logo
Panama did not cede sovereignty to the US, foreign minister says

Panama did not cede sovereignty to the US, foreign minister says

Euronews15-07-2025
Following US President Donald Trump's repeated threats to take control of the Panama Canal, arguing that the US-built trade passage is key to national security, a memorandum has allowed Washington to carry out a series of military exercises with the Panamanian police.
Three helicopters arrived in the area on Sunday to train for a possible scenario to protect the canal.
Amid concerns over a possible US takeover, Panama has defended the security agreement reached with Washington and denied that sovereignty has been ceded.
"There will be no permanent presence of foreign forces in our territory. This is temporary," Panama Foreign Minister Javier Martínez-Acha told Euronews.
"We have no presence of troops of any nationality. We have signed a memorandum of understanding, as we have with other Latin American countries, to carry out joint exercises to prepare ourselves for asymmetric threats, to prepare ourselves in case we have to act jointly to contain organised crime, drug trafficking," Martínez-Acha said in an interview.
Relations with Washington were strained after Trump accused Panama of ceding control of strategic infrastructure to China.
However, the foreign minister claims that the tensions have dissipated.
"We understand that we have a privileged region with the United States. At times it has been complex, but today we are cooperating very well based on respect for Panama's integrity and sovereignty," Martínez-Acha said.
Some 6% of the world's maritime trade passes through the Panama Canal each year.
More cooperation on tax matters
Martínez-Acha has travelled to Brussels to take part in the European Union-Central America Association Council on Monday.
One of the issues that has caused the most controversy over the years is the inclusion of Panama on the list of non-cooperative countries in tax matters.
Martínez-Acha denied that his country is a tax haven and pointed out the assurances he has given to Brussels.
"We are a responsible country. We are a country committed to transparency and tax cooperation", he explained, while acknowledging that there is still work to be done.
"We will do them. We are considering reforms in the way tax cooperation is transmitted," Martínez-Acha said.
Following a vote in the European Parliament ratifying a European Commission proposal, Panama has now been removed from the blacklist of countries with weak controls on illicit money flows.
However, the Central American country remains on the list of non-cooperative states for tax purposes, which also includes Russia and Trinidad and Tobago.
Among the pending tasks is the elimination of preferential tax regimes to avoid the existence of offshore structures without genuine economic activity.
"We have to make a reform from a tax point of view so that if these multinational companies have economic substance in Panama, or if these foreign incomes are repatriated to Panama, they are subject to tax," Martínez-Acha explained.
"If they are repatriated to third countries, then they will not be subject to tax".
For Europe, Panama is not only strategically important economically, but also essential in preventing sanctions violations against countries such as Russia.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why are Gazans not getting sorely needed aid?
Why are Gazans not getting sorely needed aid?

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

Why are Gazans not getting sorely needed aid?

UN agencies and aid organisations cite Israeli restrictions, safety issues and the establishment of a US- and Israeli-backed mechanism that has sidelined the humanitarian system in place. Israel says international organisations have failed, and that the previous UN-led system had allowed Hamas militants to loot aid trucks. On the ground, meanwhile, more than 100 aid and human rights groups warned this week that "mass starvation" was spreading. GHF: few sites, deadly incidents Israel's chosen aid distributor, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), began operations on May 26 after a more than two-month total aid blockade. Now the main channel for distributing food to Gaza's more than two million people, GHF has faced chaos and deadly violence at its few distribution points. The United Nations and aid groups have refused to work with GHF, saying it was created to serve Israeli military interests. "They are not a humanitarian organisation... You don't deliver humanitarian aid in areas that have been completely flattened and militarised," said Arwa Damon, founder of INARA, a US-based NGO offering medical and mental health support to children. She noted the GHF's site locations -- along two military corridors in southern and central Gaza -- rather than being spread out across the territory. With only four GHG sites and huge crowds trying to reach them, there have been repeated reports of deadly fire near them. According to UN figures, Israeli forces have killed some 800 Palestinian aid-seekers near GHF sites since late May. Israel has rejected calls to restore the UN-led system, citing concerns that Hamas looted trucks and resold aid meant to be distributed free of charge. Aid organisations sidelined International aid groups say vast quantities of aid are stockpiled outside Gaza but require Israeli military clearance to enter. Inside Gaza, coordination with the military is also essential, as fighting and air strikes rage on. Damon accused Israel of preventing aid delivery by refusing to coordinate with NGOs to grant safe passage through combat zones. "Getting that coordination approved is incredibly challenging," she told AFP. "Not to mention Israel's lack of willingness to provide humanitarian organisations with a safe route to be able to ensure a secure pickup." The UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, said on Wednesday it had "thousands of trucks in neighbouring countries waiting to enter Gaza –- banned by Israeli authorities from entering since March". 'Encountered death' for flour Israel screens all goods entering Gaza, but COGAT, the Israeli defence ministry body overseeing civil affairs in the Palestinian territories, denies limiting the number of humanitarian trucks. On Thursday it said "around 70 food trucks were unloaded at aid crossings, and over 150 were collected by the UN and international organisations from the Gazan side". But more than 800 trucks remained uncollected, and Israel's military posted footage online of hundreds of trucks loaded with food aid "sitting idle inside Gaza". UN agencies and international NGOs reject Israeli claims that they lack the capacity to distribute food. They note that aid was distributed effectively in the past, including during the last ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war that ended in March. In Khan Yunis, in Gaza's south, resident Yousef Abu Shehla said this week he had "encountered death" to get his hands on a bag of flour for his family. "We shall feed our children even if we die," he told AFP.

