
African diplomats want British government to back bill to speed up debt restructurings
Diplomats from eight southern and east African countries have signed a letter calling on the UK government to support a private member's bill that aims to speed up debt restructurings, after economic crises meant multiple countries were unable to pay back loans.
Poor countries' economies have been hit by a series of global events in recent years, including the coronavirus pandemic, which reduced growth; the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which sent inflation soaring; and raised US interest rates, which have pushed up the cost of international loans to often unaffordable levels.
Since 2020, countries including Zambia, Sri Lanka and Ghana have defaulted on their overseas debts.
Countries that can no longer afford to repay their debts have to negotiate loan writedowns or extensions with lenders including state-owned development banks from China, the US and Europe, in a process known as a debt restructuring.
A growing number of poorer countries would also need to restructure loans from private banks and international bonds owned by western companies, which are typically more expensive. Most poor countries have cheap loans from the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, which give new 'concessional' loans instead of writing down old ones.
The UK bill, introduced in November 2024 by the Labour MP Bambos Charalambous, would 'prevent private creditors suing countries while debt relief negotiations are taking place, and from seeking higher repayments than other creditors,' said a letter sent to the British chancellor, Rachel Reeves, in March and shared exclusively with the Guardian.
The average developing country is now spending 9.5% of government revenues repaying debt, double the level of a decade ago. The poorest countries are spending 15%, according to the UN development programme. From 2012 to 2022, public spending on debt grew faster than on health and education.
The letter said that '90% of debt owed to private creditors by the world's poorest countries is governed by English law and is transacted through the City of London. This is why any relief from undue profit to private lenders relies on your government.'
Signatories included high commissioners to the UK from Zambia, Mozambique and South Africa, which has made tackling the 'unprecedented debt crisis among many African countries' a priority of its G20 presidency this year.
Charalambous said he hoped the government would adopt the bill and that he had met the Treasury minister Emma Reynolds. A UK government spokesperson said: 'The UK fully agrees that private creditors should participate in restructurings on comparable terms. Overall, we have seen evidence of private creditors' willingness to engage and provide debt treatments where needed, including for Zambia and Ghana.
'As such, the UK is not currently pursuing a legislative approach to ensuring private creditor participation in restructurings, although we continue to keep our position under review.'
After the Covid pandemic hit, lending countries agreed to pause debt repayments. However, western private creditors refused, an issue that aggrieved China.
Zambia stopped repaying its international debts in November 2020. Along with Ethiopia and Chad it sought to restructure its loans in early 2021 under a new G20 process called the common framework. However, the process was fraught with delays.
It took 17 months for Chad to reach a deal that did not cut debt levels, after the commodities trader Glencore dragged out negotiations.
Chinese intransigence reportedly held up Zambia's agreement with lending countries until 2023. Those countries then rejected a deal the Zambia government reached with western bondholders, as they said it was better than their deal. A bonds agreement was finally reached in 2024.
Some officials and analysts argued the UK bill was targeting a prior problem of western 'vulture funds' buying up poor countries' defaulted bonds to sue them for payouts. They argued recent restructurings have been delayed by the proliferation of new types of lenders, including Chinese state-owned institutions and African multilateral trade banks.
Abebe Aemro Selassie, the IMF's Africa director, told a press conference last week that he was not sure new legislation would speed up debt restructurings: 'In recent restructurings, I am not aware of [private creditors holding out] being the main hindrance.'
Since 2014, the inclusion of 'collective action clauses' – where the owners of 75% of a country's bonds can approve a restructuring deal – in 88% of bonds has stopped most 'vulture fund' minority bondholders from suing countries, the thinktank ODI said in a report.
However, Ethiopia's negotiations to cut the value of its single bond have reportedly been delayed by a bondholder group.
In Zambia, Malawi and Ghana, the African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) and Trade & Development Bank (TDB) have not agreed to loan writedowns. Both are regional trade banks set up by African governments that lend at high interest rates but have demanded to be excluded from restructurings like the IMF and World Bank.
Spokespeople for Afreximbank and TDB did not respond to requests for comment.
