logo
‘Chaos, fear and confusion': Trump-backed crackdown hits DC's homeless population

‘Chaos, fear and confusion': Trump-backed crackdown hits DC's homeless population

CNN4 days ago
Fear and confusion are spreading among Washington, DC's homeless population at the start of President Donald Trump's crackdown on encampments.
Leaders from three prominent advocacy groups in the nation's capital — where about 800 people live on the streets on any given night — told CNN they're bracing for the worst, lobbying city officials to open up more shelter beds, and mulling potential lawsuits.
Facing new pressure from Trump, DC officials are also grappling with the same broad question that other big cities have faced as they seek to get homeless people off the street: How to provide enough shelter space and services to accommodate them.
'There's definitely a lot of chaos, fear and confusion,' said Amber Harding, executive director of the Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, a nonprofit with hundreds of open cases. 'It doesn't help that the messaging from the federal government has been all over the place. And there's no communication or coordination with the DC government.'
Sweeps began Wednesday after a anxious few days where homeless residents and their allies waited to see who would be targeted, and which federal forces would be involved.
Another major sweep took place Thursday morning at an encampment near a highway close to the vaunted Lincoln Memorial and Kennedy Center, where Trump's motorcade often passes through. Last week, he posted photos of this encampment on social media.
Officials from DC agencies, social workers, advocacy groups and well-wishers helped homeless residents pack up their belongings and dismantle about a dozen tents. No federal law enforcement agents were on site, and a DC official told CNN the sweep was conducted solely by local authorities. One DC police officer patrolled traffic nearby.
As part of Trump's stated goal to 'rescue' DC from 'bloodshed, bedlam and squalor,' he announced aggressive new moves this week to federalize the local police force and deploy National Guard troops in the city. He also declared that homeless people 'have to move out, IMMEDIATELY,' and added, 'we will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital.'
White House officials said they'll send homeless people to shelters — or to jails if they refuse. But advocates claimed this would be unlawful, counterproductive and costly by disrupting existing efforts to move homeless people into shelters or permanent housing.
And not everyone wants to move to a shelter. Heather Bernard, 55, a homeless woman who lives outside of a grocery store in the Mount Pleasant neighborhood of northwest DC, told CNN she prefers to stay on the streets 'until I get my house.'
'I've been to shelters and all that,' Bernard said. 'People don't get along with me. Maybe they think I'm a threat. They put me out at one, two or three in the morning, on snow days or wet days. It's their facility, so you can't fight it. When they say leave, you have to leave.'
The latest federal survey, released in December, found that there were about 770,000 homeless people in the United States – the highest number on record, after a spike during the Covid-19 pandemic that still hasn't waned. Studies show that homeless Americans are disproportionately people of color, have mental illness or addiction, or are members of the LGBT community.
How to handle these people and their tents, particularly in areas that are busy or frequented by tourists, has plagued the mostly Democratic leaders in big US cities. A dispute over whether cities can ticket people for sleeping on the streets even reached the Supreme Court last year. Trump, with his unique authority over DC as president, has now taken matters into his own hands in the federal district.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that DC's police department, which is now under the direct control of the Trump administration after he federalized the force, will use 'pre-existing laws that are already on the books' to force homeless people to move into shelters or addiction treatment, or 'be susceptible to fines or jail time.'
This claim, and Trump's past pronouncements, left experts like Harding confused.
'People can be offered a space in a shelter, but they can't be forced to take a space, and then fined or arrested if they don't go into shelter,' Harding said. 'That's not a law in DC.'
Additionally, when Trump said last week that homeless people would be offered beds and forced into shelters, 'there were literally no beds available,' Harding said.
Advocacy groups and the city worked together to opened up some new beds the next day, Harding said. And a DC official told CNN on Thursday that local authorities can quickly add additional beds on an emergency basis, as the Trump-backed sweeps continue this week.
The vast majority of homeless people in DC are already in shelters: The latest tally found that only about 15% of DC's roughly 5,100 homeless people live on the streets. This is from a 'point-in-time' count, a census of homeless people on a given night.
