IGP appreciates role of media practitioners
KUALA LUMPUR: The Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) extends its appreciation to all media practitioners for their continued cooperation in delivering accurate and reliable information to the public, thereby contributing to the nation's security and harmony.
Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Tan Sri Razarudin Husain said the mass media is an important entity that plays a vital role in conveying the force's efforts to uphold the supremacy of the Constitution and enforce the law fairly across all levels of society.
'The strong cooperation between PDRM and the media is built on a shared responsibility to disseminate accurate and transparent information in the interest of justice, regardless of the situation.
'The media has a 'unique power' that can influence the minds and win the hearts of the public, making them strategic partners in efforts to strengthen security and curb negative influences,' he said at the IGP's Appreciation Ceremony with the Media in Bukit Aman today.
He added that PDRM continuously recognises the media not only as providers of information and the voice of the people, but also as 'observers' who can offer constructive feedback and suggestions to improve PDRM's service delivery system.
'The responsibilities of police officers and media practitioners are centred on safeguarding national security, fostering racial harmony, and promoting inclusive national unity.
'Therefore, the distribution of information must be in line with the needs, fundamental rights and interests of the community so that we continue to be trusted and relevant,' he said.
He also reaffirmed PDRM's commitment to strengthening synergy with the media, in line with the spirit of the Malaysia MADANI policy, which upholds the values of respect, kindness, inclusivity, and equality in building a sustainable nation.
'PDRM continues to adopt a pragmatic approach in strengthening relations with the media, in line with the theme 'Polis dan Masyarakat Berpisah Tiada' (Police and Community: No Separation',' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
Wrongly deported Salvadoran migrant arrested on return to US
WASHINGTON: The Salvadoran migrant at the heart of a row over President Donald Trump's hardline deportation policies was returned to the United States on Friday and arrested on human smuggling charges, officials said. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was brought back to the United States from El Salvador and immediately arrested on charges of trafficking undocumented migrants into the country, Attorney General Pam Bondi said. 'Abrego Garcia has landed in the United States to face justice,' Bondi said at a press conference. The US Supreme Court had ordered the Trump administration to 'facilitate' the return of Abrego Garcia after he was mistakenly deported in March to a notorious maximum security prison in El Salvador. But Bondi insisted to reporters that his return to the United States resulted from an arrest warrant presented to the Salvadoran authorities. 'We're grateful to (Salvadoran) President (Nayib) Bukele for agreeing to return him to our country to face these very serious charges,' she said. In a post on X, Bukele said 'we work with the Trump administration, and if they request the return of a gang member to face charges, of course we wouldn't refuse.' White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson said Abrego Garcia's return 'has nothing to do with his original deportation.' 'There was no mistake,' Jackson said on X. 'He's returning because a new investigation has revealed crimes SO HEINOUS, committed in the US, that only the American Justice System could hold him fully accountable.' Abrego Garcia, 29, was living in the eastern state of Maryland until he became one of more than 200 people sent to a prison in El Salvador as part of Trump's crackdown on undocumented migrants. Most of the migrants who were summarily deported were alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, which the Trump administration has declared a foreign terrorist organization. - 'Administrative error' - Justice Department lawyers later admitted that Abrego Garcia -- who is married to a US citizen -- was wrongly deported due to an 'administrative error.' Abrego Garcia had been living in the United States under protected legal status since 2019, when a judge ruled he should not be deported because he could be harmed in his home country. Bondi alleged that Abrego Garcia had 'played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring' and was a smuggler of 'children and women' as well as members of the Salvadoran gang MS-13. 'This defendant trafficked firearms and narcotics throughout our country on multiple occasions,' she said. Bondi said that Abrego Garcia, who was indicted by a grand jury in Tennessee, would be returned to El Salvador upon completion of any prison sentence. Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen visited Abrego Garcia in April at the prison where he was being held in El Salvador and welcomed his return to the United States. 'For months the Trump Administration flouted the Supreme Court and our Constitution,' the senator from Maryland said in a statement. 'Today, they appear to have finally relented to our demands for compliance with court orders and with the due process rights afforded to everyone in the United States,' he said. 'The Administration will now have to make its case in the court of law, as it should have all along.' According to the indictment, Abrego Garcia was involved in smuggling undocumented migrants from Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras and other countries into the United States between 2016 and earlier this year.
