appeared.
Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
Indiana Pacers Free Agency Primer: Why Big Men And Money Are At Center
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA - MARCH 02: Myles Turner #33 of the Indiana Pacers attempts a shot in the ... More second quarter against the Chicago Bulls at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on March 02, 2025 in Indianapolis, Indiana. (Photo by) INDIANAPOLIS – 2025 free agency is here for the Indiana Pacers, and what once was a straightforward offseason became more complicated one week ago. Last Sunday, the Pacers were playing in Game 7 of the NBA Finals. Reaching that stage was proof that Indiana is a top-tier team – they reached the Eastern Conference Finals the year prior, too. Win or lose, it felt clear that the Pacers would enter the offseason looking to keep talent in house and pay the luxury tax for a title-contending team. Then, less than one quarter in Game 7, Pacers star guard Tyrese Haliburton tore his right Achilles. It ended his game, and the Pacers season. The 2025-26 campaign now won't be highlighted by a Haliburton-led group. Instead, Indiana has to figure out who they are and how much they can win with their new resources. If the Pacers front office assesses that they can't reach the same heights, will they be willing to spend as much money on the roster? How should they approach the balance of winning and development? Answering those questions is step one for the front office. Step two is then making key decisions on the handful of players that will be central to the Pacers offseason maneuvering. Why Myles Turner and the center position is in the middle of everything for the Pacers The Pacers ended the season with four centers on their roster in Myles Turner, Isaiah Jackson, Thomas Bryant, and Tony Bradley. Three of them will enter free agency with Bradley being the only one under contract (non-guaranteed) for next season. As things stand, Indiana doesn't have a starter or depth at the five spot. They're also over the salary cap, meaning they have limited resources to add talent. Thankfully, they have Turner's Bird Rights, meaning that even with the Pacers over the salary cap they can pay Turner any legal contract. But how much is the right amount? The Pacers currently have 11 players on their roster entering free agency and will be about $18-19 million from the luxury tax line. Turner is expected to command more than $19 million as a free agent, and the Pacers have other roster spots to fill as well. Keeping Turner, a starting center who has been largely rock solid for the blue and gold since Haliburton arrived, makes good sense for the franchise. But it will make them expensive. Centers near Turner's level of skill – such as Nicolas Claxton, Jarrett Allen, and Isaiah Hartenstein – all make in the mid-20 to $30 million per year range. That's what the market suggests Turner could command. Indiana has no ability to replace Turner if he leaves in free agency, but there aren't any logical destinations with enough spending power to give Turner a fitting contract. Some negotiation with the Pacers seems logical. 'That is the number one priority,' Pacers head coach Rick Carlisle said of retaining Turner in free agency. Are the Pacers willing to pay Turner about $30 million per year? They should be. Retaining good players is usually the right choice, even if it requires making other tough financial decisions later. There's a lot at play here, but a reunion seems like a win from the outside. Turner has been with the Pacers for his entire 10-season career. He averaged 15.6 points and 6.5 rebounds per game this past season. His start to the playoffs was strong, but his impact faded in the Eastern Conference Finals and more in the NBA Finals. Bryant, who was acquired midseason by the Pacers, is going to be an unrestricted free agent. Backup to reserve level centers typically only command minimum salary deals on the open market, so the Pacers could afford Bryant if he is interested in sticking around. Keeping him and Bradley may be less interesting to Indiana, though. It may depend on what happens with other internal free agents. Jackson will become a restricted free agent after the Pacers sent him a qualifying offer. That contract would be a one-year, $6.4 million agreement, and Jackson likely won't command that much money on the open market. He could sign his qualifying offer if he is so inclined. Restricted free agency and the right of first refusal is a nice crutch for teams – so the Pacers may value their relationship with Jackson and his representatives. They can still negotiate a new deal in restricted free agency. Keeping Jackson still makes good sense, just at a cheaper salary number than his qualifying offer. He's talented and fits how the Pacers hope to play stylistically. Plus, Jackson can keep his Bird Rights by staying with the Pacers, which could help him maximize his long-term earnings if he plays well. The big man position is the center of the Pacers offseason. It is likely that at least some of those fives return from last year. But how many of them, and for how much money, will be critical. Once that is more known and decided, the Pacers can move on to other matters. What is the right path for the Pacers with Bennedict Mathurin? Bennedict Mathurin is another key part of the Pacers offseason. He is eligible for a rookie-scale contract extension after finishing his third season, and at his best he's a rare talent. The Pacers have to figure out if they can afford him, or if they should want to. NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA - MARCH 01: Bennedict Mathurin #00 of the Indiana Pacers stands on the court ... More during the third quarter of an NBA game against the New Orleans Pelicans at Smoothie King Center on March 01, 2024 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Photo by) Mathurin is clearly a good player. He averaged 16.1 points and 5.3 rebounds per game last season and was the best player in an NBA Finals victory. He might be a starter next season with Haliburton sidelined. The Pacers have many reasons to potentially keep Mathurin around. But there are thoughts about fit, money, and value that make it a complicated conversation. If Turner sticks around, the Pacers will be a somewhat expensive team this coming season, barring other moves. Add in an extension for Mathurin the following year and the franchise will blow right past the luxury tax line without shedding multiple other players. It's also hard to pin down Mathurin's market value right now – what is the right role for him? What does his talent say he should be paid? Those aren't easy questions to answer. There's also fit challenges. Mathurin is a terrific face-up player, but the Pacers want to play fast and make quick decisions. Blending those styles has been a never-ending goal for the franchise. 'We've got to work at melding his strengths with the things that our team needs to do to make it really work for him and our team. It's an important thing to understand, it's an important thing for our fans to understand, and it's an important thing for our team to understand,' Pacers head coach Rick Carlisle said of the situation in March. With those fit challenges in mind, an extension is challenging. Mathurin's salary is near the amount that the Pacers project to be over the luxury tax line if Turner is re-signed, and players become harder to trade if they receive a rookie-scale extension. Flexibility is important in the Pacers expensive, yet injury-based, reality. If Mathurin has a great season as a starter, Indiana should want to keep him. But they'd be paying him for production in a role that may be atypical when Haliburton returns. This is a complicated situation, and any outcome will be telling about the Pacers future in both the short and long term. Could the Pacers trade a veteran to save money? If the Pacers end up keeping Turner and going over the luxury tax, are they willing to stay there? Luxury tax payments are based on a team's spending level at the end of the season. Indiana would have the entire campaign to get under the tax if they wanted to. But making trades is easier in the offseason, and if the blue and gold determine they want to duck the tax given their lower ceiling as soon as possible, and they also want to keep Turner, they may need to move some money. Obi Toppin and T.J. McConnell, two rock solid players, both make between $10 and 15 million. They seem like strong candidates for a financially-motivated move, though it would certainly make the Pacers worse in the short term if either of those two players are moved for little salary in return. What else is key for the Pacers in free agency? There's a ton of little things in the air for the Pacers this offseason. But Myles Turner and their spending are in the middle of it all. Moves are already being made around the NBA, and the Pacers will strike soon.
