Pennsylvania Rejects Application for Cyber Charter School with AI Teacher and Two Hours of Daily Class
This article was originally published in Pennsylvania Capital-Star.
The Pennsylvania Department of Education on Wednesday denied an application for a controversial cyber charter school that uses artificial intelligence called Unbound Academy, which was seeking to operate in Pennsylvania.
The proposed school would have been part of a multi-state network of schools where classes are led by AI tutors and human staff serve as 'guides.'
Related
'The artificial intelligence instructional model being proposed by this school is untested and fails to demonstrate how the tools, methods and providers would ensure alignment to Pennsylvania academic standards,' the Department of Education's decision said.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Human teachers' unions and advocacy groups applauded the decision.
'AI can help teachers, but it can never replace a teacher guiding a student's learning in a classroom,' Pennsylvania State Education Association President Aaron Chapin said in a statement. 'Pennsylvania's students are better off because the Department of Education rejected this cyber charter school application today.'
Susan Spicka, the executive director of Education Voters of PA, a nonprofit advocacy group, called Unbound Academy's cyber charter application 'egregiously deficient.'
Related
The decision to reject the application cited multiple issues with Unbound Academy's initial proposal. Those included concerns about unrealistic projections for enrollment growth, whether the school could attain insurance and its ability to support special education based on the proposed budget and tuition rates.
The Department of Education also said Unbound Academy's application failed to provide sufficient information about the curriculum, courses and planned student activities.
'The department finds multiple, significant deficiencies,' the decision read. 'These deficiencies, individually, collectively, and in any combination, are cause to deny the application. '
The website for 2 Hour Learning, the company that provides the AI model Unbound Academy hoped to use, says their students 'crush academics' at an accelerated pace with only two hours of academic instruction per day, based on data from their flagship 'Alpha School.'
'Traditional school is broken. It's outdated, full of busywork, and sadly for our kids, often a waste of time,' Mackenzie Price, the co-founder of 2 Hour Learning, says in a promotional video on their website. She said students at schools using their technology can learn 'twice as much in two hours per day as they would in six hours of traditional school.'
Related
The company says their program is already being used in schools in Texas and Florida, with more set to open in California and Arizona this fall.
Since it was announced, the proposed cyber charter school raised red flags with critics of cyber charter schools, as well as lawmakers in Harrisburg.
Sen. Lindsey Williams (D-Allegheny), the minority chair of the Senate Education Committee, said she plans to introduce a bill calling for a moratorium on the approval of new cyber charter schools, citing Unbound Academy specifically. A memo seeking co-sponsors said operators of schools like Unbound Academy 'perceive our state as ripe for profiteering off of Pennsylvania's children and taxpayers.'
The proposal is backed by Education Voters of PA.
Related
There are currently 14 cyber charter schools operating in Pennsylvania, and they've experienced an enrollment boom since the outbreak of the COVID pandemic. The schools are funded with taxpayer money, taken in part from the budgets of local school districts where their students would have otherwise enrolled. Though last year's changes to the school funding formula eased that burden by providing reimbursements for some of those lost funds.
This week, Education Voters of Pennsylvania released a report on spending at the state's largest online charter school, Commonwealth Charter Academy. They found that hundreds of thousands of dollars were used on vehicles, dining, travel, entertainment and retail purchases.
Commonwealth Charter Academy's chief branding and government relations officer told the Capital-Star that the findings were 'cherry-picked' and the expenditures were 'well within what is customary for organizations of like size that have a statewide footprint'
Related
A 2019 Department of Education report found that students at cyber charter schools typically performed worse or the same as those in traditional public schools based on academic tests. However, cyber charter students typically had higher rates of attendance and graduation.
A contact listed on Unbound Academy's application did not respond to a request for comment.