Iran says it's ready for nuclear talks if US works to rebuild trust
Iran says it's ready for nuclear talks if US works to rebuild trust

Euronews

time4 hours ago

  • Euronews

Iran says it's ready for nuclear talks if US works to rebuild trust

Iran is ready to engage in talks with the United States on its nuclear programme but only if Washington takes meaningful steps to rebuild trust, Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said on Thursday. Iran is set to meet on Friday in Istanbul with Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3 nations, and the European Union's deputy foreign policy commissioner. They will be the first talks since Iran's 12-day conflict with Israel in June, which involved US B-52 bombers striking nuclear facilities in Iran. Gharibabadi said in a social media post on Thursday that to enter negotiations, Iran sought :several key principles" to be upheld. He said these included "rebuilding Iran's trust — as Iran has absolutely no trust in the United States — avoiding the use of talks as a platform for hidden agendas such as military action, though Iran remains fully prepared for any scenario; respecting and recognising Iran's rights under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, including enrichment in line with its legitimate needs; and the lifting of sanctions." Friday's talks will be held at the deputy ministerial level, with Iran sending Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-e Ravanchi. A similar meeting was held in Istanbul in May. The stakes are high. European leaders have threatened to trigger the snapback mechanism included in the 2015 nuclear deal, which would reimpose sanctions that were lifted in exchange for Iran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear programme. The UK, France and Germany were signatories to that deal which collapsed in 2018 when President Donald Trump withdrew the US from it, saying it wasn't tough enough. Iranian officials have warned that a move to reimpose sanctions would have consequences. Gharibabadi said earlier this week that it could force Tehran to withdraw from key non-proliferation agreements. In a letter to UN Secretary General António Guterres, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused the E3 of hypocrisy, saying they failed to uphold their obligations under the 2015 deal while supporting Israel's recent strikes on Iran. In the recent conflict, US B-52 bombers struck Iranian nuclear facilities in support of Israel's air campaign. Iran responded with missile attacks, including a strike on a US base in Qatar, which President Masoud Pezeshkian insisted was not directed at the Qatari state. In an interview with Al Jazeera that aired on Wednesday, Pezeshkian said Iran is prepared for another war and accused Israel of attempting to assassinate him during a 15 June meeting of Iran's national security council in Tehran. Pezeshkian reiterated that Iran's nuclear programme will continue within the framework of international law and insisted the country has no intention of pursuing nuclear weapons. "Our nuclear capabilities are in the minds of our scientists," he said, emphasising Iran's position that future negotiations must be rooted in mutual respect, not threats. According to the official judicial news agency Mizan, at least 13 Iranian nuclear scientists were killed during the conflict with Israel. A spokesperson for Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation said on Thursday the country's nuclear industry would recover from the attacks by Israel and the United States. "Our nuclear industry is deeply rooted. What has roots cannot be harmed by attack or pressure — it will grow back and thrive again," state TV quoted Behrouz Kamalvandi as saying. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported in May that Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% had grown to over 400 kilograms. That material, just below weapons-grade level, remains a central concern for the West. Despite the growing stockpile, Iran has said it remains open to diplomacy, though it recently suspended cooperation with the IAEA following legislation signed by Pezeshkian.