The Star
20 hours ago
- The Star
Holding Sara Duterte trial isn't a choice, it's our constitutional duty, says senator
MANILA: Sen Sherwin Gatchalian (pic) reminded his colleagues in the Senate on Friday (June 6) that proceeding with the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte is not a matter of choice, but a constitutional mandate of the Senate. 'This is no longer our decision. It's not up to us whether to proceed or not — this is our constitutional duty,' he said in an interview over DZMM. It has been four months since the House of Representatives transmitted the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte to the Senate on Feb 5. Once transmitted to the upper chamber, Gatchalian said the Senate has no other choice but to proceed with the impeachment proceedings. 'This is very clear in our Constitution that once the Articles of Impeachment are transmitted to the Senate, we no longer have a choice but to proceed with the impeachment court,' Gatchalian pointed out. 'In fact, the word 'forthwith' is even written there. It's no longer our decision; it's our duty to carry it out,' the senator repeated. He made the remark when asked about the draft resolution initiated by Sen. Ronaldo 'Bato' Dela Rosa, seeking to declare the 'de facto dismissal' of the impeachment case against the vice president. The resolution cited the 'inability' of the Senate to immediately act on it when the Constitution explicitly provides that the 'trial shall forthwith proceed' after the Articles of Impeachment were transmitted to the upper chamber. Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero originally set the presentation of the Articles of Impeachment by the House of Representatives panel of prosecutors for June 2 but later moved it to June 11, the last day of session before the 19th Congress adjourns sine die on June 13. The Senate can only convene as an impeachment court after the reading of charges against the vice president. 'In my opinion, our senators should remember that this is no longer a personal decision or an individual choice. As senators, this is now our constitutional duty,' Gatchalian said. 'When we were sworn in as senators, we also swore an oath to uphold our Constitution — and it clearly states that once the Articles of Impeachment are transmitted to us, we are duty-bound to proceed,' the senator specified. Once the impeachment court is convened, Gatchalian said the trial will continue until a decision is reached. Although he acknowledged that the trial could not be finished within month or before the 19th Congress ends on June 30, the senator believes the Senate impeachment court can cross over to the next Congress. 'This will definitely carry over into the 20th Congress, and I see it as part of the Senate's mandate to continue the impeachment court hearings, as the Senate is a continuing body,' he pointed out. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Thai Constitutional Court rejects two petitions involving GT200 and former PM Prayut
BANGKOK: The Constitutional Court of Thailand on Thursday (June 5) dismissed two petitions—one concerning the controversial GT200 bomb detector scandal, and the other involving former Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha's appointment of a Cabinet minister. GT200 petition rejected for lack of new evidence In the first case, the court rejected a petition by Colonel Kriangkrai Ladpala, who requested a review of a previous ruling concerning the GT200 fake bomb detectors. On Feb 5, 2025, the court had already dismissed Kriangkrai's original complaint, in which he argued that it was unconstitutional for the Ministry of Defence to take legal action against military officers involved in the purchase of the ineffective GT200 devices. His argument was that the officers had also been misled by the supplier and therefore should not be held criminally responsible. Following the court's rejection, Kriangkrai filed a second petition, asserting that the court had failed to consider the deception of the officers in its initial ruling. However, on Thursday, the court ruled that it had already decided the matter and that Kriangkrai had provided no new evidence to justify a review. As a result, the second petition was also dismissed. Petition against Prayut over Thamanat appointment dismissed In the second case, political activist Pirapong Supkitthanakul sought the court's ruling to retroactively remove General Prayut as prime minister. The petition focused on Prayut's decision to appoint Thamanat Prompow to his Cabinet, despite Thamanat's prior conviction for drug trafficking in an Australian court. Pirapong cited Article 170(4) of the Constitution, claiming Prayut had appointed someone lacking 'integrity and ethical standards,' which should disqualify him from serving as prime minister. Pirapong submitted the petition under Article 82, which allows individuals to challenge a prime minister's actions in court. However, the Constitutional Court unanimously ruled that Pirapong did not have legal standing under Article 82 to file the complaint. Therefore, the petition was rejected. - The Nation/ANN