Related
Pennsylvania Capital-Star is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Pennsylvania Capital-Star maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor for questions: info@penncapital-star.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Student Loan Update: Court Documents Reveal Details of Trump Admin Plans
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Court documents have revealed new details about the Trump administration's attempts to transfer the management of the country's $1.6 trillion student loan portfolio away from the Department of Education. The documents, submitted to a federal court, showed that the Department of Education had been negotiating a deal with the Treasury to oversee federal student loans, a role historically managed by the department's Federal Student Aid office. The plan was put on hold after a federal judge blocked the administration's broader efforts to dismantle the Department of Education. Newsweek reached out to the Treasury Department for comment. Why It Matters The potential transfer of the federal student loan portfolio, which affects more than 42 million Americans, has significant implications for borrowers, government oversight and loan servicing standards. With student loan delinquency on the rise and millions of Americans seeing their credit scores hit record lows, the debate over who manages repayment, collections, and borrower protections has reached a new urgency. Court intervention has preserved the Department of Education's central role for now, but ongoing legal and policy battles could reshape loan management for years. President Donald Trump speaks at a roundtable event at the White House on June 9, 2025. President Donald Trump speaks at a roundtable event at the White House on June 9, To Know Under the Trump administration, the Department of Education had been negotiating a memorandum of understanding with the Treasury Department to review student loan management and collections operations, Rachel Oglesby, chief of staff at the agency, confirmed in a late Tuesday court filing. Nine Education Department employees were set to move from the Federal Student Aid Default Collections Unit to the Treasury to "discuss collections activities," the Education Department confirmed to Newsweek. Those plans were halted after U.S. District Judge Myong Joun in Boston ruled last month, ordering the rehiring of more than 1,300 Education Department employees affected by mass layoffs in March and blocking the transfer of loan management to the Small Business Administration (SBA). The court's intervention kept existing federal student loan programs under the purview of the Department of Education, restricting the administration from shifting responsibilities to other agencies without congressional approval. Some experts have said that while the Treasury Department is more experienced than the SBA in managing collections and public funds, shifting federal student loan management would demand legislative action. The Higher Education Act of 1965 stipulates that loan responsibilities are assigned to the Federal Student Aid within the Department of Education. The Treasury's 2014-2015 pilot program for collecting defaulted student loans reportedly yielded lower returns than private collection agencies. Proposals to integrate student loan repayments with wage withholding systems have also faced complications due to income-reporting and privacy limitations. As policy debates continue, the end of the pandemic-era federal loan payment pause contributed to a surge in late payments and defaults. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported that nearly six million borrowers were 90 or more days delinquent or in default between January and March 2025, with many experiencing steep drops in credit scores. These credit impacts may hinder access to mortgages, car loans and other financial products. What People Are Saying Madi Biedermann, deputy assistant secretary for communications at the Department of Education, told Newsweek: "The Department of Education signed an Interagency Agreement with the Department of Labor on May 21 regarding administration of certain career, technical, and adult education grants. The Workforce Development Partnership will allow ED and DOL to better coordinate and deliver on workforce development programs and strengthen federal support for our nation's workforce, a top priority of the Trump Administration. "This is one of many existing agreements ED has with other agencies to collaborate on services for the American people. As acknowledged in the status report, ED has paused implementing this IAA while we seek relief from the district judge's preliminary injunction." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "The Trump administration is largely restricted from making sweeping changes here. Dismantling a federal agency like the Department of Education requires an act of Congress. So while they've made noise about shutting it down, the real impact has been around restarting payments and rolling back deferment and forgiveness programs." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "The proposal for the Treasury to take over the federal administrative responsibilities for student loans is no surprise, as this was a change largely discussed when the administration started ramping up its planning to shutter parts of the Department of Education. For student loan borrowers, if the plan was ever to take effect, it would more than likely not mark a substantial change to their current payment plans." What Happens Next The status of federal student loan management—and who ultimately oversees the $1.6 trillion portfolio—remains unresolved pending further court action and any potential congressional intervention. "It would just be the shift from one department overseeing the debt to another. At the same time, this proposal becoming a reality is something that may increasingly not occur," Beene said. "Disbanding and relocating aspects of the Department of Education would require congressional involvement, and there's already signs of hesitation to supporting such." Borrowers are advised to continue routine payments as legal and policy outcomes develop.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Student loan rates & refinancing: What borrowers should know
