Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla's trial date for July 2021 unrest matter set
Image: Doctor Ngcobo/Independent Media
Umkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) member of Parliament, Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla is no longer intending to petition the National Director of Public Prosecution (NDPP), Advocate Shamila Batohi, to withdraw charges against her but said she is ready for trial.
This was revealed by her attorney Advocate Dali Mpofu SC at the pre-trial hearing held in the Durban High Court yesterday. Both the State and the defence said they were ready for the trial and the court dates were set down for November 10 to 21.
Sambudla-Zuma was arrested and charged in January. The state alleged that she was instrumental in fomenting deadly violence that left many people dead and paralysed the economy, particularly in KwaZulu-Natal in July 2021.
She faced three counts emanating from her social media posts during the civil unrest. Count one is incitement to commit the offence of terrorism, with the state alleging that between June and July 2021, at various places within the country, the accused unlawfully and intentionally incited others to commit terrorism by engaging in terrorist activities.
On count two, which was incitement to commit violence, the state alleged that the accused incited, instigated, commanded or procured other persons unlawfully, who assembled with common intent to forcibly disturb the public peace or tranquility or to invade the rights of other persons.
On count three, the state also accused her of violating Section 17 of the Riotous Assemblies Act, 17 of 1956 which dealt with the illegal assembling of persons with the intention to cause a riot.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
Wearing a black T-shirt with the words 'Modern Day Terrorism Charges', Zuma-Sambudla looked relaxed and smiled. Speaking after the postponement inside the court, Zuma-Sambudla said she still maintained that the charges against her were politically motivated, however, she was ready for trial.
"I still maintain that this case is politically motivated. I am in high spirits and ready for the trial. My party comrades and I are in and out of court because the system wants to punish us for supporting ubaba (Jacob Zuma), said Sambudla-Zuma.
At her last appearance in March, she indicated that she would fight for the dropping of the charges.
During the pre-trial hearing, Mpofu read her admission that between June and July she had tweeted using her X account, which had more than 100,000 followers, during her father's arrest.
However, she denied having incited anyone to cause violence. Her argument was that people who may have caused violence and looted did so out of their own anger over her father's arrest in July 2021, not because they were incited by her tweets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
37 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
The National Convention did not change my mind about the National Dialogue
Malaika Mahlatsi 20 August 2025 | 12:30 national dialogue Cyril Ramaphosa Government of national unity (GNU) UNISA hosted the two-day convention for the National Dialogue at its main campus in Pretoria. Picture: @GovernmentZA/X On the 15th of August, as I left my house in the northern suburbs of Johannesburg and drove to UNISA's main campus in Muckleneuk, Pretoria, to attend the first National Convention of the National Dialogue, there were many thoughts on my mind. I was attending the National Convention as part of the media - an in-house analyst for Newzroom Afrika. The first thought on my mind was that the National Convention should not have been taking place on the day. Days prior to the event, various organisations - political parties and non-governmental organisations had pulled out. These include, among others, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, the Steve Biko, and the FW de Klerk Foundation. The legacy foundations cited concerns over the rushed timeline, inadequate preparation, and a shift towards government control as reasons for their withdrawal. According to the legacy foundations, the National Dialogue was intended to be a citizen-driven and inclusive process, but ran the risk of morphing into a government-led initiative, eroding its legitimacy as a people's dialogue. Parties such as the Democratic Alliance (DA), the second biggest political party after the African National Congress (ANC), and a member of the Government of National Unity (GNU) had already withdrawn from the process (albeit for reasons I deem opportunistic). The Freedom Front Plus (FF+) withdrew just a day before the event was scheduled to take place. Other political parties, including uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP), the biggest opposition party in South Africa, and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), which won nearly 10 percent of the vote in the 2024 general election, the fourth highest after the ANC, DA and MKP, had long since stated their rejection of the National Dialogue. The EFF, in a statement released on the 13th of June 2025, characterised the dialogue as a platform "for failed politicians to rehabilitate themselves under the guise of public consultation". The MKP, which revealed that it was not invited to the dialogue and wouldn't have participated regardless, described it as "a politically compromising gathering" that was aimed at flattering president Cyril Ramaphosa rather than genuinely engaging with ordinary South Africans about the problems facing the country. This is a sentiment