Harding said her legal clinic has done 'extensive trainings' with DC's Metropolitan Police Department. But in addition to federalizing MPD, Trump also directed agents from the FBI, Drug Enforcement Agency, the US Marshals Service and other federal officers to assist with local law enforcement duties in the nation's capital.
It's unclear which of these federal agencies, if any, are involved in clearing homeless encampments. The US Park Police, which is part of the Interior Department and has cleared dozens of homeless camps this year, didn't answer CNN's request for comment.
'We don't feel any confidence that federal law enforcement have any training in how to interact with people on the street, or know what resources are available,' Harding said.
DC Council member Charles Allen told CNN he's also worried about the federal influx.
'People have a right to be concerned,' said Allen, a Democrat whose ward includes the Capitol Hill area where many young families live. 'In my own neighborhood, just the other day, US Park Police were wandering through in the afternoon with assault rifles. How does that make us any safer?'
A leader of another top homeless advocacy group in DC, who requested anonymity to speak candidly, said 'people are scared' — and that some nonprofits are worried about speaking out too forcefully about what's unfolding because they 'don't want to piss off the (DC) mayor, because everyone is competing for their slice of local government funding.'
DC Mayor Muriel Bowser called Trump's takeover of MPD 'unsettling,' but promised to cooperate, and showed deference to Trump's legal authority. So far, she has stuck a more diplomatic tone than many of her fellow Democrats in dealing with Trump, though she did eventually come around to labeling his federal deployments as an 'authoritarian push.'
She also noted that DC's violent crime rates fell in recent years from Covid-era peaks, and her administration touted a 9% drop in the city's homeless population this year.
Bowser has had time to prepare for this seemingly inevitable clash.
Trump said in March that he told Bowser she 'must clean up all of the unsightly homeless encampments' in DC or 'we will be forced to do it for her!' And last month, he signed an executive order making it easier for jurisdictions to remove homeless people from the streets, reversing decades of federal policy that focused on giving them stable housing.
Trump's actions have created a crisis in the DC advocacy space that supports the city's homeless population. His antagonistic posture toward a city where Kamala Harris won 90% of the vote last year should not come as a surprise, conservativestrategist Gregg Keller told CNN.
'it's a very poorly kept secret,' Keller said. 'It's understood within the political right and the Trump administration that these advocacy groups are often little more than political arms of the Democrat Party, which helps explain why they're being targeted for scrutiny.'
The DC mayor's office declined to comment when contacted by CNN.
Bernard, the homeless woman who lives outside a Mount Pleasant grocery store, swept up her area with a broom Wednesday morning before what was supposed to be a scheduled cleanup by city agencies, that was slated several weeks before Trump's announcements.
Employees from local nonprofits that have worked with her for years — trying to get her into permanent housing — were also waiting to see what would happen, and if any of the newly empowered federal agents would tear down her site. She had three chairs, a doormat, a small table, nearly 20 bags filled with food and clothes, a cooler, and two shopping carts.
A handful of well-wishers from the tight-knit neighborhood stopped by, too. One young woman flagged down 'Miss Heather,' hugged her, and handed her a bag with some food.
'I felt alone and lost,' before settling in Mount Pleasant two decades ago, Bernard said. 'They care about me in this community. I'm very mannerly, and I try to behave. But I have problems, too. I'm homeless, I'm bipolar, and a few other things. But I don't let it deter me.'
Due to a logistical hiccup, the scheduled clean-up didn't happen. But Bernard's future is uncertain. And advocates like Edward Wycoff, from District Bridges, who works on Bernard's case, say the Trump-backed sweeps disrupt real efforts to end homelessness.
'The amount of money expended on pushing people out pales in comparison to what we're going to end up spending,' Wycoff said. 'They'll no longer be connected to their services, and then the cost becomes exponential. If this is a test case — on this block or in this city, as it seems to be — we will have a very dire situation in the coming months.'
Other homeless DC residents that spoke to CNN expresses unease about shelters even if a bed is available — which the White House says could lead to their arrest.
'They keep sending me to shelters, and I'm not shelter material,' said Isis Burnette, who is has been homeless for three years and lives on the street in the Capitol Hill neighborhood.
Holding back tears, she said, 'I don't belong in a shelter. I want a house. I want a home.'
CNN's Camila DeChalus, Kit Maher, Christine Lien and Steven Williams contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iowa US Senate candidate ends bid to run against Republican incumbent Joni Ernst
Iowa US Senate candidate ends bid to run against Republican incumbent Joni Ernst

