Cassidy says Trump budget bill ‘great news' for Americans
President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' was signed into law by Trump on Friday. U.S. Sen. Cassidy, R-La., one of the 218 to vote in favor of the bill, said the bill's passage was the result of 'Republican's hard work.'
While opponents of the bill have criticized cuts to social and health programs and increases in defense spending, and voiced concerns over long-term environmental effects, Republicans championed the bill as a salve for issues affecting the middle class. Cassidy is no exception.
He called the legislation 'great news' for working and middle-income Americans, citing how it prevented the 'largest tax hike in history;' cut taxes on tips over time; 'secured the southern border; and expanded oil and gas production off the Louisiana coast, which should result in $100 million more funneled into Louisiana for coastal restoration issues, he said.
'We got it done. … Bottom line, this bill helps families who feel as if they've been left behind for decades. I worked hard to get a lot of stuff in this bill, stuff that's good for our country, good for our state and good for families.'
Cassidy, who is the chair of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, spearheaded the 'Educational Choice for Children Act (ECCA). This legislation, which was included in the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' is the first federal school choice legislation to be signed into law.
ECCA establishes a dollar-for-dollar federal tax credit, up to $10 billion annually, for individuals and organizations' donations to scholarship-granting organizations, which distribute school-choice scholarships.
This legislation is a step towards empowering parents to make educational decisions for their children, Cassidy said.
'President Trump and I are in agreement, a child should never be stuck in a failing school when mom or dad, usually mom, knows there's a better school right around the corner.
He also 'worked to strengthen and protect Medicaid' in the 'Big, Beautiful Bill.'
The bill calls for cuts to Medicaid that will total about one trillion dollars over the next decade. This has raised concerns for rural hospitals and small-town patients who rely on Medicaid for healthcare.
To address this, Cassidy said he helped to create the Rural Health Transformation Program, which allows states to access, allocate and distribute rural health funding. The fund will provide $10 billion a year, over five years, to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), which will distribute funding to eligible states.
'I'm a doctor who treated Medicaid patients for decades, and I'll always fight for the disabled American who needs Medicaid to enhance their life, to save their lives.'
He also worked to expand the 'no tax on tips' portion of the bill to include barbers, beauticians and those in the food service industry, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's visit to Scotland is in ‘public interest', says Chancellor
The visit of US President Donald Trump to Scotland is in the 'public interest', Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said. Mr Trump is due to touch down in Scotland on Friday evening ahead of a four-day visit, during which he will meet Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and First Minister John Swinney. His meeting with Sir Keir is seen as a chance to refine the UK-US trade deal which came into force last month. Speaking to journalists during a visit to the Rolls-Royce factory near Glasgow Airport on Friday morning, the Chancellor talked up the importance of the visit. 'It's in Britain's national interest to have strong relations with the US administration and as a result of both that long-term special relationship, but actually more importantly, the work that our Prime Minister Keir Starmer has done in building that relationship with President Trump has meant that we were the first country in the world to secure a trade deal,' she said. 'That has a tangible benefit for people here in Scotland, whether it is people working in the Scotch whisky industry or people working in the defence sector like here at Rolls-Royce, that trade deal means lower tariffs than any country in the world on things that we send to the US.' Ms Reeves dodged a question relating to senior ministers – including Health Secretary Wes Streeting, Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Scottish Secretary Ian Murray – supporting a motion when in opposition in 2019 calling for the president's first state visit to be cancelled and accusing him of 'misogyny, racism and xenophobia'. Mr Trump is expected to visit both of his golf clubs in Scotland – in South Ayrshire and Aberdeenshire – during the visit, which has been described as 'private' by the White House, before leaving on Tuesday. His presence is likely to spark protests across the country, with Police Scotland being forced to request aid from other forces to help increase manpower for the trip. In a carefully worded statement ahead of the visit, Mr Swinney said the focus it will bring to Scotland will allow people to have their voice heard on issues including 'war and peace, justice and democracy'. Speaking to the PA news agency on Friday, the First Minister said his meeting with Mr Trump would present an opportunity to 'essentially speak out for Scotland' on issues like trade and the increase of business from the United States in Scotland. 'But there are clearly also significant international issues upon which the people of Scotland have a view and want to have that view expressed by their First Minister,' he said. 'That relates to the awfulness of the situation in Gaza and the unbearable human suffering that is going on in Gaza. 'I want to make sure that those concerns and those views are expressed to the President of the United States. 'We have that opportunity, and I intend to take that opportunity to make sure that Scotland's voice is heard.' Mr Swinney also urged all of those set to protest against the President's visit to do so 'peacefully and to do so within the law'.