Andrew Pentis, Bankrate consumer lending analyst and certified student loan counselor, joins Wealth with Yahoo Finance Senior Reporter Allie Canal to discuss student loan interest rates and to explain when borrowers might want to consider refinancing their loans. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Wealth here. All week, we're giving you everything you need to know about paying back your student loans. Today it's all about interest rates and refinancing. An interest rate is basically the fee a lender charges for borrowing money. It is usually expressed as a percentage of the total principle amount owed. When refinancing, a borrower will swap their original loan for a new one, usually at a lower interest rate. Joining us now to discuss is Andrew Pentis, he's Bankrate consumer lending analyst and a certified student loan counselor. So Andrew, if you're just starting this process, what's the easiest way for borrowers to first check their current student loan interest rates? So they know the baseline of where they're starting. Yeah, it really depends on what your type of loan is. So if you have a federal student loan, the best way to check your current student loan interest rate is to log into your account at You can also talk to your federal student loan servicer, though that's easier said than done with long wait times and a diminished Department of Education. But in terms of your private student loans, yeah, check your statements. If you receive a paper bill in the mail, or contact your lender directly or log into their online portal if you can, but it should be fairly easy to collect those rates. So what would you consider a quote unquote good rate for a student loan right now, and what should borrowers aim for if they're shopping around or thinking about refinancing? Yeah, a good rate is lower than the rate you currently have and the lowest possible rate that you can qualify for. That's the short answer. Uh, but for context, federal student loan interest rates have been in the single digits for a long time. It was recently announced that rates for next school year will actually descend a bit. We're in a higher rate environment for those private student loan rates and refinancing rates, but still there are single digits single digit rates out there. So if you do have good credit or a creditworthy cosigner, you can lower your interest rate through refinancing, it can be really wise. When does it actually make sense to refinance and when should borrowers avoid it, especially if they do have some of those federal loans? The slam dunk situation for refinancing your student loans is if you already have a private student loan with a high interest rate. And that's because if you refinance it to a lower rate, you're not giving anything up. You might even switch to a better lender. But the more complicated situation is if you have federal student loans and you're considering refinancing those or lumping those into a refinance application with your private loans. And the reason it's complicated is that federal loans contain a lot of safety nets and protections, like access to income driven repayment plans that cap your dues at a percentage of your monthly income, as well as pathways to loan forgiveness. So refinancing those loans will strip those benefits away and turn the federal loans into a private loan permanently. So you really want to tread cautiously about refinancing those government exclusive loans. You mentioned better lenders. So if someone does decide to refinance, what types of lenders should they be considering? All types, there are credit unions, banks, online lenders and marketplaces like Bankrate as well as state guaranteed and state funded agencies that offer student loan refinancing. So just like with any other consumer financial product, it really helps to survey the landscape, check in with different types of lenders, and that way you hopefully get very various offers that you can compare and get the best deal possible for your situation. And given the current economic uncertainty, what are some guidelines that borrowers should keep in mind before refinancing or locking in that new rate? Yeah, the thing to harp on here really is that if you have that federal student loan and you're considering refinancing it, you know, as you mentioned, given these uncertain economic times, you really should should be hesitant to refinance those federal student loans, at least until the dust settles. And the reason for that again is that if you keep your federal student loan and something happens, you know, maybe you lose your employment or lose some of your income, you have access to some relief through that federal student loan. So whether it be a deferment or forbearance that pauses your monthly dues, or that income driven repayment plan that caps your monthly payment, those are really important protections to have when, you know, you might not be sure, for example, that you're holding onto your job. So definitely that's the best advice for now. We've been talking a lot about the Federal Reserve, how they could potentially lower interest rates sooner than expected. If you're considering refinancing now, can you refinance multiple times, or should you wait and try and slow play it? Absolutely. This is not a situation where you have to feel like you need to time the market, because if you can get a lower interest rate right now, say by refinancing a private student loan, it could save you lots of money and interest. And then yes, say that rates descend in 2026 or later and you want to refinance again, you can absolutely do that, assuming that your credit has maintained and you've built up a positive payment history on your existing refinance loan. Andrew, some smart tips for those borrowers. Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Thanks for having me. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: The Road to Educational Equity: Can Ed Tech Solve the Digital Divide?