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Iowa US Senate candidate ends bid to run against Republican incumbent Joni Ernst

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — An Iowa Democratic state lawmaker bowed out of the 2026 U.S. Senate primary race on Monday and endorsed a fellow legislator as the 'best hope' to unseat Republican U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst, who has yet to formally announce her bid for a third term. Rep. J.D. Scholten said in a statement he was suspending his campaign and endorsing Democratic Rep. Josh Turek, who launched his campaign last week. Both represent districts in counties that overwhelmingly supported Donald Trump in 2024. Turek joined a crowded primary field that includes state Sen. Zach Wahls, who on Monday announced the endorsement of a northeast Iowa iron workers union; Nathan Sage, a former chamber of commerce president; and Des Moines School Board Chair Jackie Norris. Eyes remain on Ernst as Republicans encountered early headaches in some of the 2026 races that will be pivotal to maintaining the party's Senate majority, including a contentious GOP primary in Texas and a surprise retirement announcement by two-term Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina. After flipping pork chops last week at the Iowa State Fair, Ernst told reporters that she'd make an announcement on her own 2026 intentions in the next several weeks, adding, 'I've got a lot more work to do.' In a reelection bid, Ernst would face GOP primary challengers who include former state Sen. Jim Carlin and Navy veteran Joshua Smith. Of her Democratic competitors, Ernst said 'good for them.' 'When we see those Democrats getting in, what they're trying to do is get their name out there, but they cannot deny the fabulous agenda that President Trump has," Ernst said. 'Glad they're engaging but, you know what, they're not going to stand a chance.' Ernst announced a campaign manager in June, an October date for her annual fundraiser and has raised just shy of $1.8 million in the first half of the year. A former Army National Guard member and a retired lieutenant colonel, she was first elected to an open Senate seat in 2014. She served for several years in the No. 3 spot in the Senate GOP leadership and was considered a vice presidential contender for Trump's first White House run. She's since faced some backlash from Trump supporters, including earlier this year after signaling a hesitance to support Trump's pick for defense secretary, Pete Hegseth. Democrats meanwhile are capitalizing on a retort Ernst made about Medicaid cuts at a town hall in May. As Ernst explained that the legislation protects Medicaid for those who need it most, someone in the crowd yelled that people will die without coverage. Ernst responded: 'People are not ... well, we all are going to die.'

Well-mannered White House welcome for Ukraine leaves many questions
Well-mannered White House welcome for Ukraine leaves many questions

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Well-mannered White House welcome for Ukraine leaves many questions