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
July 2025 is when the Trump era started to end
It took six months into President Trump's second term to get here, but something shifted in Trump World this month. The administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case — including its assertion that a 'client list' doesn't exist — sent tremors through the MAGA ecosystem, creating a permission structure for key players on the right to start treating Trump like a lame duck. This was a significant development, even though there are obvious reasons to view Trump this way. Constitutional limits prevent him from running again after 2024. That alone creates an expiration date on his relevance that even the most obsequious loyalists can't ignore forever. Then there's the Epstein connection, which didn't just put a fresh stink on an already scandal-soaked politician. It found him on the wrong side of a definitive MAGA narrative. It's one thing to be indicted multiple times; it's quite another to be entangled in the biggest conspiracy theory of our era. But there's something else in the air: Trump looks old. We may have grown accustomed to his ALL CAPS rants, but the physical symptoms are harder to normalize — the swollen ankles. The makeup caked awkwardly on his hands. Taken together — the reality of Trump's lame-duck status, being out of touch with much of his base and now the physical deterioration — we are left with a picture of a man whose once iron-clad grip on his party is finally beginning to loosen. The base might not say it outright. MAGA influencers certainly won't admit it — but they absolutely see it. And more importantly, they're starting to act on it. The jostling has begun. For this reason, it's no longer absurdly premature to start talking about succession. And, for my money, there are three leading contenders. Vice President JD Vance — seemingly the obvious successor — is clearly positioning himself as heir apparent to Trumpism 2.0: similar themes, better vocabulary, a little more polish and (crucially) a future. Tucker Carlson now also seems to be testing out what it would look like to actually run for office. And Donald Trump Jr. is lurking around the perimeter; the assumption is that his name will carry him somewhere, though it's not clear where (or even if) anyone would follow him. For those hoping the MAGA spell would break post-Trump, the prospects are strikingly bleak. These three men all occupy somewhat similar turf — a figure like Nikki Haley will not be not on this list. Trumpism will survive, albeit without Trump. But winning the internecine battle to lead this movement might be a Pyrrhic victory. Trump's coalition cannot be inherited any more than his celebrity status or charisma can. The coalition wasn't built to outlive 2024. It is an unruly jumble of people with wildly incompatible worldviews, glued together by little more than shared grievance and a cult of personality. It includes paleoconservative nationalists and neoconservative interventionists, Christian fundamentalists and manosphere libertines, fans of McDonald's and crunchy health nuts. And it worked, somehow, in 2024 — but only for Trump. This has always been the dirty secret of Trumpism: It's not transferrable. You could see it in the 2018 midterms, when Republicans took a beating without Trump on the ballot. You saw it again in 2022, when a rogues' gallery of Trump-endorsed candidates flopped spectacularly. The Trump base doesn't show up for the brand — it shows up for the man. So what happens when the man is gone? We're about to find out. For the first time in nearly a decade, the right is confronting a future without a clear standard-bearer. And every would-be successor faces the same paradox: To win Trump's base, you have to sound like Trump. But the more you sound like Trump, the more you remind people you're not him. It's difficult to imagine that any of the frontrunners could maintain the same patchwork coalition. Vance might be able to pick off the nationalist-intellectual set, but he lacks Trump's charisma, and gives off oily politician vibes. Tucker might dominate the culture-war lane. Don Jr. might do okay with the too-online meme crowd. But no one can put Humpty Dumpty back together again. Because the thing they're all trying to inherit — Trumpism— isn't an ideology. It's a person. This is the tragedy and farce of the post-Trump GOP: It bet everything on a single man, and now it has no idea how to function without him. Trump hollowed out the party, scorched the institutions and rewired the voter base. And he will likely leave behind a political husk that still bears his name but contains little of his animating style. Of course, Trump isn't gone yet. Republicans — thanks, perhaps, to their plans to gerrymander Texas — could still hold on to Congress in November. Maybe Trump can ultimately find a way to outrun the Epstein controversy and set the terms for the next four years. And, regardless, he could also play a vital role in picking (or sabotaging) whoever inherits his mantle. But that doesn't change the fact that his era is already ending. The spell is finally starting to wear off. And somewhere, just beneath the surface, it feels like the scramble for 2028 has already begun. The question isn't whether someone can pick up the torch. It's whether that person can prevent the flame from being extinguished entirely.
