How to help reunite missing pets after the Independence Day Floods
Central Texas animal rescue groups have united together to recover and reunite displaced animals with their families.
MAP: Where have flash flooding fatalities been confirmed in Texas?
Austin Pets Alive! (APA!), which recently flew over 130 animals out of the state to create more shelter space, has been steadfast in their search for missing pets since deploying Friday afternoon.
In partnership with Kerville Pets Alive, APA! cleared all the animals from the Kerr County Animal Shelter so that only recently-recovered pets remained in the flood-affected shelters.
Since then, both Pets Alive locations have enlisted their teams of veterinarians, volunteers and staff to the surrounding shelters to support incoming pets. This work includes searching for missing pets.
'One of our volunteers, who is an expert cat trapper… went two doors down and was able to get a cat that was about to go underneath the home,' said Suzie Chase, Austin Pets Alive! community affairs officer. 'She was able to retrieve it and give it back to the home owner's daughter.'
Chase emphasized that pets are family.
'Just like if you are missing a person, you would also want to have everyone out supporting you and looking for your pet,' Chase said.
Whether you're missing a pet or you've found one, PetcoLoveLost is a good first place to look, according to Chase. The website uses image-recognition technology to notify families when photos of lost dogs match photos of found dogs. You can also manually search its national database of photos.
Posting pet information on community platforms can also assist in the search process. Williamson County Regional Animal Shelter and Hill Country Humane Society have photos of animals on their social media. And of course, reach out to your local animal shelter.
'The people who have microchipped their pets are getting their pets back faster,' Chase said as a helpful reminder.
If you find a dog, follow all the same steps, including taking the pet to get scanned for a microchip.
April Peiffer, Williamson County Regional Animal Shelter's community engagement coordinator, said that if it's an option to shelter the animal at your home, hold onto missing pets until recovery efforts slow down.
'It's just better for the pet if they don't have to stay here at the shelter,' Peiffer said. 'Not only is it more comfortable in a home environment but they're also less likely to be exposed to illnesses.'
Luis Sanchez, Austin Pets Alive!'s director of public relations, said that all found pets should stay in or near the local community to give owners at least 10 days or more to find them.
Currently, Chase said the best way to help is with monetary donations. The money will go to veterinarian supplies, medicine, animal rescue staff resources and more. If you have the space, fostering pets allows animal shelters to take in more displaced pets.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
15 hours ago
- CBS News
Proposed Texas reservoir continues to hang over landowners' heads after 50 years
For cattle rancher Eddie Belcher, his family's 900-acre plot of land in Northeast Texas is everything. The land has been owned by Belcher's family for seven generations. Although Belcher has lived in and visited cities across the country, he said nothing compares to his home in Bogata, Texas. "I can't put into words what it's like to be raised the way we were raised," Belcher said. "This land grows on you." Belcher built a log cabin on his land, complete with a bar named after his late father. He built it even though he knows that at some point in the next few decades, the entire area could be underwater. The proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir has been hanging over the heads of residents in Red River and Titus Counties for more than half a century. First introduced in the state's water plan in 1968, the reservoir would flood 66,000 acres of the Sulphur River Basin. Building it would require private landowners, like Belcher, to sell their land. "I decided this is where I was going to build my house regardless," Belcher said. "I took the chance that we would beat this." Even though the project was first proposed 57 years ago, construction hasn't started on the Marvin Nichols Reservoir. It's a fact that landowners, including Belcher, said has left the region in a sort of limbo. "We see that with the threat of the lake over the land for decades now, many of the regional ranches have fallen into disrepair," Belcher's neighbor and cattle rancher, Dr. Jim Marshall, said. "People sort of lost hope." But Dan Buhman, general manager of the Tarrant Regional Water District, said the fact that the reservoir hasn't been built is a sign of the progress that's been made in water conservation. "We conserve, and that pushes the need out, and so that is a win," Buhman said. "Obviously, they don't want us to come and build the lake tomorrow. And our customers, the rate payers, the people who pay their water bill, don't want us to go build an expensive supply before it's needed." But Buhman, who also chairs the Region C Water Planning Area, said there will be a day when it will have to be built. The $7 billion project is an integral part of the region's water planning strategy in the future. "We have looked at it every way to Sunday and said, can we conserve our way out of this growth?" Buhman said. "It's just not possible. The math says you need the water supplies." Although critics call reservoirs outdated and inefficient, Buhman said they continue to be an important part of Region C's water supply in the future. "Reservoirs are not an outdated strategy," Buhman said. "Absolutely, we see evaporation, that is part of the equation for a reservoir, there's no question about it. But when you compare it to all the other possibilities, they capture the water in the spring and they supply it in August when there isn't any. And that is exactly what we need." Eighty