By Trevor Hunnicutt and Gram Slattery WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump gathered European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy for a hastily arranged White House meeting on Monday to discuss a path to ending Russia's war in Ukraine. Here are takeaways from the talks: WARM TONE, LITTLE SUBSTANCE Seven European leaders, the Ukrainian president, their motorcades, dozens of Trump administration staff and more than 100 journalists swarmed the White House campus on Monday in anticipation of the unusual meeting. Would Trump and Zelenskiy agree on a path to peace? Or would their latest Oval Office session devolve into a bitter squabble as in February? Neither scenario occurred. Zelenskiy, chided for his appearance and manner in February, adjusted both. Wearing more formal clothing and repeatedly expressing his gratitude to Trump, he was greeted by a far more complimentary U.S. president than in the past. But, despite Trump's vow to assist in Ukraine's security after a hypothetical peace deal, there was no immediate sign that any party had substantially changed position on land swaps, security guarantees or sanctions. Instead, Trump ended with promises to host a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to address the many remaining issues. HEAPING PRAISE "Have you said 'thank you' once?" U.S. Vice President JD Vance asked Zelenskiy in February, accusing him of failing to show sufficient gratitude for U.S. support. On Monday, Zelenskiy made sure that was not an issue. His opening remarks in the Oval Office included eight thank-yous, mostly for Trump. "Thank you so much, Mr. President ... thank you for your attention. Thank you very much for your efforts, personal efforts to stop killings and stop this war. Thank you," Zelenskiy said. He included the U.S. first lady, who sent a letter to Putin about abducted children in Ukraine. "Using this opportunity, my thanks to your wife," the Ukrainian president said. "And thanks to all our partners and that you supported this format. And after our meeting, we're going to have leaders who are around us, the UK and France, Germany... all partners around Ukraine supporting us. Thanks (to) them. Thank you very much for your invitation." Unlike in February, Vance this time sat largely silent. COMBAT FORMAL The stakes of the meeting could not have been higher. But one of the most-asked questions among diplomats in D.C. could not have been more frivolous: Would the Ukrainian president wear a suit? The answer: kind of. Zelenskiy showed up to the White House in what one European diplomat described as "almost a suit." His black jacket had tiny lapels and jetted chest pockets. He did not wear a tie. His attire, which split the difference between the battlefield and the boardroom, could be described as combat formal. Those sartorial details matter when it comes to dealing with the U.S. president, who was upset that Zelenskiy did not wear a suit for their February meeting. Zelenskiy passed the fashion test this time, however. When one journalist in the Oval Office said Zelenskiy looked "fabulous," Trump chimed in to agree. "I said the same thing," Trump told reporters. DIVIDE OVER CEASEFIRE The assembled European leaders, Zelenskiy included, were careful to paper over policy disagreements with Trump, keeping their comments vague and showering the U.S. president with compliments. But one point of disagreement did bubble to the surface. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told the assembled leaders and media that he wanted to see Putin agree to a ceasefire. Trump had long pushed for a ceasefire in Ukraine. But he largely jettisoned that goal after meeting with Putin last week in Alaska, a shift that was widely seen as a diplomatic defeat for Ukraine. The U.S. president now says he is fine trying to move directly to a peace deal. "To be honest, we all would like to see a ceasefire," Merz said. "I can't imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire, so let's work on that." Trump pushed back, arguing he has solved many conflicts without first reaching a ceasefire. WHOSE BOOTS ON THE GROUND? One of the great mysteries that hung over the summit was what support the U.S. would give to secure any Russia-Ukraine deal long term. Trump hasn't offered U.S. troops' "boots on the ground" to guarantee Ukraine's security from Russia, reflecting American reticence to commit to military entanglements or a head-to-head confrontation with a nuclear power. Instead, he has offered weapons sales and promised that Americans will do business in Ukraine, assurances that Ukrainians see as far less than a security guarantee. Europeans are preparing for a peacekeeping mission backed by their forces. Yet, asked explicitly whether U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine could include U.S. troops in the country, Trump did not rule it out. Instead, he teased an announcement as soon as Monday on the topic. "We'll let you know that, maybe, later today," Trump said. He said Europe was the "first line of defense" but that "we'll be involved." WHAT'S NEXT Trump said he would call Putin and set up a trilateral meeting with Ukraine at a time and place to be determined. Despite some private misgivings, the assembled leaders agreed that such a meeting was a logical next step. Still, the path forward is more complex than Trump and his allies are letting on. For one, Russia has delayed and obstructed high-level meetings with Ukraine in the past, and it was not immediately clear that Putin would actually sit down with Zelenskiy, who he frequently describes as an illegitimate leader. Additionally, it is unclear how much a principal-level meeting would actually advance the cause of peace. The gulf between the Russian and Ukrainian positions is vast. The Kremlin said on Monday the presence of NATO troops in Ukraine is a non-starter, a stance that would be hard for Ukraine to swallow. Russia is also calling for Ukraine to fork over significant chunks of territory that Kyiv controls, another proposal that Ukraine's leaders are not entertaining.