is shared by many - and certainly, by the protestors who were gathered on sidewalks near the venue, raising issues around the privatisation of public goods, the erasure of the Khoi people from collective national memory, poor service delivery and high levels of unemployment. It was this group that I first came across as I made my way through the police checkpoint a few meters from the UNISA entrance. On the first day of the National Convention, the venue was abuzz with activity as delegates and the media waited in anticipation for proceedings to begin. The contentious National Convention was flighted on all news channels, and the media was as invested as some South Africans in what the National Convention would achieve given the withdrawal of the legacy foundations and the crisis of legitimacy that exists around the role of the national government in the Cyril Ramaphosa, who delivered the keynote address, was supposed to convince South Africans about the value of the National Dialogue, given the crisis of legitimacy around it. What he did, instead, was confirm the concerns and criticisms that are being levelled against the process. Specifically, he confirmed what the EFF has been raising about the platform being an attempt by the government to rehabilitate itself under the guise of public consultation. Nowhere was this as aptly captured as in the part of his speech where, explaining what South Africans would have to cogitate on, said the following: 'We will need to have difficult conversations about many issues, including: Why do South African women have to live in fear of men? Why do so many people live in abject poverty and so few live lives of opulence? Why, after decades of democracy, are the prospects for a white child so much better than those of a black child? Why do women get paid less than men for the same work? Why, when we have a Bill of Rights, are LGBTQI+ people still discriminated against, stigmatised and harassed? Why do clinics run out of medicine? Why do taps run dry? These are some of the questions that we must be willing to ask and which we must prepared to answer'. It is unconscionable that in 2025, the president genuinely believes that these are issues that a National Dialogue must reflect upon. These issues are neither new – they are the very issues that South Africans have been dialoguing about for decades. More than that, solutions to these problems have been proposed by every stakeholder in the country – from the government itself to the private sector, civil society, unorganised people, the media and multilateral institutions. There is a copious amount of data, a lot of it scientifically rigorous, that engages with and answers these very questions. In public participation platforms such as ward meetings, presidential imbizos, planning processes including the Integrated Development Planning (IDP), labour surveys, data gathering processes for government reports, media platforms including social media, parliamentary committee hearings, and even protests, this data has been provided. How, in 2025, does the president stand before the nation and demand that we ask ourselves why service delivery is failing, why violence against women and children is rampant, why discriminatory attitudes towards the LGBTIQ+ community persist, and all other issues that South Africans have reflected upon, raised on many platforms, made recommendations on solutions for? Does he not read data collected from people by the very government that he leads? Does he not hear these issues at presidential imbizos and other public participation processes? Does the president not read newspapers, watch the news or listen to community radio stations? Why, for goodness' sake, would a president think issues that emerge largely from the failure of the state, a state that he was intentional to make clear at the beginning of his keynote address that he heads, must be preoccupy the minds of South Africans who are living with the consequences of this failure? The tone that the president set for the National Dialogue confirms the sentiments of Sinawo Tambo, the spokesperson of the EFF who once argued on this EWN platform that president Ramaphosa is attempting to make South Africans take collective responsibility for the failures of the party he leads and seeks to mask this scapegoating with the sentimentality of a National Dialogue. Nothing else explains why the president saw it sensible to ask of us why clinics run out of medicines, taps run dry, poverty continues to debilitate millions, and Black people remain on the receiving end of structural violence. The president knows answers to these questions – or at least, he should. I refuse to believe that a Head of State is not being furnished with the data that is constantly being churned out by his own government about these very issues. If that were the case, then there is absolutely no reason for him to remain in office because to not know such critical details about a country that one leads is nothing short of a dereliction of duty. I refuse to believe he does not know. That leaves us with one other possibility – that the National Dialogue is yet another theatre of the performance of democracy, and that the president himself is the main character in the play. If that is the case, then this multi-million Rand process is everything that critics are characterising it as – a rehabilitation centre for failed leadership. Malaika, a bestselling award-winning author, is a geographer and researcher at the Institute for Pan African Thought. She is a PhD in Geography candidate at the University of Bayreuth in Germany.