percent of the proposed reservoir's water would go to Region C, which includes the Dallas-Fort Worth area. Twenty percent would remain in Region D. Today, Texas is home to about 31 million people. By 2070, that's expected to grow to more than 50 million. The state's rapid growth has helped create a water shortage crisis. "The Texas Water Development Board... their data shows, not to be alarming, but towns and cities could face a severe water shortage by 2030, if we continue with severe, prolonged drought and if there are no water solutions implemented throughout the state," said Alejandra Martinez, the Texas Tribune's environmental reporter. A water shortage isn't just a public health risk. Without action toward increasing the state's water supply, a severe drought could cause $153 billion in economic damages annually, according to an estimate in the Texas Water Development Board's 2022 water plan. "This session, Gov. Greg Abbott put out really early on that he wanted a Texas-size investment for water supply projects," Martinez said. "So this session, there was a big investment made towards water, $20 billion worth of investment, one of the biggest investments made by the Texas Legislature for water supply for the whole state. How that money will be distributed throughout the state is yet to be seen." While $20 billion is a sizable investment, some experts say it isn't enough. The nonprofit Texas 2036 estimates the state needs to spend about $154 billion to secure its water supply in the coming decades. "Water experts I talked to say this was a significant step forward," Martinez said. "But they also said, in that same vein, this is just a down payment." Those opposed to the Marvin Nichols Reservoir are holding out hope Region C finds alternative water solutions, even as efforts to kill the project have so far failed. "It's not that the people of Northeast Texas want to harm the people of Dallas-Fort Worth," said state Rep. Gary VanDeaver of New Boston. "They want to see the entire state thrive and continue to grow, and certainly a big piece of that is having adequate water. But what the people of Northeast Texas do want to make sure that people understand is we deserve our livelihood as well." VanDeaver introduced a bill that would have killed the reservoir project. It ultimately failed. In June, the Texas Water Development Board found that an interregional conflict exists between Regions C and D regarding the reservoir. The two groups met for mediation and came to an agreement that requires Region C to study another water supply strategy alongside Marvin Nichols. A new study comparing the projects would have to begin by March 2026. The agreement also requires that no application for permitting would occur for Marvin Nichols before 2030. Region D Water Planning Group will discuss and consider ratification of the agreement Wednesday. Region C will do the same on Oct. 6. All of this leaves families like the Belchers and Marshalls wondering if and when they will be forced to sell their land. "The land would lose everything," Marshall said. "The community would be gone forever, and all of this wonder we see out here in nature would literally be drowned." Belcher said he'll continue to do what he can to oppose the project and honor his mother's wish that the land not be sold. "There's not a price for this land," Belcher said. "You can't put a price on seven generations.
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
35 Union Pacific train cars derail near Texas town, no injuries reported
GORDON, Texas (AP) — Thirty-five cars of a Union Pacific train derailed Tuesday afternoon near a small Texas town, officials said. No injuries were reported and no evacuations have been ordered following the afternoon derailment, Union Pacific spokeswoman Robynn Tysver said. News footage showed multiple train cars piled on top of one another on the railroad track located in a rural area. A grass fire and smoke could be seen beside the derailment site. The emergency services district said the derailment was being treated as a hazardous material situation. But it was not immediately known what the derailed train cars were carrying. The derailment occurred around 2 p.m. just east of the town of Gordon, Tysver said. Gordon is located about 65 miles (105 kilometers) southwest of Fort Worth. None of the railroad cars were leaking their contents, according to a post on social media by the Palo Pinto County Emergency Services District 1. 'Crews are on scene, mitigating the damage and hazards. Fire officials are proceeding with caution (at) the scene,' the emergency services district said in a statement. The Palo Pinto Fire Department was working to contain a grass fire, Tysver said. 'Union Pacific crews are en route,' Tysver added. The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Train carrying possible hazardous materials derails in Texas: Officials
A train that may be carrying hazardous materials derailed in Palo Pinto County, Texas, on Tuesday, according to local officials. The incident occurred at about 2 p.m., local time, over a railroad bridge on Coalville Road, about two miles east of Gordon, Texas, according to Palo Pinto County emergency services. The train was from Union Pacific Railroad, the company confirmed to ABC News. Approximately 35 Union Pacific cars derailed. Union Pacific said no one was injured in the derailment. MORE: NTSB reveals cause of 2023 toxic train crash in East Palestine, Ohio Palo Pinto County emergency services said no cars are leaking contents and that crews are on scene, mitigating the damage and hazards. The Palo Pinto Fire Department is working to contain a grass fire at the scene. Fire officials are "proceeding with caution," county officials said. "This is being treated as a HazMat situation." The cause of the derailment is under investigation. ABC News' Matt Claiborne and Bonnie Mclean contributed to this report. This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
