
The RARE Executive Candidate: Why Good Isn't Good Enough
Gina Riley | Gina Riley Consulting & creator of Career Velocity, a comprehensive career transition system.
What's worse than being unqualified for the job? Being perfectly qualified and still coming in second. Again and again. Especially when the role feels tailor-made for your expertise.
As an executive search consultant with Talence Group, I've seen firsthand what separates the offer-winners from the runners-up. It's not degrees, titles or pedigree. It's how prepared they are to deliver when it counts most, in mission-critical, high-visibility interviews that determine who will lead a critical part of the business into its next era.
Too many experienced leaders treat the executive interview like a conversation when it's actually a high-stakes business meeting. Finalist rounds are a live audition that assesses your ability to lead, influence and navigate ambiguity while demonstrating the clarity and conviction that instills confidence in decision makers.
That's why the winners don't wing it. They become what I call RARE candidates.
In executive-level hiring, qualifications are table stakes or the bare minimum to enter conversations. What decision makers want to see is how you think, lead and communicate when pressure is high and ambiguity is real. They're not looking for a resume walk-through. They want to feel your leadership in action.
Yet even the most experienced candidates often show up with long-winded stories, vague value propositions or surface-level understanding of the organization's strategic context. It's the equivalent of walking into a board meeting with half-baked slides, a high-risk move that erodes credibility and squanders opportunity.
• Underestimating The Importance Of Deep Research: Many candidates rely solely on publicly available information, missing critical insights into internal dynamics, recent challenges and future goals.
• Failing To Align Past Experiences With Future Needs: Executives often present past achievements without connecting them to the prospective company's current and future challenges. In doing so, they fail to become a candidate with the relevant skills urgently needed today.
• Neglecting To Demonstrate Executive Presence: It's not just about what you say, but how you say it. Confidence, clarity, adaptability and humility are key.
• Not Evaluating The Organization's Fit: Candidates sometimes overlook the fact that interviews are a two-way street. Assessing whether the organization's culture and values align with your own is equally important in making a good business match.
In my upcoming book, Qualified Isn't Enough, I introduce the RARE Candidate formula, developed to help executives show up as the sharpest, most aligned version of themselves.
Winning candidates go far beyond basic searches. They dive into analyst calls, leadership transitions and strategic plans. They know the stakeholders. They anticipate the political shifts. They prepare like they already work there.
This isn't reading the company website—it's diagnosing what keeps the CEO up at night.
Your stories must connect directly to what the business needs now. Tailor your message to demonstrate how your leadership style solves their problems and accelerates outcomes.
You're not reporting history. You're bringing to life the value you deliver for their future.
Final interviews can involve founders, C-suite panels or board directors. The words are only half the story. How you listen, adapt and respond signals your readiness to lead at the next level.
Executive presence isn't just charisma. It's your ability to shift energy, pace and tone to meet each room where it is.
RARE candidates don't chase every opportunity. They show discernment. They ask sharp, strategic questions. They test alignment with culture, values and leadership chemistry.
Power dynamics go both ways. You're not just being interviewed—you're interviewing them.
When I began working with my client 'Nick,' he had the resume, the pedigree and the referrals. But he couldn't get past first-round interviews. It quickly became clear why: his unique value proposition (UVP) was muddled. His stories wandered. And he hadn't done the strategic prep to understand how the role would shift the organization's dynamics.
He rambled in interviews. His mind wandered. So did his listeners.
We overhauled his approach and applied the RARE framework. We mapped the business context. We reframed his wins. We sharpened his message. Nick didn't just become a finalist, he became the kind of sharp, decisive "must-hire leader" people wanted on their team.
He didn't just make it to the final rounds. He started winning simultaneous offers.
Here's how I put it in Qualified Isn't Enough:
'By thoroughly researching, tailoring your message, reading the room and asking the right questions, you present yourself as the candidate who not only fits the role but also elevates the organization. This sets you apart in a field of equally qualified executives.'
Senior-level interviews aren't about perfection. They're about preparation. The RARE candidate doesn't improvise; they rehearse. They don't hope to rise under pressure; they train for it.
Because that's what it takes to win.
Forbes Agency Council is an invitation-only community for executives in successful public relations, media strategy, creative and advertising agencies. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
Do You Need An Accountant For Your Small Business?