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Former rhino conservationist among six accused in horn trafficking
Former rhino conservationist among six accused in horn trafficking Six accused, including the founder of a rhino conservation enterprise, appeared in the Pretoria Magistrate's Court in connection with an international rhino horn trafficking syndicate, reportedly worth R250-million. They were all granted bail and are expected to return to court on December 9. The group is facing 55 charges, which include multiple counts of racketeering, fraud, contravention of the National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act (NEMBA), involving 964 rhino horns, contravention of the Riotous Assemblies Act, theft, and money laundering. The accused are: – John Frederick Hume (83), the founder and former owner of the Platinum Rhino Conservation Enterprise. – Clive John Mervan Melville (63), a transport maintenance manager. – Izak Hermanus du Toit (50), a practising attorney. – Elizabeth Catharina van Niekerk (58), a director of a non-profit organisation. – Mattheus Hendrikus Wessels Poggenpoel (37), an insurance broker and part-time farmer. – Johannes Abraham Hennop (52), a game reserve manager. Bail was set at R100 000 for Hume, R10 000 each for Melville and Van Niekerk, and R20 000 each for Du Toit, Poggenpoel, and Hennop. National Prosecuting Authority's spokesperson Lumka Mahanjana said it is alleged that between 2017 and 2024, the accused operated an international rhino horn trafficking syndicate and defrauded the Department of Forestry, Fisheries, and the Environment (DFFE). 'They allegedly obtained permits to trade rhino horn locally, while intending to channel the horns into illegal international markets in South-east Asia.' Mahanjana stated that the fraudulent scheme is estimated to have involved 964 rhino horns, valued at R250-million. 'After intensive investigations by the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation's (DPCI) Wildlife Trafficking Section of the Serious Organised Crime Investigation Unit, based at national headquarters, the six handed themselves over at the Pretoria Central Police Station on August 19, where they were formally arrested.' She explained that during bail proceedings, they all asked to be released on bail because they are not flight risks, and had co-operated with the police investigation. She continued that two of the accused, Melville and Poggenpoel, had stated in affidavits that they had previous convictions for fraud and possession of rhino horn, with both paying fines. Poggenpoel also disclosed that he has a case against him pending in the Winburg Magistrate's court in the Free State, because police allegedly found ammunition that was not properly secured, and for which he did not have a permit. Scheduled medicine was also apparently found during this visit. According to Mahanjana, Advocate Patsy Jacobs read an affidavit by investigating officer Edward du Plessis, saying that the State did not oppose bail as the accused are not flight risks, their addresses had been confirmed, and they had co-operated with investigators. The court granted bail to the six with the following conditions: – All accused must hand over their passports and may not apply for new travel documents while the matter is pending. – They must report to their nearest police station once a week. – They may not interfere with investigations, tamper with evidence or influence witnesses. – They must not commit any further offences while on bail. ALSO READ: Six alleged international rhino horn traffickers to appear in Pretoria court Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Zuma praises Ghana's support for Morocco in Western Sahara dispute
Former President Jacob Zuma and the MK Party delegation were warmly welcomed by His Royal Majesty, King Tackie Teiko Tsuru II, Ga Mantse, and the Ga Traditional Council ahead of his address at the 8th Annual Leadership Lecture at the University of Professional Studies, Accra (UPSA) on Tuesday. Image: MK Party. Former president Jacob Zuma has described the MK Party as 'the only true hope for the last stage of the total liberation of the South African people' and a 'genuine continuation of the liberation struggle'. Zuma, the MK Party leader, was delivering the eighth Annual Leadership Lecture at the University of Professional Studies in Accra, Ghana, on Tuesday. He praised the party's manifesto - known as the People's Mandate - as the foundation of its vision and policy direction. The manifesto outlines plans to reclaim dignity, land and mineral resources, people's power, the economy, human capital and technological capacity, public spaces, safety and security, as well as South Africa's sovereignty and its position in Africa and the world. 'Together, these pillars embody the uncompromising vision of the MKP as the only true hope for the last stage of the total liberation of the South African people - a liberation not just from apartheid's political chains, but from economic captivity, poverty, unemployment and neo-colonial domination that continue to strangle our nation,' Zuma said. He took aim at the newly formed Government of National Unity (GNU), calling it a 'compromised' arrangement and contrasting it with MKP, which he said upheld the 'spirit of our forebears to deliver full freedom, dignity and prosperity to every South African'. Zuma also reflected on South Africa's growing relationship with Ghana, highlighting more than 20 bilateral agreements in areas such as trade, defence, agriculture, and ICT - including a recent visa waiver for ordinary passport holders. Since 2019, cooperation between the two countries has been elevated to a presidential-level Bi-National Commission, Zuma said, enabling real accountability and progress. 'These agreements matter not just on paper, but in action - driving economic integration, tech exchange, cultural bonds and stronger people-to-people links,' he said. Zuma commended Ghana for its stance on the Western Sahara dispute, backing Morocco's autonomy plan over the separatist agenda. 'Some may disagree, but I say: Africa must not be divided for the convenience of outsiders. The era of Balkanising Africa to serve foreign agendas is over. By prioritising stability and integration, Ghana has once again placed itself at the forefront of Pan-African leadership,' Zuma said. He warned against external interference in African affairs, declaring: 'The days of Africa dancing to foreign drums are over. We shall beat our own drum.' Zuma also called on African nations to unite against Western dominance. 'The West built its power by chaining Africa. The new generation of Africans must build our power by breaking those chains,' he said. 'Africa must produce not just employees for foreign corporations, but inventors, thinkers and builders of African systems. We must move from the classroom to the policy room, from the laboratory to the marketplace, from the lecture hall to the halls of power.'