'Non-bond private creditors … are very different … and it is unlikely that the solutions provided in the [UK] bill would apply easily to them,' said Frederique Dahan, a director at ODI.
Malawi, which has a GDP per head of $580, has been trying to get debt writedowns while being battered by climate and economic shocks that have led to fuel, fertiliser and medicine shortages.
Thomas Bisika, Malawi's high commissioner to the UK and who signed the letter supporting Charalambous's bill, said: 'This unsustainable debt has really grossly affected social and economic development in the country.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves is leaving Britain defenceless
Last week, the Prime Minister said that we 'need to see the biggest shift in mindset in my lifetime: to put security and defence front and centre – to make it the fundamental organising principle of government'. The unfolding crisis in the Middle East underscores the need to do so. Now, more than ever, our national security must be the Government's overriding priority, trampling on any other competing demands for government money and ministers' time. But it isn't. This noble organising principle seems not to apply where it matters most: the Government's economic strategy. In her spending review this week, the Chancellor gave us her own definition of security: 'securonomics'. This ugly word, reeking of socialist greyness and uniformity, means – to quote Rachel Reeves – 'government must step up to provide security for working people and resilience for our national economy.' She is right about the need for economic resilience. For years, it has been clear that, in a turbulent world, the scale and structure of debt, combined with anaemic growth, makes our economy highly vulnerable to global shocks. Yet instead of rebuilding a fiscal buffer, the Chancellor has left us with a fiscal wafer so thin it could crack at the merest tap. Instead of bringing debt down, it will be higher at the end of the Parliament than today – and the cost of servicing it is already more than we spend on defence. And instead of supporting growth – critical to everything – the Government has suffocated it with higher taxes. Next, how has the Chancellor helped deliver 'security for working people'? For most working people, job security – the ability to find and keep a steady job – is key. Yet job insecurity is rising. By raising National Insurance on employers – a £25bn jobs tax – Rachel Reeves has provoked the biggest fall in employment in five years. Unemployment is ticking up. The broader definition of 'security' obviously encompasses our nation's defence. Although defence spending is set to rise to 2.5 per cent GDP during this Parliament, this is clearly not enough. At the upcoming Nato summit, the UK will be pressed to raise it to at least 3.5 per cent. But in Wednesday's spending review, what was the Chancellor's 'choice'? To give the NHS, not defence, a bigger slice of government largesse. 90 per cent of the total increase in spending from 2025-6 will go to health. The NHS will see a record cash investment: real-terms, day to day spending is set to increase by 3 per cent per year, costing an extra £29 billion. A government that sees defence as the organising principle of government would not have made that choice. It would have made the case that we need to move from a state that prioritises welfare to one that prepares for warfare. And as part of a strategy to put debt on a gradual downward path, it would have made tough decisions on spending overall – starting with a reform of incapacity and disability benefits, which now cost more than the defence budget. Instead, as her speech took us from spending more on affordable homes, to car production to training to buses in Rochdale, the Chancellor disorganised her Downing Street neighbour's organising principle, showing it the respect Tracey Emin had for her bed. There is only one conclusion one can draw from all this. Last week, when the Prime Minister said we need to make security and defence 'the organising principle of government', he left off four words: 'for this week only'.