In a nation where ZIP codes often determine opportunity, the promise of educational equity remains out of reach for millions of students. Despite years of reform, the link between a child's environment and their academic outcomes still remains. Today, as schools integrate digital tools into everyday learning, a new dimension of inequality has come into focus: access to technology. While some students benefit from personalized platforms and high-speed connectivity, others are still left behind, struggling to participate in a system that increasingly assumes digital access. The debate is no longer whether ed tech can improve education, but whether it will reach those who require it the most. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter The integration of technology into classrooms has the potential to improve learning, but only if access is universal. In reality, disparities in broadband connectivity, device availability, and digital literacy continue, especially in rural and low-income regions. A 2024 report by the Pew Charitable Trusts indicates that 43% of adults earning less than $30,000 annually lack broadband access, and nearly half of households making under $50,000 struggle to afford internet services. This leads to a 'homework gap' that disproportionately impacts students in excluded communities, limiting their ability to complete assignments and engage with digital learning resources. Beyond infrastructure, the challenge extends to technology deployment. Schools with more resources can invest in training educators, curating high-quality digital content, and supporting students with tailored interventions. In contrast, under-resourced schools may lack the technical assistance and instructional direction required for effective ed tech integration. Without thoughtful implementation, technology risks becoming a superficial fix rather than a meaningful equalizer. To bridge the gap, tech access should be treated as a foundational right, not a privilege. That means investing in affordable internet for all households, making sure every student has access to a reliable device, and providing the support systems that make digital learning meaningful and accessible. Ed tech, when designed and deployed with equity in mind, can be an effective tool to close learning gaps. AI-powered and gamified learning platforms, for example, offer the ability to personalize content to meet students where they are, regardless of age, ability, or background. Adaptive platforms, for instance, are able to recognise when a student is behind and make real-time material adjustments. Through milestones and rewards, gamified modules can keep students motivated. This is especially helpful for students who might otherwise lose interest in a strict, one-size-fits-all approach. These features can have a particularly significant effect on classrooms with a variety of learning demands but a small number of teachers. Too often, though, innovative learning technologies are piloted in affluent districts with the budget and infrastructure to support them, while the students who could benefit most remain out of reach. Without targeted strategies to expand access and usage, ed tech risks strengthening the very disparities it aims to address. True equity means creating educational technology that represents the diversity of the learners themselves. This includes considering various cognitive styles, linguistic backgrounds, and cultural situations. Platforms should offer multilingual support, dyslexia-friendly fonts, sensory-sensitive modes for neurodiverse kids, and culturally relevant material. Without these design considerations, ed tech may inadvertently exclude the very students it aims to uplift, even when devices and internet access are available. The answer lies not just in the tools themselves, but also in how and where they are deployed. Equity-focused implementation requires a commitment to both access and impact –- ensuring students can use the technology, and that the technology truly supports their learning journey. Related This is not a challenge educators can tackle alone. It requires coordinated action from policymakers, district leaders, nonprofit partners, and the tech community itself. Public investment should prioritize infrastructure development in under-served areas, such as expanding broadband coverage and subsidizing device distribution. Equally important is funding for professional development, helping teachers integrate digital tools into their pedagogy in ways that are culturally responsive, developmentally appropriate, and aligned with academic goals. At the policy level, educational equity must be embedded into procurement decisions, funding formulas, and accountability frameworks. Leaders must ask not just whether technology is available in schools, but whether it is making a measurable difference for students who have historically been left behind. Collaboration across sectors is critical. Nonprofits can help support communities in navigating the digital learning landscape. Tech providers can design solutions with accessibility and inclusion built in from the start. And local governments can act as conveners — aligning resources, reducing duplication, and ensuring families are supported beyond the school day. There is no silver bullet to educational inequity, but there is momentum. Across the country, districts are experimenting with community Wi-Fi programs, public-private partnerships, and learning models that prioritize flexibility and student engagement. These efforts prove that with the right intentions, innovation and inclusion can go hand in hand. What's needed now is sustained commitment. We should resist the temptation to view ed tech as a short-term fix or an optional add-on. Instead, it must be approached as a core element of a broader equity agenda, one that prioritizes student outcomes, not just new tools. Ed tech holds enormous promise, but only if we build systems that ensure its promise reaches every student. That starts with recognizing that the digital divide is not just a tech problem, it's an equity problem. And equity is something we must design for from the beginning.