By Levi King An accountant brings expertise, efficiency, and strategic value to your business. My first year of business was one of the more interesting experiences of my life. I was still in my early twenties and had taken what I thought was a pretty significant leap of faith by dropping out of college in order to start my own company. When it was time for me to hire an accountant I asked my dad for a recommendation. He had used a local CPA for years, and since I was busy as hell with a million other things, I figured this was a good enough recommendation for me. During my first conversation with the CPA, he advised that I remain a sole proprietor rather than incorporate. I was just a kid in his eyes and therefore unlikely to make the kinds of profits my first year that would have justified changing my status for tax purposes. Nine months later, we met again. He studied my numbers in silence. He was a big dude, physically, so that when he started giggling, his whole desk shook. He proceeded to explain that if I'd rejected his advice and incorporated, I'd have saved an extra $20,000 in taxes. Writing that check took an unbelievably painful bite out of the operating capital I'd managed to build to that point. I fired the guy immediately and found a new CPA. The main point here is that even though I'd had a bad experience with my first CPA, I didn't let that stop me from doing some due diligence and hiring a better one right away Running a small business is a demanding endeavor, requiring owners to juggle numerous responsibilities—from sales and marketing to customer service and operations. Amid these daily challenges, financial management often becomes an overwhelming task, especially as the business grows. Hiring an accountant as soon as possible is not just a matter of convenience; it is a strategic decision that can profoundly impact the success, stability, and growth potential of your business. Many small business owners initially believe they can manage their own finances, especially with the abundance of accounting software available today. However, an accountant brings a level of expertise and specialized knowledge that goes far beyond basic bookkeeping. Accountants are trained to interpret complex financial data, stay current on ever-changing tax laws, and provide tailored advice that aligns with your business goals. Their insights can help you make better decisions about budgeting, forecasting, and risk management, ensuring your business remains compliant and financially healthy. Time is one of the most valuable resources for any business owner. Managing payroll, tracking expenses, preparing invoices, and reconciling accounts can consume countless hours each week. By hiring an accountant, you free yourself from these time-consuming tasks, allowing you to focus on what you do best—growing your business and serving your customers. Delegating financial responsibilities to a professional also reduces stress, as you can trust that your records are accurate, your tax filings are correct, and your financial statements are up to date. Financial errors can have serious consequences for small businesses. Simple mistakes, such as missing a tax deadline or misclassifying an expense, can result in penalties, audits, or lost deductions. Accountants are meticulous about compliance and accuracy, ensuring that your financial records are error-free and audit-ready. Their attention to detail helps you avoid costly pitfalls and provides peace of mind that your business is operating within the bounds of the law. Tax season is often a source of anxiety for small business owners, particularly those unfamiliar with the complexities of business tax codes. An accountant's expertise is invaluable in this area. They know which deductions and credits your business is eligible for, how to structure your finances to minimize your tax burden, and how to file all necessary forms correctly and on time. By optimizing your tax strategy, an accountant can save your business significant amounts of money—funds that can be reinvested into growth and innovation. As your business expands, so do its financial needs and challenges. Growth often brings increased revenue, but it also leads to more complex expenses, payroll, and reporting requirements. An accountant can help you navigate this complexity by providing financial projections, analyzing investment opportunities, and updating your business plan as needed. Their guidance ensures you make informed decisions about scaling your operations, hiring new employees, or pursuing new markets, all while maintaining a strong financial foundation. Accurate, timely financial reporting is essential for understanding your business's performance and making strategic decisions. Accountants provide detailed financial reports that offer clarity on profitability, cash flow, and expense management. These reports are not just numbers on a page—they are tools that help you identify trends, spot opportunities for cost savings, and set realistic financial goals. With an accountant's analysis, you gain a deeper understanding of your business's strengths and weaknesses, empowering you to make data-driven decisions. Regulatory compliance is a critical aspect of running a business, especially as laws and requirements evolve. Accountants stay up-to-date on changes in tax regulations, labor laws, and industry standards, ensuring your business remains compliant at all times. Their vigilance protects you from legal issues, fines, and reputational damage. In the event of an audit or financial review, having an accountant on your team provides invaluable support and documentation, making the process smoother and less stressful. Beyond day-to-day financial management, accountants serve as strategic advisors. They can assist with business planning, investment strategies, and succession planning, helping you set and achieve long-term goals. Whether you are seeking funding, preparing for expansion, or considering a business transition, an accountant's perspective is crucial for evaluating options and mitigating risks. Perhaps the greatest benefit of hiring an accountant early is the freedom it provides. With a trusted financial expert managing your accounts, you can devote your energy to innovation, customer relationships, and building your brand. This focus not only enhances your business's chances of success but also improves your quality of life as an entrepreneur. More from AllBusiness: In conclusion, hiring an accountant as soon as possible is one of the smartest investments a small business owner can make. An accountant brings expertise, efficiency, and strategic value to your business, helping you avoid mistakes, save money, and achieve your goals. Rather than viewing your accountant as an expense, consider him or her a partnership that empowers you to build a stronger, more resilient, and more successful business from day one. You own your business; the buck stops with you. Never take anyone's advice at face value, regardless of how pitifully you stack up in terms of time in the trenches. You believed in yourself enough to risk everything for a dream—honor that trust by seeking a wide range of opinions before making momentous decisions.


