North Dakota governor vetoes the housing budget — by mistake
When North Dakota Gov. Kelly Armstrong took up an agency budget bill approved by the legislature, he vetoed a couple of line items. At least, that was his intention Monday. Instead, he accidentally vetoed $35 million for the state's housing budget.
Now the state is figuring out how to deal with the unusual problem of a mistaken veto.
'I have no recollection of anything like this happening in the 37 years I've been here,' John Bjornson, legislative council director, said Thursday. 'So, yeah, I'd say it's a little extraordinary.'
Armstrong wasn't the only governor to possibly flub a line-item veto this week. Late Wednesday, Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen announced that he would be striking about $47 million in funding and cash transfers over the next two years from budget bills passed last week by the Nebraska Legislature. Those cuts included about $12 million over two years for the Nebraska Supreme Court.
But on Thursday afternoon, the Speaker of the Legislature John Arch announced the body would be sending a letter to Pillen, a fellow Republican, informing him he had missed a 5-day deadline, which came at midnight Wednesday, to properly file the line-item vetoes and that the line items are now law. Pillen's office responded that it handled the veto properly and would consult with the state attorney general about next steps.
In North Dakota, the governor's staff called his veto of the housing budget in Senate Bill 2014 a markup error. Armstrong's staff met with the legislative council Thursday morning to discuss options.
'This was an honest mistake, and we will fix it,' a statement from the governor's office read.
Armstrong, a Republican who served three terms in Congress, was elected governor in 2024. The legislative session that adjourned earlier in the month was his first as governor.
In a message accompanying the veto, Armstrong wrote he had intended to veto a $150,000 grant to fund a Native American homelessness liaison position. The budget veto would take effect July 1.
What happens next is largely up to the governor, Bjornson said, but it is likely that the legislature will need to reconvene in Bismarck for a special session. The governor's office said it will call a special session if needed but hopes to 'avoid the expense.'
If the legislature overrides the veto, that would include funding for the grant Armstrong had wanted to strike. If the legislature wants to only fund the $35 million housing budget, lawmakers may need to pass a new bill, which could take as long as three days, Bjornson said.
The Legislature has six days available to use of its 80-day session limit, and a special session could open the opportunity to override other vetoes by the governor. The governor vetoed all or parts of four bills this session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Expert says Trump and Musk's relationship was doomed from the very start
It's no shock the 'short-lived romance' between Donald Trump and Elon Musk has come to a crashing end, according to an expert on US politics – it was all a question of ego. The US President and the world's richest man formally brought their working relationship to a close last month in an Oval Office press conference. There did not appear to be any animosity between the pair at the time, with Trump thanking Musk for 'tirelessly helping lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform programme in generations'. But things have gone sour rather quickly. Yesterday afternoon, the South African billionaire described Trump's flagship Congressional spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination'. Angelia Wilson, Professor of Politics at the University of Manchester, said this moment was predictable from the moment Musk joined the Republican's presidential campaign last year. She said: 'I hope most of the world could see that those two rather significant egos were not going to stay best buddies for long.' Professor Wilson argues Musk stepped in to fill a role played by Steve Bannon, the founder of alt-right news website Breitbart, during Trump's first campaign and administration. Bannon served as the White House Chief Strategist following the inauguration but had a similarly truncated tenure, leaving just seven months in the job. Both he and Musk played the part of a 'best friend', Professor Wilson said, offering 'some direction of something new and different and interesting'. She said: 'Look at the cycle of American politics, and look at the cycle of the previous Trump administration. 'We had Bannon, and they came in and did this, 'we're going to get rid of half the government', 'we're going to shrink the size of the government', and then realised that they're not walking into a palace. 'He's not a king, and there is eventually going to be some pushback about that. And those type of men with large egos are going to struggle if they're in it for their own ego and not in it for the country.' After announcing his backing for Trump shortly after the then-candidate survived an assassination attempt, Musk became comfortably the biggest single political donor in last year's election. He gave a total of $288 million (around £210m) to support the Republican presidential nominee and other party figures down the ballot. When Trump entered the White House to begin his second term, he appointed Musk to head up the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) and handed him an enormous amount of power. So far, Doge has not saved anywhere near the amount of money Musk said it would – but it has fired tens of thousands of government workers and effectively shut down major bodies such as aid agency USAID. Professor Wilson, author of a book on Trump's rise titled The Politics of Hate, argues that despite Musk's description of himself as 'first buddy', the two men probably never really liked each other much. 'I think when you're talking about two significant figures like that, or any significant figures that have such large egos and are in politics, I wouldn't throw around the word 'like',' she said. 'I don't know what their basis of their friendship was, but I don't think it was even to the extent of a Facebook friendship, that they weren't, in that sense, emotionally close. It was, if anything, a partnership of convenience.' But if it was a partnership of convenience, it seems to have been an extremely lucrative one. More Trending While Trump got 'a bro that would help him get elected with something new and shiny', Professor Wilson said, Musk got to cut regulations and gained access to 'the data that he needs or that he wanted' from government files. That may be a reason why – despite the Tesla boss's fury over the spending bill – neither Trump nor his administration have fired back with vicious insults, as they have in the past when criticised. Professor Wilson predicted: 'I don't think Musk is going to be an enemy of the White House.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Women who have a miscarriage in West Virginia could be prosecuted MORE: Urgent health alert for ham croquettes in the US over allergy fears MORE: Three missing sisters found dead after going to visit dad as manhunt for him is underway
NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
GOP bill for Trump's agenda would add $2.4 trillion to the debt, budget office says
WASHINGTON — The sweeping Republican bill for President Donald Trump's domestic agenda is projected to add $2.4 trillion to the national debt, according to a new estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. It is slightly higher than an earlier version of the bill, which the CBO projected to add $2.3 trillion in new debt. The long-awaited new score factors in a series of last-minute revisions GOP leaders made to placate holdouts before the House passed the legislation last month. The changes include a higher state and local tax (SALT) deduction and a provision that triggers the Medicaid work requirements sooner than the original legislation did. Overall, CBO and the Joint Committee on Taxation found that over a 10-year period, the legislation would decrease revenues by $3.7 trillion, while cutting net spending by $1.3 trillion — for a total of $2.4 trillion in new red ink. The legislation is now in the hands of the Senate, where top Republicans want to pass a revised version by July 4. It is unclear what changes they will make or how those revisions would impact the deficit. The score contradicts claims by the White House and GOP leaders that the bill won't worsen the national debt. They have highlighted the spending while downplaying the tax cuts and extensions that affect the long-term budget outlook. And it emboldens new criticism by Trump's former billionaire adviser Elon Musk, who excoriated the bill Tuesday as a "disgusting abomination," citing the increase in the debt.
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Trump tax-cut bill will add $2.4 trillion to US debt, nonpartisan analysis says
WASHINGTON, June 4 (Reuters) - The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office on Wednesday released a revised estimate of the cost of President Donald Trump's tax-cut bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, concluding it will add $2.4 trillion to the federal government's $36.2 trillion debt. The new assessment comes a day after key Trump ally Elon Musk blasted the bill as a "disgusting abomination," giving fresh support to Republican deficit hawks who have been pushing back against the measure. An earlier CBO estimate predicted the Republican bill, which passed on May 22 with no Democratic support, would add around $3.8 trillion to Washington's debt over the next decade. The measure, now awaiting action in the Senate, aims to extend Trump's 2017 tax cut law while also achieving steep spending reductions, largely on a healthcare program for the poor. The new CBO estimate takes into account late changes that were made to the bill as Republican leaders steered it to passage.