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
George Santos to report to prison for start of 7-year prison term
Former Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) is set to report to prison on Friday, officially capping off the New York Republican's dramatic rise-and-fall in politics that saw him ascend as a GOP trailblazer before plunging to disgrace in the party. Santos, 37, has not announced the prison at which he will surrender to begin an 87-month prison sentence — more than seven years — which he received after pleading guilty to wire fraud and aggravated identity theft as part of a plea deal last summer. He faced 23 federal counts for a number of criminal schemes, including money laundering, theft of public funds, making materially false statements to the House of Representatives and Federal Election Commission (FEC) and falsifying records submitted to obstruct the FEC. The beginning of Santos's prison sentence marks the end — for now — of a story that captivated Washington for months, which began in 2022 with praise for the first openly gay Republican to win a House seat as a non-incumbent, gained notoriety when news broke that much of his biography and resume were fabricated, grew larger after two criminal indictments, and hit an apex when he was expelled from the House, becoming just the sixth lawmaker to ever be ousted from the lower chamber. Santos recognized his drama-filled tenure in Congress in a social media post published one day before he reported to prison. 'Well, darlings… The curtain falls, the spotlight dims, and the rhinestones are packed. From the halls of Congress to the chaos of cable news what a ride it's been!' Santos wrote Thursday on social platform X. 'Was it messy? Always. Glamorous? Occasionally. Honest? I tried… most days.' He added, 'To my supporters: You made this wild political cabaret worth it. To my critics: Thanks for the free press.I may be leaving the stage (for now), but trust me legends never truly exit.' In the lead-up to his report date, Santos made his interest in a pardon clear, filing the necessary paperwork and going as far as to tell Piers Morgan during an interview on his YouTube show in May: 'I'll take a commutation, clemency, whatever the president is willing to give me.' 'Seven years and three months in prison for a first-time offender over campaign matters just screams 'over the top,' and I would appreciate if the president would consider,' the former New York lawmaker added. In the days before arriving at prison, however, he recognized that his efforts would likely be futile. The Federal Bureau of Prisons does not disclose the locations at which inmates are set to report ahead of their surrenders. The judge overseeing his case requested he be housed in a facility 'within the North-East region of the United States.' Santos's former campaign treasurer pleaded guilty to federal conspiracy charges last year for her role in fabricating the ex-lawmaker's campaign finance reports. She was sentenced in May to three years of probation, avoiding prison time, unlike her former boss. The Santos saga began in December 2022 when — after being lauded for flipping a Long Island battleground district red — The New York Times published a bombshell report that he misrepresented his family history, previous employment and education. The scandal snowballed from there. Santos arrived in Washington shrouded in controversy, prompting him to quickly step down from his two committee assignments within a month of beginning his tenure in Congress. The House Ethics Committee announced an investigation into the embattled lawmaker in March, his first 13 charges came in May, followed by another 10 in October. Throughout that timeline, Santos faced three efforts to remove him from Congress, including failed tries in May and November. In December, however, an attempt led by other New York Republicans — worried that the chaos of Santos would negatively impact their re-election endeavors — was successful, with lawmakers overcoming the inflated two-thirds threshold for passage. The vote was 311-114-2, with 105 Republicans joining nearly all Democrats to eject Santos from the chamber after roughly 11 months on the job, leaving the GOP conference one vote down in its razor-thin majority. The impetus was a damning report from the committee, which determined that Santos 'violated federal criminal laws,' finding that he improperly used campaign funds — including on luxury goods and Botox — and reported fictitious personal loans to his campaign and another political action committee. 'To hell with this place,' Santos declared on his way out of the Capitol following the vote.