Despite Online MAGA Freakout About Her Jeans, Sydney Sweeney's New Movie Bombs
Despite Online MAGA Freakout About Her Jeans, Sydney Sweeney's New Movie Bombs

Gizmodo

time11 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Despite Online MAGA Freakout About Her Jeans, Sydney Sweeney's New Movie Bombs

A couple of weeks ago, American Eagle launched a new ad campaign for its blue jeans line that featured actress Sydney Sweeney. In one of the ads, Sweeney weirdly broached the topic of genetics (she said, and I quote: 'genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color. My jeans are blue'), but, for the most part, the ads seems to be about how great Sweeney's posterior looks when she's wearing the company's denim. Not long after the jeans ads aired, the internet collectively lost its mind. One TikToker compared the ad to 'Nazi propaganda' and, soon, NPR had dubbed it the 'ad campaign that launched a thousand critiques.' CNN asked what America had 'learned' from the Sweeney 'situation.' Vox used the episode to wax eloquent about the 'unsettling legacy of the blonde bombshell.' Dr. Phil and Lizzo both got upset—for different reasons—and America's president, in a move that was very on-brand for him, issued a mispelling-strewn statement calling 'Sidney' the 'HOTTEST.' Meanwhile, a number of high-profile MAGA folks (including J.D. Vance, Charlie Kirk, and Ted Cruz) attempted to commandeer the topic, and use it to engineer a backlash to the supposed backlash to Sweeney's ads. Meanwhile, Rolling Stone magazine unveiled a timeline of America's conservatives efforts to 'claim' Sweeney for themselves as a cultural icon. Based on the national conversation we were all just forced to have about Sweeney and her jeans, one would've thought MAGA's collective lust for Sweeney could have easily been translated into hefty box office numbers for her newest movie, Americana. After all, if middle America is now collectively salivating over Sweeney, wouldn't they want to go see her every chance they get? Apparently that's not how things worked out, however. Sweeney's new movie only garnered some $500,000 during its opening weekend, The Hollywood Reporter has noted. Film critics have been lukewarm to positive about the film, with Vulture calling it 'a '90s-style ensemble crime movie that engages in a sly exploration of the iconography and mythology we use to define the country' and noting that the film is not 'particularly political' but that it is 'blessed with a fairly strong cast.' However, Americana's real problem would appear to be less the fact that its lead actress's brand endorsements have stirred up controversy and more about the fact that most people haven't heard of it. I go to the movies a lot, and am generally aware of the upcoming developments at my local cinema, and I can't say that I'd even seen an ad for Americana or heard much about it prior to writing this article. The movie's ad, which seems to offer a run-of-the-mill comedic crime romp, doesn't have much of a partisan bent. The internet is not a real place, but not infrequently, through a kind of alchemical magic, it can produce real-world events. Sometimes the web can stir up so much ideological turmoil that it spills offline and into the real world (just look at January 6th, if you need an example). The problem is that no one really cared that deeply about the American Eagle ad in the first place. A few pissed off leftist people online and a gaggle of MAGA commentators attempted to get everyone to care about it, and the news media carried the story into our collective consciousness, if only to have something somewhat entertaining to write about instead of the incessant horrors visited upon us daily by the Trump administration. For Fox News, it was a way to avoid talking about the incessant horrors visited upon us daily by the Trump administration, in a different way. Still, despite the best efforts of a select few to make the Great Jeans War of 2025 happen, America's heart just wasn't in it. A recent poll from The Economist/YouGov showed only 12 percent of Americans found the ad 'offensive.' We've been through a solid half-decade of having our minds messed with by the Extremely Online, and America may have completely exhausted its moral panics.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store