Bloomberg
29 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trumponomics: Why China Can Afford to Wait on a Trade Deal
On this episode of Trumponomics, host Stephanie Flanders, Bloomberg's Head of Government and Economics, leads a panel from the Hong Kong Invest conference to unpack the latest round of high-stakes trade talks between the US and China, exploring why Beijing may still have the upper hand and how far any decoupling of the two economies will go. She's joined by Robin Xing, Chief China Economist at Morgan Stanley, Lotus Asset Management Chief Investment Officer Hao Hong, and Bloomberg reporter Rebecca Choong Wilkins.


CNN
30 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump administration reviewing Biden-era submarine pact with Australia, UK
US President Donald Trump's administration has launched a formal review of former President Joe Biden's AUKUS defense pact with Australia and Britain to allow Australia to acquire nuclear-powered submarines, a US defense official said. Australia, which sees the submarines as critical to its own defense as tensions grow over China's expansive military buildup, said it remained committed to the project and looked forward to working closely with the US on the review. As well as causing alarm in Australia, the review could also throw a wrench in Britain's defense planning. AUKUS, worth hundreds of billions of dollars, is at the center of a planned expansion of Britain's submarine fleet. 'We are reviewing AUKUS as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda,' the US official said of the review, first reported by Financial Times. 'Any changes to the administration's approach for AUKUS will be communicated through official channels, when appropriate.' AUKUS was formed in 2021 to address worries about China's growing power. It envisages Australia acquiring up to five US Virginia-class submarines from 2032. Then, Britain and Australia would design and build a new class of submarine, with US assistance. The UK would take first delivery in the late 2030s, with delivery to Australia in the early 2040s. Before that, the US and Britain would start forward rotations of their submarines in 2027 out of an Australian naval base in Western Australia. Vocal skeptics among Trump's senior policy officials include Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's top policy adviser, who cautioned last year that submarines were a scarce, critical commodity, and US industry could not produce enough to meet American demand. Submarines would be central to US military strategy in any confrontation with China centered in the First Island Chain, running from Japan through Taiwan, the Philippines and on to Borneo, enclosing China's coastal seas. 'My concern is why are we giving away this crown jewel asset when we most need it,' Colby said last year. Only six countries operate nuclear-powered submarines: the US, the UK, Russia, China, France and India. A spokesperson for Australia Defense Minister Richard Marles said the US had informed Australia and the UK of the review. 'AUKUS will grow both US and Australian defense industry as well as generating thousands of new manufacturing jobs,' the spokesperson said. A British government spokesperson called AUKUS 'one of the most strategically important partnerships in decades' that also produces 'jobs and economic growth in communities across all three nations.' 'It is understandable that a new administration would want to review its approach to such a major partnership, just as the UK did last year,' the official said, adding that Britain will 'continue to work closely with the US and Australia … to maximize the benefits and opportunities' of AUKUS. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but one official told Reuters the Trump administration 'is regularly reviewing foreign agreements to ensure they align with the American people's interests – especially those initiated under the failed Biden foreign policy agenda.' US Senator Tim Kaine, a Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said AUKUS was 'critical to ensuring a free and open Indo-Pacific' and the administration should work to strengthen it and the US submarine industrial base. 'Anything less would play directly into China's hand,' said Kaine, who represents Virginia, where US submarines are built. AUKUS is Australia's biggest-ever defense project, with Canberra committing to spend A$368 billion ($240 billion) over three decades to the program, which includes billions of dollars of investment in the U.S. production base. On Tuesday, Britain announced plans to invest billions of pounds to upgrade its submarine industry, including at BAE Systems in Barrow and Rolls-Royce Submarines in Derby, to boost submarine production as announced in Britain's Strategic Defence Review. Under this, it will build up to 12 next-generation attack submarines of the model intended to be jointly developed by the UK, US and Australia under AUKUS. In the US Congress on Tuesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said 'we're having honest conversations with our allies' and added in reference to Australia: 'We want to make sure those capabilities are part of how they use them with their submarines, but also how they integrate with us as allies.' Former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who signed a previous agreement to acquire French submarines shelved in favor of AUKUS, told CNBC last week it was 'more likely than not that Australia will not end up with any submarines at all, but instead, simply provide a large base in Western Australia for the American Navy and maintenance facilities there.' AUKUS expert John Lee at Washington's conservative Hudson Institute think tank said the Pentagon review was aimed at determining whether it could afford to sell up to five submarines when it was not meeting its own production targets. Kathryn Paik, a Biden White House official now at Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies, said providing submarines to Australia would not sacrifice US readiness but instead boost collective deterrence. 'This review most definitely makes our allies in Canberra and London concerned, and could cause them to doubt US reliability as an ally and partner,' she said.