French anger over toxic chemical piles pressure on Macron
French anger over toxic chemical piles pressure on Macron

France 24

time5 hours ago

  • France 24

French anger over toxic chemical piles pressure on Macron

On July 10, a 23-year-old master's student launched a petition urging the French government to drop legislation allowing the reintroduction of acetamiprid, a pesticide that is harmful to ecosystems but popular with many farmers in Europe. Banned in France since 2018, the chemical remains legal in the European Union, and proponents say French farmers need it to help them compete. Support for the petition spread like wildfire, with university lecturers, actors, left-wing lawmakers and star chefs backing it. It had racked up 1.9 million signatures by Thursday afternoon. The controversial legislation is dubbed the Duplomb law, after its author, Laurent Duplomb, a senator for the right-wing Republicans party. The bill was adopted on July 8, but without a proper debate, to bypass gridlock in a bitterly divided parliament. Signatories of the petition have urged President Emmanuel Macron not to sign it into law. The petition calls the legislation a "frontal attack on public health". But supporters say their frustration goes beyond environmental concerns. Commentators say it may be a sign of exasperation with deadlock in a hung parliament and a desire to have a greater say in political matters. Elodie Germain, 46, said the mobilisation represents a form of "democratic revenge", after Macron forced a controversial pension reform through parliament in 2023 and dissolved the lower chamber last year, sparking political turmoil that resulted in a hung parliament. "There is of course an environmental aspect behind my signature, but there is also a lot of frustration," said Germain. "After the pension reform and the dissolution, here we have another example of a bill being forced through parliament." 'Blindness of our politicians' Francois Veillerette of environmental association Generations Futures struck a similar note. "People have felt for months that they are not being listened to," he said. Such is the success of the mobilisation that representatives of France's culinary world, usually reticent about airing political views, published an open letter calling for the withdrawal of the legislation and a moratorium on pesticide use. "We are appalled by the blindness of our politicians and their now all-too-obvious ties to the agro-industry," said the letter, which has collected signatures from nearly 400 people, including Michelin-starred chefs and restaurateurs. "We, restaurateurs, work hard, we keep our mouths shut and get on with it," said Glenn Viel, a celebrated 3-star Michelin chef. "But at some point, you have to bang your fist on the table." Jacques Marcon, another 3-star Michelin chef, said he was ready to become "a true activist for the agricultural and environmental cause". Newspaper Le Monde said the petition had put politicians on edge. "The unprecedentedly large grassroots movement making itself heard on environmental issues through the now-famous petition has caught everyone off guard," it said in an editorial. The petition has drawn attention to parliament's "shortcomings", it added. 'Completely abnormal' In France, if a petition submitted on the National Assembly's website reaches 500,000 signatures, parliament's lower house may choose to hold a public debate, limited to the content of the petition. While any review of the legislation is unlikely at this stage, the government is under increasing pressure to respond. France has a long history of mass protests, including the yellow vest protests for economic justice. The grassroots movement began in 2018 with a petition calling for lower fuel prices. Several left-wing parties and environmental associations have urged Macron to demand a "new deliberation" of the legislation in parliament. On Wednesday, Macron said he would wait for the conclusions of the Constitutional Council, due to rule on the validity of the legislation by August 10, according to the government spokeswoman. Experts warn that if no solution is found, the situation could breed even more frustration. Guillaume Gourgues, a lecturer in political science at the University of Lyon 2, who signed the petition, said it was "completely abnormal" that there was no outlet in France for "a mobilisation of this magnitude". "No one has the slightest idea what this will achieve," he said, referring to the proposed parliamentary debate. Gally Vangeenberghe, a 21-year-old sales assistant from the northern city of Lille, said the fact the legislation had been adopted without debate was "heresy." "I find it unacceptable." la-sde-dep-egn-cgc-as/ah/jhb © 2025 AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store