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26trim%3D2%2C0%2C3%2C0%26crop%3D&w=3840&q=100)

Scotsman
31 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why there's plenty to like in Rachel Reeves' Spending Review for Edinburgh - but housing is the crunch point
The Chancellor's Spending Review announcements should be welcomed, writes Edinburgh City Council leader Jane Megaher. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... There was a lot to welcome in Chancellor Rachel Reeves' Spending Review statement. The single biggest injection into housing by the UK government for 50 years promises to transform social housing and living standards for tens of thousands of people across Britian – and there's no reason this shouldn't be replicated here in Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad With £52 billion promised in devolved budgets, the Chancellor has outlined the largest ever grant for Scotland. An exceptional opportunity, surely, for the Scottish Government to tackle our nation's shameful statistics on poverty and homelessness at long last, providing every Scot with the safe, warm home and life chances they deserve. Around £4bn over the next decade in extra funding for housing is expected to be provided to the Scottish Government as a result of the Spending Review – and with the Finance Secretary preparing to unveil her own spending plans on June 25, we're making the case loudly and clearly that this investment should be passed on in full to our cities and regions. Looking out across Edinburgh from Calton Hill | Adobe In Edinburgh and the South East of Scotland, where the housing emergency is most keenly felt, we know all too well the financial challenges of building enough homes to keep up with economic growth and demand. Add to that the fact that we have the fastest growing population in Scotland, accounting for 84 per cent of Scotland's predicted population growth over the next eight years, the challenge facing us could not be clearer. With Rachel Reeves committing £39bn towards affordable housing down south, the Scottish Government must follow suit and put much-needed homes at the heart of its own investment plans. As former US President Jimmy Carter famously said, 'decent housing is not just a wish, it is a human right'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The creation of the Cabinet Secretary for Housing portfolio is a positive step with Mairi McAllan MSP in this new role. Addressing the national housing emergency and accommodating the population growth in the Edinburgh City Region must be a priority and I look forward to working constructively with her to tackle these challenges. Another positive from Wednesday's announcement was confirmation from the Chancellor that she would commit up to £750 million for a next generation 'Exascale super-computer' to be housed at the University of Edinburgh. This will be a national asset supporting countless jobs and investment in the sciences and academia, cementing the region's role as a powerhouse for life sciences, technology and invention. Given Edinburgh's long-standing innovation capabilities, it is fantastic that we will be able to reap the associated economic, social and environmental benefits. On top of this, £410m will be shared across the devolved nations for a Local Innovation Partnership Fund and it makes great sense for our City Region to lead on this in Scotland. From artificial intelligence to data and robotics, this money could unlock a huge amount of investment building on the successful projects we've already delivered, including the National Robotarium, the Usher Institute and Easter Bush, which is now the global location of 'Agritech' excellence. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Chancellor has delivered her part. For the good of the Scottish economy, I now call upon the Scottish Government to pass on these additional funds in full and to prioritise investment in Edinburgh and the wider city region.


Fashion United
34 minutes ago
- Fashion United
Luxury and AI: Are superhuman customer advisors on the horizon?
With the emergence of chatbot applications driven by artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT or Gemini, web browsing and search habits have evolved considerably. The effectiveness of these tools and the new behaviours they induce have influenced purchases and raised the expectations of luxury brand consumers to a higher level of demand in terms of customer experience. This was a major development to which brands are adapting by redefining the standards of excellence in their customer service. Yet, only few high-end fashion marketplaces or luxury brand e-shops have deployed a customer service that fully satisfied their buyers. This was one of the first conclusions drawn from a new Boston Consulting Group (BCG) study on Customer Experience and AI in Luxury. According to this document, 56 percent of respondents stated they were not satisfied with their luxury shopping experience. Luxury customers interviewed in the survey expressed their frustration at having to enter their personal data several times and stated they did not feel recognised or valued when customer advisors had no knowledge of their preferences. They also indicated impersonal and inconsistent follow-up and engagement from advisors after purchase. Today, most customers (64 percent) still made their purchases in-store, but the share of online purchases increased: 38 percent of customers stated that they shopped more online for luxury goods than three to five years ago. In addition, the study pointed out that even when the final purchase took place in-store, luxury customers spent time researching and planning from their screens. According to BCG experts, brands had no choice but to implement AI within their teams to design new operating models that would give customer advisors new capabilities. "Customer advisors become "superhuman" thanks to instant access to customer information, proactive suggestions and the ability to write personalised communications," the study stated. The full implementation of AI as a full member of the team would thus make it possible to offer exceptional customer service on a large scale. However, the dose of artificial intelligence used would always have to be used with a great deal of common sense so that the aura of luxury was maintained and the service did not fall into robotisation. Finally, with extensive personalisation resulting from the collection and processing of vast quantities of customer data, brands would have to ensure they did not lose consumer trust through the use of data deemed too intrusive. This article was translated to English using an AI tool. FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@